KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 30

YÖNETİŞİM KALİTESİNİN DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLARA ETKİSİ: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

THE EFFECT OF GOVERNANCE QUALITY ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

Burcu Yılmaz Şahin(Giresun Üniversitesi)0000-0002-2520-7804
Adem Kulaç(ORDU UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0922-5308
Sayfa
319–342
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışmada, ihracat ve yönetişim göstergelerinin uzun vadede DYY üzerinde olumlu ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etki gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Gelişmekte olan ülkelere yapılan doğrudan yabancı yatırım (DYY) dünya çapında ilgi görmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu ekonomiler benzer sosyal, ekonomik ve diğer koşullara sahip aynı gelişme aşamasındadır, ancak kurumsal ortamları bu gelişmekte olan ekonomiler içindeki DYY akımını etkilemektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışmada, ihracat ve yönetişim göstergelerinin uzun vadede DYY üzerinde olumlu ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etki gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002-2023 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Dünya Yönetişim Endeksi · Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım · Panel ARDL

Özet

Gelişmekte olan ülkelere yapılan doğrudan yabancı yatırım (DYY) dünya çapında ilgi görmektedir. Bu ekonomiler benzer sosyal, ekonomik ve diğer koşullara sahip aynı gelişme aşamasındadır, ancak kurumsal ortamları bu gelişmekte olan ekonomiler içindeki DYY akımını etkilemektedir. Bu çalışma, 2002-2023 dönemi için 118 ülke ekonomisinde iyi yönetişimin altı bileşeninin DYY girişleri üzerindeki etkilerini, panel veri analizi kullanarak incelemektedir. Veri seti, DYY (% GDP), ihracat (% GDP) ile World Governance Index (WGI) göstergelerini içermektedir. Çalışmada, ihracat ve yönetişim göstergelerinin uzun vadede DYY üzerinde olumlu ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etki gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir. İyi yönetişimin ev sahibi ülkelere DYY girişlerini teşvik etmede çok önemli bir anahtar faktör olduğuna dair ampirik kanıtlar sağlanmıştır. Siyasi açıdan istikrarlı, etkin ve güvenilir bir hükümete ve güçlü bir düzenleyici çerçeveye sahip ekonomiler, DYY akışını çekme eğilimindedir.

Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries attracts worldwide attention. These economies are at the same stage of development, sharing similar social, economic, and other conditions; however, their institutional environments influence FDI inflows within these developing economies. This study examines the impact of the six components of good governance on FDI inflows in 118 economies over the period 2002-2023 using panel data analysis. The dataset includes FDI (% of GDP), exports (% of GDP), and World Governance Index (WGI) indicators. In the study, it has been determined that exports and governance indicators exert a positive and statistically significant impact on foreign direct investment (FDI) in the long term. Empirical evidence suggests that good governance is a crucial key factor in attracting FDI to host countries. Economies with politically stable, efficient, and reliable governments and strong regulatory frameworks tend to attract higher FDI inflows

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şahin, B. Y., Kulaç, A. (2025). YÖNETİŞİM KALİTESİNİN DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLARA ETKİSİ: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 30, 319–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/1116998

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (68)

  1. Ali, F. A., Fiess, N., & MacDonald, R. (2010). Do institutions matter for foreign direct investment?. Open economies review, 21, 201-219.
  2. Aizenman, J., & Noy, I. (2006). FDI and trade – two-way linkages? Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(2), 151–171. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2005.11.002
  3. Akerlof, G.A., 1970. The market for lemons’: quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly journal of economics, 84 (3), 488–500.
  4. Arrow, K.J., 1963. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American economic review, 53 (5), 941–973.
  5. Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., & Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164-177.
  6. Berle, A.A., Jr. & Means, G., 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
  7. Bhujabal, P., Sethi, N., & Padhan, P. C. (2024). Effect of institutional quality on FDI inflows in South Asian and Southeast Asian countries. Heliyon, 10(5), e27060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27060
  8. Bond SR, & Eberhardt M (2009) Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator. MPRAPaper No. 17870
  9. Bond, S. R., & Eberhardt, M. (2013). Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in panel time series models. Nuffield College & School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  10. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  11. Brewer, T.L., 1993. Government, market imperfections, and foreign direct investment. Journal of international business studies, 24 (1), 147–157.
  12. Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397–415. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.06.001
  13. Cheng, L. K., & Kwan, Y. K. (2000). Trade Openness and Foreign Direct Investment: The Role of Trade Policy. The Journal of Development Studies, 36(4), 127-137.
  14. Chudik, A & Paseran, H., 2013. Large Panel Data Models with Cross-Sectional Dependence: A Survey. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper No. 153.
  15. Coase, R.H., 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.
  16. Coase, R.H., 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of law and economics, 3 (1), 1–44.
  17. Cuervo-cazurra.A. (2008). Better the devil you don’t know: Types of corruption and FDI in transition economies. 14.12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2007.02.003
  18. Dahmani, M., Mabrouki, M., & Ben Youssef, A. (2021). The ICT, financial development, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: Panel CS-ARDL Evidence. GREDEG Working Papers Series, (2021-46).
  19. Demirtaş, G., & Akçay, S. (2006). Kurumsal Faktörlerin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Üzerine Etkisi: Ampirik Bir Kanıt. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 15 - 33.
  20. Demsetz, H., 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American economic review, 62, 347–359.
  21. Doğru, B. (2012). The effect of institutional variables on FDI inflows: Evidence from upper-middle income countries. Global Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 1(1), 1-12.
  22. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 133–162. https//doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00207-6
  23. Dunning, J.H., 1993. Multinational enterprise and the global economy. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  24. Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). The new growth empirics: A survey. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 4734.
  25. Frees, E. W. (1995). Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. Journal of econometrics, 69(2), 393-414.
  26. Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the american statistical association, 32(200), 675-701.
  27. Globerman.S.& Sapiro.D. (2002). Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure. World Development. 30(11). 1899–1919.
  28. Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3 (4), 305–360.
  29. Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization. 57. 587–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303573040
  30. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2004). Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996–2002. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
  31. Kaufmann, D. (2005). Myths and realities of governance and corruption. World Bank Working Papers and Articles.
  32. Khan, H., Dong, Y., Bibi, R., & Khan, I. (2023). Institutional Quality and Foreign Direct Investment: Global Evidence. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 10547-10591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01508-1
  33. Konatar, M., Đurašković, J., Popović, N., & Radović, M. (2025). Does Public Debt Crowd Out Public Investment in Central and Eastern European economies? A Dynamic Approach Using CS-ARDL. Prague Economic Papers, 34(1), 26–44.
  34. Kostevc, Č., Redek, T. & Sušjan, A. (2007). Foreign direct investment and institutional environment in transition economies. Transition Studies Review, 14(1), 40-54.
  35. Kuzmina, O., Rudenko, V., & Shtelma, O. (2015). Governance and foreign direct investment in Russia Evidence from the regions. Economic Systems, 39(2), 205–222. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.10.002
  36. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. A & Vishnu, R., 1998. Law and finance. Journal of political economy, 106 (6), 1113–1155.
  37. Leyva, R., & Orona, C. (2017). The Governance as a Determinant of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America. Latin American Business Review, 36, 123-145.
  38. Maiti, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2013). Governance, foreign direct investment and domestic welfare. International Review of Economics & Finance, 27, 406-415.
  39. Markowitz, H.M., 1959. Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investment. New York: John Wiley.
  40. Mengistu, A. A., & Adhikary, B. K. (2011). Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381003755765
  41. Mirkovikj, B. K., Gkasis, P., & Golitsis, P. (2024). Regulatory Quality and Foreign Direct Investment: A Case Analysis of North Macedonia. Theoretical Economics Letters, 14(5), 1883-1913.
  42. North, D., 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. London: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93–130.
  44. Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727–731.
  45. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625.
  46. Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79-113.
  47. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1997). Pooled estimation of long-run relationships in dynamic heterogeneous panels.
  48. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (1999). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, 371-413.
  49. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  50. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435.
  51. Pesaran, M. H. (2006). A CCE estimator for panel data models with common factors. Econometric Theory, 22(2), 265-293.
  52. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  53. Pesaran, M. H. & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
  54. Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99–125.
  55. Piwonski, K. (2010). Does the ‘Ease of Doing Business’ in a country influence its foreign direct investment inflows? (Senior Capstone Project). Bryant University.
  56. Rammal, H. G., & Zurbruegg, R. (2006). The impact of regulatory quality on intra-foreign direct investment flows in the ASEAN markets. International Business Review, 15(4), 401-414.
  57. Ricardo, D., 1817. On the principle of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray.
  58. Soyyiğit, S. & Doğan, S. (2020). Kurumsal yapı göstergeleri, ihracat ve doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: Bağımsız Devletler Topluluğu örneği. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 9(1), 353-376.
  59. Tobin, J., 1958. Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Review of economic studies, 25, 65–86.
  60. Uğurlu, S. (2020). The impact of governance on foreign direct investment in OECD countries. International Journal of Economic Studies, 24(3), 295–310.
  61. Üçler, G. (2017). Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar için Kurumların Önemi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 54(627), 119-134.
  62. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748.
  63. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel Cointegration Tests of the Fisher Effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233.
  64. Williamson, O.E., 1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.
  65. World Bank. (2025). Worldwide governance indicators. Retrieved February 19, 2025.
  66. Yılmaz, E. & Kaya, H. (2021). Kurumsal yönetişim kalitesinin doğrudan yabancı yatırımlara etkisi 2002-2018 dönemi. Dünya Ekonomi ve Politika Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 211-233.
  67. Chudik, A & Paseran, H., 2013. Large Panel Data Models with Cross-Sectional Dependence: A Survey. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper No. 153.
  68. Globerman.S.& Sapiro.D. (2002). Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure. World Development. 30(11). 1899–1919.