KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Transportation and Logistics / 2023 / Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Evaluation of Bicycle Transportation Experiences and Bicycle Planning in Turkey, Land Use – Praxis Based Model Proposal

Hatice Gül Önder(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4794-6923
Furkan Akdemir0000-0003-0964-338X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-01-18
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It has been concluded that according to the developed model, while the activity of cycle transport planning is made in new areas, bicycle transport praxis of the residents, as in the model, should be organized in coordination with land use and in the framework of preparation> organizing>moving stages.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Today, the bicycle is one of the best-accepted means of transport modes of the world within the framework of sustainability.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The effort which governments make to make bicycle transport widespread has been formed through making plans for bicycle transportation and carrying them out in the physical environment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It has been concluded that according to the developed model, while the activity of cycle transport planning is made in new areas, bicycle transport praxis of the residents, as in the model, should be organized in coordination with land use and in the framework of preparation> organizing>moving stages.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Innovativeness · Autonomous Delivery Vehicles · Structural Equation Modeling

Abstract

Today, the bicycle is one of the best-accepted means of transport modes of the world within the framework of sustainability. The effort which governments make to make bicycle transport widespread has been formed through making plans for bicycle transportation and carrying them out in the physical environment. In this study, the lawful framework for bicycle use and its regulations in Turkey, and regulations about bicycle transport planning of some cities whose transportation master plans have been analyzed. As a result of the examinations made, the proposal of a bicycle transport planning model based on the land use-transportation-praxis trio has been improved. This proposal defines the advancement of the bicycle transportation network from immediate surroundings to farther, larger-scale land use, primarily from the praxis of bicycling of people as a hobby to more comprehensive demands in which bicycle use is needed to go to work. It has been concluded that according to the developed model, while the activity of cycle transport planning is made in new areas, bicycle transport praxis of the residents, as in the model, should be organized in coordination with land use and in the framework of preparation> organizing>moving stages.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Önder, H. G., Akdemir, F. (2024). Evaluation of Bicycle Transportation Experiences and Bicycle Planning in Turkey, Land Use – Praxis Based Model Proposal. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, Volume: 8 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2023.1316181

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (48)

  1. Akı, M. (2018). Belediyeler için Bisikletli Ulaşımın Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Yol Haritası Çalıştayı Sonuç Raporu (Hazırlayan: WRI Ross Sürdürülebilir Şehirler Merkezi), Yaşanabilir Şehirler Sempozyumu, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul. google scholar
  2. Bisiklet Yolları Yönetmeliği, (2019). https://mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=34025&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  3. Boisjoly, G., and Yengoh, G. T. (2017). Opening the Door to Social Equity: Local and Participatory Approaches to Transportation Planning in Montreal. European Transport Research Review, 9(3), 1-21. google scholar
  4. Cervero, R., Denman, S., & Jin, Y. (2019). Network design, built and natural environments, and bicycle commuting: Evidence from British cities and towns. Transport policy, 74, 153-164. google scholar
  5. Clemente, A. A. (2020). Bicycle paths as a contribution to urban resilience in high-density areas. UPLanD-Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & environmental Design, 5(1), 93-110. google scholar
  6. Eric J. Miller (2018) Accessibility: Measurement And Application in Transportation Planning, Transport Reviews, 38:5, 551-555, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1492778 google scholar
  7. Fishman, E. (2016). Bikeshare: A review of recent literature. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 92-113. google scholar
  8. Gatersleben, B., & Haddad, H. (2010). Who is the typical bicyclist?. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 13(1),41-48. google scholar
  9. Gössling, S. Schröder. M. Spath, P. and Freytag, T. (2016) Urban Space Distribution and Sustainable Transport, Transport Reviews, 36:5, 659-679, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1147101 google scholar Hickman, R., & Banister, D. (2014). Transport, climate change and the city. Abingdon: Routledge. google scholar
  10. Karpinski, E. (2021). Estimating the effect of protected bike lanes on bike-share ridership in Boston: a case study on Commonwealth Avenue. Case studies on transport policy, 9(3), 1313-1323. google scholar
  11. İmar Kanunu, (1985). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.3194.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 22 Nisan 2020) google scholar
  12. Karayolları Trafik Kanunu, (1983). http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2918.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  13. Karayolları Trafik Yönetmeliği, (1997). https://mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=8182&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  14. Koglin, T. (2015). Velomobility and the Politics of Transport Planning. GeoJournal 80, 569-586 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9565-7 google scholar
  15. Larsen, J. (2017). The making of a pro-cycling city: Social practices and bicycle mobilities. Environment and planning A, 49(4), 876-892. google scholar
  16. Lovelace, R., Goodman, A., Aldred, R., Berkoff, N., Abbas, A., & Woodcock, J. (2017). The Propensity to Cycle Tool: An Open Source Online System for Sustainable Transport Planning. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 505-528. google scholar
  17. Li, Z., Wang, W., Yang, C., & Ragland, D. R. (2013). Bicycle commuting market analysis using attitudinal market segmentation approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 47, 56-68. google scholar
  18. Mateo-Babiano, I., Bean, R., Corcoran, J., & Pojani, D. (2016). How does our natural and built environment affect the use of bicycle sharing?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 295-307. google scholar
  19. Mekânsal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği, (2014). http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/06/20140614-2.htm (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  20. Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Basagana, X., Cirach, M., Cole-Hunter, T., Dadvand, P., et Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2017). Health Impacts Related To Urban And Transport Planning: A Burden of Disease Assessment. Environment International, 107, 243-257. google scholar
  21. Noyes, P., Fung, L., Lee, K. K., Grimshaw, V. E., Karpati, A., et DiGrande, L. (2014). Cycling İn The City: An İn-Depth Examination Of Bicycle Lane Use İn A Low-İncome Urban Neighborhood. Journal of physical activity and health, 11(1), 1-9. google scholar
  22. Otopark Yönetmeliği, (2018). https://mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=24408&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  23. Planlı Alanlar İmar Yönetmeliği, (2017). https://mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=23722&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 (Erişim tarihi:21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  24. Piwek, L., Joinson, A., & Morvan, J. (2015). The use of self-monitoring solutions amongst cyclists: An online survey and empirical study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 126-136. google scholar
  25. Sayyadi, R., & Awasthi, A. (2018). A simulation-based optimisation approach for identifying key determinants for sustainable transportation planning. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 5(2), 161-174. google scholar
  26. Şehir İçi Yollarda Bisiklet Yolları, Bisiklet İstasyonları ve Bisiklet Park Yerleri Tasarımına ve Yapımına Dair Yönetmelik (2015). http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/11/20151103-1.htm (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  27. T.C. Bayındırlık ve İskân Bakanlığı (2009). Kentleşme Şurası 2009: Kentsel Teknik Altyapı ve Ulaşım Komisyonu Raporu. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/kentges/editordosya/kitap2.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  28. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı 100 Günlük İcraat Programı (2018). https://www.tccb.gov.tr/assets/dosya/100_GUNLUK_ICRAAT_PROGRAMI.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (2017). Şehir İçi Bisiklet Yolları Kılavuzu, İstanbul: Alpar Matbaa. google scholar
  29. T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2013). Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018). http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Onuncu-Kalk%C4%B1nma-Plan%C4%B1-2014-2018.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 13 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  30. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı (2015). Fiziksel Aktiviteyi Teşvik Projesi 2015-2018, Basın Açıklaması, https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,3459/fiziksel-aktiviteyi-tesvik-projesi-2015-2018-18052015.html (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  31. T.C. Ulaştırma Bakanlığı (2011). Türkiye 2023 Ulaşım ve İletişim Stratejisi Hedef 2023, http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPTemelBelge/files/93C5Y+Turkiye_Ulasim_veIletisim_Stratejisi.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 20 Mayıs 2021) google scholar
  32. Ulaşımda Enerji Verimliliğinin Artırılmasına İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar Hakkında Yönetmelik, (2019). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/05/20190502-5.htm (Erişim tarihi: 22 Nisan 2020) google scholar
  33. Vigar, G. (2017). The four knowledges of transport planning: Enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making. Transport Policy, 58, 39-45. google scholar Woods, R., and Masthoff, J. (2017). A comparison of car driving, public transport and cycling experiences in three European cities. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 103, 211-222. google scholar
  34. Zhao, J., Fan, W., & Zhai, X. (2020). Identification of land-use characteristics using bicycle sharing data: A deep learning approach. Journal of google scholar
  35. Zhao, Y., Ke, S., Lin, Q., & Yu, Y. (2020). Impact of land use on bicycle usage. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 13(1), 299-316. google scholar
  36. 29 Eylül 2010 tarih ve 27714 sayılı Resmi Gazetede yayınlanan Genelge (2010). https://resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2010/09/20100929-5.htm (Erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2020) google scholar
  37. 12 Aralık 2019 tarih ve 30976 sayılı Resmi Gazetede yayınlanan Bisiklet Yolları Yönetmeliği (2019). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/12/20191212-1.htm (Erişim tarihi: 20 Mayıs 2021) google scholar
  38. Antalya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2013). Antalya Kent İçi Ulaşım Ana Planı Rapor-5 Yönetici Özeti, Antalya. google scholar
  39. Erzurum Büyükşehir Belediyesi- Boğaziçi Proje Mühendislik A.Ş. (2013). Erzurum Ulaşım Ana Planı, Erzurum, Erzurum Büyükşehir Belediyesi. google scholar
  40. Gazi Üniversitesi AUAP Ofisi - Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2013). Ankara UAP - Ankara Metropoliten Alanı ve Yakın Çevresi Ulaşım Ana Planı 2013, Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi AUAP Ofisi - Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi. google scholar
  41. Gazi Üniversitesi KUTEM - Rize Belediyesi. (2018). Rize Ulaşım Ana Planı 2018, Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi KUTEM - Rize Belediyesi. google scholar
  42. Gazi Üniversitesi KUTEM - Erzincan Belediyesi. (2017), Erzincan Ulaşım Ana Planı 2017. Erzincan, Erzincan Belediyesi. google scholar
  43. Malatya Büyükşehir Belediyesi-Altyapı Mühendislik Ltd. (2017). Malatya Ulaşım Ana Planı Raporu 2017, Malatya Büyükşehir Belediyesi Ulaşım Dairesi Başkanlığı. google scholar
  44. Mersin Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016). Mersin Ulaşım Ana Planı Sonuç Raporu 4/6, Mersin Büyükşehir Belediyesi-Boğaziçi Proje Mühendislik A.Ş., Mersin Büyükşehir Belediyesi Ulaşım Daire Başkanlığı Mersin. google scholar
  45. İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2011). İstanbul Metropoliten Alanı Kentsel Ulaşım Ana Planı, İstanbul, İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Ulaşım Daire Başkanlığı Ulaşım Planlama Müdürlüğü. google scholar
  46. İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi-Boğaziçi Proje Mühendislik A.Ş. (2017) Ulaşım Planı İzmir (UPİ) 2030 İzmir, İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi google scholar
  47. Muğla Büyükşehir Belediyesi-UlaşımArt Ltd.- Plan Ofis Ulaşım Planlama Ltd. Şti. (2018) Muğla Ulaşım Ana Planı, Muğla, Muğla Büyükşehir Belediyesi. google scholar
  48. Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi - Mescioğlu Mühendislik Müşavirlik A.Ş. (2011). Sakarya Ulaşım Ana Planı (2011-2023). Sakarya, Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi. google scholar