KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Social Inquiry / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2

Jeostratejinin Siber Uzaydaki İz Düşümünü Keşfetmek: Kamu Diplomasisinden Ekonomik Çıktılara Estonya E-Oturumu

Exploring The Projection Of Geostrategy in Cyberspace: From Public Diplomacy to Economic Impacts Estonian E-Residency

Melikşah Aksu(Yeditepe Üniversitesi)0009-0006-2791-1543
Elif Karakoç Keskin(Yeditepe Üniversitesi)0000-0002-2831-2247
Oğuz Kuş(İstanbul Üniversitesi)0000-0002-2593-4980
Sayfa
360–378
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu nedenle, programın uzun vadeli başarıya ulaşması için teknolojik altyapı, etik ve hukuki hususların önem arz ettiği vurgulanmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada, Estonya e-Oturumu programından hareketle kamu diplomasisinden ekonomiye çeşitli boyutları ışığında e-Oturumun jeostratejik bir araç olarak konumunu keşfetmek amaçlanmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Devletlerin siber uzaydaki rekabette avantaj sağlamak için çeşitli stratejiler geliştirmesi durumu, e-Oturum programının jeostrateji ilişkiselliğinde değerlendirilmesini mümkün kılmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu nedenle, programın uzun vadeli başarıya ulaşması için teknolojik altyapı, etik ve hukuki hususların önem arz ettiği vurgulanmıştır.
🔬Tür:İnceleme Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Jeostrateji · Jeostratejik İletişim · Siber Uzay

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Estonya e-Oturumu programından hareketle kamu diplomasisinden ekonomiye çeşitli boyutları ışığında e-Oturumun jeostratejik bir araç olarak konumunu keşfetmek amaçlanmaktadır. Estonya e-Oturumu, ikamet ettikleri bölgeden bağımsız şekilde bireylere dijital bir kimlik kartı sağlayarak şirketler kurmalarına, finansal hizmetleri kullanmalarına, Avrupa Birliği pazarına erişmelerine olanak tanımaktadır. Devletlerin siber uzaydaki rekabette avantaj sağlamak için çeşitli stratejiler geliştirmesi durumu, e-Oturum programının jeostrateji ilişkiselliğinde değerlendirilmesini mümkün kılmaktadır. Çalışmada devletlerin, başka ülkelerin vatandaşlarıyla doğrudan iletişim kurarak kendi politikalarını, kültürlerini ve değerlerini tanıtmaları gibi konuları kapsayan kamu diplomasisi, girişimciler aracılığıyla ekonomik sermayenin ülkeye taşınması gibi ekonomik çıktılar içeren güçlü teknolojik altyapıların ulusal güvenliğe etkisi gibi bağlamlar üzerine yoğunlaşılmıştır. Çalışma sonunda e-Oturum programını, jeostratejik bir araç olarak nitelemenin mümkün olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca program, dijital eşitsizlik, veri güvenliği ve veri gözetimine yönelik tehditler, hukuki belirsizlikler gibi riskleri ve sınırlılıkları da içermektedir. Bu nedenle, programın uzun vadeli başarıya ulaşması için teknolojik altyapı, etik ve hukuki hususların önem arz ettiği vurgulanmıştır.

Abstract

This study aims to explore the position of Estonia’s e-Residency program as a geostrategic tool by analyzing its various dimensions, from public diplomacy to economic impact. The program provides individuals with a digital identity card, enabling them to establish companies, access financial services, and enter the EU market regardless of their place of residence. The increasing competition among states in cyberspace has made it essential to assess the e-Residency program within a geostrategic framework. The study focuses on public diplomacy, including how states engage with foreign citizens to promote their policies, culture, and values. It also examines economic benefits, such as attracting entrepreneurial capital, and the impact of strong technological infrastructures on national security. While the program has geostrategic potential, it also presents risks, including digital inequality, data security threats, and legal uncertainties. Therefore, technological, ethical, and legal considerations are crucial for its long-term success.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aksu, M., Keskin, E. K., Kuş, O. (2026). Jeostratejinin Siber Uzaydaki İz Düşümünü Keşfetmek: Kamu Diplomasisinden Ekonomik Çıktılara Estonya E-Oturumu. International Journal of Social Inquiry, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 360–378. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1758445

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (79)

  1. Abaku, T., Calzati, S., Masso, A. (2021). “Exploring digital sustainability of/through Estonia’s e-residency: Africa’s case and the importance of culture for sustainability”. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(3), 300-313.
  2. Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Human Geography, 42(1), 25-43. Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2019). Digital geographies. Sage.
  3. Badie, B. (2019). New perspectives on the international order: No longer alone in this world. Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Bathke, B. (2025). NATO airspace: can Baltic startups counter Russian drones? 3 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.dw.com/en/nato-airspace-air-defense-can-baltic-startups-help-bring-down-cheap-russian-drones/a-74464795 adresinden erişildi.
  5. Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2011). The globalization of world politics. Oxford University Press.
  6. Blue, A. (2021). Evaluating Estonian e-residency as a tool of soft power. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 17(4), 359-367.
  7. Bridle, J. (2016). Algorithmic citizenship, digital statelessness. GeoHumanities, 2(2), 377–381.
  8. Budnitsky, S. (2022). A relational approach to digital sovereignty: e-Estonia between Russia and the west. International Journal of Communication, 16, 1918-1939.
  9. Cairncross, F. (2002). The death of distance. RSA Journal, 149(5502), 40-42.
  10. Calzada, I. (2023). Emerging digital citizenship regimes: Pandemic, algorithmic, liquid, metropolitan, and stateless citizenships. Citizenship Studies, 27(2), 160-188.
  11. Cohen, J. E. (2007). Cyberspace as/and space. Colum. L. Rev., 107, 210.
  12. Csurgai, G. (2021). Geopolitics, geostrategy and geoeconomics: reflections on the changing force factors in the international system. A. Zoltai (Ed.), The Eurasia Series Recent Geopolitical Trends in Eurasia (ss. 13-25). Eurasia Center.
  13. Devriendt, L., Derudder, B., & Witlox, F. (2008). Cyberplace and cyberspace: Two approaches to analyzing digital intercity linkages. Journal of Urban Technology, 15(2), 5–32.
  14. Edenborg, E. (2022). Disinformation and gendered boundarymaking: Nordic media audiences making sense of “Swedish decline”. Cooperation and Conflict, 57(4), 496-515.
  15. E-Estonia (2019). What it takes to build a seamless state. 15 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://e-estonia.com/what-it-takes-to-build-a-seamless-state/ adresinden erişildi.
  16. E-Estonia. (2025). Cybersecurity. 23 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://e-estonia.com/solutions/cyber-security/secure-data-sharing/ adresinden erişildi.
  17. Elliott, C. I. & Roberts, A. (2024). The concept of the strategic state: An assessment after 30 years. Australian Journal of Public Administration.
  18. e-Resident. (2025a). Key statistics. 18 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/dashboard/ adresinden erişildi.
  19. e-Resident. (2025b). The Story. 16 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/the-story/ adresinden erişildi.
  20. ERR News. (2026). Estonian e-residency program brought in €125 million in 2025. 2 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://news.err.ee/1609934015/estonian-e-residency-program-brought-in-125-million-in-2025 adresinden erişildi.
  21. Espinoza, I., V., & Pino, A. (2024). E-government as a evelopment strategy: The case of Estonia. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(2), 86-99.
  22. Flint, C. (2022). Introduction to geopolitics. Routledge.
  23. Foulon, M. & Meibauer, G. (2024). How cyberspace affects international relations: Thepromise of structural modifiers. Contemporary Security Policy, 45(3), 426-458.
  24. Gao, C., Guo, Q., Jiang, D., Zhenbo, W., Fang, C., & Hao, M. (2019). Theoretical basis and technical methods of cyberspace geography. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(12), 1949-1964.
  25. Gordon, E., & Nouwens, M. (2022). The digital silk road: China's technological rise and the geopolitics of cyberspace. Routledge.
  26. Grygiel, J. J. (2007). Great powers and geopolitical change. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  27. Gündoğdu, S. (2022). Implementation tools and areas of public diplomacy. B. Parlak & K. C. Doğan (Ed.), The hanbook of public administration vol.2. (ss. 387-404). Livre De Lyon
  28. Gündoğdu, S., & Arafat, M. (2021). Public diplomacy practices in Turkish Foreign Policy (2002-2013). Turkish Studies-Economics, Finance, Politics, 16(4).
  29. Gvineria, S., Bankauskaite, D., Struberga, S., Nazarov, M., & Teperik, D. (2026). Exploring interdependencies between identity and resilience: Lessons from the war in Ukraine for the Baltic States. In Democratic resilience in the Baltics, Vol. 2: Societal resilience as a defensive power (pp. 181-207). Springer Nature.
  30. Hardy, A. (2021). Securing e-Estonia: Challenges, insecurities, opportunities. PhD Thesis. Royal Holloway, University of London.
  31. Hardy, A. (2024). Estonia's digital diplomacy: Nordic interoperability and the challenges of cross-border e-governance, Internet Policy Review, 13(3), 1-31.
  32. Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press.
  33. Hurrell, A. (2024). Geopolitics and global economic governance. Oxford Review of Economic Plicy, 40, 220-233.
  34. Huskaj, G. (2023). Digital geopolitics: A review of the current state. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security. 18 (1), 152-161.
  35. Kausch, K. (2017). Cheap havoc: How cyber-geopolitics will destabilize the Middle East. 20 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://www.gmfus.org/news/cheap-havoc-how-cyber-geopolitics-will-destabilize-middle-east. adresinden erişildi.
  36. Kelly, P. (2016). Classical geopolitics: A new analytical model. Stanford University Press.
  37. Kerikmäe, T., Troitiño, R. D., & Shumilo, O. (2019). An idol or an ideal? A case study of Estonian e-governance: Public perceptions, myths, and misbeliefs. Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 7(1), 71–80.
  38. Kerikmäe, T. & Pärn‑Lee, E. (2021). Legal dilemmas of Estonian artifcial intelligence strategy: in between of e‑society and global race. AI & Society, 36, 561-572.
  39. Kim, J., & Raswant, A. (2022). International business and security geostrategy in perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
  40. Kimmo, M., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2018). “E-residency as a nation branding case”. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ss.419-428). Association for Computing Machinery.
  41. Kinsley, S. (2014). The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 364-384.
  42. Kotka, T., Vargas, C., & Korjus, K. (2015). Estonian e-Residency: Redefining the nation-state in the digital era. University of Oxford Cyber Studies Programme working paper, 3.
  43. Kuehl, D. T. (2009). From cyberspace to cyberpower: Defining the problem. Cyberpower and national security, 30.
  44. Kuş, O., Karakoç Keskin, E. & Tanır Levendeli, Ş. (2025). Exploring the role of digitalized migration in polycrisis: opportunities and limitations in the context of e-residency. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 45(2), 511-538.
  45. Kuş, O., Karakoç Keskin, E., & Tanır Levendeli, Ş. (2026). ‘There is no need to come to the country at all!’conceptualization of digitalized migration: an ethnographic research on Turkish e‐Residents. Global Networks, 26(2), e70049.
  46. Lambach, D. (2020). The territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review, 22(3), 482-506.
  47. Lipkan, V., Kuznichenko, O., & Ivanov, A. (2023). Geoeconomics as a tool of modern geostrategy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1), 113-123.
  48. Lobastova, S. (2020). Geopolitics of cyberspace and virtual power. Journal of Liberal Arts and Humanities, 3, 97-113.
  49. Masso, A., Kasapoglu, T., Tammpuu, P., & Calzada, I. (2024). Datafied control and selection of digital identity: Estonian e-Residency as 'Citizenship by Connection'.
  50. McCaffrey, R. C., Henisz, J. W., & Jones, O. (2024). Geostrategy by design: How to manage geopolitical risk in the new era of globalization. Disruption Books.
  51. Middlemiss, M. (2025). Defence tech in focus: Estonia hosts its first defence week in 2025. 3 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/blog/posts/defence-tech-estonia adresinden erişildi.
  52. Nedelea, M. O. (2025). The transformation of diplomacy in the digital age: the legal framework, security challenges, and the Estonian model. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 12(2), 63-77.
  53. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public affairs.
  54. Polese, A., Ambrosio, T., & Kerikmäe, T. (2020). Estonian identity construction between nation branding and building. Czech Journal of International Relations, 55(2), 24-46.
  55. Ramadhan, I. (2021). The implication of cyberspace towards state geopolitics. Politicon: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 3(2), 161-184.
  56. Republic of Estonia E-Residency, (2024). 22 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://www.e-resident.gov.ee adresinden erişildi.
  57. Republic of Estonia. (2024). Information system authority cyber security in Estonia. 21 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://www.ria.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2024-02/Cyber-security-in-Estonia-2024.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  58. Republic of Estonia. (2025). Republic of Estonia ministry of foreign affairs. Cyber Diplomacy. 24 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://www.vm.ee/en/activity/digital-and-cyber-diplomacy/overview-cyber-diplomacy adresinden erişildi.
  59. Ramiro Troitiño, R. D. & Mazur, V. (2024). e-Identity: A Step Forward to European Digital Citizenship. D. Ramiro Troitiño (Ed.), e-governance in the European Union, contributions to political science. Cham: Springer.
  60. Sakwa, R. (2020). Greater Russia: Is Moscow out to subvert the West? International Politics, 58, 334-362.
  61. Saranya, S., Monika, K., Manikandan, J., Nagaraju, S., Nagendiran, S., & Geetha, B. T. (2024). "Blockchain-based identity management: Enhancing privacy and security in digital identity system," 7th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), Greater Noida, India, 2024, pp. 1620-1625.
  62. Särav, S., Kerikmäe, T. (2016). “E-residency: A cyberdream embodied in a digital identity card?” The Future of Law and eTechnologies. Editörler: T. Kerikmäe, T., A. Rull. Cham: Springer.
  63. Seiam, A. D. & Salman, D. (2024). Examining the global influence of e‑governance on corruption: a panel data analysis. Future Business Journal, 10(1):29, 1-13.
  64. Sharmin, S. & Chowdhury, H. R. 2023. Digital transformation in governance: The impact of e-governance on public administration and transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362-379. Shin, I-Y. (2020). Geography, cultural identity and flexibility in Estonia. Korean Studies Information Service Systems, 30(1), 45-57.
  65. Ståhlberg, P., & Bolin, G. (2016). Having a soul or choosing a face? Nation branding, identity and cosmopolitan imagination. Social Identities, 22(3), 274-290.
  66. Stokel-Walker, C. (2025). As Russia tests NATO’s limits, Estonia’s tech scene heats up. 6 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.inc.com/chris-stokel-walker/nato-nations-feel-threatened-by-russia-estonias-tech-entrepreneurs-think-they-can-help/91254101 adresinden erişildi.
  67. Sullivan, C. (2016). Digital citizenship and the right to digital identity under international law. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(3), 474-481.
  68. Sullivan, C. (2018). Digital identity–From emergent legal concept to new reality. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 723-731.
  69. Sullivan, C.,Burger, E. (2017). E-residency and blockchain. Computer Law and Security Review, 33(4), 470-481. Szondi, G. (2008). Public diplomacy and nation branding: conceptual similarities and differences. Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
  70. Tambur, S. (2026). Estonia’s e-residency posts record revenues – but the small print matters. 1 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://estonianworld.com/opinion/estonias-e-residency-posts-record-revenues-but-the-small-print-matters adresinden erişildi.
  71. Tammpuu, P. (2019). “‘Yay! I am officially an #estonian #eResident!’ Representations of Estonian e-residency as a novel kind of state-related status and affiliation on Twitter”. M. F. Murru, F. Colombo, L. Peja, S. Tosoni, R. Kilborn, R. Kunelius, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, L. Kramp, and N. Carpentier (eds.). Communication as the intersection of the old an the new: the intellectual work of the 2018 European Media and Communication Doctoral Summer School, (pp. 115–126). Edition lumière.
  72. Tammpuu, P., & Masso, A. (2018). ‘Welcome to the virtual state’: Estonian e-residency and the digitalised state as a commodity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 543-560.
  73. Tammpuu, P., & Masso, A. (2019). Transnational digital ıdentity as an instrument for global digital citizenship: the case of Estonia’s e-residency. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(621), 621-634.
  74. Tschap, N. (2024). The new Baltic way- Baltic identity amidst the geopolitics of digital transformation. University of Twente Student Theses.
  75. Veselinovic, J. (2022). European foreign policy think tanks and ‘strategic autonomy’: Making sense of the EU’s role in the world of geoeconomics. M. Babic, A. D. Dixon, I. T. Liu (Eds.). The Political Economy of Geoeconomics: Europe in a Changing World (ss. 81-106). Palgrave Macmillan.
  76. Vysotskyi, O., Deviatko, N., & Vysotska, O. (2022). Theory of technologies of geographical determinism in international relations. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 31(3), 554-565.
  77. Walt, S. (2021). Big tech won’t remake the global order. Foreign Policy. 22 Şubat 2025 tarihinde https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/08/big-tech-wont-remake-the-global-order/ adresinden erişildi.
  78. Wigell, M., & Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: the case of Russia’s geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92(3), 605–627.
  79. Kuş, O., Karakoç Keskin, E. & Tanır Levendeli, Ş. (2025). Exploring the role of digitalized migration in polycrisis: opportunities and limitations in the context of e-residency. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 45(2), 511-538.