KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

FROM BLINDNESS TO TRANSFORMATION: AN ANALYSIS OF UNITED NATIONS WOMEN’S GENDER DİSCOURSE FROM A SOCIAL POLICY PERSPECTIVE

Merve Çiloğlu Yörübulut(BANDIRMA ONYEDİ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9193-0550
Sayfa
27–48
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, özellikle pandemi sonrası dönemde UN Women’ın giderek daha dönüştürücü bir yaklaşımı benimsediğini, ancak aynı zamanda toplumsal cinsiyet farklılıklarını görünmez kılan kapsayıcı söylemlerin de öne çıktığını göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Toplumsal cinsiyet ayrımcılığı, uluslararası örgütlerin toplumsal cinsiyet söylemleri içinde yeniden üretilebilen yapısal bir sorun teşkil etmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğini teşvik etmeyi amaçlayan küresel politika belgelerine yerleşmiş kavramsal çerçeveler ve söylemsel stratejiler ise bu yapısal sorunu derinleştirebilmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, özellikle pandemi sonrası dönemde UN Women’ın giderek daha dönüştürücü bir yaklaşımı benimsediğini, ancak aynı zamanda toplumsal cinsiyet farklılıklarını görünmez kılan kapsayıcı söylemlerin de öne çıktığını göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010–2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Toplumsal cinsiyet · Toplumsal cinsiyet körlüğü · Kadın

Özet

Toplumsal cinsiyet ayrımcılığı, uluslararası örgütlerin toplumsal cinsiyet söylemleri içinde yeniden üretilebilen yapısal bir sorun teşkil etmektedir. Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğini teşvik etmeyi amaçlayan küresel politika belgelerine yerleşmiş kavramsal çerçeveler ve söylemsel stratejiler ise bu yapısal sorunu derinleştirebilmektedir. Bu çalışma, UN Women tarafından 2010–2024 yılları arasında yayımlanan yıllık raporları belge analizi yöntemiyle incelemekte; toplumsal cinsiyete kör, toplumsal cinsiyet açısından tarafsız, toplumsal cinsiyete duyarlı ve toplumsal cinsiyet dönüştürücü yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde değerlendirmektedir. Amaç, kurumsal söylemin zaman içinde toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğine yaklaşımında nasıl bir evrim geçirdiğini ortaya koymak ve sosyal politika perspektifinden bu söylemlerin toplumsal cinsiyet temelli ayrımcılığı yeniden üretme ya da dönüştürme potansiyelini eleştirel biçimde değerlendirmektir. Bulgular, özellikle pandemi sonrası dönemde UN Women’ın giderek daha dönüştürücü bir yaklaşımı benimsediğini, ancak aynı zamanda toplumsal cinsiyet farklılıklarını görünmez kılan kapsayıcı söylemlerin de öne çıktığını göstermektedir. Bu durum, eşitlik retoriği altında yeni ayrımcılık biçimlerinin ortaya çıkabileceğine işaret etmektedir.

Abstract

Gender discrimination constitutes a structural problem that can be reproduced within the gender discourses of international organizations. The conceptual frameworks and discursive strategies embedded in global policy documents aiming to promote gender equality may, in fact, deepen this structural issue. This study examines the annual reports published by UN Women between 2010 and 2024 through document analysis, within the framework of gender-blind, gender-neutral, gender-sensitive, and gender-transformative approaches. The aim is to reveal how institutional discourse has evolved over time in its approach to gender equality and to critically assess, from a social policy perspective, the potential of these discourses either to reproduce or to transform gender-based discrimination. The findings indicate that UN Women has increasingly adopted a more transformative approach, particularly in the post-pandemic period; however, inclusive discourses that obscure gender differences have also become more prominent. This suggests that new forms of discrimination may emerge under the rhetoric of equality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yörübulut, M. Ç. (2026). FROM BLINDNESS TO TRANSFORMATION: AN ANALYSIS OF UNITED NATIONS WOMEN’S GENDER DİSCOURSE FROM A SOCIAL POLICY PERSPECTIVE. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 27–48. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1787189

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (67)

  1. Ahmed, S. (2014) “The Cultural Politics of Emotion”, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  2. Allwood, G. (2013) “Gender Mainstreaming and Policy Coherence for Development: Unintended Gender Consequences and EU Policy”, Women’s Studies International Forum, 39: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.01.008
  3. Bacchi, C. (2009) “Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?”, Pearson. Bonfert, A. T., Bunker, S., Tojeiro, C. M., and Hovhannisyan, Ş. (2023) “Leveraging Gender Data to Accelerate Gender Equality”, World Bank Group Gender Thematic Policy Note.
  4. Cameron, D. (1992) “Feminism and Linguistic Theory” (2nd ed.), London: Macmillan.
  5. Code, L. (1991) “What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge”, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  6. Connell, R. W. (2009) “Gender in World Perspective” (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Polity Press.
  7. Connell, R. W. and Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept”, Gender & Society, 19(6): 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
  8. Cornwall, A. and Rivas, A. M. (2015) “From ‘Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment’ to Global Justice: Reclaiming a Transformative Agenda for Gender and Development”, Third World Quarterly, 36(2): 396–415.
  9. Cornwall, A., Edström, J., and Greig, A. (2011) “Men and Development: Politicizing Masculinities”, London: Zed Books.
  10. Crenshaw, K. (1991) “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color”, Stanford Law Review, 43(6): 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2013) “Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches” (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  12. Criado Perez, C. (2019) “Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men”, New York: Abrams Press. EIGE (2022) “Gender-responsive evaluation”, European Institute for Gender Equality, https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-responsive-evaluation, (22.10.2025).
  13. Ely, R. J. and Meyerson, D. E. (2000) “Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change”, Staw, B. M. ve Sutton, R. I. (Ed.) Research in Organizational Behavior, (22): 103–152.
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) “Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Eveline, J. and Bacchi, C. (2005) “What Are We Mainstreaming When We Mainstream Gender?”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(4): 496–512.
  16. FAO (2023) “Gender Transformative Approaches: Overview”, https://www.fao.org/joint-programme-gender-transformative-approaches/overview/gender-transformative-approaches/en, (04.06.2026).
  17. FAO (2024a) “Step by Step Guide to Integrating a Gender Transformative Approach throughout the Project Cycle”, Rome: FAO.
  18. FAO (2024b) “Theory of Change for Gender Transformative Programming for Food Security, Nutrition and Sustainable Agriculture”, Rome: FAO.
  19. Fisher, J. and Makleff, S. (2022) “Advances in Gender-Transformative Approaches to Health Promotion”, Annual Review of Public Health, 43: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-121019-053834
  20. Forman-Rabinovici, A. and Mandel, H. (2023) “The Prevalence and Implications of Gender Blindness in Quantitative Political Science Research”, Politics & Gender, 19(2): 482–506.
  21. Fraser, N. (1997) “Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition”, New York: Routledge. Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003) “Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange” (Çev. J. Golb, J. Ingram ve C. Wilke), London: Verso.
  22. Goetz, A. M. (1997) “Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development”, London: Zed Books.
  23. Goetz, A. M. and Baden, S. (1997) “Who Needs [Sex] When You Can Have [Gender]?: Conflicting Discourses on Gender at Beijing”, Feminist Review, 56(1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1997.13
  24. Hoskyns, C. and Rai, S. M. (2007) “Recasting the Global Political Economy: Counting Women’s Unpaid Work”, New Political Economy, 12(3): 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460701485268
  25. IGWG (2009) “The Gender Integration Continuum: A Tool for Assessing Gender Integration in Programs and Policies”, Washington, DC: USAID. https://www.igwg.org/resources/the-gender-integration-continuum-training-session-user-guide/, (22.09.2025).
  26. IGWG (2017a) “Gender Integration Continuum Training Session User’s Guide”, USAID. https://www.igwg.org/resources/gender-integration-continuum-training-session-users-guide/, (22.09.2025).
  27. IGWG (2017b) “Gender Transformative Approaches: Definitions and Examples”, USAID. https://www.igwg.org/resources/gender-transformative-approaches-definitions-and-examples/, (22.09.2025).
  28. Jacquot, S. (2015) “Transformations in EU Gender Equality: From Emergence to Dismantling”, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Jewkes, R., Flood, M., and Lang, J. (2015) “From Work with Men and Boys to Changes of Social Norms and Reduction of Inequities in Gender Relations: A Conceptual Shift in Prevention of Violence against Women and Girls”, The Lancet, 385(9977): 1580–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4
  30. Kabeer, N. (2005) “Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment: A Critical Analysis of the Third Millennium Development Goal”, Gender & Development, 13(1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332273
  31. Kantola, J. and Lombardo, E. (2017) “Feminist Political Analysis: Exploring Strengths, Hegemonies and Limitations”, Feminist Theory, 18(3): 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117721882
  32. Krook, M. L. and True, J. (2022) “Gender and Global Political Economy”, Waylen, G., Celis, K., Kantola, J. ve Weldon, L. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics (2nd ed., ss. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Lakoff, R. (1973) “Language and Woman’s Place”, Language in Society, 2(1): 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
  34. Lombardo, E. and Meier, P. (2008) “Framing Gender Equality in the European Union Political Discourse”, Social Politics, 15(1): 1–29.
  35. Lorber, J. (1994) “Paradoxes of Gender”, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  36. Mackay, F., Kenny, M., and Chappell, L. (2010) “New Institutionalism through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?”, International Political Science Review, 31(5): 573–588.
  37. March, C., Smyth, I., and Mukhopadhyay, M. (1999) “A Guide to Gender-Analysis Frameworks”, Oxford: Oxfam. Mazur, A. G. (2002) “Theorizing Feminist Policy”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Merriam, S. B. (2009) “Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation” (2nd ed.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  39. Merriam, S. B. and Tisdell, E. J. (2015) “Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation” (4th ed.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  40. Merry, S. E. (2006) “Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  41. Mohanty, C. T. (2003) “Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity”, Durham: Duke University Press.
  42. Molyneux, M. (2006) “Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme”, Social Policy and Administration, 40(4): 425–449.
  43. Moser, C. (1993) “Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training”, London: Routledge. Mukhopadhyay, M. and Singh, N. (Eds.) (2007) “Gender Justice, Citizenship and Development”, New Delhi: Zubaan/IDRC.
  44. O’Leary, Z. (2014) “The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project” (2nd ed.), London: Sage.
  45. O’Neil, T., Domingo, P., and Valters, C. (2014) “Progress on Women’s Empowerment: From Technical Fixes to Political Action”, Working Paper No. 6, London: Overseas Development Institute, ss. 1–15.
  46. OECD (2022) “Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and Girls: DAC Guidance for Development Partners”, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0bddfa8f-en, (10.10.2025).
  47. OECD (2023) “Toolkit for Mainstreaming and Implementing Gender Equality 2023”, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3ddef555-en, (10.10.2025).
  48. Rao, A. and Kelleher, D. (2005) “Is There Life After Gender Mainstreaming?”, Gender & Development, 13(2): 57–69.
  49. Rees, T. (2005) “Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(4): 555–574.
  50. Risman, B. J. (2004) “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism”, Gender & Society, 18(4): 429–450.
  51. Savoldi, B., Cupin, E., Thind, M., Lauscher, A., Piergentili, A., Negri, M., and Bentivogli, L. (2025) “mGeNTE: A Multilingual Resource for Gender-Neutral Language and Translation”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09409. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09409, (04.10.2025).
  52. Spender, D. (1980) “Man Made Language”, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  53. Tiessen, R. (2015) “Gender Essentialism in Canadian Foreign Aid Commitments to Women, Peace, and Security”, International Journal, 70(1): 84–100.
  54. True, J. and Mintrom, M. (2001) “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming”, International Studies Quarterly, 45(1): 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00181
  55. UN Women (2022) “Evaluating UN Women’s policy advocacy work: Corporate evaluation [PDF]”, UN Women. UNESCO (1999) “Guidelines on gender neutral language” (3rd ed.), Unit for the Promotion of the Status of Women and Gender Equality, UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377299, (12.11.2025).
  56. UNESCO (2003) “Gender and education for all: The leap to equality” (EFA Global Monitoring Report 2003/4), UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/gender education all, (12.11.2025).
  57. UNFPA (2020) “State of world population 2020: Against my will – Defying the practices that harm women and girls and undermine equality”, United Nations Population Fund. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pubpdf/UNFPA_PUB_2020_EN_State_of_World_Population.pdf, (06.11.2025).
  58. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993) “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”, Discourse & Society, 4(2): 249–283. Verloo, M. (2007) “Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe”, Central European University Press.
  59. Verloo, M. and Lombardo, E. (2007) “Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach”, Verloo, M. (Ed.) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe (ss. 21-46). Amsterdam University Press.
  60. Verloo, M. (2018a) “Gender Knowledge, and Opposition to the Feminist Project: Extreme Right Populist Parties in the Netherlands”, Politics and Governance, 6(3): 20–30.
  61. Verloo, M. (2018b) “Varieties of Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe”, New York: Routledge.
  62. Walby, S. (2005) “Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice”, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3): 321–343.
  63. World Bank (2022) “Toolkit for enabling gender-responsive urban mobility and public spaces”, World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099945110272242829/idu0c61c7c0601a6404b3a0ae750f3c6a2b14f30, (04.11.2025).
  64. World Bank (2023) “Addressing social and gender norms to promote gender equality: Insights and lessons from implementation”, World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099347503062325525/idu020244a450e664b498f0be5505f272f1a167b, (04.11.2025).
  65. World Health Organization (2011) “Gender Responsive Assessment Scale”, Gender Mainstreaming Manual for Health Managers: A Practical Approach, Geneva: World Health Organization.
  66. World Health Organization (2019) “Delivered by Women, led by Men: A Gender and Equity Analysis of the Global Health and Social Workforce” (Human Resources for Health Observer Series No. 24), Geneva: World Health Organization.
  67. World Health Organization (2022) “Mainstreaming Gender within the WHO Health Emergencies Programme: 2022–2026 Strategy”, Geneva: World Health Organization.