KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Education and Future / 2026 / Sayı: 29

Okuduğunu Anlama Becerisinin Okuma Akıcılığı ve Okuma Motivasyonu ile İlişkisinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile İncelenmesi

Examination of the Relationship between Reading Comprehension, Reading Fluency, and Reading Motivation Using Structural Equation Modeling

Zehra Yaşar Sağlık(Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi)0000-0001-5626-4660
Beyza Sanır0009-0002-9070-3836
Zeynep Yıldız0009-0007-8509-5334
Sayfa
15–29
Yayın Tarihi
2026-02-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç olarak, içsel motivasyon okuma performansını geliştirirken, akıcı okuma okuduğunu anlama becerisini desteklemekte ve okuma motivasyonu bu süreçte önemli bir aracılık işlevi görmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama düzeyleri ile akıcı okuma becerileri ve okuma motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkileri Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (SEM) aracılığıyla incelemektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmanın örneklemi, 2023–2024 eğitim-öğretim yılı güz döneminde Gaziantep ilindeki çeşitli ilkokullarda öğrenim gören 239 (117 erkek ve 122 kız) öğrenciden oluşmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç olarak, içsel motivasyon okuma performansını geliştirirken, akıcı okuma okuduğunu anlama becerisini desteklemekte ve okuma motivasyonu bu süreçte önemli bir aracılık işlevi görmektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2023–2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Okuma · okuduğunu anlama · akıcı okuma

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama düzeyleri ile akıcı okuma becerileri ve okuma motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkileri Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (SEM) aracılığıyla incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemi, 2023–2024 eğitim-öğretim yılı güz döneminde Gaziantep ilindeki çeşitli ilkokullarda öğrenim gören 239 (117 erkek ve 122 kız) öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Veriler, “Hikâye Edici Metni Anlama Testi (HEMAT)”, “Bilgi Verici Metni Anlama Testi (BVMAT)”, “Okuma Motivasyonu Ölçeği (OMÖ)”, akıcı okuma metni ve öğretmen değerlendirme formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, akıcı okuma ile okuduğunu anlama, içsel ve dışsal motivasyon arasında orta düzeyde pozitif ilişkiler olduğunu göstermiştir; ancak okuduğunu anlama ile dışsal motivasyon arasındaki ilişki daha zayıftır. İçsel motivasyon, hem akıcı okuma hem de okuduğunu anlama üzerinde anlamlı etkiye sahipken, dışsal motivasyon yalnızca akıcı okumayı etkilemektedir. Akıcı okuma ile okuduğunu anlama arasındaki doğrudan etki pozitif ve anlamlıdır. Motivasyonun aracılık etkisi incelendiğinde, okuma motivasyonunun her iki beceri üzerinde de anlamlı etkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Okuduğunu anlama, okuma motivasyonundaki varyansın %18’ini, akıcı okuma ise %11’ini açıklarken, okuma motivasyonu akıcı okuma varyansının %34,7’sini açıklamaktadır. Sonuç olarak, içsel motivasyon okuma performansını geliştirirken, akıcı okuma okuduğunu anlama becerisini desteklemekte ve okuma motivasyonu bu süreçte önemli bir aracılık işlevi görmektedir.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among fourth-grade elementary school students’ reading comprehension levels, fluent reading skills, and reading motivation through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The study sample consisted of 239 students (117 males and 122 females) attending various elementary schools in Gaziantep during the fall semester of the 2023–2024 academic year. A relational screening model was employed in this study. Data were collected using the Narrative Text Comprehension Test (NTCT), Informative Text Comprehension Test (ITCT), the Reading Motivation Scale (RMS), a reading fluency passage, and a teacher evaluation form. The analysis results indicated moderate positive correlations between fluent reading and reading comprehension, as well as between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation; however, the relationship between reading comprehension and extrinsic motivation was weaker. While intrinsic motivation had a significant effect on both fluent reading and reading comprehension, extrinsic motivation influenced only fluent reading. The direct effect of fluent reading on reading comprehension was positive and significant.When examining the mediating role of motivation, it was observed that reading motivation had a significant effect on both skills. Reading comprehension explained 18% of the variance in reading motivation, while fluent reading accounted for 11%; conversely, reading motivation explained 34.7% of the variance in fluent reading. In conclusion, intrinsic motivation enhances reading performance, fluent reading supports reading comprehension, and reading motivation serves an important mediating function in this process.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sağlık, Z. Y., Sanır, B., Yıldız, Z. (2026). Okuduğunu Anlama Becerisinin Okuma Akıcılığı ve Okuma Motivasyonu ile İlişkisinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile İncelenmesi. Journal of Education and Future, Sayı: 29, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1644855

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (69)

  1. Akyol, H. (2005). Türkçe ilkokuma yazma öğretimi. [Turkish primary reading and writing teaching]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
  2. Akyol, H. (2016). Programa uygun Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri [Turkish teaching methods suitable for the programme]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
  3. Akyol, H., ve Yildiz, M. (2013). Okuma uzmanlığı ve okuma uzmanı yetiştirilmesine yönelik bir program önerisi [A program proposal for training the reading specialist]. Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları [Research in Reading & Writing Instruction], 1(1).
  4. Akyol, H., Yildirim, K., Ates, S., Cetinkaya, Ç., & Rasinski, T. (2014). Okumayı değerlendirme öğretmenler için kolay ve pratik bir yol [An easy and practical way for teachers to assess reading]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
  5. Andreassen, R., & Bråten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x
  6. Ates, S., Yildirim, K., Can, R., & Turkyilmaz, M. (2014). Relations among contextual silent reading fluency, non-contextual silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A path analysis of fifth grade readers. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4010-4014.
  7. Athey, I. (1982). Reading: The affective domain reconceptualized. In B. A. Hutson (Ed.), Advances in reading/language research (Vol. 1, pp. 203–218). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  8. Baker, T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452-477.
  9. Baştug, M., ve Keskin, H. (2012). Akıcı okuma becerileri ile anlama düzeyleri (basit ve çıkarımsal) arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between fluent reading skills and comprehension level (literal and inferential)]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty], 13(2), 227-244.
  10. Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773-785.
  11. Bozkurt, M. (2013). Beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin üstbilişsel okuduğunu anlama farkındalığı ve okuma motivasyonları ile okuma düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki [5th grade students of elemantry school metacognitive reading comprehension and reading motivations and readin level between relationship] (Unpublished Master Thesis). Bülent Ecevit University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Classroom Teaching, Zonguldak.
  12. Buyukozturk, Ş., Cakmak, E. K., Akgun, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2024). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
  13. Byrne, B. M., (2010), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis Group, ISBN 978-0- 8058-6372-7 (hardcover: alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-0-8058-6373-4 (pbk.: alk. paper).
  14. Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663-672.
  15. Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, İ., Demir, O., Ozdamar, K., & Sanisoglu, S. Y. (2013). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve uyum indeksleri [Confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices: review]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 210-223.
  16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256.
  17. Gunes, F. (2009). Hızlı okuma ve anlamı yapılandırma [Speed reading and structuring meaning]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  18. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199–205.
  19. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). New York: Longman.
  20. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256.
  21. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C., Rice, M. E., Faibisch, F., Hunt, B., &
  22. Mitchell, A. (1996). Growth in literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 306–333.
  23. Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282–313.
  24. Hasselbring, T. S., & Goin, L. I. (2004). Literacy instruction for older struggling readers: What is the role of technology? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20(2), 123–144.
  25. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
  26. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Van Den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.
  27. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
  28. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. USA: Sage Publications.
  29. Kim, Y. S., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2012). Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(1), 93-111.
  30. Kim, Y.-S., Petscher, Y., Foorman, B., & Zhou, C. (2010). The contributions of phonological awareness and letter-name knowledge to letter sound acquisition: A cross-classified multilevel model approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 313–326.
  31. Kim, Y.-S., Wagner, R. K., & Foster, L. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338–362.
  32. Koca, C. (2020). İlkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin okur öz algısı, okuma motivasyonu ve okuduğunu anlama becerileri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Examining the relations between reader self-perception, reading motivation and reading comprehension skills of 4th grade primary school students.] (Unpublished Master Thesis). Düzce University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Classroom Teaching, Düzce.
  33. Kusdemir, Y., & Bulut, P. (2018). The relationship between elementary school students’ reading comprehension and reading motivation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(12), 97-110.
  34. Lau, K., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00195
  35. Law, Y. (2008). The relationship between extrinsic motivation, home literacy, classroom instructional practices, and reading proficiency in second-grade Chinese children. Research in Education, 80(1), 37–51.
  36. Law, Y. (2009). The role of attribution beliefs, motivation and strategy use in Chinese fifth-graders' reading comprehension. Educational Research, 51(1), 77–95.
  37. Liao, X., Zhu, X., & Zhao, P. (2021). The mediating effects of reading amount and strategy use in the relationship between intrinsic reading motivation and comprehension: Differences between grade 4 and grade 6 students. Reading and Writing, 34(10), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10218-6
  38. Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011
  39. Makebo, T. H., Bachore, M. M., & Ayele, Z. A. (2022). Investigating the correlation between students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 229-242.
  40. Marín-Marín, J. A., López-Belmonte, J., Lampropoulos, G., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2023). Influence of the application of a reading plan on motivation, emotional intelligence, fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish primary school students. Texto Livre, 16, e41548.
  41. Mathewson, G. C. (1994). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 1131–1161). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  42. McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934–955.
  43. Miyamoto, A. (2023). A role of gender in the reciprocal relations between intrinsic reading motivation and reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 28(3), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2260032
  44. Oldfather, P., & Wigfield, A. (1996). Children’s motivations to read. In L. Baker, P. Afflerbach, & D. Reinking (Eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 89–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  45. Oruc, T., Aktas, İ., & Kurt, M. (2024). The predictive effect of reading motivation and creative reading perception on reading comprehension. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 25(2), 752-775. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.143682
  46. Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1986). Self-regulated learning among exceptional children. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 103–108.
  47. Prameswari, I. D., & Akhiriyah, S. (2023). The correlation between reading fluency and students' reading comprehension in junior high school. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 39-48.
  48. Price, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D’Mello, S. (2016). The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 167–201.
  49. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 550-559.
  50. Ridel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 546–567.
  51. Roehrig, A. D., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S. M., Hudson, R. F., & Torgesen, J. K. (2008). Not just speed reading: Accuracy of the DIBELS oral reading fluency measure for predicting high-stakes third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 343–366.
  52. Sanir, H., Ozmen, E. R., & Ozer, A. (2023). The mediating effects of reading fluency, comprehension strategies and prior knowledge on the relationship between intrinsic motivation and reading comprehension. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19009-19024.
  53. Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369-385.
  54. Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463.
  55. Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49-58.
  56. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). Structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge.
  57. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 159–172.
  58. Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(2), 85–106.
  59. Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: A conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9907-9
  60. Turkyilmaz, M., Can, R., Yildirim, K., & Ates, S. (2014). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, retell fluency, and reading comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4030-4034.
  61. Urun Karahan, B., ve Tasdan, M. (2016). 5. ve 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin okumaya karşı tutum ve motivasyonlarının okuduğunu anlama becerileri ile ilişkisi [The correlation of attitudes and motivations of 5th and 6th grade students toward reading with the skills of reading comprehension]. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi [International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education], 5(2), 949-969.
  62. Van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1–31). New York: Teachers College.
  63. Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186.
  64. Wang, X., Jia, L., & Jin, Y. (2020). Reading amount and reading strategy as mediators of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 586346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586346
  65. Yasar Saglik, Z. (2022). Web 2.0 araçlarıyla desteklenen kelime öğretiminin kelime bilgisi, okuduğunu anlama ve akıcı okuma becerilerine etkisi [The effect of vocabulary teaching by using Web 2.0 tools on vocabulary, reading comprehension and reading fluency skills]. (Unpublished Doctoral Disseration), Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  66. Yildiz, M. (2010). İlköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama, okuma motivasyonu ve okuma alışkanlıkları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between 5th graders? reading comprehension, reading motivation and reading habits]. (Unpublished Doctoral Disseration), Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  67. Yildiz, M., & Akyol, H. (2011). İlköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama, okuma motivasyonu ve okuma alışkanlıkları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between 5th graders’ reading comprehension, reading motivation and reading habits]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal], 31(3), 793-815.
  68. Yildiz, M., Yildirim, K., Ates, S., & Cetinkaya, Ç. (2009). An evaluation of the oral reading fluency of 4th graders with respect to prosodic characteristic. Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 353-360.
  69. Yildirim, K., & Rasinski, T. (2014). Reading Fluency beyond English: Investigations into Reading Fluency in Turkish Elementary Students. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 97-106.