KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilişsel Farkındalık Beceri Algıları ve Epistemolojik İnançlarının Kültürlerarası Duyarlılığı Yordama Gücü

The Power of Pre-service Teachers' Metacognitive Skill Perceptions and Epistemological Beliefs in Predicting Intercultural Sensitivity

İbrahim Tuncel(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6533-6352
Özden Demir(Trabzon Üniversitesi)0000-0001-6293-5045
Zeynep Ayvaz Tuncel(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1817-9603
Sayfa
2813–2839
Yayın Tarihi
2025-08-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu araştırmanın bulguları, öğretmen adaylarının üstbilişsel beceri ve epistemolojik inanç algılarının kültürlerarası duyarlılık algılarının anlamlı yordayıcıları olduğunu göstermiştir (R = 0.599, R² = 0.359, p < .05).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bilgiyi kültürel bağlamda yorumlayabilmede ve farklı kültürlere duyarlı olabilmede hem epistemolojik inançların hem bilişsel farkındalığın etkili olabileceği düşüncesinden hareketle bu araştırma tasarlanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu araştırma, öğretmen adaylarının bilişsel farkındalık beceri algıları, epistemolojik inançları ile kültürlerarası duyarlılık algıları arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bununla birlikte bilişsel farkındalık ve epistemolojik inanç değişkenlerinin, kültürlerarası duyarlılığı yordama gücünü belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu araştırmanın bulguları, öğretmen adaylarının üstbilişsel beceri ve epistemolojik inanç algılarının kültürlerarası duyarlılık algılarının anlamlı yordayıcıları olduğunu göstermiştir (R = 0.599, R² = 0.359, p < .05).
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:epistemolojik inanç · Kültürlerarası duyarlılık · bilişötesi beceriler

Özet

Bilgiyi kültürel bağlamda yorumlayabilmede ve farklı kültürlere duyarlı olabilmede hem epistemolojik inançların hem bilişsel farkındalığın etkili olabileceği düşüncesinden hareketle bu araştırma tasarlanmıştır. Bu araştırma, öğretmen adaylarının bilişsel farkındalık beceri algıları, epistemolojik inançları ile kültürlerarası duyarlılık algıları arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bununla birlikte bilişsel farkındalık ve epistemolojik inanç değişkenlerinin, kültürlerarası duyarlılığı yordama gücünü belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu araştırma, nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel desene göre tasarlanmıştır Araştırmanın verileri, Türkiye’nin farklı bölgelerinde yer alan iki farklı Üniversitede öğrenim gören 287 öğretmen adayından toplanmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında, Bilişsel Farkındalık Beceri Algısı, Epistemolojik İnanç ve Kültürlerarası Duyarlılık ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde, ölçeklerin alt boyutlarından elde edilen puanlar arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla Pearson Momentler Çarpım Korelasyon katsayısı hesaplanmıştır. Yordama ile ilgili alt problemlerin çözümü için çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın bulguları, öğretmen adaylarının üstbilişsel beceri ve epistemolojik inanç algılarının kültürlerarası duyarlılık algılarının anlamlı yordayıcıları olduğunu göstermiştir (R = 0.599, R² = 0.359, p < .05). Bununla birlikte epistemolojik inançlara kıyasla, üstbilişsel beceri algılarının kültürlerarası duyarlılık için daha güçlü bir yordama gücüne sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Epistemolojik inançların ve üstbilişsel farkındalığın kültürlerarası duyarlılık gelişimi ile ilişkisinin ve öneminin bilinmesinin öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının geliştirilmesine katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Abstract

This study was designed based on the idea that both epistemological beliefs and metacognition can be effective in interpreting information in a cultural context and being sensitive to different cultures. The study aims to investigate the relationships among pre-service teachers' perceptions of metacognitive skills, epistemological beliefs, and intercultural sensitivity perceptions, and to determine the predictive power of metacognitive skill perceptions and epistemological belief variables in predicting intercultural sensitivity. This study used a correlational design, one of the quantitative research methods. Data were collected from 287 pre-service teachers enrolled at two different universities in different regions of Turkey. The data collection tools included the Metacognitive Skill Perceptions Scale, the Epistemological Belief Scale, and the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale. Data analysis was performed using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation coefficient to examine the relationships between the scores obtained from the sub-scales of the scales. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to solve the sub-problems related to the prediction. The study's findings indicated that pre-service teachers' perceptions of metacognitive skills and epistemological beliefs were significant predictors of their perceptions of intercultural sensitivity (R = 0.599, R² = 0.359, p < .05). However, it was concluded that metacognitive skill perceptions had a stronger predictive power for intercultural sensitivity compared to epistemological beliefs. It is believed that understanding the relationship and importance of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness in relation to the development of intercultural sensitivity will contribute to the development of effective teacher training programs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tuncel, İ., Demir, Ö., Tuncel, Z. A. (2025). Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilişsel Farkındalık Beceri Algıları ve Epistemolojik İnançlarının Kültürlerarası Duyarlılığı Yordama Gücü. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 2813–2839. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1602094

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (75)

  1. Acar, Y., and Meydan, A. (2024). Türkçe öğrenen uluslararası öğrencilerde kültürlerarası duyarlılık ve zihniyet arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education Faculty, 43(2), 1025-1060. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.1537381
  2. Akbal, G., and Bahçivan, E. (2023). 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin epistemolojik i̇nançları, epistemik duyguları ve bilimsel tartışmaya yatkınlıkları arasındaki i̇lişkilerin i̇ncelenmesi: Bir çoklu durum çalışması. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.1151224
  3. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., and Koh, C. (2006). Personality correlates of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 100-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601105275267
  4. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., and Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation, and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x
  5. Bell, B. S., and Kozlowski, S. W. (2008). Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296
  6. Bennett, J. M. (1993). Toward ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Intercultural Press.
  7. Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (2004). Developing Intercultural Sensitivity: An Integrative Approach to Global and Domestic Diversity. In D. R. Landis, J. M. Bennett, & M. J. Bennett (Eds.) Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 147–165). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231129.n6
  8. Bosuwon, T. (2017). Social intelligence and communication competence: predictors of students' intercultural sensitivity. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 136–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p136
  9. Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., and Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: a functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and learning, 5, 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5
  10. Bulduk, S., Tosun, H., and Ardıç, E. (2011). Türkçe kültürler arası duyarlılık ölçeğinin hemşirelik öğrencilerinde ölçümsel özellikleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Ethics-Law and History, 19(1), 25-31.
  11. Byram, M., and Golubeva, I. (2020). Conceptualising intercultural (communicative) competence and intercultural citizenship. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 70-85). Routledge.
  12. Causey, V. E., Thomas, C. D., and Armento, B. J. (2000). Cultural diversity is basically a foreign term to me: The challenges of diversity for preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00039–6
  13. Chaudhari, P., and Pizzolato, J. E. (2008). Understanding the epistemology of ethnic identity development in multiethnic college students. Journal of College Student Development, 49(5), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0028
  14. Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2000). Exploratory study of epistemological beliefs of Hong Kong teacher education students: Resolving conceptual and empirical issues. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/713650691
  15. Chen, G. M. (1997, January). A Review of the concept of intercultural sensitivity [Conference presentation]. The Biennial convention of Pacific and Asian Communication Association, Honolulu, Hawaii, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED408634.pdf
  16. Chen, G. M., and Starosta, W. J. (2000, November 8-12). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale [Conference presentation]. The annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Seattle, WA, United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447525.pdf
  17. Cheung, R. Y., Jiang, D., Yum, Y. N., and Bhowmik, M. K. (2022). Intercultural sensitivity and prosocial behavior towards South Asians in Hong Kong: Mediating mechanisms of warmth and stigma. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 86, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.11.002
  18. Chiu, C. Y., Lonner, W. J., Matsumoto, D., and Ward, C. (2013). Cross-cultural competence: Theory, research, and application. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(6), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113493716
  19. Cho, M., and Ulwiyyah, U. (2020). Relationship between emotional intelligence and intercultural sensitivity of students in a Chinese university. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 7(5), 5948-5953. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v7i05.02
  20. Chua, R. Y., Morris, M. W., and Mor, S. (2012). Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.009
  21. Çiloğlan, F., and Bardakçı, M. (2019). The relationship between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1204-1214. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631563
  22. Danacı, M., and Pınarcık, Ö. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik i̇nançlarının problem çözme becerileri ve güçlülük düzeyleri üzerine olan etkisinin i̇ncelenmesi. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(3),1249-1263. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.335904
  23. Demir, Ö. (2013). A validation and reliability study of the metacognition scale in Turkey. Global Journal of Human Social Science Linguistics & Education, 13(10), 27-35.
  24. Demir, Ö., Doganay, A., and Kaya, H. İ. (2016). Investigation into the prediction level of professional values of prospective teachers within the context of critical thinking, metacognition and epistemological beliefs in Turkey. International Education Studies, 9(5), 204-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p204
  25. Dolce, V., Davoine, É., Wodociag, S., and Ghislieri, C. (2023). The road to an international career: The “Erasmus effect” on resilience, intercultural interactions and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92, 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.101741
  26. Dyankova, G., and Nikolova, S. (2023). Multicultural competence as a teacher’s metacognition to achieve a positive school climate. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(2), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-2-257-265
  27. Earley, P. C., and Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press.
  28. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications Ltd.
  29. Garmon, M. A. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ attitudes/beliefs about diversity: What are the critical factors? Journal of Teacher Education, 55(3), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487104263080
  30. Gholami, K., Alikhani, M., and Tirri, K. (2022). Empirical model of teachers’ neuroplasticity, knowledge, mindset, and epistemological belief system. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1042891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042891
  31. Griffith, R. L., Wolfeld, L., Armon, B. K., Rios, J., and Liu, O. L. (2016). Assessing intercultural competence in higher education: Existing research and future directions. ETS Research Report Series, 2016(2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12112
  32. Gröschke, D., and Schäfer, T. (2012). The necessity for self-regulation in intercultural situations. European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 2(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJCCM.2012.047087
  33. Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., and Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4
  34. Hibbeln, M. J. (2019). Factors influencing the ways students develop intercultural sensitivity at an international school in China (Publication No. 22583090) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations
  35. Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
  36. Holmes, S. (2016). How can the pragmatic philosophy of John Dewey make a contribution to the theory and practice of intercultural communication? Contemporary Pragmatism, 13(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-01303002
  37. Huang, L. (2023). Developing intercultural competence through a cultural metacognition-featured instructional design in English as a foreign language classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1126141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126141
  38. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., and Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6
  39. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (23. baskı). Nobel Kitap.
  40. Khan, I., Mahmood, A., and Ahmad, S. M. (2020). Teacher educators' epistemological beliefs and their implications for teacher education. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 14(4), 12–25. http://sbbwu.edu.pk/journal/
  41. Kim, K. J. (2004). The relationship between motivation and intercultural sensitivity in English achievement. 영어교육, 59(4), 97-120.
  42. Klopp, E., and Stark, R. (2022). Scientific controversies and epistemological sensitization - effects of an intervention on psychology students’ epistemological beliefs and argumentation skills. Frontiers in Education, 6, 785241 https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.785241.
  43. Kop, Y., and Demir, Ö. (2017). Assessment of social sciences teacher candidates' epistemological beliefs: A validation and reliability study of the scale. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(n12B), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051409.
  44. Lane, H. C. (2007, July 9-13). Metacognition and the development of intercultural competence. [Conference presentation abstract] 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Los Angeles, California. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA470403.pdf.
  45. Liu, M. (2022). Effects of learner variables on chinese bilingual undergraduates’ intercultural sensitivity and effectiveness. Education Sciences, 12(12), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120873
  46. Loba-Mkole, J. C. (2021). Intercultural constructions of the New Testament: Epistemological foundations. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(2), a6739 https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.6739
  47. Matsumoto-Royo, K., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., and Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2022). Lifelong learning and metacognition in the assessment of pre-service teachers in practice-based teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 879238. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.879238
  48. Mazlum, B., and Şahin, S. (2024). Kültürlerarası duyarlılık ve etnosentrizm alanındaki tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(1), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1268744
  49. Mor, S., Morris, M. W., and Joh, J. (2013). Identifying and training adaptive cross-cultural management skills: The crucial role of cultural metacognition. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0202
  50. Mor, S., and Paolini, S. (2023). Stereotype-target congruence appraisals contribute to the intercultural flexibility of individuals high on cultural metacognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101248
  51. Ng, K. Y., Van Dyne, L., and Ang, S. (2009). From experience to experiential learning: Cultural intelligence as a learning capability for global leader development. Academy of Management learning & Education, 8(4), 511-526. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.8.4.zqr511
  52. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  53. Phan, H. P. (2008). Exploring epistemological beliefs and learning approaches in context: A sociocultural perspective. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 6(16), 793–822. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v6i16.1305
  54. Pohan, C. A. (1996). Preservice teachers' beliefs about diversity: Uncovering factors leading to multicultural responsiveness. Equity & Excellence in Education, 29(3), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1066568960290310
  55. Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., and Kuusisto, A. (2016). Developing teachers' intercultural sensitivity: Case study on a pilot course in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.018.
  56. Sakharova, N. S., Yankina, N. V., Moroz, V. V., Tomin, V. V., and Dmitrieva, E. V. (2017, November). Intercultural sensitivity as condition of academic mobility success. In 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference Current issues of linguistics and didactics: The interdisciplinary approach in humanities (CILDIAH 2017) (pp. 296-300). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/cildiah-17.2017.53
  57. Sanz-Ponce, R., and González-Bertolín, A. (2018). La educación sigue siendo un “tesoro”. Educación y docentes en los informes internacionales de la UNESCO. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 9(25), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2018.25.283
  58. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
  59. Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3
  60. Sing Chai, C., Teo, T., and Beng Lee, C. (2009). The change in epistemological beliefs and beliefs about teaching and learning: a study among pre-service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660903250381
  61. Strahovnik, V. (2022). Holism of religious beliefs as a facet of intercultural theology and a challenge for interreligious dialogue. Religions, 13(7), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070633
  62. Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  63. Tabatadze, S., and Gorgadze, N. (2018). Selective intercultural sensitivity to different sources of cultural identity: Study of intercultural sensitivity of students at teacher education programs of Georgia. Journal for Multicultural Education, 12(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-11-2016-0059
  64. Tuncel, İ., and Arıcıoglu, A. (2018). The factors affecting the intercultural sensitivity perception level of psychological counseling and guidance students. International Education Studies, 11(3), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n3p61
  65. Türkan, A., Aydın, H., and Üner, S. S. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının çokkültürlü eğitime yönelik tutumları ile epistemolojik inançları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 148-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.16818
  66. Uyun, M., and Warsah, I. (2022). Prospective teachers’ intercultural sensitivity alongside the contextual factors as the affective domain to realize multicultural education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 555-576. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15430a
  67. Van der Plas, E., Zhang, S., Dong, K., Bang, D., Li, J., Wright, N. D., and Fleming, S. M. (2022). Identifying cultural differences in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(12), 3268–3280. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001209
  68. Villegas, A. M., and Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Suny Press.
  69. Villegas, A. M., and Lucas, T. (2007). The culturally responsive teacher. Educational Leadership, 64(6), 28-33.
  70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
  71. Wall, K., and Hall, E. (2016). Teachers as metacognitive role models. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1212834
  72. Weinstock, M., and Zviling-Beiser, H. (2009). Separating academic and social experience as potential factors in epistemological development. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.004
  73. Wilke, M., Depaepe, F., and Van Nieuwenhuyse, K. (2022). The interplay between historical thinking and epistemological beliefs: A case study with history teachers in Flanders. Historical Encounters, 9(1), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.52289/hej9.111
  74. Yenice, N. (2015). An analysis of science student teachers' epistemological beliefs and metacognitive perceptions about the nature of science. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 1623-1636. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.6.2613
  75. Zhu, M. M., Alberts, K. M., Bork, W. N., & Wong, D. (2023). Self-regulated learning and intercultural competence: examining the role of self-regulation in supporting preservice teachers’ intercultural learning outcomes. Intercultural Education, 34(5), 494–515. https://doi:10.1080/14675986.2023.2213655