KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Transportation and Logistics / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Analysis of Risk in the Logistics Sector Using Non-linear Time Series in Türkiye

Sultan Kuzu Yıldırım(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6577-1584
Mustafa Can(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7786-5198
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-05-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In contrast, the retail trade sector was identified as the sub-sector with the lowest volatility.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study examines the risk level of the logistics sector, which is a key sub-component of the service sector in Türkiye, by comparing it with other service sub-sectors that have a high share within the sector, namely retail trade, electricity, gas, and steam, and telecommunications indices.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Daily data from the period between March 2, 2020, and October 8, 2025, when volatility in financial markets increased significantly after COVID-19, was used for the analysis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In contrast, the retail trade sector was identified as the sub-sector with the lowest volatility.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Logistics · Risk Assessment · GARCH

Abstract

This study examines the risk level of the logistics sector, which is a key sub-component of the service sector in Türkiye, by comparing it with other service sub-sectors that have a high share within the sector, namely retail trade, electricity, gas, and steam, and telecommunications indices. Daily data from the period between March 2, 2020, and October 8, 2025, when volatility in financial markets increased significantly after COVID-19, was used for the analysis. First, returns for the indices were generated, and various non-linearity tests were used to determine whether these returns were non-linear. Next, the stationarity properties of the series were tested using non-linear unit root tests, and the appropriate ARMA(p,q) model was determined for each series based on information criteria. To examine the volatility structure of the return series, symmetric conditional heteroskedasticity models (GARCH, GARCH-M) and asymmetric effect models (T-GARCH, E-GARCH, and GJR-GARCH) were applied. The most suitable model was selected by considering error criteria and log-likelihood values. The findings reveal that the risk levels among the service sector indices are close to each other but show sectoral differentiation. According to the analysis, the telecommunications sector had the highest risk during the period under review, followed closely by the logistics sector. In contrast, the retail trade sector was identified as the sub-sector with the lowest volatility.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yıldırım, S. K., Can, M. (2026). Analysis of Risk in the Logistics Sector Using Non-linear Time Series in Türkiye. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, Volume: 11 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2026.1834544

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (22)

  1. Baccini, L., Fiorini, M., Hoekman, B., & Sanfilippo, M. (2023). Services, jobs, and economic development in Africa. World Bank Research Observer, 38(1), 147-178. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkac006 google scholar
  2. Özgün, F. (2023). Türkiye'de hizmetler sektörü istihdamı ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 9(1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1198463 google scholar
  3. Arabacı, H., & Yücel, D. (2020). Lojistik sektörünün ekonomik büyümeye etkisi. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(4), 78-84. google scholar
  4. Yurdakul, E. M. (2020). Türkiye'de lojistik sektörü ve ekonomik büyüme arasindaki ilişkinin VAR analizi ile incelenmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 20(40), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.707425 google scholar
  5. Babacan, M. (2003). Lojistik sektörünün ülkemizdeki gelişimi ve rekabet vizyonu. Ege Academic Review, 3(1), 8-15. google scholar
  6. Güriş, B. (2020). R Uygulamalı Doğrusal Olmayan Zaman Serileri Analizi, Der Yayınları, İstanbul. google scholar Daniel, B. M. (1996). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Model. Stock Market Volatil. 59, 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012598275-7.50004-1 google scholar
  7. Brooks, C. (2014). Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Cambridge University Press. 3rd. Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540872 google scholar
  8. Brock, W., Dechert, W. D., & Scheinkman, J. (1987). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. University of Wisconsin. Economics Working Paper SSRI-8702. google scholar
  9. Tsay, R. S. (1986). Nonlinearity tests for time series. Biometrika, 73(2), 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.2.461 google scholar
  10. Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 31(2), 350-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00796.x google scholar
  11. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773 google scholar
  12. Sollis, R. (2009). A simple unit root test against asymmetric STAR nonlinearity with an application to real exchange rates in Nordic countries. Economic modeling, 26(1), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2008.06.002 google scholar
  13. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., & Snell, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-6 google scholar
  14. Alexander, C. (2008). Practical Financial Econometrics. New York, John Wiley and Sons. google scholar Yıldız, B. (2016). Oynaklık Tahmininde Simetrik ve Asimetrik GARCH Modellerinin Kullanılması: Seçilmiş BİST Alt Sektör Endeksleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (72), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.396721 google scholar
  15. Kılıç, M., & Ayrıçay, Y. (2020). Seçilmiş BIST alt sektör endekslerinde volatilitenin ARCH-GARCH yöntemleri ile modellenmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (88), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.801413 google scholar
  16. Alberg, D., Shalit, H., & Yosef, R. (2008). Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH models. Applied Financial Economics, 18(15), 1201-1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100701604225 google scholar
  17. Kang, S. H., Kang, S. M., Yoon, S. M. (2009). Forecasting volatility of crude oil markets. Energy Economics, 31(1), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.09.006 google scholar
  18. Xie, S., & Huang, X. (2013). An empirical analysis of the volatility in the open-end fund market: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(sup4), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X4905S411 google scholar
  19. Sevüktekin, M., & Nargeleçekenler, M. (2006). İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasında Getiri Volatilitesinin Modellenmesi ve Önraporlanması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(4), 243-265. google scholar
  20. Kıran, B. (2006). Sektörel Bazda Hisse Senetleri Getiri Volatilitesinin Asimetrik Koşullu Değişken Varyans Modelleri ile Tahmini. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Ekonometri Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul. google scholar
  21. Singh, S., Parmar, K. S., & Kaur, J. (2023). Forecasting volatility in the stock market data using GARCH, EGARCH, and GJR models. In Handbook of Hydroinformatics (pp. 207-220). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821285-1.00024-5 google scholar
  22. Oberholzer, N., & Venter, P. (2015). Univariate GARCH models applied to the JSE/FTSE stock indices. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00616-4 google scholar