KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

Üniversite Döneminde İlişki Sürdürme Davranışları ve Romantik İlişki Doyumu

Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction During the University Period

Samiye Ogan(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-4064-0371
Fatma Selda Öz Soysal(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5406-7786
Sayfa
1191–1213
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu derleme çalışmanın bulguları, beliren yetişkinlik döneminde romantik ilişkilerin sürekliliği ve doyumunun büyük ölçüde bireylerin sergilediği ilişki sürdürme davranışlarının niteliğine bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Üniversite dönemi, bireylerin kimlik gelişimiyle birlikte romantik ilişkilere yönelik tutum ve beklentilerinin şekillendiği, yakınlık ve bağlılık süreçlerinin yoğun biçimde deneyimlendiği önemli bir gelişimsel evredir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu derleme çalışmasının amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilerinde ilişki sürdürme davranışları ile romantik ilişki doyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi, farklı kuramsal yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde ele almaktır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu derleme çalışmanın bulguları, beliren yetişkinlik döneminde romantik ilişkilerin sürekliliği ve doyumunun büyük ölçüde bireylerin sergilediği ilişki sürdürme davranışlarının niteliğine bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Romantik İlişkiler · İlişki Sürdürme Davranışları · Romantik İlişki Doyumu.

Özet

Üniversite dönemi, bireylerin kimlik gelişimiyle birlikte romantik ilişkilere yönelik tutum ve beklentilerinin şekillendiği, yakınlık ve bağlılık süreçlerinin yoğun biçimde deneyimlendiği önemli bir gelişimsel evredir. Bu dönemde kurulan romantik ilişkilerde ilişki doyumunun sağlanması ve ilişkinin sürdürülebilirliği, bireylerin sergilediği ilişki sürdürme davranışlarıyla yakından ilişkilidir. Bu derleme çalışmasının amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilerinde ilişki sürdürme davranışları ile romantik ilişki doyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi, farklı kuramsal yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde ele almaktır. İlişki sürdürme davranışları; “Karşılıklı Bağımlılık Kuramı, Rusbult Yatırım Modeli, Eşitlik (Denge) Kuramı, İlişkisel Tür Kuramı” bağlamında ele alınmıştır. Romantik ilişki doyumu ise; “Karşılıklı Bağımlılık Kuramı, Rusbult’un Yatırım Modeli, Bağlanma Kuramı, Sternberg’in Üçgen Aşk Kuramı” kapsamında değerlendirilmiştir. Bu derleme çalışmanın bulguları, beliren yetişkinlik döneminde romantik ilişkilerin sürekliliği ve doyumunun büyük ölçüde bireylerin sergilediği ilişki sürdürme davranışlarının niteliğine bağlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Alanyazın, iletişim, güven ve duygusal destek gibi ilişki sürdürme davranışlarının ilişki doyumunu artırdığını; yüksek doyum ve yatırım düzeyinin ilişkiyi sürdürmeye yönelik motivasyonu güçlendirdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, ilişki doyumundaki azalmanın ilişkinin sona ermesini güçlü biçimde yordadığı vurgulanmaktadır. Sonuçlar, üniversite öğrencilerine yönelik ilişki sürdürme becerilerini geliştirmeye odaklanan psikoeğitsel müdahalelerin önemine işaret etmektedir.

Abstract

The university period is a critical developmental stage in which individuals’ identity formation coincides with the development of attitudes and expectations toward romantic relationships, while experiences of intimacy and commitment intensify. The satisfaction and stability of romantic relationships during this period are closely linked to the relationship maintenance behaviors individuals exhibit. This review examines the association between relationship maintenance behaviors and romantic relationship satisfaction among university students through different theoretical perspectives. Relationship maintenance behaviors are considered within the frameworks of Interdependence Theory, Rusbult’s Investment Model, Equity Theory, and Relational Types Theory, whereas romantic relationship satisfaction is evaluated through Interdependence Theory, Rusbult’s Investment Model, Attachment Theory, and Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love. Findings suggest that the continuity and satisfaction of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood largely depend on the quality of these maintenance behaviors. Literature indicates that behaviors such as communication, trust, and emotional support enhance relationship satisfaction, and that higher levels of satisfaction and investment increase motivation to maintain relationships. Conversely, reduced satisfaction strongly predicts relationship dissolution. These findings emphasize the significance of psychoeducational interventions focused on strengthening relationship maintenance skills among university students, highlighting the role of supportive behaviors in fostering stable, satisfying romantic partnerships during this formative stage.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ogan, S., Soysal, F. S. Ö. (2026). Üniversite Döneminde İlişki Sürdürme Davranışları ve Romantik İlişki Doyumu. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 1191–1213. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1921224

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (107)

  1. Abendschein, B., Basinger, E. D. ve Wehrman, E. C. (2021). Interdependence theory and close relationships. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. A. Suter, & K. Floyd (Ed.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 59–72). Routledge.
  2. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
  3. Agnew, C. R. ve VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson, & J. F. Dovidio (Ed.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-021
  4. Akçabozan Kayabol, N. B. ve Hatipoğlu Sümer, Z. (2022). How to maintain a marriage: Maintenance behaviors, equity, and appreciation in understanding marital satisfaction. Current Psychology, 41(9), 5781-5794. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s12144-020-00905-y
  5. Alberti, R. ve Emmons, M. (2017). Your perfect right: Assertiveness and equality in your life and relationships. New Harbinger Publications.
  6. Alpay, Ü. (2024). Evli bireylerde çift uyumu ve psikolojik belirtilerin ilişki odaklı bilişsel faktörler ve ilişki sürdürme stratejileri açısından incelenmesi (No: 903970) [Doktora tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  7. Arnett, J. J. (2010). Emerging adulthood(s). Bridging cultural and developmental approaches to psychology: New syntheses in theory, research, and policy, 255-275.
  8. Arnett, J. J. (2023). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
  9. Arnett, J. J. (Ed.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood. Oxford University Press.
  10. Belus, J. M., Pentel, K. Z., Cohen, M. J., Fischer, M. S. ve Baucom, D. H. (2019). Staying connected: an examination of relationship maintenance behaviors in long-distance relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 55(1), 78–98.
  11. Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In H. H. Kelley et al. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 110–168). W. H. Freeman.
  12. Berscheid, E. S. ve Regan, P. C. (2016). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663074
  13. Berscheid, E., Snyder, M. ve Omoto, A. M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 792.
  14. Bialik, K. ve Fry, R. (2019). Millennial life: How young adulthood today compares with prior generations. Pew Research Center, 14.
  15. Bühler, J. L. ve Orth, U. (2024). How relationship satisfaction changes within and across romantic relationships: Evidence from a large longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(5), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000492
  16. Canary, D. J. ve Dainton, M. A. (2006). Maintaining relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti ve D. Perlman (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 727–745). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Canary, D. J. ve Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268
  18. Carnelley, K. B. ve Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Optimism about love relationships: General vs specific lessons from one's personal experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592091001
  19. Charvat, E. J., Garneau‐Rosner, C. L., Monk, J. K. ve Colaner, C. W. (2023). The intergenerational transmission of relationship instability: A focus on emerging adult on‐off relationships. Family Process, 62(1), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12765
  20. Connolly, J. ve Goldberg, A. (1999). Romantic relationships in adolescence: The role of friends and peers in their emergence and development. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown ve C. Feiring (Ed.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 266– 290). Cambridge University Press.
  21. Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D. W., Brown, P. A., Clark, L. A., Hessling, R. M. ve Gardner, K. A. (2005). Neighborhood context, personality, and stressful life events as predictors of depression among African American women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.3
  22. Çatal, M. T. ve Kalkan, M. (2019). Evli bireylerin evlilik değerleri evlilik doyumu ve evlilik tipleri. Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, 3(6), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.601115
  23. Dainton, M. (2000). Maintenance behaviors, expectations for maintenance, and satisfaction: Linking comparison levels to relational maintenance strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(6), 827-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500176007
  24. Dainton, M. (2019). Equity and relationship maintenance in first marriages and remarriages. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 60(8), 583-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2019.1586420
  25. Dainton, M. ve Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216533
  26. Dainton, M. ve Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000206
  27. Dainton, M. ve Stafford, L. (2000). Predicting maintenance enactment from relational schemata, spousal behavior, and relational characteristics. Communication Research Reports, 17(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090009388763.
  28. Dindia, K. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In Maintaining relationships through communication (pp. 1-28). Routledge.
  29. Dindia, K. ve Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000201
  30. Doss, B. D., Simpson, L. E. ve Christensen, A. (2004). Why do couples seek marital therapy?. Professional psychology: Research and Practice, 35(6), 608. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.608
  31. Dörtyol, K. (2023). Duyguları ifade etme ve ilişki sürdürme stratejileri arasındaki ilişkide romantik ilişkide kendini açma düzeyinin aracı rolünün incelenmesi (No: 818012) [Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi]. İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi.
  32. Eren, D. E. (2019). Comparison of online vs. offline dating in terms of romantic beliefs, commitment, relationship maintenance and relationship satisfaction (No: 586438) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Özyeğin Üniversitesi]. Özyeğin Üniversitesi.
  33. Ertürk, B. (2022). COVID-19 pozitif geçmişi olan beliren yetişkinlik dönemindeki romantik çiftlerde ilişki sürdürme stratejileri (No: 724629) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi]. Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi.
  34. Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T. F. ve Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 546-567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01423.x
  35. Fincham, F. D. ve Beach, S. R. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630-649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00722.x
  36. Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1987). Theories of marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(1), 1–10.
  37. Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives: Communication in marriage. Sage Publications.
  38. Fitzpatrick, M. A. ve Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication in marital and family relationships. In M. Fitzpatrick & A. Vangelisti (Ed.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 85–107). Sage Publications.
  39. Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L. ve Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683
  40. Furman, W. (2002). The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 177-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00195
  41. Furman, W. ve Hand, L. S. (2014). The Slippery Nature of Romantic Relationships: Issues in Definition and Differentiation 1. In Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood (pp. 171-178). Psychology Press.
  42. Givertz, M., Segrin, C. ve Hanzal, A. (2009). The association between satisfaction and commitment differs across marital couple types. Communication Research, 36(4), 561-584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333035
  43. Granillo-Velasco, A. D., Santiago-Silva, D. Z. ve Sánchez-Aragón, R. (2024). Emerging Adulthood. In Brothers and Sisters in Emerging Adulthood: An Ethno-Psychological Study of Mexican Siblings (pp. 11-27). Springer Nature Switzerland.
  44. Güngör, E. (2021). Investigating relationship maintenance from the investment model and socio-ecological perspectives among dating young adults (No: 697904) [Doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  45. Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M. ve Hay, J. (1985). Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. Compatible and incompatible relationships, 91-117.
  46. Hatfield, E., Walster, G. W. ve Berscheid, E. (2013). Equity: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
  47. Hazan, C. ve Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.
  48. Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P. ve Peplau, L. A. (2018). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. In Love, romance, sexual interaction (pp. 163-181). Routledge.
  49. İmamoğlu, E. O. (1993). Değişen dünyada değişen aile-içi roller. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 58-68.
  50. Johnson, D. J. ve Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 967.
  51. Józefacka, N. M., Szpakiewicz, E., Lech, D., Guzowski, K. ve Kania, G. (2023). What Matters in a Relationship—Age, Sexual Satisfaction, Relationship Length, and Interpersonal Closeness as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction in Young Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054103
  52. Karney, B. R. ve Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
  53. Kefalas, M. J., Furstenberg, F. F., Carr, P. J. ve Napolitano, L. (2011). “Marriage is more than being together”: The meaning of marriage for young adults. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 845-875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10397277
  54. Kelley, D. (2012). Marital communication. Polity.
  55. Kelley, D. L. (1999). Relational expectancy fulfillment as an explanatory variable for distinguishing couple types. Human Communication Research, 25(3), 420-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00452.x
  56. Kelley, H. H. ve Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relationships: A theory of interdependence. John Wiley.
  57. Kiefer, A. K. ve Sanchez, D. T. (2007). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships, 14, 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00154.
  58. Lujansky, H. ve Mikula, G. (1983). Can equity theory explain the quality and the stability of romantic relationships?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1983.tb00572.x
  59. Mattson, R. E., Rogge, R. D., Johnson, M. D., Davidson, E. K. B. ve Fincham, F. D. (2013). The positive and negative semantic dimensions of relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 20, 328-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01412.x
  60. McClintock, C. G., Kramer, R. M. ve Keil, L. J. (1984). Equity and social exchange in human relationships. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 183-228). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60120-3
  61. Meuwly, N. ve Schoebi, D. (2017). Social psychological and related theories on long-term committed romantic relationships. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000088
  62. Mikula, G. (2011). Perceived justice in the division of family labor: Antecedents and consequences. In Justice and conflicts: Theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 153-167). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  63. Mikulincer, M. ve Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford.
  64. Moore, K. A. ve Campbell, A. (2020). The Investment Model: Its antecedents and predictors of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Relationships Research, 11, e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2020.15
  65. Moss, B. F. ve Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Marriage and romantic relationships: defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 42, 7-31.
  66. Norona, J. C., Olmstead, S. B. ve Welsh, D. P. (2017). Breaking up in emerging adulthood: A developmental perspective of relationship dissolution. Emerging Adulthood, 5(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696816658585
  67. Ogan, S. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişkileri sürdürme stratejilerinin, bağlanma stilleri, romantik ilişki doyumu ve romantik ilişkilerde öz yeterlik ile arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi (No: 697126) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  68. Ogan, S. ve Öz Soysal, F. S. (2022). Üniversite öğrencilerinde ilişkileri sürdürme stratejilerinin yordayıcıları olarak romantik ilişki doyumu ve romantik ilişkilerde öz yeterlik. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (12), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.988829
  69. Ogan, S. ve Öz Soysal, F. S. (2023). An Investigation of Married Individuals' Relationship Maintenance Strategies in Terms of Gender and Gender Roles Attitudes. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(3), 667-680. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.3.1178
  70. Ogolsky, B. G. ve Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512463338
  71. Ogolsky, B. G. ve Monk, J. K. (Ed.). (2020). Relationship maintenance: Theory, process, and context. Cambridge University Press.
  72. Ogolsky, B. G. ve Stafford, L. (2023). A systematic review of relationship maintenance: Reflecting back and looking to the future. Personal Relationships, 30(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12429
  73. Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C. ve Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205
  74. Olson, D. H. ve Fowers, B. J. (1993). Five types of marriage: An empirical typology based on ENRICH. The Family Journal, 1(3), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480793013002
  75. Örnek, D. M. (2018). Yatırım modeline dayalı evlilik öncesi ilişki sürdürme becerileri psiko-eğitim grubunun ilişki istikrarına etkisinin incelenmesi (No: 505143) [Doktora tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi]. Çukurova Üniversitesi.
  76. Öz Soysal, F. S., Bakalım, O., Tasdelen Karçkay, A. ve Ogan, S. (2024). The association between autonomy need satisfaction and perceived romantic relationship quality: The mediating role of openness. Emerging Adulthood, 12(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231220074
  77. Özden, Z. D. (2023). Understanding relationship maintenance behaviors on Instagram: Exploring the role of relational mobility (No: 832635) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Sabancı Üniversitesi]. Sabancı Üniversitesi.
  78. Pett, R. C. ve Krawietz, C. E. (2025). A Latent Profile Analysis of Relational Maintenance Behaviors in Romantic Relationships. Personal Relationships, 32(1), e12588. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12588
  79. Righetti, F., Faure, R., Zoppolat, G., Meltzer, A. ve McNulty, J. (2022). Factors that contribute to the maintenance or decline of relationship satisfaction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(3), 161-173.
  80. Rubenstein, C. ve Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy, 206-223.
  81. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
  82. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022 3514.45.1.101
  83. Rusbult, C. E. ve Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295216002
  84. Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. ve Arriaga, X. (2011). The investment model of commitment processes. Department of Psychological Sciences Faculty Publications.
  85. Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M. ve Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Ed.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). Academic Press.
  86. Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G. ve Mainous III, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management journal, 31(3), 599-627. https://doi.org/10.5465/256461
  87. Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., Coolsen, M. K. ve Kirchner, J. L. (2004). Interdependence, closeness, and relationships. Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 147-172.
  88. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M. ve Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
  89. Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L. ve Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Ed.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  90. Sanchez, D. T. (2005). Doing gender and self-esteem in intimate relationships. Ann Arbor, MI: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
  91. Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C. ve Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2-3), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
  92. Sharabi, L. L. ve Timmermans, E. (2021). Why settle when there are plenty of fish in the sea? Rusbult’s investment model applied to online dating. New Media & Society, 23(10), 2926-2946. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820937660
  93. Sprecher, S. ve Schwartz, P. (1994). Equity and balance in the exchange of contributions in close relationships. In Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 11-41). Springer US.
  94. Stafford L. ve Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082004
  95. Stafford, L. (2020). Communal strength, exchange orientation, equity, and relational maintenance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(8-9), 2345-2365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520923741
  96. Stafford, L. ve Kuiper, K. (2021). Social exchange theories: Calculating the rewards and costs of personal relationships. In Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 379-390). Routledge.
  97. Stafford, L., Dainton, M. ve Haas, S. M. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376512
  98. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological review, 93(2), 119.
  99. Tellioğlu, G. (2025). The predictive role of relationship maintenance behaviors, irrational relationship beliefs, emotion regulation strategies in long-distance relationship satisfaction (No: 956464) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  100. Thibaut, J. W. ve Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135007
  101. Walster, E., Walster, G. W. ve Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Allyn & Bacon.
  102. Watkins, N. K. ve Beckmeyer, J. J. (2020). Assessing young adults’ beliefs regarding the importance of romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 41(2), 158-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19871080
  103. Williams, G. (2025). The Association Between Relational Ethics and Couple Satisfaction: Potential Moderators (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University).
  104. Willoughby, B. J. ve James, S. L. (2017). The marriage paradox: Why emerging adults love marriage yet push it aside. Oxford University Press.
  105. Wood, D., Crapnell, T., Lau, L., Bennett, A., Lotstein, D., Ferris, M. ve Kuo, A. (2017). Emerging adulthood as a critical stage in the life course. Handbook of life course health development, 123-143.
  106. Yang, Y. ve Castro-Medina, P. (2025). Identifying Psychological Factors Underlying Perceived Relational Justice in Intimate Partnerships. Research and Practice in Couple Therapy, 2(3), 1-11.
  107. Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D. ve Gangamma, R. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 40(4), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072