KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketimi ile Yönetişim Arasındaki İlişkide GLOBE Kültürel Boyutlarının Aracılık Rolü: 53 Ülke Üzerine Bir Analiz

The Mediating Role of GLOBE Cultural Dimensions in the Relationship Between Renewable Energy Consumption and Governance: An Analysis of 53 Countries

Ömür Saltık(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8507-8971
Filiz Bozagaç(TOROS UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3764-0111
Sayfa
125–165
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

GLOBE kültürel çerçevesi ve WGI kullanılarak geliştirilen model, yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminin yönetişimle olumsuz ilişkisinin, teknoloji ve geleneksel enerji biçimlerinin eşzamanlı kullanımından kaynaklandığını göstermektedir; kültürün önemli zıt yönlü aracı etkilerini vurgulamaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, 53 ülkeden elde edilen verilerle yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ile yönetişim arasındaki ilişkide kültürel boyutların rolünü incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:GLOBE kültürel çerçevesi ve WGI kullanılarak geliştirilen model, yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminin yönetişimle olumsuz ilişkisinin, teknoloji ve geleneksel enerji biçimlerinin eşzamanlı kullanımından kaynaklandığını göstermektedir; kültürün önemli zıt yönlü aracı etkilerini vurgulamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, kültürün kurumsal kaliteyi nasıl şekillendirdiğini, kolektif normları sosyal tercihlerle nasıl birleştirdiğini ve yatırım ortamlarını nasıl etkilediğini, kültürü enerji geçişi yönetişiminde merkezi ve etkileşimli bir faktör olarak nasıl konumlandırdığını göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:kültürel boyutlar · davranışsal iktisat · uluslararası işletme yönetimi

Özet

Bu çalışma, 53 ülkeden elde edilen verilerle yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ile yönetişim arasındaki ilişkide kültürel boyutların rolünü incelemektedir. GLOBE kültürel çerçevesi ve WGI kullanılarak geliştirilen model, yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminin yönetişimle olumsuz ilişkisinin, teknoloji ve geleneksel enerji biçimlerinin eşzamanlı kullanımından kaynaklandığını göstermektedir; kültürün önemli zıt yönlü aracı etkilerini vurgulamaktadır. Performans ve gelecek yönelimi değerleri yönetişimi güçlendirirken, grup içi toplulukçuluk zayıflatıcı etki göstermektedir. Bulgular, kültürün kurumsal kaliteyi nasıl şekillendirdiğini, kolektif normları sosyal tercihlerle nasıl birleştirdiğini ve yatırım ortamlarını nasıl etkilediğini, kültürü enerji geçişi yönetişiminde merkezi ve etkileşimli bir faktör olarak nasıl konumlandırdığını göstermektedir.

Abstract

This study explores the role of cultural dimensions in the relationship between renewable energy consumption and governance across 53 countries. Using the GLOBE cultural framework and World Governance Indicators, the structural model identifies a negative association between renewable energy use and governance, likely reflecting the coexistence of modern and traditional energy sources. Cultural dimensions show contrasting mediating effects: Performance orientation and future orientation strengthen governance, whereas in-group collectivism weakens it. The findings demonstrate how culture shapes institutional quality, connects collective norms with social preferences, and influences investment environments, positioning culture as a central and interactive factor in energy transition governance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Saltık, Ö., Bozagaç, F. (2026). Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketimi ile Yönetişim Arasındaki İlişkide GLOBE Kültürel Boyutlarının Aracılık Rolü: 53 Ülke Üzerine Bir Analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 125–165. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1770905

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (122)

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2008). Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. American Economic Review, 98(1), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.267
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Currency.
  3. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
  4. Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2016). Political economy in a changing world. Journal of Political Economy, 123(5), 1038–1086.
  5. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
  6. Ahn, T. K., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Social capital and collective action. In D. Castiglione, J. W. van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 70–100). Oxford University Press.
  7. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881
  8. Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Political competition, path dependence, and the strategy of sustainable energy transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12002
  9. Aklin, M., Bayer, P., Harish, S. P., & Urpelainen, J. (2018). Economics of household technology adoption in developing countries: Evidence from solar technology adoption in rural India. Energy Economics, 72, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.011
  10. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00030-5
  11. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (2007). Bureaucrats or politicians? Part I: A single policy task. American Economic Review, 97(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.1.169
  12. Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2015). Culture and institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(4), 898–944. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.4.898
  13. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
  14. Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fairer sex? Gender differences in altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556419
  15. Atif, M., Hossain, M., Alam, M. S., & Goergen, M. (2021). Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101665
  16. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.
  17. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
  18. Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2012). Energy access programmes and sustainable development: A critical review and analysis. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(3), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.002
  19. Banerjee, A., Mullainathan, S., & Hanna, R. (2012). Corruption (Working Paper No. 17968). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17968
  20. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363
  21. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400
  22. Bassen, A., Meyer, K., & Schlange, J. (2006). The influence of corporate responsibility on the cost of capital. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.984406
  23. Bates, R. H. (2008). State failure. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.132017
  24. Bayar, Y. (2016). Public governance and economic growth in the transitional economies of the European Union. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 12(48), 5–18.
  25. Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
  26. Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.649
  27. Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
  28. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
  29. Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E., & Sovacool, B. (2018). Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical, and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015
  30. Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2012). The potential role of carbon labeling in a green economy. Energy Economics, 34, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.032
  31. Collier, P. (1999, April). Doing well out of war. Conference on Economic Agendas In Civil Wars, 26–27, London.
  32. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448
  33. Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(44), 18452–18456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106
  34. Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X
  35. Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051
  36. Emrich, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & den Hartog, D. D. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations and leaders. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 343–394). Sage.
  37. Falk, A., & Szech, N. (2013). Organizations, diffused pivotality and immoral outcomes (IZA Discussion Paper No. 7442). IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
  38. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
  39. Fisman, R., & Miguel, E. (2007). Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6), 1020–1048. https://doi.org/10.1086/527495
  40. Fleta-Asín, J., & Muñoz, F. (2021). Renewable energy public–private partnerships in developing countries: Determinants of private investment. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2165
  41. Foxon, T. J., Gross, R., Chase, A., Howes, J., Arnall, A., & Anderson, D. (2005). UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: Drivers, barriers and systems failures. Energy Policy, 33(16), 2123–2137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.011
  42. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161311
  43. Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., & Raver, J. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225
  44. Gennaioli, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2015). Neglected risks: The psychology of financial crises. American Economic Review, 105(5), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151091
  45. Greif, A. (1993). Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders' coalition. American Economic Review, 83(3), 525–548.
  46. Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
  47. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.23
  48. Hayek, F. A., & Hamowy, R. (2020). The constitution of liberty (Definitive ed.). Routledge.
  49. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
  50. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  51. Holmström, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
  52. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage.
  53. International Energy Agency. (2022). World energy outlook 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022
  54. International Energy Agency. (2023). World energy outlook 2023. https://www.iea.org
  55. International Energy Agency. (2025). World energy outlook 2025. https://www.iea.org
  56. Jänicke, M. (2005). Trend-setters in environmental policy: The character and role of pioneer countries. European Environment, 15(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.375
  57. Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & de Luque, M. S. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400234
  58. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Rights and production functions: An application to labor-managed firms and codetermination. Journal of Business, 52(4), 469–506. https://doi.org/10.1086/296060
  59. Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. (2004). Humane orientation in societies, organizations, and leader attributes. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 564–601). Sage.
  60. Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332273
  61. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin.
  62. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. İçinde L. C. MacLean & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Fundamentals of financial decision making (pp. 99-127). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006
  63. Kalkan, G. (2024). Dünya’daki örnek uygulamaları ile yenilenebilir enerji teknolojilerinin topluluk sahipliği yoluyla toplulukları güçlendirmesi. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1454348
  64. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). Response to ‘What do the worldwide governance indicators measure?’. European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.49
  65. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
  66. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475
  67. Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., & Schade, C. (2007). ‘I think I can, I think I can’: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(4), 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.11.002
  68. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
  69. Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555253
  70. Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 659–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.09.001
  71. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press.
  72. Locke, J. (1967). Two treatises of government. Cambridge University Press.
  73. Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management. Futures, 42(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
  74. Meadowcroft, J. (2007). National sustainable development strategies: Features, challenges and reflexivity. European Environment, 17(3), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.450
  75. Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
  76. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2003). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
  77. Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155–162.
  78. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
  79. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839
  80. Omar, M. A., & Hasanujzaman, M. (2023). The role of national culture in renewable energy consumption: Global evidence. Energy Reports, 10, 1765–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.033
  81. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
  82. Ostrom, E. (2005). Policies that crowd out reciprocity and collective action. In H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, & E. Fehr (Eds.), Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life (pp. 253–275). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4771.003.0015
  83. O’Toole, L. J. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
  84. Pachauri, S., & Rao, N. D. (2013). Gender impacts and determinants of energy poverty: Are we asking the right questions? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.006
  85. Pindyck, R. S. (1991). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3), 1110–1148. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3307
  86. Przeworski, A. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990 (No:3). Cambridge University Press.
  87. Putnam, R. D., Nanetti, R. Y., & Leonardi, R. (1994). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press. REN21. (2023). Renewables 2023 global status report.
  88. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039
  89. Rodrik, D. (2014). When ideas trump interests: Preferences, worldviews, and policy innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.1.189
  90. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Political corruption and democracy. Journal of International Law, 14(2), 363–378.
  91. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2016). The limits of cost/benefit analysis when disasters loom. Global Policy, 7, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12279
  92. Ross, M. L. (2004). What do we know about natural resources and civil war? Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343304043773
  93. Rousseau, J. J. (1762). The social contract. İçinde M. Zwolinski & I. J. Mario-Garcia (Eds.), Arguing about political philosophy (pp. 42-52). Taylor & Francis.
  94. Sachs, W. (2015). Planet dialectics: Explorations in environment and development. Bloomsbury.
  95. Sağır, H. (2025). Enerji politikaları ve paradigma değişimi: İklim değişikliği bağlamında dönüşüm. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Siyaset Bilimleri Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(20), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.58202/joecopol.1594716
  96. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
  97. Sarkar, A., & Singh, J. (2010). Financing energy efficiency in developing countries– lessons learned and remaining challenges. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5560–5571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.001
  98. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809
  99. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, (48)1, 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
  100. Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press.
  101. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
  102. Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2013). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. İçinde D. A. Small, G. Loewenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The feeling of risk (pp. 51-68). Routledge.
  103. Sovacool, B. K. (2013). An international assessment of energy security performance. Ecological Economics, 88, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.019
  104. Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003
  105. Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015). Energy justice. Applied Energy, 142, 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002
  106. Sovacool, B. K., Schmid, P., Stirling, A., Walter, G., & MacKerron, G. (2020). Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nature Energy, 5(11), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3
  107. Sovacool, B. K. (2021). Who are victims of low-carbon transitions? Towards a political ecology of climate change mitigation. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, 101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916
  108. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  109. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.
  110. Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  111. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.
  112. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169
  113. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
  114. Waldman, D. A., Sully de Luque, M., Washburn, N., House, R. J., Adetoun, B., Barrasa, A.,. & Wilderom, C. P. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400230
  115. Weber, M. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. Simon and Schuster.
  116. Weber, E. U., & Milliman, R. A. (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science, 43(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123
  117. Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205
  118. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
  119. World Bank. (2021). Global economic prospects. https://www.worldbank.org
  120. World Bank. (2025a). Worldwide governance indicators. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
  121. World Bank. (2025b). World development indicators. https://data.worldbank.org
  122. Waldman, D. A., Sully de Luque, M., Washburn, N., House, R. J., Adetoun, B., Barrasa, A.,. & Wilderom, C. P. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400230