KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

Ekonomik Karmaşıklık ve Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Arasındaki Bağlantının Ortaya Çıkarılması: BRICS-T Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar

Unveiling the Nexus Between Economic Complexity and Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from BRICS-T Countries

Emre Akusta(KIRKLARELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6147-5443
Sayfa
179–207
Yayın Tarihi
2026-04-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuçlar, ekonomik karmaşıklığın çevresel performans üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma BRICS-T ülkelerinde ekonomik karmaşıklığın çevresel performans üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Analizde 1999-2021 dönemi yıllık verileri, Durbin-Hausman eşbütünleşme testi ve Augmented Mean Group (AMG) tahmincisi kullanılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuçlar, ekonomik karmaşıklığın çevresel performans üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Ekonomik Karmaşıklık · Çevresel Performans · BRICS-T

Özet

Bu çalışma BRICS-T ülkelerinde ekonomik karmaşıklığın çevresel performans üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Analizde 1999-2021 dönemi yıllık verileri, Durbin-Hausman eşbütünleşme testi ve Augmented Mean Group (AMG) tahmincisi kullanılmıştır. Panel AMG sonuçlarının sağlamlığı ise CCEMG ve CS-ARDL yöntemleri ile test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, ekonomik karmaşıklığın çevresel performans üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Ekonomik karmaşıklık endeksindeki %1'lik bir artış BRICS-T ülkelerinde çevresel performansı %0,020 ile %1,243 arasında artırmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, ekonomik büyüme, enerji yoğunluğu ve nüfus yoğunluğunun çevresel performans üzerinde olumsuz bir etkiye sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. Buna karşılık yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı çevresel performansa olumlu katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Abstract

This study analyses the impacts of economic complexity on environmental performance in BRICS-T countries. Annual data for the period 1999-2021, Durbin-Hausman cointegration test and Augmented Mean Group (AMG) estimator are used in the analysis. The robustness of the Panel AMG results is tested with CCEMG and CS-ARDL methods. The results indicate that economic complexity has a positive impact on environmental performance. An increase of 1% in the economic complexity index increases environmental performance in BRICS-T countries between 0.020% and 1.243%. However, economic growth, energy intensity and population density were found to have a negative impact on environmental performance. Renewable energy use, in contrast, contributes positively to environmental performance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akusta, E. (2026). Ekonomik Karmaşıklık ve Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Arasındaki Bağlantının Ortaya Çıkarılması: BRICS-T Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 179–207. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1582854

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (68)

  1. Abbasi, K. R., Lv, K., Radulescu, M., & Shaikh, P. A. (2021). Economic complexity, tourism, energy prices, and environmental degradation in the top economic complexity countries: Fresh panel evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 68717–68731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15312-4 Adebayo, T. S., Altuntaş, M., Goyibnazarov, S., Agyekum, E. B., Zawbaa, H. M., & Kamel, S. (2022). Dynamic effect of disintegrated energy consumption and economic complexity on environmental degradation in top economic complexity economies. Energy Reports, 8, 12832–12842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.161
  2. Adebayo, T. S., Rjoub, H., Akadiri, S. S., Oladipupo, S. D., Sharif, A., & Adeshola, I. (2022). The role of economic complexity in the environmental Kuznets curve of MINT economies: Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 24248–24260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17524-0 Adedoyin, F. F., Nwulu, N., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Environmental degradation, energy consumption and sustainable development: Accounting for the role of economic complexities with evidence from World Bank income clusters. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2727–2740. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2774
  3. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., & Huang, B. (2021). An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603
  4. Ahmed, Z., Can, M., Sinha, A., Ahmad, M., Alvarado, R., & Rjoub, H. (2022). Investigating the role of economic complexity in sustainable development and environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(8), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2097330
  5. Akiş, E., & Soyyiğit, S. (2020). Ekonomik karmaşıklık düzeyi ve CO2 emisyonu arasındaki ilişkinin analizi: ASEAN ülkeleri örneği. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(38), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.688354
  6. Alvarado, R., Tillaguango, B., Dagar, V., Ahmad, M., Işık, C., Méndez, P., & Toledo, E. (2021). Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: Empirical evidence using quantile regressions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128585
  7. Alves, L. L. M., Angelo, H., Almeida, A. N., Silva, G. F., Matricardi, E. A. T., Nunes, A., & Souza Júnior, C. V. N. (2024). Strategic Analysis of the Forest Carbon Market in Brazil. Sustainability, 16(16), 6898. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166898 Amin, S. B., Kabir, F. A., & Khan, F. (2020). Tourism and energy nexus in selected South Asian countries: A panel study. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(16), 1963–1967. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1638354
  8. Apaydın, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayakizi üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.695836
  9. Arnaut, J., & Lidman, J. (2021). Environmental sustainability and economic growth in Greenland: testing the environmental Kuznets curve. Sustainability, 13(3), 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031228
  10. Azizi, Z., Daraei, F., & Boroujeni, A. N. (2019). The impact of economic complexity on environmental pollution. Economic Development Policy, 7(2), 201–219.
  11. Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., & Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004
  12. Block, S., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., Wendling, Z. A., et al. (2024). 2024 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. epi.yale.edu
  13. Boleti, E., Garas, A., Kyriakou, A., & Lapatinas, A. (2021). Economic Complexity and Environmental Performance: Evidence from a World Sample. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 26(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-021-09750-0
  14. Boufateh, T. (2019). The environmental Kuznets curve by considering asymmetric oil price shocks: evidence from the top two. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(1), 706-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3641-3
  15. Breitung, J., & Pesaran, M. H. (2005). Unit roots and cointegration in panels. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=2785225
  16. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1287-1294. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911963
  17. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  18. Butt, H. M. M., Khan, I., & Xia, E. (2023). How do energy supply and energy use link to environmental degradation in China?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(40), 92891-92902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28960-5
  19. Can, M., & Gozgor, G. (2016). Dynamic relationships among CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and economic complexity in France. Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Economic Complexity in France (March 30, 2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2756638
  20. Can, M., & Gozgor, G. (2017). The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: Evidence from France. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 16364–16370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9219-7
  21. Chang, T., Gupta, R., Inglesi-Lotz, R., Simo-Kengne, B., Smithers, D., & Trembling, A. (2015). Renewable energy and growth: Evidence from heterogeneous panel of G7 countries using Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1405–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.022
  22. Chen, H., Zhang, X., Wu, R., & Cai, T. (2020). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve for city-level CO2 emissions: based on corrected NPP-VIIRS nighttime light data in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 121575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121575
  23. Chu, L. K. (2021). Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: New evidence from economic complexity. Applied Economics Letters, 28(7), 612–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1767280
  24. Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of econometrics, 188(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
  25. Doğan, B., Driha, O. M., Balsalobre Lorente, D., & Shahzad, U. (2021). The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2125
  26. Doğan, B., Saboori, B., & Can, M. (2019). Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(31), 31900–31912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06333-1
  27. Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: A novel estimator. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/17692
  28. Ghosh, S., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Doğan, B., Paiano, A., & Talbi, B. (2022). Modelling an empirical framework of the implications of tourism and economic complexity on environmental sustainability in G7 economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376, 134281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134281
  29. Gill, A. R., Hassan, S., & Viswanathan, K. K. (2019). Is democracy enough to get early turn of the environmental Kuznets curve in ASEAN countries?. Energy & Environment, 30(8), 1491-1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19851349 Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  30. Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A., Yildirim, M. (2014). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001
  31. Houkai, W., & Qianwen, L. (2021). COVID-19's impact on agriculture, rural areas and farmers and countermeasures. In Economics of the Pandemic (pp. 46-71). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003184447-3
  32. Ikram, M., Xia, W., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, U., & Rafique, M. Z. (2021). Exploring the nexus between economic complexity, economic growth and ecological footprint: Contextual evidences from Japan. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101460
  33. Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 163-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403192
  34. Jochmans, K., & Verardi, V. (2019). XTSERIALPM: Stata module to perform a portmanteau test for serial correlation in panel data.
  35. Kosifakis, G., Kampas, A., & Papadas, C. T. (2020). Economic complexity and the environment: Some estimates on their links. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 6(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.112117
  36. Lapatinas, A., Garas, A., Boleti, E., & Kyriakou, A. (2019). Economic complexity and environmental performance: Evidence from a world sample. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/92833
  37. Laverde-Rojas, H., & Correa, J. C. (2021). Economic Complexity, Economic Growth, and CO2 Emissions: A Panel Data Analysis. International Economic Journal, 35(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2021.1975303
  38. Laverde-Rojas, H., Guevara-Fletcher, D. A., & Camacho-Murillo, A. (2021). Economic growth, economic complexity, and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Colombia. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07188
  39. Lewis, W. A. (2013). Theory of economic growth. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203709665
  40. Li, R., Wang, Q., Liu, Y., & Jiang, R. (2021). Per-capita carbon emissions in 147 countries: the effect of economic, energy, social, and trade structural changes. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1149-1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.031
  41. Lin, B. X., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural exports. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(12), 2937-2945. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63430-X
  42. Madlener, R., & Sunak, Y. (2011). Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and energy demand: What can we learn for urban energy planning and urbanization management? Sustainable Cities and Society, 1(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.006
  43. Mensah, I. A., Sun, M., Gao, C., Omari-Sasu, A. Y., Zhu, D., Ampimah, B. C., & Quarcoo, A. (2019). Analysis on the nexus of economic growth, fossil fuel energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil price in Africa based on a PMG panel ARDL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.281
  44. Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 64871–64881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15360-w
  45. Neagu, O. (2019). The link between economic complexity and carbon emissions in the European Union countries: A model based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) approach. Sustainability, 11(17), 4753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174753
  46. Neagu, O. (2020). Economic complexity and ecological footprint: Evidence from the most complex economies in the world. Sustainability, 12(21), 9031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219031
  47. Neagu, O., & Neagu, M.-I. (2022). The Environmental Kuznets Curve revisited: Economic complexity and ecological footprint in the most complex economies of the world. Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldiș Arad, Seria Științe Economice, 32(1), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2022-0005
  48. Neagu, O., & Teodoru, M. C. (2019). The relationship between economic complexity, energy consumption structure and greenhouse gas emission: Heterogeneous panel evidence from the EU countries. Sustainability, 11(2), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020497
  49. Özbek, S., & Naimoğlu, M. (2022). Çevre kalitesi-ekonomik karmaşıklık ilişkisi: Türkiye ekonomisi üzerine fourier eşbütünleşme analizi. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 72(1), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1061837
  50. Pata, U. K. (2021). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO 2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3
  51. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers. Economics, 1240(1), 1.
  52. Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
  53. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  54. Rafique, M. Z., Nadeem, A. M., Xia, W., Ikram, M., Shoaib, H. M., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 4623–4640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01625-4
  55. Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 31(2), 350-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00796.x
  56. Rehman, S., Rehman, E., Mumtaz, A., & Jianglin, Z. (2022). A multicriteria decision-making approach in exploring the nexus between wind and solar energy generation, economic development, fossil fuel consumption, and CO2 emissions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 819384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.819384
  57. Romero, J. P., & Gramkow, C. (2021). Economic complexity and greenhouse gas emissions. World Development, 139, 105317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105317
  58. Saqib, N., Radulescu, M., Usman, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Cilan, T. (2023). Exploring the Nexus of Environmental Technology, Economic Complexity, Renewable Electricity, and Environmental Policy in G10 Countries: Implications for Sustainable Low-Carbon Future. Economic Complexity, Renewable Electricity, and Environmental Policy in G10 Countries: Implications for Sustainable Low-Carbon Future. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4401925
  59. Shahzad, U., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, F., & Shahzad, K. (2021). Investigating the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint for the United States: New insights from quantile methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123806
  60. Swart, J., & Brinkmann, L. (2020). Economic Complexity and the Environment: Evidence from Brazil. In W. Leal Filho, U. Tortato, & F. Frankenberger (Eds.), Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030 (pp. 3–45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_1
  61. Taşdemir, S. Z., & Topcu, E. (2024). Ekonomik karmaşıklık ve çevre: AB ülkeleri örneği. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(28), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1494426
  62. Tekbaş, M., & Tutumlu, H. (2023). Ekonomik büyüme, ekonomik karmaşıklık, yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ve CO2 emisyonu ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.54429/seyad.1311540
  63. Tenaw, D., & Hawitibo, A. L. (2021). Carbon decoupling and economic growth in Africa: Evidence from production and consumption-based carbon emissions. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 6, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100040
  64. The Growth Lab at Harvard University. (2019). “Growth Projections and Complexity Rankings, V2” [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/xtaqmc
  65. Ullah, S., Luo, R., Adebayo, T. S., & Kartal, M. T. (2024). Paving the ways toward sustainable development: The asymmetric effect of economic complexity, renewable electricity, and foreign direct investment on the environmental sustainability in BRICS-T. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(4), 9115–9139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03085-4
  66. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
  67. Yilanci, V., & Pata, U. K. (2020). Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: The role of economic complexity on ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32683–32694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09434-4
  68. Yıldırım, A. E., & Yıldırım, M. O. (2021). Revisiting the determinants of carbon emissions for Turkey: The role of construction sector. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 42325-42338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13722-y