KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Milli Eğitim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 48 Sayı: 224

PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİSİ ÇALIŞMALARININ DERLENMESİ: FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ ÖRNEĞİ

Hatice Belge Can0000-0003-2329-3419
Sayfa
353–380
Yayın Tarihi
2019-11-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye’de fen bilimleri eğitiminde gerçekleştirilen

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye’de fen bilimleri eğitiminde gerçekleştirilen
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye’de fen bilimleri eğitiminde gerçekleştirilen
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye’de fen bilimleri eğitiminde gerçekleştirilen
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi · Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi · Alan Yazın Taraması

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye’de fen bilimleri eğitiminde gerçekleştirilen

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Can, H. B. (2019). PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİSİ ÇALIŞMALARININ DERLENMESİ: FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ ÖRNEĞİ. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 48 Sayı: 224, 353–380. https://ajindex.com/articles/1080086

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. Aydın, S., & Boz, Y. (2012). Fen öğretmen eğitiminde pedagojik alan bilgisi araştırmalarının derlenmesi: Türkiye örneği. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(1), 479-505.
  2. Aydın, S., Demirdöğen, B., Tarkın, A., Kutucu, S., Ekiz, B., Akın, F. N., Tuysuz, M., & Uzuntiryaki, S. (2013). Providing a set of research-based practices to support preservice teachers’ longterm Professional development as learners of science teaching. Science Education, 97, 903-935.
  3. Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 1105-1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  4. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1405-1416.
  5. Bahcivan, E., & Cobern, W. W. (2016). Investigating coherence among Turkish elementary science teachers’ teaching belief systems, pedagogical content knowledge and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(10), 62-86.
  6. Borko, H., Cone, R., Russo, N. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1979). Teachers’ decision making. In P. Peter- son & H. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings and implications (pp. 136-160). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  7. Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Review of how science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge is investigated in empirical studies. In A. Hume, R. Coo- per & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teachng science (pp. 3-76). Singapore: Springer.
  8. Davis, E. A. (2003). Knowledge integration in science teaching: analysing teachers’ knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 21-53.
  9. De Jong, O., & van Driel, J. (2001). The development of prospective teachers’ concerns about teaching chemistry topics at a macro-micro-symbolic interface. In H. Behrednt, H. Dahncke,R. Duit, W. Graber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education: past, present and future (pp. 271-276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  10. Demirdöğen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakçı, E., & Köseoğlu, F. (2016). Development and natüre of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, 46, 575-612.
  11. Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95, 358-376.
  12. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. InJ. GessNewsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Boston: Kluwer.
  13. Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen,& J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). New York, NY Routledge.
  14. Grossman, P. (1990). The Making of a Teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.Hart, C. (2001). Doing a literature search: A comprehensive guide for the social sciences. London: Sage. Hume, A., Cooper, R., & Borowski, A. (2019). Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’knowledge for teachng science. Singapore: Springer.
  15. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204.
  16. Loughran, J. J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp.1043-1065). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. GessNewsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp.95-132). Boston: Kluwer.
  18. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.).Tousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  19. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2018). İlköğretim Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programları. Ankara.
  20. National Research Council (1996). Nationals Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Natio- nal Academy Press.
  21. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
  22. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and training: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-2
  23. Şimşek, N. & Boz, N. (2016). Analysis of pedagogical content knowledge studies in the context of mathematics education in Turkey: A meta-synthesis study. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(3), 799-826.
  24. Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
  25. Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.