Dergiler / Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 57

SRİ LANKA'NIN HİNT-PASİFİK'TEKİ STRATEJİK VE JEOPOLİTİK KONUMUNUN YENİDEN ŞEKİLLENMESİ: KUŞAK VE YOL GİRİŞİMİ'NİN ROLÜ

THE STRATEGIC AND GEOPOLITICAL REPOSITIONING OF SRI LANKA WITHIN THE INDO-PACIFIC: THE ROLE OF THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE

Sayfa
1756–1780
Yayın Tarihi
2025-07-23
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, Sri Lanka'nın Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi sayesinde altyapısını modern hale getirerek küresel ticaret ağlarına entegrasyonunu artırdığını göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çin tarafından 2013 yılında başlatılan ve katılımcı ülkeler için ekonomik kalkınma fırsatları sunan Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi, bölgesel olarak jeopolitik dengeleri dönüştüren küresel ölçekli bir girişimdir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Başlangıçta ekonomik büyümeye yönelik bir girişim olarak değerlendirilse de Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'nin etkileri yalnızca ekonomik alanla sınırlı kalmamış; bölgesel jeopolitik dengeleri ve uluslararası ilişkileri şekillendirerek özellikle Hint-Pasifik bölgesindeki küçük devletler üzerinde çeşitli sonuçlar doğurmuştur.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, Sri Lanka'nın Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi sayesinde altyapısını modern hale getirerek küresel ticaret ağlarına entegrasyonunu artırdığını göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi · Sri Lanka · Çin

Özet

Çin tarafından 2013 yılında başlatılan ve katılımcı ülkeler için ekonomik kalkınma fırsatları sunan Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi, bölgesel olarak jeopolitik dengeleri dönüştüren küresel ölçekli bir girişimdir. Başlangıçta ekonomik büyümeye yönelik bir girişim olarak değerlendirilse de Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'nin etkileri yalnızca ekonomik alanla sınırlı kalmamış; bölgesel jeopolitik dengeleri ve uluslararası ilişkileri şekillendirerek özellikle Hint-Pasifik bölgesindeki küçük devletler üzerinde çeşitli sonuçlar doğurmuştur. Hint Okyanusu'ndaki stratejik konumuyla Sri Lanka, Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi çerçevesinde Çin ile kapsamlı ekonomik iş birlikleri geliştirmiştir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada, Sri Lanka'nın Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'ne katılımının ekonomik, stratejik ve siyasi etkileri incelenmiş ve "Sri Lanka'nın Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'ne katılımı, Hint-Pasifik bölgesindeki stratejik ve jeopolitik konumunu nasıl etkilemiştir?" araştırma sorusuna yanıt aranmıştır. Bu çalışma, betimsel nitelikteki tekil bir vaka analizi olup, Çin'in Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi kapsamında Sri Lanka'daki etkilerini çok boyutlu olarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmadaki kaynaklar, ikincil kaynak analizi yoluyla incelenmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, Sri Lanka'nın Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi sayesinde altyapısını modern hale getirerek küresel ticaret ağlarına entegrasyonunu artırdığını göstermektedir. Ancak bu kazanımlar, Sri Lanka'nın dış borç yükünün artmasına ve ülkenin ekonomik bağımsızlığı üzerinde baskılar oluşmasına neden olmuştur. Ayrıca, Sri Lanka'nın Çin ile artan ekonomik iş birliği, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Hindistan gibi Hint-Pasifik'teki aktörlerin kaygılarını artırmış, bu da Sri Lanka’nın büyük güçler arasında hassas bir denge politikası yürütme zorunluluğunu beraberinde getirmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Sri Lanka'nın Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'ne katılımı Sri Lanka için ekonomik kalkınma açısından fırsatlar sunarken, aynı zamanda borç bağımlılığı, jeopolitik baskılar ve egemenlik kaygıları gibi riskleri de içermektedir. Bu çalışma, Sri Lanka'nın büyük güçler arasındaki konumunu değerlendirmekte ve küçük devletlerin jeopolitik rekabet içerisindeki stratejik hareketlerini anlamaya yönelik daha geniş kapsamlı araştırmalara zemin hazırlamaktadır.

Abstract

China introduced the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013 as a global-scale project aimed at promoting economic development in participating countries. At the same time, the Belt and Road Initiative has significantly reshaped regional geopolitical dynamics. Even though the Belt and Road Initiative was first presented as a policy for economic growth, its effects have gone beyond the economy and influenced not only foreign relations of countries but also regional power dynamics for the small states in the Indo-Pacific area. With its strategic location in the Indian Ocean, Sri Lanka has established economic ties with China under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative. In this context, this article examines the economic, strategic, and political implications of the Belt and Road Initiative in Sri Lankan politics. The study also seeks to answer the research question: "How has Sri Lanka’s participation in the Belt and Road Initiative affected its strategic and geopolitical position in the Indo-Pacific region?". In this study, a case study approach has been used as a qualitative methodology. Overall, these findings indicate that Sri Lanka has modernized its infrastructure and integrated into global trade networks through the Belt and Road Initiative. However, the advantages of the Belt and Road Initiative have also contributed to a significant rise in Sri Lanka's external debt burden. This has raised concerns about the economic independence of Sri Lanka. Furthermore, Sri Lanka's growing economic ties with China have raised geopolitical concerns among key regional actors, including the United States of America and India. This study assesses Sri Lanka's geostrategic position in the context of power competition and also provides the framework for future research into how small states strategically operate in geopolitical rivalries.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Olkan, K. B. (2025). SRİ LANKA'NIN HİNT-PASİFİK'TEKİ STRATEJİK VE JEOPOLİTİK KONUMUNUN YENİDEN ŞEKİLLENMESİ: KUŞAK VE YOL GİRİŞİMİ'NİN ROLÜ. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 57, 1756–1780. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1639774

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (58)

  1. Aneez, S. (2017, 2 Şubat). China's 'Silk Road' Push Stirs Resentment and Protest in Sri Lanka. Reuters. Erişim: 28 Ocak 2025, https://www.reuters.com/article/business/chinas-silk-road-push-stirs-resentment-and-protest-in-sri-lanka-idUSKBN15G5UO/
  2. Attanayake, C. (2023). Unveiling Sri Lanka's Agency: Empowering Infrastructural Transformation in China-Sri Lanka Relations. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 12(1), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2023.2280479
  3. Attanayake, C. (2024a). Why Do Small States Matter in Bay of Bengal Geopolitics? The Case of Sri Lanka. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 16(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2023.2250609
  4. Attanayake, C. (2024b, 18 Ekim). Sri Lanka: Indian Ocean Security and the US Indo-Pacific Strategy. East-West Center. Erişim: 23 Aralık 2024, https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/sri-lanka-indian-ocean-security-and-us-indo-pacific-strategy
  5. Babar, S. I. (2023). Managing the Geopolitical Competition between China and India: Sri Lanka's Strategic Balancing Act. Strategic Studies, 43(2), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.53532/ss.043.02.00311
  6. BBC. (2017, 29 Temmuz). Sri Lanka Signs Deal on Hambantota Port with China. Erişim: 16 Aralık 2024, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40761732
  7. Belt and Road Portal. (2019, 18 Mart). Belt and Road Cooperation Brings Benefits to Sri Lanka, Instead of "Debt Trap". Erişim: 28 Ocak 2025, https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/p/82886.html
  8. Brewster, D. (2017). Silk Roads and Strings of Pearls: The Strategic Geography of China’s New Pathways in the Indian Ocean. Geopolitics, 22(2), 269-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1223631
  9. Butt, A. S., Shah, H. H. ve Ahmad, A. B. (2021). Exploring the Potential Challenges of Belt and Road Initiative for Sustainable Supply Chains: South Asian Perspective. Transportation Journal, 60(3), 307-338. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/transportationj.60.3.0307
  10. Edirisinghe, P. (2017). The Influence of Logistics Competence in International Trade in Sri Lanka: A Contemporary Study. Sri Lanka Economics Research Conference (SLERC), 23-24 Kasım 2017, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale. 53-59.
  11. Fernando, H. N. (2022). Impact of the Status of Forces Agreements on Host States in the Indo-Pacific: How Will Sri Lanka Tame the Dragon and Uncle Sam?. South Asian Survey, 29(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/09715231221075089
  12. Gangte, L. (2020). The Debt-Trap Diplomacy Revisited: A Case Study on Sri Lanka's Hambantota Port. Artha Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.12724/ajss.53.4
  13. George, A. ve Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  14. Gunawan, Y. ve Napitupulu, I. R. A. (2023). The Influence of China's Belt and Road Initiative of Economic Crisis in Sri Lanka. Law Review, 23(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v20i1.6593
  15. Hartley, J. (2004). Case Study Research. C. Cassell ve G. Symon (Ed.) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (s. 323-333). London: Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280119.n26
  16. Hoque, M. ve Tama, R. A. Z. (2020). China's Belt and Road Initiative: Global Politics and Implications. European Scientific Journal, 16(31), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n31p279
  17. Hu, W., Shan, Y., Deng, Y., Fu, N., Duan, J., Jiang, H. ve Zhang, J. (2023). Geopolitical Risk Evolution and Obstacle Factors of Countries Along the Belt and Road and Its Types Classification. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021618
  18. Iyer, S. S., Mukhopadhyay, R. ve Iyer, S. D. (2021). The Sino-Indian Geopolitics and Maritime Security of the Indian Ocean Region. Strategic Analysis, 45(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2020.1870269
  19. Jayasuriya, R. (2020, 19 Temmuz). Political Fault Lines Deepen Over BRI Projects. Daily Mirror Sri Lanka. Erişim Tarihi: 29 Nisan 2025, https://www.dailymirror.lk/News-Features/Political-fault-lines-deepen-over-BRI-projects/131-193042
  20. Kamburawala, T. U. ve Abeyrathne, D. H. (2022). Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Sri Lanka: A Review of Literature. KDU Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.4038/kjms.v4i2.51
  21. Kandaudahewa, H. (2023). Sri Lanka's Strategic Dilemma: Navigating Great-Power Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v7i1.1185
  22. Karl, D. J. (2018). Sri Lanka, the Maritime Silk Road, and Sino-Indian Relations. J. M. Blanchard (Ed.) China's Maritime Silk Road Initiative and South Asia: A Political Economic Analysis of Its Purposes, Perils, and Promise içinde (s. 137-172). Singapore: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5239-2_6
  23. Kassab, H. S. (2023). What is the Indo-Pacific? Genealogy, Securitization, and the Multipolar System. Chinese Political Science Review, 8(4), 573-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-023-00233-z
  24. Knight, P. K. (2002). Small Scale Research: Pragmatic Inquiry in Social Science and the Caring Professions, London: Sage.
  25. Majuera, M. (2008). BRI boosts Sri Lanka's Status as Logistics Hub. China Daily. Erişim: 18 Aralık 2024, https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202307/25/WS64bf037fa31035260b8183b4.html
  26. McNabb, D. E. (2010). Research Methods for Political Science: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, New York and London: M. E. Sharpe.
  27. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655
  28. Mondal, S. P. ve Maitra, B. (2021). Assessing Growth Impact of Public Debt in Sri Lanka. Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 20(2), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976747920917478
  29. My Hai Loc, T. (2023). India's Regional Security and Defense Cooperation: A Study of Sino-Indian Rivalry in Sri Lanka. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 6(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.06.02.408
  30. Nan, Z. (2023, 17 Ekim). Colombo Port City rises with green Chinese solutions. China Daily. Erişim: 29 Nisan 2025, https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202310/17/WS652dedfba31090682a5e8f2d.html
  31. Nicholas, H. ve Nicholas, B. (2023). An Alternative View of Sri Lanka's Debt Crisis. Development and Change, 54(5), 1114-1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12794
  32. Pandit, K. (2019). Belt and Road Initiative: Prospects for Nepal-China Cooperation. Social Inquiry: Journal of Social Science Research, 1(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.3126/sijssr.v1i1.26917
  33. Parepa, L. A. (2020). The Belt and Road Initiative as Continuity in Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 9(2), 175-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2020.1848370
  34. Perera, S. (2021, October 17). Port City Law Triggers Political Storm as Opposition Claims Loss of Sovereignty. The Sunday Times. Erişim Tarihi: 29 Nisan 2025, https://www.sundaytimes.lk/211017/news/port-city-law-triggers-political-storm-as-opposition-claims-loss-of-sovereignty-457394.html
  35. Premaratna, S. P. ve Thrishali, A. (2020). Sri Lanka and the Geopolitics of Indo-Pacific: Perceptions, Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Polity and Society, 12(1), 1-11.
  36. Pulami, M. J. (2022). China-India Contemporary Relations: Geopolitical Challenges to the Small States in South Asia. Stosunki Międzynarodowe–International Relations, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.12688/stomiedintrelat.17419.2
  37. Qinglian, H. (2022, 18 Temmuz). Did China's Belt and Road Initiative Destroy Sri Lanka?. Benar News. Erişim: 28 Ocak 2025, https://www.benarnews.org/english/commentaries/economic-collapse-07182022154057.html
  38. Rajagopalan, R. (2017, 14 Eylül). India's Strategic Choices: China and the Balance of Power in Asia. Carnegie Endowment For International Peace. Erişim: 23 Aralık 2024, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2017/09/indias-strategic-choices-china-and-the-balance-of-power-in-asia?lang=en
  39. Ramachandran, S. (2022, 27 Mayıs). China and Sri Lanka’s Debt Crisis: Belt and Road Initiative Blowback. The Jamestown Foundation. Erişim: 28 Ocak 2025, https://jamestown.org/program/china-and-sri-lankas-debt-crisis-belt-and-road-initiative-blowback/
  40. Rasool, A. (2022). Belt and Road Initiative's Regional Impact: Lessons from South Asia. The Journal of Indian and Asian Studies, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2717541322500036
  41. Roche, E. (2018, 8 Haziran). Sri Lanka Defends Decision to Join China’s One Belt One Road Project. Mint. Erişim: 28 Ocak 2025, https://www.livemint.com/Politics/lZg4QfnterSduhYaIbP9sJ/Sri-Lanka-defends-decision-to-join-Chinas-Obor-project.html
  42. Ruwanpura, K. N., Brown, B. ve Chan, L. (2020a). (Dis)connecting Colombo: Situating the Megapolis in Postwar Sri Lanka. The Professional Geographer, 72(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2019.1653773
  43. Ruwanpura, K. N., Rowe, P. ve Chan, L. (2020b). Of Bombs and Belts: Exploring Potential Ruptures within China's Belt and Road Initiative in Sri Lanka. The Geographical Journal, 186(3), 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12344
  44. Sarker, N. I. S., Hossin, A., Yin, X. ve Sarkar, K. (2018). One Belt One Road Initiative of China: Implication for Future of Global Development. Modern Economy, 9, 623-638. https://doi.org/10.3390/10.4236/me.2018.94040
  45. Senevirathna, A. (2021). Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Indo-Pacific Strategy (IPS): Challenges and Opportunities for Sri Lanka. P. Jaiswal ve D. P. Bhatt (Ed.) Rebalancing Asia: The Belt and Road Initiative and Indo-Pacific Strategy içinde (s. 181-192). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3757-5_15
  46. Senevirathna, A. (2024). China's Belt and Road Initiative and Sri Lanka: A Geopolitical Perspective. M. Sahakyan (Ed.) Routledge Handbook of Chinese and Eurasian International Relations içinde (s. 332-344). London: Routledge.
  47. Shishir, M. F. J. ve Sakib, N. H. (2023). How Interests and Ideas of a Dominant Actor Make a Big Difference: Analyzing India's Role in SAARC and BIMSTEC. Chinese Political Science Review, 8(4), 618-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00230-8
  48. Sri Lanka Ports Authority. (2023, 31 Aralık). Annual Report 2023. Erişim: 29 Nisan 2025, https://publicfinance.lk/en/report/soe-slpa-annualreport23
  49. Sultana, G. (2019). India-Sri Lanka Relations. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 14(1), 44-51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48636700
  50. Tariq, S. (2016). Sino-Indian Security Dilemma in the Indian Ocean: Revisiting the 'String of Pearls' Strategy. Regional Studies, 34(3), 3-28.
  51. Theiventhran, G. M. (2024). Energy as a Geopolitical Battleground in Sri Lanka. Asian Geographer, 41(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2022.2098507
  52. Uluwaduge, P. (2022). China-Sri Lanka Economic Relations: Opportunities and Challenges for Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljssh.v2i2.75
  53. Walakuluge, C. ve Abeysekara, B. (2024). In Pursuit of Sri Lanka's Strategy in the Indian Ocean Region. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 7(5). 1-19.
  54. Wang, Z. ve Ye, F. (2019). China–Sri Lanka Relations in the Context of the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road: Motives, Challenges, and Prospects. Asian Perspective, 43(3), 481-503. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2019.0020
  55. Wibisono, A. N. (2019). China's "Belt and Road Initiative" in Sri Lanka: Debt Diplomacy in Hambantota Port Investment. Mandala: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 2(2), 222-245. https://doi.org/10.33822/mjihi.v2i2.1482
  56. Wignaraja, G., Panditaratne, D., Kannangara, P. ve Hundlani, D. (2020). Chinese Investment and the BRI in Sri Lanka. Chatnam House (s. 1-37) Erişim: 11 Aralık 2024, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2020/03/chinese-investment-and-bri-sri-lanka
  57. World Bank. (2022). Logistics Performance Index: Sri Lanka. Erişim: 29 Nisan 2025, https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/global
  58. Zhang, Z. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative: China's New Geopolitical Strategy?. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 4(3), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740018500240