KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31

VELİLERİN ÖZEL İLKOKUL TERCİHLERİNİN BULANIK ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YAKLAŞIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

PARENTAL CHOICE OF PRIVATE PRIMARY SCHOOLS: A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING EVALUATION

Alkan Durmuş(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5806-9962
Abdurrahman İskender(SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8055-7869
Sayfa
381–428
Yayın Tarihi
2026-05-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu model, eğitim yönetimi ve politika için güvenilir, şeffaf bir karar destek aracı sunmaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, İzmir, Türkiye’deki özel ilkokulları değerlendirmek ve ebeveynlerin okul seçimini desteklemek amacıyla bulanık çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) modeli geliştirmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Sonuçlara göre, akademik kalite (0,465) en etkili kriter olmuş, onu ekonomik koşullar (0,216) izlemiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu model, eğitim yönetimi ve politika için güvenilir, şeffaf bir karar destek aracı sunmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Bulanık AHP · Bulanık MAIRCA · Ebeveyn Tercihi

Özet

Bu çalışma, İzmir, Türkiye’deki özel ilkokulları değerlendirmek ve ebeveynlerin okul seçimini desteklemek amacıyla bulanık çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) modeli geliştirmektedir. Artan okul çeşitliliği karşısında, model; akademik kalite, ekonomik koşullar, fiziksel özellikler, yönetsel/sosyal destek ve konum olmak üzere beş ana kriteri esas alarak nesnel ve veri temelli bir rehberlik sunmaktadır. Kriter ağırlıkları Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (F-AHP) ile belirlenmiş, okul sıralamaları ise Bulanık MAIRCA (F-MAIRCA) yöntemiyle yapılmıştır. On ebeveynden yapılandırılmış formlar aracılığıyla veri toplanmış; yargılardaki belirsizlik üçgensel bulanık sayılarla modellenmiş, ardından ağırlıklar ve puanlar hesaplanmıştır. Sonuçlara göre, akademik kalite (0,465) en etkili kriter olmuş, onu ekonomik koşullar (0,216) izlemiştir. Alt kriterler arasında öğretmen ve yönetim kalitesi öne çıkmıştır. İzmir Anka Koleji, MEF Uluslararası Okulu ve İ.T.Ü. İzmir İlkokulu en üst sıralarda yer almıştır. Ağırlık değişimlerine göre yapılan duyarlılık analizi sıralamaların kararlılığını doğrulamıştır. Bu model, eğitim yönetimi ve politika için güvenilir, şeffaf bir karar destek aracı sunmaktadır.

Abstract

This study develops a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to assist parents in selecting private primary schools in İzmir, Türkiye. Faced with growing educational options, the model provides objective, data-driven guidance by evaluating five main criteria: academic quality, economic conditions, physical characteristics, managerial/social support, and location. Criterion weights were determined using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP), and school rankings were derived using Fuzzy Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (F-MAIRCA). Data from ten parents were collected via structured forms; uncertainty was modeled using triangular fuzzy numbers, followed by defuzzification and normalization. Results show that academic quality (0.465) is the most influential factor, followed by economic conditions (0.216). Among subcriteria, teacher and management quality ranked highest. F-MAIRCA analysis identified İzmir Anka College, MEF International School, and İ.T.Ü. İzmir Primary School as top performers. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of rankings under varying weights. The integrated F-AHP → F-MAIRCA approach offers a reliable and transparent tool for educational decision-making, highlighting educational quality as the dominant factor in parental preferences.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Durmuş, A., İskender, A. (2026). VELİLERİN ÖZEL İLKOKUL TERCİHLERİNİN BULANIK ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YAKLAŞIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31, 381–428. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1835795

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (112)

  1. 5580 Sayılı Özel Öğretim Kurumları Kanunu (2007). T.C. Resmî Gazete, 10015, 08.02.2007
  2. Alsauidi, F. (2015). Effect of the school facilities factor and sport activities factor on parents in terms of private and public school choice at Riyadh City Saudi Arabia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(12), 1054-1069. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2015.031215
  3. Anzar, U. (2023). Employee selection decision support system the best marketing at smk dwiwarna medan using the simple additive weighting method. j. of artif. intell. and eng. appl., 3(1), 440-447. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v3i1.351
  4. Aslan, A., Altay, G. (2019). Eğitim ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisinin analizi: Türkiye’deki özel okullar örneği (Doktora Tezi). Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Nevşehir
  5. Aslan, E. A. (2019). Türkiye’de Özel Okullaşma. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 263-276.
  6. Avşar, Z. (2016). Dershane ve özel okulların eğitim öğretim sistemimize etkileri. Eğitime Bakış Eğitim-Öğretim ve Bilim Araştırma Dergisi, 38, 38–42.
  7. Baum, D. (2018). The effectiveness and equity of public-private partnerships in education: a quasi-experimental evaluation of 17 countries. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 105. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3436
  8. Bayar, A., & Akın, E. (2023). Velilerin özel okulları tercih etme sebeplerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences (JOSHAS), 9(64), 2892–2900. DOI: 10.29228/JOSHAS.68876
  9. Bernal, J. L. (2005). Parental choice, social class and market forces: The consequences of privatization of public services in education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(6), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500200430
  10. Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., ve Naikan, V. N. A. (2020). An Integrated Approach for Fuzzy Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Using Fuzzy AHP And Fuzzy MAIRCA. Engineering Failure Analysis, 108, 104195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104195
  11. Bosetti, L. (2004). Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000227485
  12. Bozyiğit, S. (2017). Özel okulların eğitim hizmetlerine ilişkin veli beklentisi ve algısı: Nitel bir araştırma. In International Congress on Political, Economic and Social Studies (ICPESS) (2, 521–543).
  13. Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
  14. Brown, C., Daly, A., & Liou, Y. (2020). Improving trust, improving schools: Findings from a social network analysis of a school reform initiative. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2019-0066
  15. Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233-247.
  16. Bundy, D. A. P., de Silva, N., Horton, S., Jamison, D. T., & Patton, G. C. (2018). Disease control priorities: Child and adolescent health and development (3rd ed.). World Bank.
  17. Buyruk, H. (2020). A School Choice Experience at the Age of" Parentocracy": Impressions from a Public Primary School in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 230-247. DOI: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.16
  18. Canitez, M., Kocabaş, İ. (2020). Özel ve devlet okulu yöneticilerinin örgüt çalışanlarını motive etme becerisi. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 5(1), 191–215.
  19. Catsambis S. (1998), Expanding Knowledge of Parental Involvement In Secondary Education: Effects On High School Academic Success, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University & Howard University.
  20. Chen, Andrew. (2012). The costs of class: private schooling, parental choice, and class aspirations among Kathmandu’s working poor. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 1644. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1644
  21. Chesters, J. (2018). The marketisation of education in australia: does investment in private schooling improve post‐school outcomes?. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 53(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.38
  22. Chou, S-W., Chang, Y-C., (2008). The implementation factors that influence the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Benefit. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003
  23. Cruz, M. (2014). School discipline and parental preferences: The role of discipline policies in school selection. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 22(45), 1–25.
  24. Çallı, Y. Y. (2009). Türk anayasa hukukunda eğitim hakkı (Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  25. Çiftçi, S., Yayla, A., Sağlam, A. (2021). 21. yüzyıl becerileri bağlamında öğrenci, öğretmen ve eğitim ortamları. Rumeli’de Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24, 718–734. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.995863
  26. De Angelis, C., & Holmes Erickson, H. (2017). What leads parents to choose private schools? A comprehensive review of school choice determinants. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(7–8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2017.1396222
  27. Dearden, L., Machin, S., & Vignoles, A. (2011). The economics of private schooling. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(4), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grr030
  28. Dini, JPAU (2022). Exploration of the implementation of face-to-face learning is limited to the PAUD level during the new normal. Obsession Journal: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 6(3), 1846-1858
  29. Ergin, D.Y. (1993). Özel bir kolejde yapılan imaj araştırması. İstanbul: Kültür Koleji Yayınları.
  30. Ertuğrul, İ. (2007). Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Bir Tekstil İşletmesinde Makine Seçim Problemine Uygulanması. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 171-192.
  31. Exley, S. (2019). Selective schooling and its relationship to private tutoring: the case of south korea, Comparative Education, 56(2), 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1687230
  32. Fairlie R. W. (2006), Racial Segregation and the Private/Public School Choice, University of California, Santa Cruz.
  33. Falsey, B., B. Heyns (1984). The College Channel: Private and Public Schools Reconsidered. Socio logy of Education, 57(2): 111-122.
  34. Flatley, J. (2001). Parents’ reasons for choosing schools. Research Report RR321. Department for Education and Skills.
  35. Galab, S., Vennam, U., Komanduri, A., Benny, L., & Georgiadis, A. (2013). The impact of parental aspirations on private school enrolment: Evidence from Andhra Pradesh, India. Young Lives.
  36. Gigovic, L., Pamucar, D., Bajic, Z. Ve Milicevic, M. (2016). The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for Ammunition Depots. Sustainability, 8,372, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040372.
  37. Gill, A. S. (2017). State, market and social inequalities: A study of primary education in the Indian Punjab. Millennial Asia, 8(2), 194-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399617715826
  38. Gill, A. S., Narwana, K., Gupta, S. (2024). Investigating the determinants of private school choice: A fuzzy-AHP analysis. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2024.2393129
  39. Goldring, E., & Rowley, K. (2006). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public–private decision about school choice. Educational Policy, 20(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805284048
  40. Gurney, E. (2017). Choosing schools, choosing selves: Exploring the influence of parental identity and biography on the school choice process in Delhi, India. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 26(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2017.1279560
  41. Gürler, M. (2020). Devlet okuluyla özel okul arasındaki farklar. Kapadokya Eğitim Dergisi, 1(1), 1–6.
  42. Güven, İ. (2019). Eğitim tarihi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  43. Härmä, Joanna. (2021), Low-fee private schooling and poverty in developing countries. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  44. Hesapçıoğlu, M., Nohutçu, A. (1999). Velilerin özel okul tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler ve özel okulların reklam stratejileri, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 183-202.
  45. Jabri, L., Alrasheedi, A., Alsulaimani, R., Al-Hazzaa, H. (2021). Breakfast eating habits and lifestyle behaviors among saudi primary school children attending public versus private schools. Children, 8(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8020134
  46. James, Z., Woodhead, M. (2014). Choosing and changing schools in India’s private and government sectors: Young Lives evidence from Andhra Pradesh. Oxford Review of Education, 40(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.873527
  47. Johnson, S., & Johnson, R. (2019). Small class size and its impact on student learning outcomes. Educational Research Review, 28, 100–115.
  48. Jonathan, S. A., Rantung, P. L. R., Mandagi, D. W. (2023). Determining Factors for Parents to Choose a School: Empirical Analysis of Religious Based Private Schools. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 15(1), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.4064
  49. Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M., Crowley, M. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and population health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and later health. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2283-2290. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302630
  50. Karopady, D. D. (2014). Does school choice help rural children from disadvantaged sections? Evidence from longitudinal research in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political weekly, 46-53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24481152
  51. Kaur, S. (2017). Quality of rural education at elementary level: Evidence from Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, 58-63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44166150
  52. Kırkıç, K. A., Pulat, A. (2020). Do Primary Schools Exist Only for Academic Achievement? The School Characteristics that Affect Parents’ Private Primary School Preferences for Their Children. Research on Education and Psychology, 4(1), 20-40.
  53. Kingdon, G. (2010). The impact of the Sixth Pay Commission on teacher salaries: Assessing equity and efficiency effects. Research Consortium on Educational Outcomes and Poverty Working Paper, (29).
  54. Kingdon, G. (2010). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review. IZA Discussion Paper, 4974.
  55. Kumar, D., Choudhury, P. K. (2021). Determinants of private school choice in India: All about the family backgrounds? Journal of School Choice, 15(4), 576-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2020.1852517
  56. Kurada, K. (2022). Velilerin özel okul tercihlerinin planlı davranış teorisi bağlamında incelenmesi: Bir karma yöntem araştırması (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  57. Kurban, A. (2021). Devlet okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin çocuklarını özel okullara kayıt yaptırmasının nedenleri, Asya Öğretim Dergisi, 9(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.933354
  58. Küçükçayır, G., Cemaloğlu, N. (2017). Türkiye’de geçmişten günümüze özel okullar ve politikaları üzerine bir araştırma. 12. Uluslararası Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, 87-99.
  59. Lahoti, R., Mukhopadhyay, R. (2019). School choice in rural India: Perceptions and realities in four states. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(49), 51-57.
  60. Latuconsina, A. (2016). Religious learning model in building tolerance in school public spaces. Al-Iltizam: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 1(1), 1-12.
  61. Lavy, V. (2018). The effects of school choice on student achievement and educational outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 64, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.02.004
  62. Lee, M., Johnson, A., Cheng, A. (2024). How do parents choose schools for their children? experimental evidence from the private christian school sector. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 63(3), 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12911
  63. Li, Y. (2024). How does privilege play a role in school choice?. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 45(1), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/45/20230347
  64. Maral, M. (2022). Eğitimde özelleştirme politikaları açısından Türkiye, Çin ve Japonya’nın karşılaştırılması. The Journal of Social Science, 6(11), 60–94. https://doi.org/10.30520/tjsosci.1002451
  65. Mermertaş, M. F. (2014). Özel Eğitim Kurumlarının Tercih Nedenleri İle Öğrencilerin Memnuniyeti Arasındaki İlişki: Şırnak Örneği. Yayınlanmış yüksek lisans tezi. Türk Hava Kurumu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  66. Mohammadi, M., Mehranzadeh, A., Chekin, M. (2024). F-EVM: Improving Routing in Internet of Things Using Fuzzy MAIRCA Approach and Fuzzy Eigenvector Method. Cluster Computing, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-023-04241-1
  67. Myint, K. K. (2019). Ahp approach for choosing the best private school. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), 3(5), 1067-1071. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd26580
  68. Nabi, M., Farooq, M., Nazir, H. (2019). The role of school facilities in academic performance of students. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 1, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v1i01.5
  69. Nartgün, Ş., Kaya, A. (2016). Özel okul velilerin beklentileri doğrultusunda okul imajı oluşturma. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (2), 153-167.
  70. Narwana, K. (2015). A global approach to school education and local reality: A case study of community participation in Haryana, India. Policy Futures in Education, 13(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314568242
  71. Noor Alyani Yaacob, N., Osman, M. M., & Bachok, S. (2014). Factors influencing parents’ decision in choosing private schools. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.058
  72. OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. OECD Publishing.
  73. Orhan, M., Demirkol, M. (2025). Reasons for Parents Choosing Private Schools. Yıldız Journal of Educational Research, 10, no. 1 (2025): 29-41.
  74. Otrar, M., Kandemir, Y. (2016). Özel okullara yönelik bir tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2(1), 232-243. doi: 10.24289/ijsser.279100
  75. Pamucar, D., Vasin, L., Lukovac, V. (2014). Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA model. In Proceedings of the XVI International Scientific-expert Conference on Railways, Railcon, Niš, Serbia, 9–10 October 2014, 89–92.
  76. Peterson, P. E., & Llaudet, E. (2006). On the public-private school achievement debate. Harvard Program on Education Policy and Governance.
  77. Pesando, L., Wolf, S., Behrman, J., Tsinigo, E. (2020). Are private kindergartens really better? examining preschool choices, parental resources, and children’s school readiness in ghana. Comparative Education Review, 64(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.1086/706775
  78. Pianta, R., Ansari, A. (2018). Does attendance in private schools predict student outcomes at age 15? evidence from a longitudinal study. Educational Researcher, 47(7), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x18785632
  79. Rani, M. D. K., Sakthivel, S. (2015). Analytical Hierarchy Process–Study on its Applicability on Web Based Environment. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 9(4), 37-46.
  80. Rehman N. U, Khan, G, Triq, M., Tasleem, S. (2010), Determinants of Parents’ Choice in Selection of Private Schools for their Children in District Peshawar of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province. European Journal of Scientific Research, 44(2), 177-187.
  81. Riana, N., Syamsudin, A. Determinants of Parental School Selection for Early Childhood Education: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) Approach. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 9(3), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.14421/jga.2024.93-06
  82. Saaty, T.L., (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  83. Sayılan, F. (2007). Küreselleşme ve eğitimdeki değişim. In Küreselleşme ve eğitim (59–81). Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
  84. Sezer, E., Çakan, M. (2022). Öğretmen Kalitesi ve Çalışma Koşullarının TIMSS 2019 Matematik Başarısındaki Rolü. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 15(2), 395‑419. DOI number: http://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.971286
  85. Sinaga, RF (2017). Analysis of the dominant factors that influence the choice of private schools for high school level in Medan City. Journal of Educational Counseling FKIP-UHN, 4(1), 77-86.
  86. Singhal, K., Das, U. (2019). Revisiting the role of private schooling on children learning outcomes: evidence from rural india. South Asia Economic Journal, 20(2), 274-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1391561419853678
  87. Sirisawat, P., Kiatcharoenpol, T. (2018). “Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Aproaches to Prioritizing Solitions for Reverse Logistics Barriers”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 117(2018), 303-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.015
  88. Smith, A. (2000). School facilities and learning environments: The impact of school infrastructure on educational outcomes. Educational Facility Planner, 35(2), 23–28.
  89. Srivastava, P. (2008). The shadow institutional framework: Towards a new institutional understanding of an emerging private school sector in India. Research Papers in Education, 23(4), 451-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809783
  90. Stewart, T., & Wolf, P. (2015). The school voucher debate: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 500–528.
  91. Stumm, S., Plomin, R. (2020). Does private education make nicer people? the influence of school type on social–emotional development. British Journal of Psychology, 112(2), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12462
  92. Sullivan, A., Parsons, S., Ploubidis, G., Green, F., Wiggins, R. (2020). Pathways from origins to destinations: stability and change in the roles of cognition, private schools and educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology, 71(5), 921-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12776
  93. Şener, M. (2018). Özel okullarda işletmecilik alanında yaşanan problemler ve çözüm önerileri (Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  94. Tamim, T., Tariq, H. (2015). The intersection of caste, social exclusion and educational opportunity in rural Punjab. International Journal of Educational Development, 43, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.04.008
  95. Taşkın, P. (2010). 5580 Sayılı özel öğretim kurumları kanunu ve getirdiği yenilikler. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 4, 159-178.
  96. Toprakçı, E., Beytekin, O. F. ve Doğan, M. (2018). Yargıtayın özel öğretim kurumlarına ilişkin verdiği kararların incelenmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(19), 1781-1795.
  97. Ullah, A., Mukherjee, A. (2023). School choice decision of middle-class parents in urban india: a sociological introspection. Asian Education and Development Studies, 12(2/3), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-02-2023-0015
  98. Uygun, S. (2003). Türkiye’de dünden bugüne özel okullara bir bakış (gelişim ve etkileri). Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 36(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000083
  99. Van Laarhoven, P.J.M., W. Pedrcyz (1983). A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
  100. Van Pelt, D., Allison, P., & Allison, D. (2007). Ontario’s private schools: Who chooses them and why? Fraser Institute.
  101. Vega-Bayo, A., Mariel, P. (2018). School choice across different regions of Spain. Hacienda Pública Española, 227, 11-36. DOI: 10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.4.1
  102. Wamalwa, F., Burns, J. (2018). Private schools and student learning achievements in kenya. Economics of Education Review, 66, 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.07.004
  103. Wilkinson, R., Pickett, K., & Brown, C. (2004). Teacher quality and student outcomes in private schools. Educational Studies, 30(3), 255–268.
  104. Yaacob, NA, Osman, MM., Bachok, S. (2015). An assessment of the factors influencing parents' decision making when choosing private schools for their children: a case study in Selangor, Malaysia: for sustainable human capital. Procedia Environmental Science, 28, 406-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.050
  105. Yaacob, N. A., Osman, M. M., Bachok, S. (2014). Factors influencing parents’ decision in choosing private schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.058
  106. Yalçın, S., Demirtaşlı, R.N., İlgun, D.M., Yavuz, H.Ç. (2017). The Effect of Teacher and Student Characteristics on TIMSS 2011 Mathematics Achievement of Fourth‑ and Eighth‑Grade Students in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(3), 79‑94.
  107. Yaman, Z. (2021). Öğrenci ve ebeveynlerin özel okul tercihlerinde plasebo pazarlaması. The Journal of International Educational Sciences, 8(29), 297–307.
  108. Yang, Y., Wang, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Determinants of parental willingness to pay for private schooling. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.01.002
  109. Yenilmez A., S., Ertuğrul, İ. (2024). “Human Resources Management Application Selection With Fuzzy MAIRCA Method Based on Fuzzy PIPRECIA”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi (PIAR), 11, (1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.47097/piar.1427355
  110. Yılmaz, F. G. (2018). Eğitimde özerk-özel okullar ve farklı siyasi-ekonomik gelişmeler içinde eğitimde devletin yeni rolü. Çağdaş Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 101-118.
  111. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
  112. Zuilkowski, S. S., Piper, B., Ong’ele, S., & Kiminza, O. (2018). Parents, quality, and school choice: Why parents in Nairobi choose low-cost private schools over public schools in Kenya’s free primary education era. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 258-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1391084