Dergiler / Journal of International Environmental Application and Science / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Oil in Water, Radioactivity, Physical and Chemical properties Study for Produced Water from Heglig and Neem Oil Field

Mohamed Osman Zooalnoon(Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, SUDAN)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bioremediation treatment for Neem field produced water is useless, and the plantation of Phragmites Australis is suggested to be replaced by phytoremediation plant such as ( Brassica juncea L, Sorghastrum nutans, Helianthus annuus, Gleditsia triacanthos, and Brassica) for treatment of heavy metals (Pb and Ag) that exceed the acceptable limits.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study investigates the physical and chemical parameters, heavy metals, oil contents and radioactivity of Neem and Heglig field produced water to find adequate technique to be used for treatment of pollution measurements that exceed the limits of environmental legislation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For Heglig produced water all the analysis results were within the acceptable limits according to Ministry of Energy and Mining except for the oil content, TDS, NH 3 and Fe which exceeded the allowable limits because of the cumulative effect due to the evaporation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bioremediation treatment for Neem field produced water is useless, and the plantation of Phragmites Australis is suggested to be replaced by phytoremediation plant such as ( Brassica juncea L, Sorghastrum nutans, Helianthus annuus, Gleditsia triacanthos, and Brassica) for treatment of heavy metals (Pb and Ag) that exceed the acceptable limits.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Phytoremediation · bioremediation · produced water

Abstract

This study investigates the physical and chemical parameters, heavy metals, oil contents and radioactivity of Neem and Heglig field produced water to find adequate technique to be used for treatment of pollution measurements that exceed the limits of environmental legislation. For Heglig produced water all the analysis results were within the acceptable limits according to Ministry of Energy and Mining except for the oil content, TDS, NH 3 and Fe which exceeded the allowable limits because of the cumulative effect due to the evaporation. Moreover, conversion of Heglig field produced water into a source of fresh water is feasible for field scale application by using bioremediation technique for oil in water treatment. For Neem field produced water the results of total hardness, alkalinity, pH, TDS, and E conductivity exceeded the acceptable limits according to Ministry of Energy and Mining and the elements Pb, Ag and radioactivity exceeded by a large margin the acceptable limits while the result for oil in water was less than 1ppm, which is in the acceptable limit. Bioremediation treatment for Neem field produced water is useless, and the plantation of Phragmites Australis is suggested to be replaced by phytoremediation plant such as ( Brassica juncea L, Sorghastrum nutans, Helianthus annuus, Gleditsia triacanthos, and Brassica) for treatment of heavy metals (Pb and Ag) that exceed the acceptable limits.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Zooalnoon, M. O., Musa, A. (2017). Oil in Water, Radioactivity, Physical and Chemical properties Study for Produced Water from Heglig and Neem Oil Field. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1112407

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Azetsu-Scott K, Yeats P, Wohlgeschaffen G, (2007) Precipitation of heavy metals in produced water: influence on contaminant transport and toxicity. Mar Environ Res, 63(2), 146.
  2. Castro T.N, Nunes S.K.S, Barros N, (2013) Treatment of oil field produced water: A cleaner process for producing sodium Carbonate (soda ash) Brazilian Journal of petroleum and gas, 7 (1), 31-41.
  3. Fakhru'l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater, 170 (2), 530-551.
  4. Hansen BR, Davies SRH, (1994) Review of potential technologies for the removal of dissolved components from produced water. Chem Eng Res Des, 72 (A2), 176-188.
  5. Hayes T, Arthur D, (2004) The 11th annual international petroleum environmental conference. Albuquerque. Overview of emerging produced water treatment technologies, 1-36.
  6. Joint Editorial Board and Committee Members, (1999) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, by American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, 20th edition.
  7. Marzena S, Anna (2011), Use of Brassica plants in the phytoremediation and biofumigation processes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 12(11), 7760-7771.
  8. Reynolds RR, (2003) Produced water and associated issues: A manual for the Independent Operator. Oklahoma Geological Survey Open-file Report. Petroleum Technology Transfer Council South-Midcontinent Region, Vol. 6.
  9. United States Department of Energy (2010) Introduction to produced water http://www.netl.doe.gov/ technologies/pwmis/intropw/index.html.