KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2

Kişilik Özellikleri ve Cinsiyetin Spor Koçluğu Tercihlerindeki Rolü

The Role of Personality Traits and Gender in Sports Coaching Preferences

Oğuzhan Bozkurt(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7279-9304
Özgür Eken(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5488-3158
Sayfa
119–131
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Kişilik özellikleri analizlerine göre, deneyime açıklık özelliğinin eğitim ve öğretim koçluk türü üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğu, uyumluluk özelliğinin ise yalnızca eğitim ve öğretim koçluk türüne pozitif bir etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, İnönü Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi öğrencilerinin kişilik özellikleri ve cinsiyetleri ile spor koçluğu tercihleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:İlişkisel tarama modeline dayanan çalışmaya, yaşları 18 ile 24 (M = 20,5, SD = 1,7) arasında değişen toplam 243 katılımcı (141 erkek ve 102 kadın) dahil edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Kişilik özellikleri analizlerine göre, deneyime açıklık özelliğinin eğitim ve öğretim koçluk türü üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğu, uyumluluk özelliğinin ise yalnızca eğitim ve öğretim koçluk türüne pozitif bir etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:243 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:Kişilik Özellikleri · Spor Koçluğu · Cinsiyet

Özet

Bu çalışma, İnönü Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi öğrencilerinin kişilik özellikleri ve cinsiyetleri ile spor koçluğu tercihleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. İlişkisel tarama modeline dayanan çalışmaya, yaşları 18 ile 24 (M = 20,5, SD = 1,7) arasında değişen toplam 243 katılımcı (141 erkek ve 102 kadın) dahil edilmiştir. Katılımcıların kişilik özellikleri Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri ile değerlendirilirken, koçluk tercihleri Spor için Liderlik Ölçeği kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Veriler, bağımsız örneklem t-testi ve çoklu regresyon analizi yöntemleriyle incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, cinsiyetin kişilik özellikleri üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Erkekler dışa dönüklük ve öz disiplin puanlarında daha yüksek değerlere sahipken, kadınların uyumluluk, duygusal dengesizlik (nevrotizm) ve deneyime açıklık özelliklerinde daha başarılı oldukları belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, koçluk tercihleri incelendiğinde erkeklerin otoriter (otokratik) koçluk stilini anlamlı ölçüde daha fazla tercih ettikleri, kadınların ise eğitim ve öğretim odaklı koçluk stilini tercih ettikleri görülmüştür. Kişilik özellikleri analizlerine göre, deneyime açıklık özelliğinin eğitim ve öğretim koçluk türü üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğu, uyumluluk özelliğinin ise yalnızca eğitim ve öğretim koçluk türüne pozitif bir etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Dışa dönüklüğün otoriter koçluk türü üzerinde anlamlı ve olumlu bir etkisi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, demokratik ve ödüllendirici davranışsal koçluk türleri üzerinde herhangi bir kişilik özelliğinin anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, elde edilen bulgular, cinsiyetin hem kişilik özellikleri hem de koçluk tercihleri üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğunu, ayrıca kişilik özelliklerinin de koçluk tercihleri üzerinde belirleyici rol oynadığını göstermektedir.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between the personality traits and genders of students from the Faculty of Sports Sciences at Inonu University and their preferences for sports coaching. Based on a relational survey model, the study involved 243 participants, consisting of 141 males and 102 females aged between 18 and 24 (Mage = 20.5, SD = 1.7). The personality traits of the participants were assessed using the Five Factor Personality Inventory, while their coaching preferences were evaluated using the Leadership Scale for Sport. The data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and multiple regression analysis methods. According to the analysis results, gender has shown a significant effect on personality traits. Men scored higher in extraversion and self-discipline, whereas women were found to excel in agreeableness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. Additionally, the examination of coaching preferences revealed that men significantly favored the autocratic coaching style, while women preferred the educational and instructional coaching style. According to analyses of personality traits, the characteristic of openness to experience has a positive effect on the coaching types of education and training, while agreeableness has a positive impact solely on the education and training coaching type. Extraversion has shown a significant and positive effect on the autocratic coaching type. However, no personality traits have had a significant effect on the democratic and rewarding behavioral coaching types. In conclusion, the findings indicate that gender has a significant effect both on personality traits and coaching preferences, while personality traits themselves also play a determinative role in coaching preferences.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Bozkurt, O., Eken, Ö. (2025). Kişilik Özellikleri ve Cinsiyetin Spor Koçluğu Tercihlerindeki Rolü. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.1653877

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (44)

  1. Allen, M. S., Greenlees, I., and Jones, M. (2011). An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(8), 841-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.565064
  2. Allen, M. S., Greenlees, I., and Jones, M. (2013). Personality in sport: a comprehensive review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(1), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2013.769614
  3. Allen, M. S., Mison, E. A., Robson, D. A., and Laborde, S. (2020). Extraversion in sport: a scoping review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2020.1790024
  4. Amorose, A. J., and Anderson-Butcher, D. (2007). Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: a test of self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 654-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.11.003
  5. Beam, J. W., Serwatka, T. S., and Wilson, W. J. (2004). Preferred leadership of NCAA division I and II intercollegiate student-athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 27(1), 3-17.
  6. Becker, A. J., and Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Effective coaching in action: observations of legendary collegiate basketball coach pat summitt. Sport Psychologist, 22(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.22.2.197
  7. Bulut, A., Karataş, İ., and Adatepe, E. (2024). Investigation of the relationships between personality traits and self-perceptions of leadership behaviors of faculty of sport sciences students. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 19, 2743-2769. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1465708
  8. Chelladurai, P., and Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.2.1.34
  9. Chia, J. S., Pyun, D. Y., and Kwon, H. H. (2015). The impact of congruence between perceived and preferred leadership on satisfaction among college student-athletes in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(4), 498-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1064355
  10. Collinwood, B. C. (2020). Athletes’ perceptions of the influence their personality types have on their success as athletes and their relationship with their coach (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University). Northcentral University Repository.
  11. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., and McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
  12. Cruz, A. B., and Kim, H. D. (2017). Leadership preferences of adolescent players in sport: Influence of coach gender. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 16(2), 172-179.
  13. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429-456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429
  14. Garland, D. J., and Barry, J. R. (1990). Personality and leader behaviors in collegiate football: a multidimensional approach to performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(90)90026-3
  15. Hastie, P. A. (1995). Factors affectıng coachıng preferences of secondary school volleyball players’. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 347-350.
  16. Horn, T. S., Bloom, P., Berglund, K. M., and Packard, S. (2011). Relationship between collegiate athletes’ psychological characteristics and their preferences for different types of coaching behavior. Sport Psychologist, 25(2), 190-211. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.25.2.190
  17. Horzum, M. B., Ayas, T., and Padır, M. A. (2017). Adaptation of Big Five Personality Traits Scale to Turkish Culture. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(2), 398-408. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.298430
  18. Jowett, S., and Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (cart-q): development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14(4), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x
  19. Kaiseler, M., Levy, A., Nicholls, A. R., and Madigan, D. J. (2019). The independent and interactive effects of the Big-Five personality dimensions upon dispositional coping and coping effectiveness in sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(4), 410-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2017.1362459
  20. Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., and Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.32
  21. Kim, M., Kim, Y., and Won, D. (2018). From commanding to serving athletes: Nurturing the coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 13(6), 891-901. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954118790810
  22. Kirkcaldy, B. D. (1982). Personality profiles at various levels of athletic participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 3(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(82)90052-6
  23. Kuntz, J. C., and Moorfield, J. (2024). Exploring athletes’ gendered views of coaches and their impact of coach competency ratings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 74(January), 102664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102664
  24. Loughead, T. M., and Hardy, J. (2005). An examination of coach and peer leader behaviors in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(3), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.02.001
  25. Lucas, R. E., and Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: longitudinal analyses with a national sample from germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 847-861. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024298
  26. Mageau, G. A., and Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(11), 883-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374
  27. Mallett, C. J. (2005). Self-determination theory: A case study of evidence-based coaching. Sport Psychologist, 19(4), 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.19.4.417
  28. Martin, J. J., Malone, L. A., and Hilyer, J. C. (2011). Personality and mood in women’s paralympic basketball champions. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 5(3), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.5.3.197
  29. Martin, S. B., Jackson, A. W., Richardson, P. A., and Weiller, K. H. (1999). Coaching preferences of adolescent youths and their parents. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908404203
  30. Ni, P., and Feng, L. (2023). Improving collegiate student-athletes’ well-being: exploring the roles of openness to experience, knowledge sharing and perceived coaching effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(July), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191622
  31. Piedmont, R. L., Hill, D. C., and Blanco, S. (1999). Predicting athletic performance using the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00280-3
  32. Piepiora, P. (2020). A review of personality research in sport. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport, 6(4), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.12775/pps.2020.06.04.007
  33. Piepiora, P. (2021). Personality profile of individual sports champions. Brain and Behavior, 11(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2145
  34. Piepiora, P., and Witkowski, K. (2020). Self-defence as a utilitarian factor in combat sports, modifying the personality of athletes at a champion level. Archives of Budo Science of Martial Arts and Extreme Sports, 16(January 2022), 71-77.
  35. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
  36. Rammstedt, B., and John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the big five ınventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
  37. Riemer, H. A., and Toon, K. (2001). Leadership and satisfaction in tennis: Examination of congruence, gender, and ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72(3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2001.10608957
  38. Spielmann, J., Otte, F., Schumacher, T., Mayer, J., and Klatt, S. (2024). Searching for the perfect goalkeeping personality. Myth or reality? Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1418004
  39. Terry, P. C., and Howe, B. L. (1984). The coaching preferences of elite athletes competing at Universiade’83. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 9(4), 201-208.
  40. Unutmaz, V., and Gençer, R. T. (2014). Examination of the psychometric properties of the leadership scale for sports - athlete’s perception of coach behavior version. CBU Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 7(1), 27-34.
  41. Vallerand, R. J., and Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 142-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956
  42. Vincer, D. J. E., and Loughead, T. M. (2010). The relationship among athlete leadership behaviors and cohesion in team sports. Sport Psychologist, 24(4), 448-467. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.24.4.448
  43. Weiss, M. R., and Friedrichs, W. D. (1986). The influence of leader behaviors, coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8(4), 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.8.4.332
  44. Witte, K. S. (2011). Coaching leadership preferences: insight from the national collegiate athletic association division ııı athlete. Journal of Coaching Education, 4(2), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1123/jce.4.2.73