KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Çevresel Çalkantı ve Örgütsel Yenilikçilik İlişkisi

The Relationship Between Environmental Turbulence and Organizational Innovativeness

Evrim Gemici(YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0573-1086
Cemal Zehir(YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)
Sayfa
66–83
Yayın Tarihi
2019-04-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Araştırma sonuçları, teknolojik çalkantı ve pazar çalkantısının örgütsel yenilikçiliği pozitif etkilediğini ortaya koymuş ayrıca pazar çalkantısı ve teknolojik çalkantının örgütsel yenilikçilik ile direkt ilgisini kurarak, dış çevrenin yenilikçi çabanın bir parçası olduğunu göstermiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Makro çevre değişikliklerinin rekabetin doğasını değiştirdiği günümüz dünyasında pazarların dinamik yapısı nedeniyle hemen hemen her endüstri kaçınılmaz olarak sürekli yenilik ile şekillenmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Örgütlerin yenilikçi davranışa olan yatkınlığını ve inovasyon ile ilgilenme kapasitesini ölçen örgütsel yenilikçilik, bir örgütün kontrolü dışındaki çevresel faktörler sürekli değiştiğinde, stratejik bir aksiyon olarak önem kazanmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Araştırma sonuçları, teknolojik çalkantı ve pazar çalkantısının örgütsel yenilikçiliği pozitif etkilediğini ortaya koymuş ayrıca pazar çalkantısı ve teknolojik çalkantının örgütsel yenilikçilik ile direkt ilgisini kurarak, dış çevrenin yenilikçi çabanın bir parçası olduğunu göstermiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Çevresel Çalkantı · Örgütsel Yenilikçilik · Arge ve İnovasyon

Özet

Makro çevre değişikliklerinin rekabetin doğasını değiştirdiği günümüz dünyasında pazarların dinamik yapısı nedeniyle hemen hemen her endüstri kaçınılmaz olarak sürekli yenilik ile şekillenmektedir. Örgütlerin yenilikçi davranışa olan yatkınlığını ve inovasyon ile ilgilenme kapasitesini ölçen örgütsel yenilikçilik, bir örgütün kontrolü dışındaki çevresel faktörler sürekli değiştiğinde, stratejik bir aksiyon olarak önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, teknolojik çalkantı ve pazar çalkantısının örgütsel yenilikçilik ile olan ilişkisini incelemektir. Bu doğrultuda, araştırma Türkiye’nin gelişmesinde önemli rolü olan Ar-Ge ve inovasyon duyarlılığı olan 233 firmanın verilerine dayanarak anket yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiş olup, öne sürülen hipotezler Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, teknolojik çalkantı ve pazar çalkantısının örgütsel yenilikçiliği pozitif etkilediğini ortaya koymuş ayrıca pazar çalkantısı ve teknolojik çalkantının örgütsel yenilikçilik ile direkt ilgisini kurarak, dış çevrenin yenilikçi çabanın bir parçası olduğunu göstermiştir.

Abstract

Due to the aggressive nature of markets in today's world, where macro environmental factors affect the dynamics of competition, almost every industry is inevitably shaped by continuous innovation. Organizational innovativeness, which measures organizations' inclination towards innovative behavior and their capacity to deal with innovation, gains in importance as a strategic action when uncontrollable environmental factors keep on changing continually. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between technological/market turbulence and organizational innovativeness. The study involves a questionnaire-based survey obtained from 233 companies that have an R&D and innovation focus in Turkey. The formulated hypotheses are tested by using the Structural Equation Model. The results show that both technological turbulence and market turbulence are positively related to organizational innovativeness. This study also shows that the external environment is part of the innovative effort by establishing a direct link between market/technological turbulence and organizational innovativeness.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gemici, E., Zehir, C. (2019). Çevresel Çalkantı ve Örgütsel Yenilikçilik İlişkisi. Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 66–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/1219785

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (56)

  1. Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Lynn, G. S., & Keskin, H. (2007). Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(6), 794–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810710831028
  2. Akgun, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., & Ilhan, O. O. (2014). Complex adaptive system mechanisms, adaptive management practices, and firm product innovativeness. R&D Management, 44(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12036
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  4. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., & Frenz, M. (2013). Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy, 42(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002
  5. Baburoglu, O. N. (1988). The Vortical Environment: The Fifth in the Emery-Trist Levels of Organizational Environments. Human Relations, 41(3), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678804100301
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
  8. Bourgeois, L. J. (1985). Strategıc goals, perceıved uncertaınty, and economıc performance ın volatıle envıronments. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/256113
  9. Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816
  10. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9507312922
  11. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
  12. Buganza, T., Dell’Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2009). Exploring the relationships between product development and environmental turbulence: The case of mobile TLC services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00660.x
  13. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock:London.
  14. Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Droge, C. (2003). The Effects of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Strategy Planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.2002003
  15. Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
  16. Carayannis, E. G., Samara, E. T., & Bakouros, Y. L. (2015). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Theory, Policy and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  17. Chakravarthy, B. (1997). A New Strategy Framework For Coping With Turbulence. Sloan management review, 38(winter), 69–82.
  18. Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600101
  19. Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1998). Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 786–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00092-2
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research.
  22. Glazer, R., & Weiss, A. M. (1993). Marketing in Turbulent Environments: Decision Processes and the Time-Sensitivity of Information. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172694
  23. Goldsmith, S., & Mechling, J. (2008). Turbulence, Innovation, and Leadership: Adapting to Change in the 21st Century.
  24. Gopalakrishnan, S., & Damanpour, F. (1997). A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega, Int. J. Mgmt Sci., 25(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00043-6
  25. Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
  26. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (Seventh Ed). Pearson Education Limited.
  27. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252285
  28. Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.
  29. Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015
  30. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251742
  31. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
  32. Keskin, H. (2006). Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 396–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610707849
  33. Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  34. Ko, S., & Tan, B. (2012). Knowledge transfer, perceived environmental turbulence and innovation in China. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561391211242726
  35. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 1–18.
  36. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.
  37. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
  38. McCann, J. E., & Selsky, J. (2012). Mastering Turbulence: The Essential Capabilities of Agile and Resilient Individuals, Teams and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  39. McCann, J., & Selsky, J. (2012). Mastering Turbulence: The Essential Capabilities of Agile and Resilient Individuals, Teams and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  40. Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a Firm-Level Dynamic Capability through Capitalizing on Market Orientation and Innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305281090
  41. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1984). Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame. California Management Review, 26(3), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165078
  42. Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) Revisited: A Reflection on EO Research and Some Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00457.x
  43. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304
  44. OECD. (2018). Educational attainment and labour-force status. 13 Ağustos 2018 tarihinde, https://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?datasetcode=EAG_NEAC&lang=en# adresinden erişildi
  45. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and customers. NY Free Press.
  46. Siguaw, J. A., Simpson, P. M., & Enz, C. A. (2006). Conceptualizing Innovation Orientation: A Framework for Study and Integration of Innovation Research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00224.x
  47. Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00031-X
  48. Terreberry, S. (1968). The Evolution of Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(4), 590–613.
  49. Tsai, K.-H., & Yang, S.-Y. (2013). Firm innovativeness and business performance: The joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1279–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.06.001
  50. Tsuja, P. Y., & Mariño, J. O. (2013). The Influence of the Environment on Organizational Innovation in Service Companies in Peru. Review of Business Management, 582–600. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v15i49.1586
  51. Turulja, L., & Bajgoric, N. (2018). Innovation, firms’ performance and environmental turbulence: is there a moderator or mediator? European Journal of Innovation Management, EJIM-03-2018-0064. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2018-0064
  52. Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., Kimzan, H. S., & Sert, H. (2012). The Impact Of Environmental Uncertainty Dimensions On Organizational Innovativeness: An Empirical Study on SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(02), 1250015 (1-23). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003647
  53. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056
  54. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Social Structures: A Network Approach. CUP Archive.
  55. Yeung, A. C. L., Lai, K., & Yee, R. W. Y. (2007). Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizational performance: a qualitative investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), 2459–2477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601020460
  56. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9507312922