KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Transportation and Logistics / 2024 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Effects of the Maritime Silk Road on Port Development along the Route of Belt and Road Initiative

Mehmet Serdar Çelik(BANDIRMA ONYEDI EYLUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF MARITIME)0000-0001-5971-9405
Demir Ali Akyar(BANDIRMA ONYEDI EYLUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF MARITIME)0000-0003-3853-0042
Bulut Ozan Ceylan(BANDIRMA ONYEDI EYLUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF MARITIME)0000-0003-1182-3566
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-11-19
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Through an analysis of port ownership patterns, recent investment flows, current political climates, and the extent of MSR’s involvement, this report provides a detailed perspective on the marine aspect of China’s overarching goal.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a comprehensive strategy devised by the Chinese government to promote global connectivity through multiple pathways.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The ports situated along the MSR are not only infrastructural institutions; rather, they play a crucial role in facilitating commerce, fostering economic development, shaping geopolitical strategies, and facilitating cultural interchange.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Through an analysis of port ownership patterns, recent investment flows, current political climates, and the extent of MSR’s involvement, this report provides a detailed perspective on the marine aspect of China’s overarching goal.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Maritime Transportation · Port Development · Port infrastructure

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a comprehensive strategy devised by the Chinese government to promote global connectivity through multiple pathways. The Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) is primarily concerned with establishing land-based links that stretch across continents. In contrast, the Maritime Silk Road (MSR) is focussed on creating sea-based corridors that connect different maritime hubs. The ports situated along the MSR are not only infrastructural institutions; rather, they play a crucial role in facilitating commerce, fostering economic development, shaping geopolitical strategies, and facilitating cultural interchange. The objective of this research is to not only delineate the existing nodes and ports comprising the MSR but also ascertain prospective sites that might be smoothly included into this maritime infrastructure. A comprehensive comprehension of MSR necessitates an evaluation of the perspectives held by various international stakeholders. The basis of this study is a comprehensive literature analysis that aimed to analyse the development of ports inside the MSR framework since its establishment in 2013. Despite the significance of the programme, there is a notable scarcity of comprehensive studies that expressly examine port involvement in MSR. The existence of this gap serves to highlight the originality and uniqueness of our study. Through an analysis of port ownership patterns, recent investment flows, current political climates, and the extent of MSR’s involvement, this report provides a detailed perspective on the marine aspect of China’s overarching goal.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çelik, M. S., Akyar, D. A., Ceylan, B. O. (2024). Effects of the Maritime Silk Road on Port Development along the Route of Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2024.1384502

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (70)

  1. Ahmed, Z. S. (2019). Impact of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor on nation-building in Pakistan. Journal of Contemporary China, 28(117), 400-414. google scholar
  2. Akyar, D. A., Celik, M. S., & Ceylan, B. O. (2023). Global terminal operators: a competitive strategic position analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 1-19. google scholar
  3. Baker, S., Frank, G., Cornett, A., Williamson, D., & Kingery, D. (2016). Physical modelling and design optimizations for a new container terminal at the port of Moin, Costa Rica. In Ports 2016 (pp. 560-569). google scholar
  4. Barnes, P., Bateman, S., Behm, A., Benich, P., Bergin, A., Cronin, P.,. & Zhang, F. (2015). Chinese investment in the Port of Darwin. google scholar
  5. Barton, B. (2021). Agency and autonomy in the Maritime Silk Road Initiative: An examination of Djibouti’s Doraleh container terminal disputes. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 14(3), 353-380. google scholar
  6. Blanchard, J. M. F. (2017). Probing China’s twenty-first-century maritime silk road initiative (MSRI): an examination of MSRI narratives. Geopolitics, 22(2), 246-268. google scholar
  7. Blanchard, J. M. F., & Flint, C. (2017). The geopolitics of China’s maritime silk road initiative. Geopolitics, 22(2), 223-245. google scholar
  8. Celik, M. S. (2023). Determining maritime silk road strategies for ports along the route of belt and road initiative: A case of eastern Aegean ports. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 51, 101056. google scholar
  9. ÇELIK, M. S., & ÇAYLAN, D. Ö. (2021). Systematic literature review of 21st century maritime silk road: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 19(3), 35-57. google scholar
  10. Çelik, M. S., Akyar, D. A., & Ceylan, B. O. (2022). Bir kuşak bir yol projesinin ortaya çıkışındaki ana etmenler: Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti (ÇHC) bakış açısı. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 32(3), 1125-1139. google scholar
  11. Ceylan, B. O. (2023). Shipboard compressor system risk analysis by using rule-based fuzzy FMEA for preventing major marine accidents. Ocean Engineering, 272, 113888. google scholar
  12. Ceyhan, S., Kamacı, A., & Peçe, M. A. (2017). Filyos liman projesinin kruvaziyer gemi turizmi açısından değerlendirilmesi ve bölge ekonomisine katkısı. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(13), 271-283. google scholar
  13. Chan, M. H. T. (2018). The belt and road initiative-the new silk road: a research agenda. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 7(2), 104-123. google scholar
  14. Chan, Y. K. (2018). Cultural Heritage on China’s 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road: The Case of Guangdong Province. China Report, 54(2), 159-174. google scholar
  15. Chaziza, M. (2018). The Chinese Maritime Silk Road Initiative: The Role of the Mediterranean. Mediterranean Quarterly, 29(2), 54-69. google scholar
  16. Chung, C. P. (2018). What are the strategic and economic implications for South Asia of China’s Maritime Silk Road initiative?. The Pacific Review, 31(3), 315-332. google scholar
  17. Clemens, M. (2015). The Maritime Silk Road and the PLA. China Brief, 15(6), 7-10. google scholar
  18. Dave, B., & Kobayashi, Y. (2018). China’s silk road economic belt initiative in Central Asia: economic and security implications. Asia Europe Journal, 16, 267-281. google scholar
  19. De Langen, P. W., & Heij, C. (2014). Corporatisation and performance: A literature review and an analysis of the performance effects of the corporatisation of port of Rotterdam authority. Transport Reviews, 34(3), 396-414. google scholar
  20. Duchâtel, M., & Duplaix, A. S. (2018). Blue China: Navigating the maritime silk road to Europe. Policy Brief, 34. google scholar
  21. Gekara, V. O., & Chhetri, P. (2013). Upstream transport corridor inefficiencies and the implications for port performance: a case analysis of Mombasa Port and the Northern Corridor. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(6), 559-573. google scholar
  22. Ghiasy, R., Su, F., & Saalman, L. (2018). the 21 Century maritime silk road-security implications and ways forward for the European Union. google scholar
  23. Gholizadeh, A., Madani, S., & Saneinia, S. (2020). A geoeconomic and geopolitical review of Gwadar Port on belt and road initiative. Maritime Business Review, 5(4), 335-349. google scholar
  24. Guan, K. C. (2016). The maritime silk road: history of an idea. Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre Working Paper, (23). google scholar
  25. Gurmeet, K. (2018). Pakistan’s Gwadar Port: A New Naval Base in China’s String of Pearls in the Indo-Pacific. CSIS Briefs, March (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2018), 1-5. google scholar
  26. Günay, E., Çetiner, S., Sevinç, S., & Kütükçü, E. (2019). Tarihi İpek Yolundan Modern İpek Yolu Projesine: Türkiye-Çin Ekonomik İşbirliği Çerçevesinde Orta Koridor ile Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 157-175. google scholar
  27. Haralambides, H. E., & Merk, O. (2020). china’s ‘belt and road initiative’and global maritime trade flows. In International Association of Maritime Economists Conference. google scholar
  28. Hillman, J. 2018. “How Big Is China’s Belt and Road?” Blog post, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC. https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-bigchinas-belt-and-road, (04.09.2020). google scholar
  29. Huang, T., Chen, Z., Wang, S., & Jiang, D. (2021). Efficiency evaluation of key ports along the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road based on the DEA-SCOR model. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(3), 378-390. google scholar
  30. Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China’s Belt & Road initiative: motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review, 40, 314-321. google scholar
  31. Hughes, A. C., Lechner, A. M., Chitov, A., Horstmann, A., Hinsley, A., Tritto, A.,. & Douglas, W. Y. (2020). Horizon scan of the belt and road initiative. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(7), 583-593. google scholar
  32. Jiang, B., Li, J., & Gong, C. (2018). Maritime shipping and export trade on “Maritime Silk Road”. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(2), 83-90. google scholar
  33. Jiang, M., Lu, J., Yang, Z., & Li, J. (2020). Risk analysis of maritime accidents along the main route of the Maritime Silk Road: a Bayesian network approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(6), 815-832. google scholar
  34. Johnston, L. A. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative: what is in it for China?. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 6(1), 40-58. google scholar
  35. Karlı, H., Karlı, R. G. Ö., & Çelikyay, S. (2021). Fuzzy AHP Approach to The Determinatıon of Smart Port Dimensions: A Case Study on Filyos Port. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 9(1), 322-336. google scholar
  36. Kavirathna, C. A., Hanaoka, S., Kawasaki, T., & Shimada, T. (2021). Port development and competition between the Colombo and Hambantota ports in Sri Lanka. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(1), 200-211. google scholar
  37. Lai, K. P., Lin, S., & Sidaway, J. D. (2020). Financing the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): research agendas beyond the “debt-trap” discourse. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(2), 109-124. google scholar
  38. Lam, J. S. L., Cullinane, K. P. B., & Lee, P. T. W. (2018). The 21st-century Maritime Silk Road: challenges and opportunities for transport management and practice. Transport reviews, 38(4), 413-415. google scholar
  39. LehmanBrown International Accountants (LBIA). (2017). The Belt and Road Initiative. google scholar
  40. Len, C. (2015). China’s 21st Century Maritime Silk Road initiative, energy security and SLOC access. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 11(1), 1-18. google scholar
  41. Len, C. (2017). China’s Maritime Silk Road and Energy Geopolitics in the Indian Ocean: Motivations and Implications for the Region. Asia’s Energy Security and China’s Belt and Road Initiative, 41-53. google scholar
  42. Liang, R., & Liu, Z. (2020). Port Infrastructure connectivity, logistics performance and seaborne trade on economic growth: An empirical analysis on “21st-century maritime silk road”. Journal of Coastal Research, 106(SI), 319-324. google scholar
  43. Liu, Z., Schindler, S., & Liu, W. (2020). Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development. Journal of Transport Geography, 87, 102812. google scholar
  44. Malik, J. M. (2020). Myanmar’s Role in China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative. In China’s New Global Strategy (pp. 174-190). Routledge. google scholar
  45. Monir, M. M. I. (2017). The role of Port of Chittagong on the economy of Bangladesh. Erasmus University Rotterdam. https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/40492. google scholar
  46. Ohashi, H. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the context of China’s opening-up policy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 7(2), 85-103. google scholar
  47. Pant, H. V. (2018). India-Iran Cooperation at Chabahar Port: Choppy Waters. google scholar
  48. Park, Y., & Dossani, R. (2020). Port infrastructure and supply chain integration under the belt and road initiative: role of Colombo Port in the apparel industry in South Asia. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 307-326. google scholar
  49. Peng, P., Yang, Y., Lu, F., Cheng, S., Mou, N., & Yang, R. (2018). Modelling the competitiveness of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road with big data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 852-867. google scholar
  50. Qiu, X., Wong, E. Y., & Lam, J. S. L. (2018). Evaluating economic and environmental value of liner vessel sharing along the maritime silk road. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3), 336-350. google scholar
  51. Radwan, M. E., Chen, J., Wan, Z., Zheng, T., Hua, C., & Huang, X. (2019). Critical barriers to the introduction of shore power supply for green port development: case of Djibouti container terminals. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21, 1293-1306. google scholar
  52. Rhode, G. F. (2022). China’s Emergence as a Power in the Mediterranean: Port Diplomacy and Active Engagement. In Studies in Diplomacy and Statecraft (pp. 175-196). Routledge. google scholar
  53. Rolland, N. (2017). China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”: Underwhelming or game-changer?. The Washington Quarterly, 40(1), 127-142. google scholar
  54. Roy-Chaudhury, S. (2019). China, the belt and road initiative, and the Hambantota port project. St Antony’s International Review, 15(1), 153-164. google scholar
  55. Tekdal, V. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: at the crossroads of challenges and ambitions. The Pacific Review, 31(3), 373-390. google scholar
  56. Tian, W., Yu, M., & Zhang, F. (2016). The exceptional performance of Chinese outward direct investment firms. China Economic Journal, 9(2), 209-219. google scholar
  57. Tracy, E. F., Shvarts, E., Simonov, E., & Babenko, M. (2017). China’s new Eurasian ambitions: the environmental risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(1), 56-88. google scholar
  58. Van der Putten, F. P., & Meijnders, M. (2015). China, Europe and the maritime silk road. Clingendael Institute. google scholar
  59. Van der Putten, F. P., Montesano, F. S., van de Ven, J., & Ham, P. (2016). The Geopolitical Relevance of Piraeus and China’s New Silk Road for Southeast Europe and Turkey. Clingendael, Netherlands Institute of International Relations. google scholar
  60. Villafuerte, J., Corong, E., & Zhuang, J. (2016, June). The one belt, one road initiative: Impact on trade and growth. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Purdue University, Washington, DC, USA (pp. 15-17). google scholar
  61. Wan, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, D., & Yip, T. L. (2021). Identifying important ports in maritime container shipping networks along the Maritime Silk Road. Ocean & Coastal Management, 211, 105738. google scholar
  62. Wang, C., Haralambides, H., & Zhang, L. (2021). Sustainable port development: The role of Chinese seaports in the 21st century Maritime Silk Road. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 13(1-2), 205-232. google scholar
  63. Wang, Y. (2016). Offensive for defensive: the belt and road initiative and China’s new grand strategy. The Pacific Review, 29(3), 455-463. google scholar
  64. Winter, T. (2021). The geocultural heritage of the Silk Roads. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(7), 700-719. google scholar
  65. Yean, T. S. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative in Malaysia: Case of the Kuantan Port. google scholar
  66. Yin, R., Zhao, B., Zhang, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Analyzing the structure of the maritime silk road central city network through the spatial distribution of financial firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(11), 2656-2678. google scholar
  67. Zhang, X. (2017). Chinese capitalism and the maritime silk road: A world-systems perspective. Geopolitics, 22(2), 310-331. google scholar
  68. Zhao, C., Wang, Y., Gong, Y., Brown, S., & Li, R. (2021). The evolution of the port network along the Maritime Silk Road: From a sustainable development perspective. Marine Policy, 126, 104426. google scholar
  69. Barnes, P., Bateman, S., Behm, A., Benich, P., Bergin, A., Cronin, P.,. & Zhang, F. (2015). Chinese investment in the Port of Darwin. google scholar
  70. Hughes, A. C., Lechner, A. M., Chitov, A., Horstmann, A., Hinsley, A., Tritto, A.,. & Douglas, W. Y. (2020). Horizon scan of the belt and road initiative. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35(7), 583-593. google scholar