Dergiler / Journal of Transportation and Logistics / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 1

İş Birliği ve Rekabet İkilemi: Rekabetçi İş Birliğinin Firmaların Rekabetçi Davranışlarına Etkisi

The Cooperation and Competition Dilemma: The Impact of Coopetition on Firms’ Competitive Behaviors

Rukiye Sönmez(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3262-9896
Umut Eroğlu(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3102-1763
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-05-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Rekabetçi iş birliği anlaşmalarının kapsamının genişletilmesi, hamle repertuarlarının çeşitliliğini etkileyerek rekabetçi davranışı arttırdığı görülmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Rekabetçi iş birliği hem literatürde hem de uygulamada artan ilgiye sahiptir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ancak şiddetli rekabet ortamında rakiplerle iş birliği gerçekleştirmek firmaları tedirgin etmekte ve strateji arayışına yöneltmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Rekabetçi iş birliği anlaşmalarının kapsamının genişletilmesi, hamle repertuarlarının çeşitliliğini etkileyerek rekabetçi davranışı arttırdığı görülmektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Competitive Dynamics · Competitive Behavior · Competitive Move

Özet

Rekabetçi iş birliği hem literatürde hem de uygulamada artan ilgiye sahiptir. Ancak şiddetli rekabet ortamında rakiplerle iş birliği gerçekleştirmek firmaları tedirgin etmekte ve strateji arayışına yöneltmektedir. Bu nedenle bu araştırmada, aynı rekabetçi iş birliği ağında yer alan firmaların rakipleriyle aynı anda hem iş birliği içerisinde olmasının hem de rekabet etmesinin rekabetçi davranışlarını etkileyip etkilemediğini araştırılmaktadır. Araştırmada öncelikle rekabet boyutu için rekabetçi davranışı belirleyebilmek amacıyla rekabetçi hamlelere odaklanılmış. Ardından iş birliği boyutunu için rakip firmaların birbirleriyle oluşturdukları iş birliklerine ve sektör içerisinde bu iş birliklerinden oluşan rekabetçi iş birliği ağına odaklanılmıştır. Türk havayolu sektörü, bu araştırmada örneklem olarak seçilmiştir. Rekabetçi hamle ve rekabetçi iş birliklerine yönelik verilerin elde edilmesinde yapılandırılmış içerik analizi ile kodlama yapılmıştır. Kodlanan verilen nicelleştirilerek regresyon analizi ile analiz edildiğinde firmaların, rekabetçi iş birliği ilişkilerinin özelliklerinden ve yapısından yola çıkarak rekabetçi davranışların öngörülebileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Rekabetçi iş birliği ağı içerisinde yapısal özelliklerden firmanın merkeziliği arttıkça rekabetçiliği de artmakta iken yapısal özerkliği ve bağlarının gücü arttıkça rekabetçiliği gerilemektedir. Firmaların rekabetçi iş birliği ilişkilerinin özelliklerinde pazar örtüşümü artıkça firma agresifliği ve hamle repertuarı çeşitliliği artmaktadır. Rekabetçi iş birliği anlaşmalarının kapsamının genişletilmesi, hamle repertuarlarının çeşitliliğini etkileyerek rekabetçi davranışı arttırdığı görülmektedir.

Abstract

Co-opetition has received increasing attention both in literature and practice. This study explores how simultaneous collaboration and competition with rivals affect the competitive behavior of firms in the same co-opetition network. The study first focuses on competitive moves to identify competitive behavior for the competition dimension. Then, it focuses on the collaborations that competitors form with each other for the cooperation dimension and the co-opetition network formed by collaborations within the sector. The sample of the study is the firms operating in the Turkish airline sector. Data on moves and collaborations were collected through structured content analysis using explicit and implicit coding techniques and analyzed using OLS regression. As a result, competitive behaviors can be predicted based on the characteristics and structure of firms’ co-opetitive relationships. Among the structural characteristics of the co-opetition network, as the centrality of the firm increases, its competitiveness increases, while its competitiveness decreases as its structural autonomy and the strength of its ties increase. In terms of the characteristics of firms’ co-opetitive relationships, as market overlap increases, firm aggressiveness and the diversity of its repertoire of moves increase. Expanding the scope of co-opetition agreements also increases competitive behavior by affecting the diversity of move repertoires.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sönmez, R., Eroğlu, U. (2026). İş Birliği ve Rekabet İkilemi: Rekabetçi İş Birliğinin Firmaların Rekabetçi Davranışlarına Etkisi. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, Volume: 11 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2026.1174848

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (95)

  1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455. google scholar
  2. Albers, S., & Schweiger, B. (2011). Network-based competition – antecedents, forms, and research implications, 5th International Conference on Economics and Management of Networks, December 1-3, Limassol, Cyprus. google scholar
  3. Aldemir, H.Ö. (2018). Türkiye’deki charter/tarifesiz havayollarının rekabet yaklaşımının Miles ve Snow’un rekabet tipolojisine göre incelenmesi, Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 3(1), 1-12. google scholar
  4. Arranz, N. & Arroyabe, J. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of spanish firms, Technovation, 28, 88-100. google scholar
  5. Arun Kumar, T. V., & Manikandan, K. S. (2024). Business group affiliation and competitive repertoire. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 477-505. google scholar
  6. Aslan, Z. (2005). Türk firmalarının iş ilişkileri: Ostim örneği, Başkent Üniversitesi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara. google scholar
  7. BarNir, A. & Smith, K.A. (2002). Interfirm alliances in small business: The role of social networks, Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 219-232. google scholar
  8. Baum, J.A.C. & Korn, H.J. (1996). Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry, Academy of Management Journal, 39.2, 255-291. google scholar
  9. Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. (1999). Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 14(3), 178-194. google scholar
  10. Bleeke, J. & Ernts, D. (2003). Sınır ötesi ittifaklarda kazançlı çıkmanın yolu, (Çev: Ahmet Kardam), Harvard Business Review Dergisinden Seçmeler, MESS Yayınları, Ankara. google scholar
  11. Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S. & Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 577-601. google scholar
  12. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. google scholar
  13. Carnes, C.M., Xu, K., Sirmon, D. G., Karadag, R. (2019). How competitive action mediates the resource slack–performance relationship: A meta-analytic approach, Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 57-90. google scholar
  14. Chen, M.J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration, Academy of Management Review, 21, 100-134. google scholar
  15. Chen, M.J., Kuo-Hsien, S.U. & Tsai, W. (2007). Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 101-118. google scholar
  16. Chen, M-J. & MacMillan, C.I., (1992). nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility, Academy of Management Journal, 35.3, 539-570. google scholar
  17. Chen, M-J. & Miller, D. (1994). Competitive attack, retaliation, and performance: An expectancy-valence framework, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 85-102. google scholar
  18. Chen, M-J. & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform, Academy of Management Annals, 6.1,1-89. google scholar
  19. Chen, M.J., Smith K.G. & Grimm, C.M. (1992). Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses, Management Science, 38, 439-455. google scholar
  20. Child, J., Faulkner, D. & Tallman, S. B. (2005). Cooperative strategy, Oxford University Press, New York. google scholar
  21. Cho, J. (2024). Thriving in the global competitive landscape: Competitive dynamics and longevity of emerging market firms. Asian Business & Management, 23(1), 82-109. google scholar
  22. Codal,K.S. & Güner, S. (2022). Exploring the sources of centrality in the Turkish domestic airport network. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 7(2), 199-212. google scholar
  23. Contractor, F.J., & Lorange, P. (1988). Cooperative strategies international business, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. İçerisinde Hassan, A., Chrisman, J.J., & Mohamed, F. 2010. Horizontal alliances and competitive aggressiveness: An embeddedness approach, Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 17.3, 240-252. google scholar
  24. Crick, J. M., & Crick, D. (2021). The yin and yang nature of coopetition activities: non-linear effects and the moderating role of competitive intensity for internationalised firms, International Marketing Review, 38(4), 690-716. google scholar
  25. Culpan, R. (2002). Global business alliances: Theory and practice, Quorum Books, Westport, Connecticut, London. google scholar
  26. Czakon, W., Srivastava, M. K., Le Roy, F., & Gnyawali, D. (2020). Coopetition strategies: Critical issues and research directions, Long Range Planning, 53 (1). google scholar
  27. Çırpın, B.K. & Kurt, D. (2016). Havayolu taşımacılığında hizmet kalitesi ölçümü. Journal of Transportation and Logistics,1, 83-98. google scholar
  28. Dagnino G.B. & Minà A. (2021). Unraveling the philosophical foundations of co-opetition strategy, Management and Organization Review, 17(3), 490-523. google scholar
  29. D'aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering, Free Press, New York. google scholar
  30. Domke-Damonte, D. j. (1998). An investigation of antecedents and outcomes of cooperative and competitive strategic repertoire: The case of the commercial airline industry, Unpublished Dissertation, The Florida State University, Florida. google scholar
  31. Ferrier, W. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 858-877. google scholar
  32. Ferrier, W. J. & Lee, H. (2002). Strategic aggressiveness, variation, and surprise: How the sequential pattern of competitive rivalry influences stock market returns, Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(2), 162-180. google scholar
  33. Ferrier, W. J.; Fhionnlaoich, C. M., Smith, K. G. & Grimm, C. M. (2002). The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: a reconciliation of conflicting views, Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(4‐5), 301-316. google scholar
  34. Ferrier, W.J., Smith K.G. & Grimm, C.M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers, Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 372-388. google scholar
  35. Garraffo, F.M. & Siregar, S.L. (2022), Coopetition among competitors in global industries: Drivers that lead to coopetitive agreements, Competitiveness Review, 32(3), 428-454. google scholar
  36. Gimeno, J. (2004). Competition within and between networks: The contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 820-842. google scholar
  37. Gimeno, J., & Woo, C.Y. (1996). Hypercompetition in a multimarket environment: The role of strategic similarity and multimarket contact in competitive de-escalation, Organization Science, 7(3), 322-341. google scholar
  38. Gnyawali, D. R. & Madhavan, R. (2011). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective, The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431-445. google scholar
  39. Gnyawali, D.R. & Charleton, T. R. (2018). Nuances in the interplay of competition and cooperation: Towards a theory of coopetition, Journal of Management, 44(7), 2511-2534. google scholar
  40. Gnyawali, D.R., He, J.ve Madhavan, R. (2006). Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: An empirical examination, Journal of Management, 32(4), 507-530. google scholar
  41. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. google scholar
  42. Gueguen, G. (2009). Coopetition in business ecosystems in the information technology sector: The example of intelligent mobile terminals, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8, 135-153. google scholar
  43. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203-215. google scholar
  44. Gulati, R.N. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619-652. google scholar
  45. Hassan, A., Chrisman, J.J. & Mohamed, F. (2010). Horizontal alliances and competitive aggressiveness: An embeddedness approach, Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 17(3), 240-252. google scholar
  46. Hassan, A.M. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of competitive aggressiveness: An embeddedness perspective, Unpublished Dissertation, Mississippi State University. google scholar
  47. Hossain, L. (2009). Effect of organisational position and network centrality on project coordination, International Journal of Project Management, 27, 680-689. google scholar
  48. Inkpen A.C., & Tsang E.W.K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer, The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165. google scholar
  49. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A. & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 28(3), 413-446. google scholar
  50. Jack, S. L. (2005). The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis, Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1233-1259. google scholar
  51. Jayachandran, S., Gimeno, J. & Varadarajan, P. R. (1999). The theory of multimarket competition: A synthesis and implications for marketing strategy. The Journal of Marketing, 49-66. google scholar
  52. Kim, K.H. (2020), Coopetition: Complexity of cooperation and competition in dyadic and triadic relationships, Organizational Dynamics, 49(2). google scholar
  53. Köker, A. R. (2008). Örgütlerarası ağların yenilik derecesi üzerindeki etkileri: OSTİM ve Ankara organize sanayi bölgelerinde bir çalışma, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara. google scholar
  54. Köseoğlu, M.A., Yildiz, M., Okumus, F., & Barca, M. (2019). The intellectual structure of coopetition: past, present and future. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(1), 2-29. google scholar
  55. Larrañeta, B., Molina-Morales, F. X., & Herrero, I. (2020). Centrality in networks of geographically proximate firms and competitive capabilities, Business Research Quarterly, 23(4), 254-269. google scholar
  56. Larrañeta, B., Zahra, S.A., & González, J.L.G. (2014). Strategic repertoire variety and new venture growth: The moderating effects of origin and industry dynamism, Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 761-772. google scholar
  57. Lei, D. & Slocum, J. W. (1992). Global strategy, competence- building and strategic alliances, California Management Review, 35(1), 81-97. google scholar
  58. Lin, W. L., Mohamed, A. B., Sambasivan, M., & Yip, N. (2020). Effect of green innovation strategy on firm‐idiosyncratic risk: A competitive action perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 886-901. google scholar
  59. Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition, Journal of World Business, 42, 129-144. google scholar
  60. Madhavan, R., Koka, B.R., & Prescott, J.E. (1998). Networks in transition: How industry events(re) shape interfirm relationships, Strategic Management Journal, 439-459. google scholar
  61. Moura, F.H.S., Caetano, M. & Severino, M.R. (2020). Airport competitiveness analysis from aircraft and passenger movement. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 5(2), 143-157. google scholar
  62. McEvily, B. & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133. google scholar
  63. Miller, D. & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 419-439. google scholar
  64. Minà, A., Dagnino, G. B., & Vagnani, G. (2020). An interpretive framework of the interplay of competition and cooperation. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(1), 1-35. google scholar
  65. Nohria, N., & Garcia‐Pont, C. (1991). Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 105-124. google scholar
  66. Ólafsdóttir, B., Kristjánsdóttir, E. S., & Freeman, S. (2024). Paradoxical tensions at multiple levels: A model of unbalanced supranational coopetition. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 40(4), 101365. google scholar
  67. Özkan, T. & Ağ, A. (2021). Corporate sustainability performance assessment: CRITIC-ARAS integrated model. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(42). google scholar
  68. Park, S. H. & Russo, M. V. (1996). When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure, Management Science, 42, 875-890. google scholar
  69. Pegels, C. C., Song, Y. I., & Yang, B. (2000). Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 911-923. google scholar
  70. Pellegrini, M.M., Caputo, A. & Matthews, L. (2019), Knowledge transfer within relationship portfolios: the creation of knowledge recombination rents, Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 202-218. google scholar
  71. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 116-145. google scholar
  72. Prahalad, C. K. & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance, Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485-501. google scholar
  73. Provan, K. G., Fish, A. & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks, Journal of Management, 33(3), 479-516. google scholar
  74. Ricciardi, F., Zardini, A., Czakon, W., Rossignoli, C. & Kraus, S. (2021), Revisiting the cooperation-competition paradox: A configurational approach to short- and long-term coopetition performance in business networks, European Management Journal. google scholar
  75. Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy-when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance, British Journal of Management, 23, 307-324. google scholar
  76. Rodríguez, A., Alcalde‐Heras, H., & Iñigo, E. A. (2024). Exploring coopetition and value‐based networks in business models for sustainability-A case study of the specialty coffee industry in Colombia. Business Strategy and the Environment. google scholar
  77. Sanou, F. H., Roy, F. L. & Gnyawali, D. R. (2016). How does centrality in coopetition networks matter? An empirical investigation in the mobile telephone industry. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 143-160. google scholar
  78. Shamout, M. D. (2023). A configural model of analytics capabilities, ambidexterity, co‐opetition, and firm performance in the supply chain context. Business Strategy & Development, 6(2), 128-139. google scholar
  79. Soda, G., Tortoriello, M., & Iorio, A. (2018). Harvesting value from brokerage: Individual strategic orientation, structural holes, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 896-918. google scholar
  80. Song, Y. II. (1997). An investigation on the patterns of strategic interactions and competitive dynamics in the airline industry: A strategic interaction perspective, Unpublished Dissertation, State University of New York. google scholar
  81. Sönmez, R. (2016). İşbirlikçi rekabet ağı içerisinde firmaların rekabetçi davranışları, Marmara Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10, 1-23. google scholar
  82. Sönmez, R. & Eroğlu, U. (2014). Rekabetçi çevrede rekabetçi hamlelerin özellikleri ve misillemenin belirlenebilirliği üzerine bir araştırma, 23. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi. Muğla, 270-272. google scholar
  83. Sönmez, R. & Eroğlu, U. (2018). Firmalar arası rekabetçi etkileşim: Rekabetçi hamlelerin özellikleri ve misilleme arasındaki ilişki, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13 (1-2), 41-69. google scholar
  84. Sönmez, R. & Eroğlu, U. (2021). Havayolu sektöründe rekabetçi hamlelerin belirlenmesi: Sektöre özgü bir tipoloji önerisi, Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(1), 52-69. google scholar
  85. Sönmez, R., Düzgün, A. & Ön, E. (2023). The impact of a firm's business model change on its competitiveness: From atlasjet to atlasglobal, Alanya Akademik Bakış, 7(2), 721-739. google scholar
  86. Sözen, H. C. (2009). Örgütsel öğrenme, değişim ve sosyal ağ düzenekleri, (Der. Varoğlu AK. & Basım N.), Örgütsel Değişim ve Öğrenme, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara. google scholar
  87. Sözen, H.C. (2007). Bağlam kapsamında örgütler arası ağ düzenekleri: Dayanıklı ev aletleri sektörü örneği, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara. google scholar
  88. Steinberg, P. J., Hennig, J. C., Oehmichen, J., & Heigermoser, J. (2023). How the country context shapes firms' competitive repertoire complexity. Global Strategy Journal, 13(3), 552-580. google scholar
  89. Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L., & Fombrun C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507-519. google scholar
  90. Toh, P.K., & Polidoro, F. (2013). A competition-based explanation of collaborative invention within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1186-1208. google scholar
  91. Yan, Y., & Guan, J. (2018). Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 244-258. google scholar
  92. Yao, F. K., Chen, M. J., Li, J., Combs, D., & Li, Q. (2024). A review of 50 years of research since Knickerbocker (1973): Competitive dynamics in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-29. google scholar
  93. Young, G., Smith, K.G. & Grimm, C.M. (1996). Austrian and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance, Organization Science, 7(3), 243-254. google scholar
  94. Zhang, L., Li, S., Xue, J., Yang, W., & Li, Y. (2024). How does channel network coopetition behaviors affect transaction specific investment? The moderating roles of contract type and dependence asymmetry. Industrial Marketing Management, 118, 126-135. google scholar
  95. Zhang, J.J., Yan, Y. & Guan, J.C. (2019), Recombinant distance, network governance and recombinant innovation, Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 143(6), 260-272. google scholar