KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

Çevre Bölgelerde Orta Büyüklükte Güç Dış Politika Davranışı: Orta Asya’da Türkiye ve Güney Kore Vakaları

Middle Power Foreign Policy Behavior in Peripheral Regions: The Cases of Türkiye and South Korea in Central Asia

Fatma Aslı Kelkitli(İSTANBUL AREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0164-8736
Sayfa
399–426
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-22
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca, hem Türkiye hem de Güney Kore, uluslararası toplantılar düzenlemek ve Orta Asya’ya yardım uzatmak gibi orta büyüklükte güç araçlarına başvururken, bölgesel çatışmalarda uzlaştırıcı/arabulucu rollerini üstlenememişlerdir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde Türkiye ve Güney Kore’nin Orta Asya'daki dış politika davranışlarını karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Makale, hem Ankara’nın hem de Seul’ün çok taraflı diplomatik platformların kurulması, kalkınma yardımlarının tahsis edilmesi ve yumuşak güç araçlarının kullanılması yoluyla Orta Asya devletleriyle etkileşimlerini genişletmeyi ve kurumsallaştırmayı başardığını savunmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, hem Türkiye hem de Güney Kore, uluslararası toplantılar düzenlemek ve Orta Asya’ya yardım uzatmak gibi orta büyüklükte güç araçlarına başvururken, bölgesel çatışmalarda uzlaştırıcı/arabulucu rollerini üstlenememişlerdir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Yükselen orta büyüklükte güçler · Türkiye · Güney Kore

Özet

Bu çalışma, Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde Türkiye ve Güney Kore’nin Orta Asya'daki dış politika davranışlarını karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektedir. Makale, hem Ankara’nın hem de Seul’ün çok taraflı diplomatik platformların kurulması, kalkınma yardımlarının tahsis edilmesi ve yumuşak güç araçlarının kullanılması yoluyla Orta Asya devletleriyle etkileşimlerini genişletmeyi ve kurumsallaştırmayı başardığını savunmaktadır. Türkiye’nin Orta Asya devletleriyle olan siyasi bağları, Güney Kore’nin Orta Asya ile olan siyasi ilişkisine göre daha köklü ve kurumsallaşmışken, Güney Kore, bölgedeki ekonomik performans açısından Türkiye’yi geride bırakmaktadır. Sosyo-kültürel nüfuz sahası, eğitim ve eğlence alanlarında Türkiye ve Güney Kore’nin artan çabalarına rağmen Rusya'nın hala hâkim olduğu bir sahadır. Ayrıca, hem Türkiye hem de Güney Kore, uluslararası toplantılar düzenlemek ve Orta Asya’ya yardım uzatmak gibi orta büyüklükte güç araçlarına başvururken, bölgesel çatışmalarda uzlaştırıcı/arabulucu rollerini üstlenememişlerdir.

Abstract

This study examines the foreign policy behavior of Türkiye and South Korea in Central Asia comparatively in the post-Cold War era. The article argues that both Ankara and Seoul accomplished to expand and institutionalize their interaction with the Central Asian states through the establishment of multilateral diplomatic platforms, allocation of development assistance and utilization of soft power instruments. While Türkiye’s political bonds with the Central Asian states are more entrenched and institutionalized compared to the South Korea’s political association with Central Asia, South Korea surpasses Türkiye in terms of economic performance in the region. The socio-cultural sphere is a domain in which Russia still prevails despite the increasing Turkish and South Korean efforts in education and entertainment realms. Furthermore, while both Türkiye and South Korea resorted to middle power means of convening international meetings and extending aid in Central Asia, they were unable to assume conciliator/mediator roles in regional conflicts.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kelkitli, F. A. (2023). Çevre Bölgelerde Orta Büyüklükte Güç Dış Politika Davranışı: Orta Asya’da Türkiye ve Güney Kore Vakaları. Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 399–426. https://doi.org/10.32449/egetdid.1321013

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (94)

  1. Ahn, JH. (2022, April 6). KOMSCO, Kyrgyzstan sign MOU for digital cooperation. The Korea Herald. https://m.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20220406000676
  2. Akmatalieva, A. (2021, October 13). Central Asia and South Korea: Seeking opportunities for increased cooperation. CABAR. https://cabar.asia/en/central-asia-and-south-korea-seeking-opportunities-for-increased-cooperation
  3. Alimov, R. (2022, May 17). Russia-Central Asia: How to develop cooperation amid unstable conditions. Valdai Club. https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/russia-central-asia-how-to-develop-cooperation/
  4. Aydın, M. (1996). Turkey and Central Asia: Challenges of change. Central Asian Survey, 15(2), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634939608400943
  5. Aydın, M. (2004). Foucault’s pendulum: Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Turkish Studies, 5(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468384042000228576
  6. Balcer, A. (2012). Between energy and soft pan-Turkism: Turkey and the Turkic Republics. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 11(2), 151-162.
  7. Balcı, B. and Liles, T. (2018). Turkey’s comeback to Central Asia. Insight Turkey, 20(4), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2018204.06
  8. Chapnick, A. (1999). The middle power. Canadian Foreign Policy, 7(2), 73-82.
  9. Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., and Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. UBC Press.
  10. Cooper, A. F. and Parlar Dal, E. (2016). Positioning the third wave of middle power diplomacy. International Journal, 71(4), 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702016686385
  11. Çınar, K. (2013). Turkey and Turkic nations: A post-Cold War analysis of relations. Turkish Studies, 14(2), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.802925
  12. Dadabaev, T. (2018). “Silk Road” as foreign policy discourse: The construction of Chinese, Japanese and Korean engagement strategies in Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.12.003
  13. Dadabaev, T. and Soipov, J. (2020). Craving jobs? Revisiting labor and educational migration from Uzbekistan to Japan and South Korea. Acta Via Serica, 5(2), 111-140. doi: 10.22679/avs.2020.5.2.005 Development Initiatives. (2022). Global humanitarian assistance report 2022. https://devinit.org/documents/1221/GHA2022_Digital_v8_IdHI18g.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2023).
  14. Dubnov, A. (2018, April 19). Reflecting on a quarter century of Russia’s relations with Central Asia. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/04/19/reflecting-on-quarter-century-of-russia-s-relations-with-central-asia-pub-76117
  15. Engin, B. and Baba, G. (2015). MIKTA: A functioning product of “new” middle power-ism? Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 11(42), 1-40.
  16. Fidan, H. (2010). Turkish foreign policy towards Central Asia. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448950903507560
  17. Fumagalli, M. (2012). South Korea’s engagement in Central Asia from the end of the Cold War to the “New Asia Initiative”. The Journal of Northeast Asian History, 9(2), 69-97.
  18. Fumagalli, M. (2016). Growing inter-Asian connections: Links, rivalries, and challenges in South Korean-Central Asian relations. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.10.004
  19. Global Times. (2022, January 26). China to aid 5 Central Asia countries with additional 50 million vaccines, to continue ‘high-level political mutual trust’. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202201/1246926.shtml
  20. Hak, YS. (2009). Strategic opportunities for South Korean development of energy resources in Central Asia. US-Korea Institute at SAIS Working Paper Series, 1-16.
  21. Henrikson, A. K. (1997). Middle powers as managers: International mediation within, across and outside institutions. In Andrew F. Cooper (Ed.), Niche diplomacy: Middle powers after the Cold War (pp. 46-72). Macmillan.
  22. Hong, K. (2009). South Korean approaches to peacekeeping and peacebuilding: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 23(1), 23-45.
  23. Hwang, B. (2012). A new horizon in South Korea-Central Asia relations: The ROK joins the “Great Game”. KoreaCompass, 1-8.
  24. Hyundai. (2023). “Astana Motors” deepens localization of Hyundai car production. https://hyundaiplant.kz/en/news/41/ (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  25. Kalın, I. (2011). Soft power and public diplomacy in Turkey. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 16(3), 5-23.
  26. Kim, SM. (2016). South Korea’s middle-power diplomacy: Changes and challenges. Chatham House Asia Programme Research Paper, 1-16.
  27. Kim, SM. (2018). Cursed by geopolitics? South Korea’s place in Asia’s changing politics of space. SWP, (5), 1-9.
  28. King Sejong Institute Foundation. (2023). King Sejong Institutes worldwide-Asia area. https://www.ksif.or.kr/ste/ksf/hkd/lochkd.do?menuNo=20101800&lang=eng (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  29. KOCIS. (2022). [KCC at a glance] Nur Sultan. https://www.kocis.go.kr/eng/openIntroduction/view.do?seq=1042158&rn=&page=2&pageSize=10&photoPageSize=6&totalCount=0&searchType=&searchText= (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  30. KOCIS. (2023). Greetings. https://www.kocis.go.kr/eng/openGreetings.do. (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  31. KOICA. (2020). Annual Report 2020. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/2020%20KOICA%20Annual%20Report%20(3).pdf (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  32. Korea National Oil Corporation. (2023). Operations-Kazakhstan. https://www.knoc.co.kr/ENG/sub03/sub03_1_1_2.jsp (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  33. Korea.net. (2023). About Korea.net. https://www.korea.net/AboutUs/KOCIS (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  34. Korean.net. (2023). OKFellowship Program. https://eng.korean.net/portal_en/support/scholarship_pro.do (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  35. Köstem, S. (2017). When can idea entrepreneurs influence foreign policy? Explaining the rise of the “Turkic World” in Turkish foreign policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), 722-740. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw016
  36. KSP. (2023a). About KSP. https://www.ksp.go.kr/english/pageView/ksp-is (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  37. KSP. (2023b). Project. https://www.ksp.go.kr/english/pageView/info-eng (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  38. Kumar, S. (2022, April 12). Kazakhstan ready to support Korean investments: Kazakh ambassador. The Korea Herald. https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20220412000525
  39. Lavrov, S. (2022, May 20). Russia–Central Asia: 30 years on the path of friendship and cooperation. News Central Asia. http://www.newscentralasia.net/2022/05/20/russia-central-asia-30-years-on-the-path-of-friendship-and-cooperation/
  40. Lee, SJ. (2012). South Korea as new middle power seeking complex diplomacy. East Asia Institute Asia Security Initiative Working Paper, 25, 1-32.
  41. Lukyanov, G., Mironov, A., and Kulieva, N. (2022, February 25). Turkey’s policy in Central Asia: Are ambitions well-founded? Russian International Affairs Council. https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/turkey-s-policy-in-central-asia-are-ambitions-well-founded/
  42. Mechanisms of deepening Uzbek-Korean cooperation are considered. (2022, June 7). Yuz. https://yuz.uz/en/news/rassmotren-mexanizm-uglubleniya-uzbeksko-koreyskogo-sotrudnichestva
  43. Mo, J. (2016). South Korea‘s middle power diplomacy. International Journal, 71(4), 587-607. https://doi.org.10.1177/0020702016686380
  44. Nikolova, M. (2021, January 23). Might K-Pop’s next big star come from Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan? Emerging Europe. https://emerging-europe.com/after-hours/might-k-pops-next-big-star-come-from-kazakhstan-or-kyrgyzstan/.
  45. Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, (80), 153-171.
  46. ODA Korea. (2023). The Republic of Korea’s country partnership strategy for Tajikistan. https://www.odakorea.go.kr/contentFile/CPS(eng)/2022/TJK.pdf (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  47. OECD. (2022, April 12). ODA levels in 2021-Preliminary data. https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/ODA-2021-summary.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2023).
  48. OIC. (2023). OIC General Secretariat follows with great concern the situation in Kazakhstan, calls for end to violence and affirms full solidarity with Kazakhstan in preserving national unity. https://www.oic-oci.org/topic/?t_id=30693&ref=19594&lan=en. (Accessed 17 June 2023).
  49. ORASAM. (2019, February 11). The number of labor migrants from Kyrgyzstan in Turkey has increased. https://orasam.manas.edu.kg/index.php/en/kirgizistan-2/1635-the-number-of-labor-migrants-from-kyrgyzstan-in-turkey-has-increased (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  50. Organization of Turkic States. (2022). Statement by the Secretary General of the Organization of Turkic States on the situation at the Kyrgyz-Tajik state border. https://www.turkkon.org/en/haberler/statement-by-the-secretary-general-of-the-organization-of-turkic-states-on-the-situation-at-the-kyrgyz-tajik-state-border_2444 (Accessed 17 June 2023).
  51. Organization of Turkic States. (2023a). Presidential Summits. https://www.turkkon.org/en/zirveler. (Accessed 17 June 2023).
  52. Organization of Turkic States. (2023b). Turkic World Vision–2040. https://www.turkkon.org/assets/pdf/haberler/turkic-world-vision-2040-2396-97.pdf (Accessed 17 June 2023).
  53. Organization of Turkic States (2023c). Statement of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of Turkic States on the situation in Kazakhstan. https://www.turkkon.org/en/haberler/organization-of-turkic-states-convened-its-extraordinary-meeting-of-foreign-ministers-on-the-situation-in-kazakhstan_2437 (Accessed 17 June 2023).
  54. Organization of Turkic States. (2023d). Turkic Academy. https://www.turkkon.org/en/iliskili-kurumlar/turkic-academy_1 (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  55. Organization of Turkic States. (2023e). Turkic University Union. https://www.turkkon.org/en/isbirligi-alanlari/education_4/turkic-university-union_14. (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  56. Pannier, B. (2022, April 15). Perspectives-Turkey and Central Asia: Ukraine War will strengthen ties. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/perspectives-turkey-and-central-asia-ukraine-war-will-strengthen-ties.
  57. Parlar Dal, E. and Erşen, E. (2014). Reassessing the ‘Turkish Model’ in the post-Cold War era: A role theory perspective. Turkish Studies, 15(2), 258-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2014.926238
  58. Parlar Dal, E. and Kurşun, A. M. (2016). Assessing Turkey’s middle power foreign policy in MIKTA: Goals, means, and impact. International Journal, 71(4), 608-620. https://doi.org.10.1177/0020702016686382
  59. Parlar Dal, E. (2018). Profiling middle powers in global governance and the Turkish case: An introduction. In E. Parlar Dal (Ed.), Middle powers in global governance: The rise of Turkey (pp. 1-31). Palgrave Macmillan.
  60. Ping, J. H. (2005). Middle power statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia and the Asia-Pacific. Ashgate Publishing Company.
  61. President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2019). President Kasssym-Jomart Tokayev takes part in Kazakhstan-South Korea business forum. https://www.akorda.kz/en/events/astana_kazakhstan/participation_in_events/president-kassym-jomart-tokayev-takes-part-in-kazakh-south-korean-business-forum (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  62. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2017). Uzbekistan-South Korea: New stage of the strategic partnership. https://president.uz/en/lists/view/1276 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  63. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018). A large manufacturing facility is commissioned at Uzbek metallurgical plant. https://president.uz/en/lists/view/1979 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  64. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021). A solid foundation set to a higher level of special strategic partnership. https://president.uz/en/lists/view/4834 (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  65. Presidential Council on Nation Branding. (2023). History. http://17koreabrand.pa.go.kr/gokr/en/cms/selectKbrdCmsPageTbl.do?cd=0117&m1=1&m2=2 (Accessed 8 June 2023).
  66. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2009). Summit and S. Korea’s ‘New Asia Initiative’, by Lee, Soon-chun Chancellor of the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/brd/m_5691/view.do?seq=307573&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&multi_itm_seq=0&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=10&titleNm= (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  67. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023a). Uzbekistan overview. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/nation/m_4902/view.do?seq=129 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  68. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023b). Kazakhstan overview. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/nation/m_4902/view.do?seq=100 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  69. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023c). 13th Korea-Central Asia Cooperation Forum takes place. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/brd/m_5676/view.do?seq=321408#:~:text=The%2013th%20Korea%2DCentral,of%20the%20Central%20Asian%20countries (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  70. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023d). Kazakhstan. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/nation/m_4902/view.do?seq=100 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  71. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023e). Uzbekistan. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/nation/m_4902/view.do?seq=129 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  72. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023f). Kyrgyzstan. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/nation/m_4902/view.do?seq=102 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  73. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023g). Tajikistan. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/nation/m_4902/view.do?seq=124 (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  74. Republic of Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023h). Turkmenistan. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/nation/m_4902/view.do?seq=126 (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  75. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Culture and Tourism Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency. (2020). Turkish Development Assistance Report 2020. https://www.tika.gov.tr/upload/old/2022/TurkiyeKalkinma2020ENG_Web.pdf (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  76. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Culture and Tourism Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency. (2023). News. https://www.tika.gov.tr/en/news/list (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  77. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023a). Peaceful resolution of conflicts and mediation. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/resolution-of-conflicts-and-mediation.en.mfa (Accessed 7 June 2023).
  78. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023b). Türkiye’s enterprising and humanitarian foreign policy: A synopsis. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/synopsis-of-the-turkish-foreign-policy.en.mfa (Accessed 7 June 2023).
  79. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of National Defense General Staff. (2023). Contribution of the Turkish Armed Forces to peace support operations. https://www.tsk.tr/Sayfalar?viewName=ContributionToTafToPeace (Accessed 7 June 2023).
  80. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of National Education. (2022). National education statistics, formal education 2021/’22. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2022_09/15142558_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2021_2022.pdf (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  81. Shim, D. and Flamm, P. (2013). Rising South Korea: A minor player or a regional power? Pacific Focus, 28(3), 384-410. https://doi.org.10.1111/pafo.12015
  82. Study in Korea. (2023). Global Korea Scholarship. https://www.studyinkorea.go.kr/en/sub/gks/allnew_invite.do. (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  83. Turan, I. (2022, July 22). Türkiye, UN, Russia, Ukraine sign deal to resume grain exports. AA. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/russia-ukraine-war/turkiye-un-russia-ukraine-sign-deal-to-resume-grain-exports/2643586
  84. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2023a). Exports by countries. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=dis-ticaret-104&dil=1 (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  85. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2023b). Imports by countries. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=dis-ticaret-104&dil= (Accessed 18 June 2023).
  86. Tursunbaeva, K. (2014, August 7). Central Asia’s rulers view Turkish ‘soap power’ with suspicion. GlobalVoices. https://globalvoices.org/2014/08/07/central-asias-rulers-view-turkish-soap-power-with-suspicion/
  87. Türkiye Scholarships. (2023). Scholarship supports. https://www.turkiyeburslari.gov.tr/scholarshipsprocess# (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  88. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2022, October 27). Key indicators. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/ (Accessed 7 June 2023).
  89. Urinboyev, R. and Eraliov, S. (2022). The political economy of non-Western migration regimes: Central Asian migrant workers in Russia and Turkey. Springer.
  90. Varpahovskis, E. (2019, August 8). Advanced education diplomacy for South Korea & Central Asia. CPD. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/advanced-education-diplomacy-south-korea-central-asia
  91. Woods, E. and Baker, T. (2022, May 5). Public opinion on China waning in Central Asia. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2022/05/public-opinion-on-china-waning-in-central-asia/
  92. YÖK. (2021). Yükseköğretimde hedef odaklı uluslararasılaşma. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/2021/yuksekogretimde-hedef-odakli-uluslararasilasma.pdf (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  93. YÖK. (2023). The number of students according to the nationality. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/. (Accessed 19 June 2023).
  94. Yurtbilir, M. M. (2021). Trajectory of Turkish soft power in Central Asia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In K. Nourzhanov and S. Peyrouse (Eds.), Soft power in Central Asia: The politics of influence and seduction (pp. 135-166). Rowman & Littlefield.