Dergiler / Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1 Özel Sayı

Türk akademisyenlerin kongre tercihleri üzerine bir araştırma

A research on the conference attendees' preferences of Turkish faculty members

Sayfa
109–120
Yayın Tarihi
2010-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışma sonucunda, kongre tercih ölçütlerinin eğlence ve aktivite, kongre, maddi maliyet, altyapı, zaman maliyeti ve destinasyon kategorileri altında toplandığı görülmüştür.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çalışmanın amacı kongre katılımcılarının tercihlerinin belirlenmesidir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Veriler Türkiye'deki üniversitelerde çalışan, ulusal ya da uluslar arası bir kongreye katılmış 246 akademisyenden toplanmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışma sonucunda, kongre tercih ölçütlerinin eğlence ve aktivite, kongre, maddi maliyet, altyapı, zaman maliyeti ve destinasyon kategorileri altında toplandığı görülmüştür.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:kongre turizmi · öğretim üyeleri · akademisyenler

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı kongre katılımcılarının tercihlerinin belirlenmesidir. Kongre katılımcılarının tercih kriterlerinin belirlenmesi için bir ölçek geliştirilmiştir. Kongre tercih faktörlerini ortaya çıkarmak için açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Veriler Türkiye'deki üniversitelerde çalışan, ulusal ya da uluslar arası bir kongreye katılmış 246 akademisyenden toplanmıştır. Verilerin elde edilmesinde yüz yüze ve e-posta ile anket tekniğinden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, kongre tercih ölçütlerinin eğlence ve aktivite, kongre, maddi maliyet, altyapı, zaman maliyeti ve destinasyon kategorileri altında toplandığı görülmüştür.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify the prefences of conference attendees. A Scale was developed to determine conference attendee's preference criteria. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to determine the factors of conference preference. Data were gathered from 246 faculty members of Turkish universities who attended a national or international conference. According to the results the conference preference criteria are divided into six categories of leisure and entertainment conference itself, monetory coast, infrastucture, time coast and destination.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yüncü, K. D., Kozak, N. (2010). Türk akademisyenlerin kongre tercihleri üzerine bir araştırma. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1 Özel Sayı, 109–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/1189201

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (45)

  1. Ajzen, I., ve Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research, Psychological Bulletin, 84: 888-918
  2. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. A Comment, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3): 375-381
  3. Baloğlu, Ş. ve Curtis, L. (2005). Association Meeting Planners’ Perceptions and Intentions for Five Major US Convention Cities: The Structured and Unstructured Images, Tourism Management, 26 (5): 743-752
  4. Choi, J-J. ve Boger, C. A. (2002). State Association Market: Relationship Between Association Characteristics and Site Selection Criteria, Journal of Convention&Exhibition, 4 (1): 55-73
  5. Crompton, J. (1992). Structure of Vacation Destination Choice Sets, Annals of Tourism Research, 19: 420-34
  6. Crouch, G. ve Ritchie, B. (1998). Convention Site Selection Research: A Review, Conceptual Model and Propositional Framework. Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 1 (1): 49-69
  7. Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50
  8. Gnoth, J. (1998). Branding Tourism Destinations, Annals of Tourism Research, 25 (3): 758-760
  9. Go, F. M., ve Govers, R. (1999). The Asian Perspective: Which International Conference Destinations in Asia Are The Most Competitive? Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 1 (4): 37-50
  10. Grant, Y. (1994). Factors That Contribute to the Selection Process of Meetings from the Perspective of the Attendees, Doktora Tezi, Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic State University
  11. Grant, Y. N. J. ve Weaver, P. A. (1996). The Meeting Selection Process: A Demographic Profile of Attendees Clustered by Criteria Utilized in Selecting Meetings, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 20 (1): 57-71
  12. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tahtam, R. L., ve Black, W. C
  13. . Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Fifth Edition
  14. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modelling Concept, Issues and Applications. SAGE Publication Inc
  15. Jaekyoon, J. ve McCleary, K. W. (1999). Classifying US Association Meeting Planners Based on International Destination Selection Criteria: A Case Study of South Korea, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18(2): 183-199
  16. Jago, L. K. ve Deery, M. (2005). Relationships and Factors Influencing Convention Decision-Making, Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, 7(1): 23–42
  17. Kotler, P. ve Armstrong, G. (2004). Principles of Marketing. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall
  18. Kotler, P., Bowen, J. ve Makens. (2006). Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall
  19. Lee, M. J. ve Back, K. J. (2005). A Review of Economic Value Drivers in Convention and Meeting Management Research, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17 (5): 409-420
  20. Lee, M. J. ve Back, K. J. (2007). Effects of Destination Image on Meeting Participation Intentions: Empirical Findings from a Professional Association and its Annual Convention, The Service Industries Journal, 27 (1): 59–73
  21. Lee, M. ve Back, K. (2005). A Review of Convention and Meeting Management Research 1990–2003: Identification of Statistical Methods and Subject Areas, Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, 7 (2): 1–12
  22. Mair, J. ve Thompson, K. (2008). The UK Association Conference Attendance Decision-Making Process, Tourism Management, 2008: 1-10
  23. Ngamsom, B. ve Beck, J. (2000). A Pilot Study of Motivations, Inhibitors, and Facilitators of Association Members in Attending International Conferences, Journal of Convention and Exhibition Management, 3 (3): 45-62
  24. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw- Hill
  25. Oppermann, M. ve Chon, K. S. (1997). Convention Participation Decision-Making Process, Annals of Tourism Research, 24 (1): 178-191
  26. Oppermann, M. (1996). Convention Destination Images: Analysis of Association Meeting Planners’ Perceptions, Tourism Management, 17 (3): 175-182
  27. Oppermann, M. (1998). Convention Participation Decision-Making Process, Annals of Tourism Research, 24 (1): 178–191
  28. Oppermann, M. ve Chon, K. S. (1995). Factors Influencing Professional Conference Participation by Association Members: A Pilot Study of Convention Tourism, Travel and Tourism Research Association Journal, 26: 254-259
  29. Oppermann, M. ve Chon, K. S. (1997). Convention Participation Decision-making Process, Annals of Tourism Research, 24 (1): 178-191 PCMA. (2003). Professional Convention Management Association Annual Survey. www.pcma.org Price, C. (1993). An Empirical Study of The Value of Professional Association Meetings from The Perspective of Attendees (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi). Blacksburg, VA.: Virginia Polytechnic and State University
  30. Rittichainuwat, B. N., Beck, J. A. ve Lalopa, J. (2001). Understanding Motivations, Inhibitors, and Facilitators of Association Members in Attending International Conferences, Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 3 (3): 45-62
  31. Rogers, T. (1998). Conferences: A Twenty-First Century Industry
  32. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman
  33. Schumacker R. E. ve Lomax R. G. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Londra: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  34. Sethi, V., ve King, W. R. (1994). Development of Measures to Assess the Extent to which an Information Technology Application Provides Competitive Advantage, Management Science, 40 (12): 1601-1624
  35. Severt, D., Wang, Y., Chen, P-J. ve Breiter, D. (2007). Examining the Motivation, Perceived Performance and Behavioral Intentions of Convention Attendees: Evidence from a Regional Conference, Tourism Management, 28: 399–408
  36. Swarbrooke, J., ve Horner, S. (2001). Leisure Marketing: A Global Perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier
  37. Um, S. ve Crompton, J. L. (1990). Attitude Determinants in Tourism Destination Choice, Annals of Tourism Research, 17: 432-448
  38. Var, Turgut., Ceasario, C. F. ve Mauser, G. (1985). Convention Tourism Modelling, Tourism Management, 6 (3): 194-204
  39. Witt, S. F., Sykes, A. M. ve Dartus, M. (1995). Forecasting International Conference Attending, Tourism Management, 16 (8): 559–570
  40. Woodside, A. G., ve Lysonski, S. (1989). A General Model of Traveler Destination Choice, Journal of Travel Research, 27 (4): 8-14
  41. WTO. (2006). Tourism Highlights 2006 Edition. http:// www.unwto.org/facts/menu.html. Erişim tarihi: 15.04.2009
  42. Yoon, J. J-E. ve Weber, K. (2005). Progress in Convention Tourism Research, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 29 (2): 194-222
  43. Zhang, H. Q., Leung, V. ve Qu, H. (2007). A Refined Model of Factors Affecting Convention Participation Decision-Making, Tourism Management, 28: 1123–1127.
  44. . Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Fifth Edition
  45. Kotler, P., Bowen, J. ve Makens. (2006). Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall