KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

TÜRKİYE’DE ELEKTRİKLİ ARAÇ TERCİHLERİNİN ARDINDAKİ ÇEVRECİ MOTİVASYONU KEŞFETMEK: BİREYSEL VE POLİTİK ÇEVRECİ TUTUMLAR AÇISINDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

EXPLORING THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOTIVATIONS BEHIND ELECTRIC VEHICLE PREFERENCES IN TURKEY: AN ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL AND POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES

Yasemin Kaya(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0002-4601-1341
Erdem Söyler(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0001-5627-6696
Salih Yıldırım(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1237-8214
Sayfa
780–806
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, gençlerin EV tercihinde bireysel ve politik çevreci tutumlarının etkisi olduğunu ve pozitif bir eğilime sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Ulaşımdan kaynaklanan emisyonların azaltılması, iklim kriziyle mücadelenin en kritik odaklarından birisidir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu amaç doğrultusunda Türkiye’nin öğrenci sayısı itibariyle en büyük üniversitelerinden biri olan Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi’nde eğitim gören 1.300 lisans öğrencisine anket uygulanmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, gençlerin EV tercihinde bireysel ve politik çevreci tutumlarının etkisi olduğunu ve pozitif bir eğilime sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Elektrikli Araç Tercihi · Bireysel Çevre Tutumu · Politik Çevre Tutumu

Özet

Ulaşımdan kaynaklanan emisyonların azaltılması, iklim kriziyle mücadelenin en kritik odaklarından birisidir. Ulaşımdan kaynaklı emisyonların azaltmasında elektrikli araçlar (EV'ler) önemli bir seçenek olarak ön planda çıkmaktadır. Birçok hükümet iklim politikalarının bir parçası olarak fosil yakıtlı araçların kullanımını kısıtlarken, EV’lerin benimsenmesini ve yayılımını destekleyen politikalar geliştirmektedir. Bununla birlikte bu politikaların sürekliliği açısından, bu politikalara yönelik halk desteği konusunda bir geri bildirim sağlamak son derece önemlidir. İklim ve çevre politikalarına daha spesifik olarak EV’lere ilişkin halk desteği konusunda fikir sahibi olmak, çevreciliğin siyasal hayatta geri planda kaldığı ülkeler için özellikle önemlidir. Çalışma bu soruna ışık tutmak için, elektrikli araç tercihinin ardındaki bireysel ve politik çevreci tutumların belirlenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Türkiye’nin öğrenci sayısı itibariyle en büyük üniversitelerinden biri olan Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi’nde eğitim gören 1.300 lisans öğrencisine anket uygulanmıştır. Anket sonuçları çoklu regresyon analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, gençlerin EV tercihinde bireysel ve politik çevreci tutumlarının etkisi olduğunu ve pozitif bir eğilime sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. İlaveten sonuçlar, gençlerin EV tercihinde politik çevreci tutumlarının bireysel çevreci tutumlarından daha güçlü bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, EV tercihine yönelik pazar araştırmalarına yeni bir boyut eklediği gibi karar alıcılar açısından sürdürülebilir ulaşım politikalarının desteklenmesi konusunda güçlü bir altlık sunmaktadır.

Abstract

Reducing transportation-related emissions is a critical component of combating the climate crisis, and electric vehicles (EVs) have emerged as a key solution in this context. While many governments are implementing policies that restrict the use of fossil-fuel vehicles and promote EV adoption, the sustainability of these policies largely depends on public support. This issue is particularly relevant in countries where environmentalism is politically marginalized and ideological polarization is pronounced. This study examines how personal and political environmental attitudes influence individuals’ preferences for EVs. A survey of 1,300 undergraduate students at Bursa Uludağ University was conducted, and the data were analyzed using multiple regression techniques. The findings indicate that young people demonstrate a positive inclination toward EV adoption, with both personal and political environmental attitudes playing significant roles. Notably, political environmental attitudes exert a stronger influence than personal attitudes. These results contribute to market research on EV adoption and provide valuable insights for policymakers seeking to design and sustain effective sustainable transportation strategies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kaya, Y., Söyler, E., Yıldırım, S. (2026). TÜRKİYE’DE ELEKTRİKLİ ARAÇ TERCİHLERİNİN ARDINDAKİ ÇEVRECİ MOTİVASYONU KEŞFETMEK: BİREYSEL VE POLİTİK ÇEVRECİ TUTUMLAR AÇISINDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 780–806. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1852710

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (79)

  1. Abou-Chadi, T., & Kayser, M. A. (2017). It’s not easy being green: Why voters punish parties for environmental policies during economic downturns. Electoral Studies, 45, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.10.009
  2. Aguilar-Luzón, M. C., Carmona, B., Calvo-Salguero, A., & Castillo Valdivieso, P. A. (2020). Values, environmental beliefs, and connection with nature as predictive factors of the pro-environmental vote in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01043
  3. Automotive Distributors’ and Mobility Association. (2025). Makroekonomik değerlendirme haziran 2025. https://www.odmd.org.tr/folders/2837/categorial1docs/5920/Makroekonomik%20Değerlendirme.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
  4. Automotive Industry Exporters’ Association. (2025). Elektronik kütüphane. https://oib.org.tr/tr/elektronik-kutuphane.html?t=İstatistikler sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2025
  5. Axsen, J., Goldberg, S., & Bailey, J. (2016). How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.015
  6. Barbarossa, C., De Pelsmacker, P., & Moons, I. (2017). Personal values, green self-identity and electric car adoption. Ecological Economics, 140, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.015
  7. Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002
  8. Brückmann, G., Willibald, F., & Blanco, V. (2021). Battery electric vehicle adoption in regions without strong policies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102615
  9. Buhmann, K. M., Rialp-Criado, J., & Rialp-Criado, A. (2024). Predicting consumer intention to adopt battery electric vehicles: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 16(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031284
  10. Cantillo, J., Astorino, L., & Tsana, A. (2025). Determinants of pro-environmental attitude and behaviour among European Union (EU) residents: differences between older and younger generations. Quality & Quantity, 59(3), 2623–2659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02089-8
  11. Carroll, P., Casswell, S., Huakau, J., Perry, P., & Chapman, P. H. (2009). Environmental attitudes, beliefs about social justice and intention to vote Green: lessons for the New Zealand Green Party? Environmental Politics, 18(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802682635
  12. Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Guerzoni, M. (2018). Price or performance? A probabilistic choice analysis of the intention to buy electric vehicles in European countries. Energy Policy, 118, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.034
  13. Chen, Y., Cramton, P., List, J. A., & Ockenfels, A. (2021). Market design, human behavior, and management. Management Science, 67(9), 5317–5348. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3659
  14. Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., & Wee, S. (2017). Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1217282
  15. Cologna, V., Berthold, A., Kreissel, A. L., & Siegrist, M. (2024). Attitudes towards technology and their relationship with pro-environmental behaviour: Development and validation of the GATT scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 95, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102258
  16. Cordera, R., dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2019). Demand for environmentally friendly vehicles: A review and new evidence. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(3), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1459969
  17. D’Ecclesiis, E. A. R., Levi, E., & Patriarca, F. (2025). Exploring the multifaceted relationship between environmental attitudes and political voting. Ecological Economics, 230, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108518
  18. Dagsvik, J. K., Wennemo, T., Wetterwald, D. G., & Aaberge, R. (2002). Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(4), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00013-1
  19. Davis, L., Li, J., & Springel, K. (2025). Political ideology and U.S. electric vehicle adoption. https://doi.org/10.3386/w33591
  20. Daziano, R. A., & Bolduc, D. (2013). Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 9(1), 74–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.524173
  21. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
  22. Ewing, G., & Sarigöllü, E. (2000). Assessing consumer preferences for clean-fuel vehicles: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.106.16946
  23. Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2013). What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users? Transport Policy, 30, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.005
  24. Griebenow, D., Neugart, M., & Pichler, S. (2024). Voting green (pp. 1–35). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4966233
  25. Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., Axsen, J., Beard, G., Daina, N., Figenbaum, E., Jakobsson, N., Jochem, P., Kinnear, N., Plötz, P., Pontes, J., Refa, N., Sprei, F., Turrentine, T., & Witkamp, B. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
  26. Hardman, S., Shiu, E., & Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2016). Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.010
  27. Hasan, F., Danish Kirmani, M., Zaidi, N., & Rehman, A. (2024). Environmental concern and price value in electric vehicle adoption: Examining intentions of Indian consumers. Journal of Sustainable Marketing, 196–216. https://doi.org/10.51300/JSM-2024-131
  28. Haustein, S., & Jensen, A. F. (2018). Factors of electric vehicle adoption: A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1398790
  29. Hayashida, S., La Croix, S., & Coffman, M. (2021). Understanding changes in electric vehicle policies in the U.S. states, 2010–2018. Transport Policy, 103, 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.001
  30. He, X., Hu, Y., & Hong, Z. (2023). Consumers’ intention to purchase electric vehicles: the moderating role of environmental awareness. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 68(4), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2276060
  31. Hidrue, M. K., Parsons, G. R., Kempton, W., & Gardner, M. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(3), 686–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.002
  32. Higueras-Castillo, E., Guillén, A., Herrera, L.-J., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2021). Adoption of electric vehicles: Which factors are really important? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(10), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1818330
  33. Higueras-Castillo, E., Kalinic, Z., Marinkovic, V., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020). A mixed analysis of perceptions of electric and hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy, 136, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111076
  34. Higueras-Castillo, E., Molinillo, S., Coca-Stefaniak, J. A., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2019). Perceived value and customer adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles. Sustainability, 11(18), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184956
  35. Hoffmann, R., Muttarak, R., Peisker, J., & Stanig, P. (2021). Voting for tomorrow: Climate change, environmental concern, and green voting. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868754
  36. Jia, W., & Chen, T. D. (2021). Are Individuals’ stated preferences for electric vehicles (EVs) consistent with real-world EV ownership patterns? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 93, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102728
  37. Kahn, M. E. (2007). Do greens drive hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.05.001
  38. Knez, M., Jereb, B., & Obrecht, M. (2014). Factors influencing the purchasing decisions of low emission cars: A study of Slovenia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 30, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.007
  39. Lane, B., & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude–action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.026
  40. Langbroek, J. H. M., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2016). The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 94, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.050
  41. Lee, S. S., Kim, Y., & Roh, T. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior on electric vehicle use intention: Integrating value-belief-norm theory and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138211
  42. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
  43. Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1230794
  44. Mandys, F. (2021). Electric vehicles and consumer choices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110874
  45. Mannoni, E. (2024). Pro-environmental voting: What it is, how to measure it, and its determinants among contemporary European voters. Parliamentary Affairs, 78(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae017
  46. Mersky, A. C., Sprei, F., Samaras, C., & Qian, Z. (Sean). (2016). Effectiveness of incentives on electric vehicle adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.011
  47. Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.659007
  48. Morton, C., Anable, J., & Nelson, J. D. (2016). Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 18, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.01.007
  49. Mutavdžija, M., Kovačić, M., & Buntak, K. (2022). Assessment of selected factors influencing the purchase of electric vehicles—a case study of the Republic of Croatia. Energies, 15(16), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165987
  50. Our World in Data. (2025). CO₂ emissions by sector, world. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-by-sector sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 03.09.2025
  51. Ozaki, R. (2011). Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.650
  52. Prasanna, S., Rangarajan, V., Khan, M., & Ahmed, K. A. A. (2021). Examining the factors influencing consumers’ choice for electric vehicles in India. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 13(3/4), 302. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2021.123482
  53. Raudsepp, M. (2001). Some socio-demographic and socio-psychological predictors of environmentalism. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2001.4.06
  54. Rehman, A. (2025). Impact of environmental values, pro-environmental behavior, and pricing on purchase intention of electric vehicles. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-025-00449-6
  55. Republic of Turkiye Ministry of Industry and Technology. (2025). Mobilite araç ve teknolojileri yol haritası. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/assets/pdf/plan-program/MobiliteAracveTeknolojileriYolHaritasi.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
  56. Rezagholizadeh, E. (2023). On the gap between awareness and voting behavior: Are US citizens who believe in climate change voting for green parties? (Master's thesis). https://www.modul.ac.at/uploads/files/Theses/Master/Grad_2023/MSC_2023/62004296_REZAGHOLIZADEH_Elmira_Thesis.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2024
  57. Ritchie, H. (2020, Ekim). Cars, planes, trains: where do CO₂ emissions from transport come from? OurWorldinData.Org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 03.09.2025
  58. Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2023). CO₂ and greenhouse gas emissions. OurWorldinData.Org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
  59. Salari, N. (2022). Electric vehicles adoption behaviour: Synthesising the technology readiness index with environmentalism values and instrumental attributes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 164, 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.07.009
  60. Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
  61. Schumacher, I. (2014). An empirical study of the determinants of green party voting. Ecological Economics, 105, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.007
  62. She, Z.-Y., Qing Sun, Ma, J.-J., & Xie, B.-C. (2017). What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy, 56, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001
  63. Sintov, N. D., Abou-Ghalioum, V., & White, L. V. (2020). The partisan politics of low-carbon transport: Why democrats are more likely to adopt electric vehicles than Republicans in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101576
  64. Sovacool, B. K., Kester, J., Noel, L., & de Rubens, G. Z. (2018). The demographics of decarbonizing transport: The influence of gender, education, occupation, age, and household size on electric mobility preferences in the Nordic region. Global Environmental Change, 52, 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.008
  65. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  66. Sun, W., Zhang, X., Li, H., Wu, J., & Zheng, S. (2018). Environmental ideology and household energy conservation in Beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1600–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.065
  67. T.C. Ministry of Environment Urbanisation and Climate Change. (2023, May 12). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti güncellenmiş birinci ulusal katkı beyanı. https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/dokumanlar/turkiye-cumhuriyeti--8230-102-20230512125223.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2025
  68. T.C. Ministry of Environment Urbanisation and Climate Change. (2024). İklim değişikliği azaltım stratejisi ve eylem planı (2024-2030). https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/icerikler/files/İklim Değişikliği Azaltım Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (2024-2030).pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2025
  69. Turkish Exporters Assembly. (2025). İhracat rakamları. https://tim.org.tr/tr/ihracat-rakamlari sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2025
  70. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025, July 18). Motorlu kara taşıtları. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Haziran-2025-54042 sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2025
  71. Uludag Exporters’ Associations. (2025). İhracat rakamları. https://uib.org.tr/tr/ihracat-ihracat-rakamlari sayfasından erişilmiştir. Erişim Tarihi: 01.10.2025
  72. Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9
  73. Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2017). The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.013
  74. Wee, S., Coffman, M., & La Croix, S. (2018). Do electric vehicle incentives matter? Evidence from the 50 U.S. states. Research Policy, 47(9), 1601–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.003
  75. White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.008
  76. Whitehead, J., Washington, S. P., & Franklin, J. P. (2019). The impact of different incentive policies on hybrid electric vehicle demand and price: An international comparison. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10020020
  77. Zhang, K., Guo, H., Yao, G., Li, C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, W. (2018). Modeling acceptance of electric vehicle sharing based on theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 10(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124686
  78. Zhao, H., Furuoka, F., Rasiah, R. A., & Shen, E. (2024). Consumers’ purchase intention toward electric vehicles from the perspective of perceived green value: An empirical survey from China. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15060267
  79. Ziefle, M., Beul-Leusmann, S., Kasugai, K., & Schwalm, M. (2014). Public perception and acceptance of electric vehicles: Exploring users’ perceived benefits and drawbacks. In Aaron Marcus (Ed.), International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 628–639). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07635-5