Dergiler / Reforma / 2026 / Issue: 103

A New Integration Approach in the Context of the OTS: Functional-Constructivism

Cüneyt Akın(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6230-7222
Dergi
Reforma
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings reveal that the OTS exhibits a hybrid integration pattern in which intergovernmental decision-making, functional sectoral cooperation, and constructivist identity-building operate simultaneously, and that member states contribute to this cyclical process in differentiated roles.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study evaluates the structure and functioning of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) through Functional-Constructivism, a hybrid model developed by synthesizing major approaches in international relations and regional integration literature, including functionalism, neo-functionalism, and social constructivism.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methodologically, the study adopts a theory-driven qualitative case study design based on comparative theoretical analysis and qualitative document analysis of primary sources including OTS summit declarations, institutional documents, and official strategy papers, as well as secondary academic literature.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings reveal that the OTS exhibits a hybrid integration pattern in which intergovernmental decision-making, functional sectoral cooperation, and constructivist identity-building operate simultaneously, and that member states contribute to this cyclical process in differentiated roles.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Functional-constructivism · integration theories · regional integration

Abstract

This study evaluates the structure and functioning of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) through Functional-Constructivism, a hybrid model developed by synthesizing major approaches in international relations and regional integration literature, including functionalism, neo-functionalism, and social constructivism. Classical integration theories derived largely from the European Union experience tend to emphasize economic and technical integration, but they do not fully explain identity-based regional formations such as the OTS, which are shaped by shared language, culture, and historical memory. Since its institutionalization, the OTS has advanced through the simultaneous development of functional cooperation and identity construction. The Functional-Constructivism model argues that practical cooperation in economic, technical, institutional, educational, and cultural fields interacts with shared norms and collective identity, producing a gradual and cyclical process of integration. Rather than predicting rapid supranationalization, the model explains long-term institutional deepening under intergovernmental conditions. Using the OTS case, the study discusses the explanatory capacity, strengths, and limits of this model and assesses the conditions under which the OTS may evolve into a prospective Turkic Union while highlighting its relevance for culturally grounded regional organizations beyond the European experience and for future comparative integration research. Methodologically, the study adopts a theory-driven qualitative case study design based on comparative theoretical analysis and qualitative document analysis of primary sources including OTS summit declarations, institutional documents, and official strategy papers, as well as secondary academic literature. The findings reveal that the OTS exhibits a hybrid integration pattern in which intergovernmental decision-making, functional sectoral cooperation, and constructivist identity-building operate simultaneously, and that member states contribute to this cyclical process in differentiated roles.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akın, C. (2026). A New Integration Approach in the Context of the OTS: Functional-Constructivism. Reforma, Issue: 103. https://ajindex.com/articles/1134995

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Arı, T. (2025). Uluslararası ilişkiler teorileri. Ekin Yayınevi.
  2. Bülbül, K. (2021). Siyaset bilimi sözlüğü. Adres Yayınları.
  3. Caporaso, J. A., & A. L. Pelowski. “Economic and Political Integration in Europe: A Time-Series Quasi- Experimental Analysis.” The American Political Science Review, vol. 65, no. 2, 1971, pp. 418–433.
  4. Dedeoğlu, B. (1996). Adım adım Avrupa Birliği. Çınar Yayınları.
  5. Deutsch, K. W. (1979). Tides among nations. Free Press.
  6. Ermağan, İ. (2012). Avrupa Birliği bütünleşmesinde şüphecilik. Çanakkale University Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 7(1), 162.
  7. Etzioni, A. (1965). Political unification: A comparative study of leaders and forces. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  8. Gürkaynak, M., & Yalçıner, S. (2009). A study on the interdependence and globalization in international politics. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 6(23), 73–92.
  9. Haas, E. B. (2004). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces 1950-1957. University of Notre Dame Press.
  10. Heywood, A. (2014). Global politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Köksoy, F. (2020). Two men, one theory: The reflection of neofunctionalism through Haas and Schmitter on the Caribbean Community. Ege Journal of Strategic Research, 11(1), 24.
  12. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company.
  13. Mitrany, D. (1943). A working peace system: An argument for the functional development of international organization. Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  14. Purtaş, F. (2013). Türk Cumhuriyetlerinin kültürel entegrasyonu ve TÜRKSOY. [Article/Report].
  15. Safi, A. (2020). Regionalism and Afghanistan. In Proceedings Book of the 3rd International New York Conference on Evolving Trends in Interdisciplinary Research & Practices (p. 229).
  16. Sancaktar, C. (2013). Integration and integration theories. In H. Çomak & C. Sancaktar (Eds.), Theoretical studies in international relations (pp. 113-157). Beta Publishing.
  17. Schmitter, P. C. (1970). A revised theory of regional integration. International Organization, 24(4), 836–868.
  18. Şahin, K. (2018). Bütünleşme olgusunda analiz düzeyi. Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri, 118, 92-93.
  19. Şeyşane, V. (2018). International institutions and state behavior. In N. Doğan & V. Şeyşane (Eds.), International organization and global governance (p. 37). Anadolu University Press.
  20. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Yapıcı, M. (2007). The place and effectiveness of integration theories in the discipline of international relations. Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 9(3), 133-155.