Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Endometrial cytology as a diagnostic tool for subclinical endometritis in beef heifers

Sayfa
24–41
Yayın Tarihi
2015-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Endometrial cytology is a noninvasive technique with high specificity and repeatability for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis postpartum in dystocic beef heifers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The obstetric assistance of dystocia in field conditions promotes greater bacterial contamination of the uterus, causing subclinical endometritis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A group of 829 Angus heifers were assisted at calving.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Endometrial cytology is a noninvasive technique with high specificity and repeatability for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis postpartum in dystocic beef heifers.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Beef heifers · cytology · biopsy

Özet

The obstetric assistance of dystocia in field conditions promotes greater bacterial contamination of the uterus, causing subclinical endometritis. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of subclinical endometritis in beef heifers receiving professional calving assistance, and to evaluate endometrial cytology as a diagnostic technique compared to uterine biopsy. A group of 829 Angus heifers were assisted at calving. Dystocia was classified based on difficulty at assistance, which was estimated as complex or simple. At the end of the calving season, 93 dystocic heifers were reported (10.7%). The percentage of simple resolution and complex resolution was 88.2% and 11.8%, respectively. After 60 days of calving, all animals underwent a gynecological examination, endometrial cytology, and uterine biopsy. In all, 38.9% of heifers presented subclinical endometritis diagnosed by endometrial cytology (sensitivity = 78.6%, specificity = 95.8%). There was a significant association (r = 0.8528) between uterine cytology and uterine biopsy. No associations were observed between endometrial cytology or biopsy and calf viability, or between endometrial cytology or biopsy and calving resolution. Endometrial cytology is a noninvasive technique with high specificity and repeatability for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis postpartum in dystocic beef heifers.

Abstract

The obstetric assistance of dystocia in field conditions promotes greater bacterial contamination of the uterus, causing subclinical endometritis. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of subclinical endometritis in beef heifers receiving professional calving assistance, and to evaluate endometrial cytology as a diagnostic technique compared to uterine biopsy. A group of 829 Angus heifers were assisted at calving. Dystocia was classified based on difficulty at assistance, which was estimated as complex or simple. At the end of the calving season, 93 dystocic heifers were reported (10.7%). The percentage of simple resolution and complex resolution was 88.2% and 11.8%, respectively. After 60 days of calving, all animals underwent a gynecological examination, endometrial cytology, and uterine biopsy. In all, 38.9% of heifers presented subclinical endometritis diagnosed by endometrial cytology (sensitivity = 78.6%, specificity = 95.8%). There was a significant association (r = 0.8528) between uterine cytology and uterine biopsy. No associations were observed between endometrial cytology or biopsy and calf viability, or between endometrial cytology or biopsy and calving resolution. Endometrial cytology is a noninvasive technique with high specificity and repeatability for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis postpartum in dystocic beef heifers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MOSCUZZA, C., ALVAREZ, G., GUTIERREZ, B., ZURITA, M., TROPEANO, M., PERNA, R. (2015). Endometrial cytology as a diagnostic tool for subclinical endometritis in beef heifers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 24–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/121685

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. García JM, Campero CM, Melucci OG, Chayer R. Pérdidas por partos distócicos en vaquillonas de carne con servicio de 15/18 meses. Rev Therios 1999; 28: 172–182 (in Spanish). Turner HA, McInnis ML, Angell RF, Weber DW. Factors associated with dystocia in beef heifers. Prof Anim Sci 1991; 8: 43–47.
  2. Price TD, Wiltbank JN. Dystocia in cattle: a review and implications. Theriogenology 1978; 9: 195–219.
  3. Holland MD, Speer NC, Lefever DG, Taylor RE, Field TG, Odde KG. Factors contributing to dystocia due to fetal malpresentation in beef cattle. Theriogenology 1993; 39: 899– 908. Barlund CS, Carruthers TD, Waldner CL, Palmer CW. A comparison of diagnostic techniques for postpartum endometritis in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2008; 69: 714– 723. Bonnett BN, Martin SW. Path analysis of peripartum and postpartum events, rectal palpations findings, endometrial biopsy results and reproductive performance in Holstein– Friesian dairy cows. Prev Vet Med 1995; 21: 279–288.
  4. Gilbert RO, Gröhn YT, Miller PM, Hoffman DJ. Effect of parity on periparturient neutrophil function in dairy cows. Vet Immunol Immunop 1993; 36: 75–82.
  5. Studer E, Morrow DA. Postpartum evaluation of bovine reproductive potential: comparison of findings from genital tract examination per rectum, uterine culture, and endometrial biopsy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1978; 172: 489–494.
  6. Bonnett BN, Martin SW, Gannon VP, Miller RB, Etherington WG. Endometrial biopsy in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Bacteriological analysis and correlations with pathological findings. Can J Vet Res 1991; 55: 168–173.
  7. Kasimanickam R, Duffield TF, Foster RA, Gartley CJ, Leslie KE, Walton JS, Johnson WH. A comparison of the cytobrush and uterine lavage techniques to evaluate endometrial cytology in clinically normal postpartum dairy cows. Can Vet J 2005; 46: 255–259.
  8. Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods. Aus NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 65: 689–691.
  9. Santos NR, Lamb GC, Brown DR, Gilbert RO. Postpartum endometrial cytology in beef cows. Theriogenology 2009; 71: 739–745.
  10. Djemali M, Freeman AE, Berger PJ. Reporting of dystocia scores and effects of dystocia on production, days open, and days dry from dairy herd improvement data. J Dairy Sci 1987; 70: 2127–2131. Palmer C. Endometritis en vacas lecheras. Rev Taurus 2008; 10: 25–32 (in Spanish). Doornbos DE, Bellows RA, Burfening PJ, Knapp BW. Effects of damage, prepartum nutrition and duration of labor on productivity and postpart