KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İşletme Bilimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Örgütsel Sağlık Politikası Algısı ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti: Cinsiyetin Etkileşimsel Rolü

Organizational Health Policie Perception and Turnover Intention: The Interactional Role of Gender

Fatih Hasgül(TOKAT GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY)0009-0001-0548-2729
Altuğ Çağatay(TOKAT GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7067-5570
Sayfa
99–117
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-04
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca, cinsiyetin bu ilişkiyi anlamlı şekilde etkilediği; kadın çalışanların politik algıya karşı daha duyarlı olduğu ve daha yüksek işten ayrılma niyeti taşıdığı tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, kamu hastanelerinde görev yapan sağlık çalışanlarının örgütsel sağlık politikası algısı ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemekte ve cinsiyetin bu ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkisinin olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırma ayrıca, bu dinamiklerin cinsiyete göre nasıl farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, cinsiyetin bu ilişkiyi anlamlı şekilde etkilediği; kadın çalışanların politik algıya karşı daha duyarlı olduğu ve daha yüksek işten ayrılma niyeti taşıdığı tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:İşten Ayrılma Niyeti · Örgütsel Sağlık Politikası Algısı · Cinsiyet Faktörü

Özet

Bu çalışma, kamu hastanelerinde görev yapan sağlık çalışanlarının örgütsel sağlık politikası algısı ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemekte ve cinsiyetin bu ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkisinin olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Sağlık sektöründe hizmet sürekliliğini tehdit eden işten ayrılma niyeti, kurum içindeki politik davranış algısı bağlamında ele alınmaktadır. Örgütsel sağlık politikası algısı, liyakate dayanmayan karar süreçleri, kayırmacılık ve kişisel çıkarlara dayalı eylemler gibi adaletsiz uygulamalarla tanımlanmaktadır. Bu tür algıların, çalışanların örgüte bağlılıklarını zayıflattığı ve işten ayrılma niyetlerini artırdığı bilinmektedir. Araştırma ayrıca, bu dinamiklerin cinsiyete göre nasıl farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada nicel araştırma deseni benimsenmiş, Türkiye’de kamu hastanelerinde görev yapan 340 sağlık çalışanından anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Veri toplama araçları olarak Türkçeye uyarlanmış Örgütsel Sağlık Politikası Algısı Ölçeği ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Veriler SPSS 25 programıyla analiz edilmiş; korelasyon, regresyon ve düzenleyici etki testleri uygulanmıştır. Analizler sonucunda, örgütsel sağlık politikası algısı ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, cinsiyetin bu ilişkiyi anlamlı şekilde etkilediği; kadın çalışanların politik algıya karşı daha duyarlı olduğu ve daha yüksek işten ayrılma niyeti taşıdığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma, sağlık kurumlarında adil, şeffaf ve cinsiyet duyarlı yönetim uygulamalarının önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between health workers’ perceptions of organizational health policy and their intention to leave in public hospitals, and investigates whether gender has a moderating effect on this relationship. The intention to leave, which threatens the continuity of service in the healthcare sector, is addressed in the context of perceived political behavior within the organization. Perceptions of organizational health policy are defined by unjust practices such as non-merit-based decision-making processes, favoritism, and actions driven by personal interests. Such perceptions are known to weaken employees’ commitment to the organization and increase their intention to leave. The research also aims to reveal how these dynamics differ by gender. A quantitative research design was adopted, and data were collected through a survey administered to 340 healthcare workers employed in public hospitals in Türkiye. As data collection instruments, the Organizational Health Policy Perception Scale and the Intention to Leave Scale, both adapted into Turkish, were used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25, employing correlation, regression, and moderation effect tests. The analyses revealed a significant and positive relationship between perceptions of organizational health policy and intention to leave. Furthermore, gender was found to have a significant moderating effect on this relationship; female employees were more sensitive to political perceptions and exhibited a higher intention to leave. The study underscores the importance of fair, transparent, and gender-sensitive management practices in healthcare institutions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Hasgül, F., Çağatay, A. (2026). Örgütsel Sağlık Politikası Algısı ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti: Cinsiyetin Etkileşimsel Rolü. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.1699035

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (75)

  1. Aiken, L. S. ve West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage.
  2. Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C. ve Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of management Perspectives, 24(2), 48-64.
  3. Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  4. Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S. ve Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(2), 278. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278
  5. Ayman, R. ve Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American psychologist, 65(3), 157.
  6. Barnard, A. (2018). Well-being, more than a dream: Women constructing metaphors of strength. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1186.
  7. Barnett, R. C. ve Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American psychologist, 56(10), 781.
  8. Batt, R. ve Valcour, P. M. (2003). Human resources practices as predictors of work‐family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 189-220.
  9. Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of vocational behavior, 67(2), 169-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009
  10. Champoux, J. E. ve Peters, W. S. (1987). Form, effect size, and power in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1987.tb00257.x
  11. Chan, S. C. ve Mak, W. M. (2014). The impact of servant leadership and subordinates' organizational tenure on trust in leader and attitudes. Personnel Review, 43(2), 272-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2011-0125
  12. Chang, C.-H., Rosen, C. C. ve Levy, P. E. (2009). The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee attitudes, strain, and behavior: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670894
  13. Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator re search in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59(2), 143–178.
  14. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C. ve Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
  15. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley ve Sons.
  16. Conway, J. M. ve Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
  17. Cooper, C. L. ve Cartwright, S. (1994). Healthy mind; healthy organization—A proactive approach to occupational stress. Human Relations, 47(4), 455-471.
  18. Cortese, C. G., Colombo, L. ve Ghislieri, C. (2010). Determinants of nurses’ job satisfaction: The role of work–family conflict, job demand, emotional charge and social support. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01064.x
  19. Çelik, O. T. ve Üstüner, M. (2019). Örgütsel politika algısı ölçeğinin okul örgütleri için Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.425250
  20. Danna, K. ve Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500305
  21. De Clercq, D., Khan, M. A. ve Haq, I. U. (2023). Perceived organizational politics and turnover intentions: Critical roles of social adaptive behavior and emotional regulation skills. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 247-265.
  22. DeJoy, D. M. ve Wilson, M. G. (2003). Organizational health promotion: Broadening the horizon of workplace health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(5), 337-341.
  23. Drory, A., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2010). Organizational politics and human resource management: A typology and the Israeli experience. Human Resource Management Review, 20(3), 194-202.
  24. Eagly, A. H. ve Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233.
  25. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500.
  26. Ferris, G. R. ve Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational health policies. Journal of Management, 18, 93–116.
  27. Ferris, G. R., Harrell-Cook, G. ve Dulebohn, J. H. (2000). Organizational health policies: The nature of the relationship between politics perceptions and political behavior. İçinde R. L. Tett (Ed.) Research in the Sociology of Organizations (ss. 89-130). Emerald Group Publishing.
  28. Frazier, P. A., Tix, P. A. ve Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator efects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134.
  29. Geller, P. L. (Ed.). (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Anthropology. Routledge.
  30. Greenhaus, J. H. ve Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
  31. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W. ve Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
  32. Halbesleben, J. R. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, 8(1), 102-117.
  33. Halbesleben, J. R. ve Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work ve Stress, 22(3), 242-256.
  34. Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C., Perrewe, P. L. ve Johnson, D. (2003). Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relationship between politics perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 438-456.
  35. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd Edition). Sage Publications.
  36. Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D. ve Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530.
  37. Hu, L.-t. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  38. Kelloway, E. K. ve Day, A. (2005). Building healthy workplaces: Where we need to be. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 37(4), 309.
  39. Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., Oakes, J. M., Fan, W., Okechukwu, C. A., Davis, K. D., Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., King, R. B., Hanson, G. C., Mierzwa, F. ve Casper, L. M. (2014). Changing work and work–family conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 485–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414531435
  40. Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B. ve Matthews, R. A. (2011). How work–family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(3), 352-369.
  41. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A. ve Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
  42. Landells, E. M. ve Albrecht, S. L. (2017). The positives and negatives of organizational politics: A qualitative study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(1), 41-58.
  43. Landells, E. M. ve Albrecht, S. L. (2019). Perceived organizational politics, engagement, and stress: The mediating influence of meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1612.
  44. Mathieu, J. E. ve Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
  45. Mosquera, P., Tigre, F. B. ve Alegre, M. (2025). Overcoming organizational politics and unlocking meaningful work through ethical leadership. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(3), 685-704.
  46. Maxwell, S. E. ve Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
  47. Michaels, C. E. ve Spector, P. E. (1982). Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 53.
  48. Miller, B. K., Rutherford, M. A. ve Kolodinsky, R. W. (2008). Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9061-5
  49. Moen, P., Kelly, E. L., Fan, W., Lee, S. R., Almeida, D., Kossek, E. E. ve Buxton, O. M. (2016). Does a flexibility/support organizational initiative improve high-tech employees’ well-being? Evidence from the work, family, and health network. American Sociological Review, 81(1), 134-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415622391
  50. Neal, A. ve Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
  51. Nielsen, K. ve Miraglia, M. (2017). What works for whom in which circumstances? On the need to move beyond the ‘what works?’question in organizational intervention research. Human relations, 70(1), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716670226
  52. Nixon, A. E., Mazzola, J. J., Bauer, J., Krueger, J. R. ve Spector, P. E. (2011). Can work make you sick? A meta-analysis of the relationships between job stressors and physical symptoms. Work & Stress, 25(1), 1-22.
  53. Obeng, H. A., Atan, T. ve Arhinful, R. (2025). Exploring organizational politics, psychological well-being, work-life balance, and turnover intentions in Ghanaian hospitals: A conservation of resource theory perspective. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 1053.
  54. Öztürk, N. (2023). Sağlık çalışanlarında duygusal emek davranışının iş performansı ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisi. [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi].
  55. Parker, S. K. ve Griffin, M. A. (2011). Understanding active psychological states: Embedding engagement in a wider nomological net and closer attention to performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 60-67.
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  57. Powell, G. N. ve Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and decisions at the family→ work interface. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1011-1039.
  58. Rhoades, L. ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
  59. Robertson, I. ve Cooper, C. (2011). Well-being: Productivity and happiness at work. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306738
  60. Rubenstein, A. L., Eberly, M. B., Lee, T. W. ve Mitchell, T. R. (2018). Surveying the forest: A meta‐analysis, moderator investigation, and future‐oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 23-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12226
  61. Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G. ve Mainous, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599–627.
  62. Schermelleh Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  63. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G. ve Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 361-388.
  64. Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L. ve Knudsen, E. A. (2017). Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1601. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000246
  65. Slaughter, J. E. ve Allen, D. G. (2024). Essentials of Employee Recruitment: Individual and Organizational Perspectives: An Introductory Chapter. İçinde Essentials of Employee Recruitment (ss. 1-10). Routledge.
  66. Şahin, F. (2011). Lider-üye etkileşimi ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişki üzerinde cinsiyetin etkisi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(2), 277-288.
  67. Tett, R. P. ve Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: A meta-analytic test of causal paths. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
  68. Tremblay, M., Sire, B. ve Balkin, D. B. (2000). The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction, and its effects on work attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 25(3), 269-290.
  69. Tziner, A. ve Birati, A. (1996). Assessing employee turnover costs: A revised approach. Human Resource Management Review, 6(2), 113-122.
  70. Wang, D., Hom, P. W. ve Allen, D. G. (2017). Coping with newcomer “Hangover”: How socialization tactics affect declining job satisfaction during early employment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 196-210.
  71. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M. ve Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.
  72. Wilson, M. G., DeJoy, D. M., Jorgensen, C. M. ve Crump, C. J. (1999). Health promotion programs in small worksites: results of a national survey. American Journal of Health Promotion, 13(6), 358-365.
  73. Witt, L. A., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S. ve Zivnuska, S. (2002). Interactive effects of personality and organizational health policies on contextual performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(8), 911-926.
  74. Yıldırım, D. ve Aycan, Z. (2008). Nurses’ work demands and work–family conflict: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1366–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.10.010
  75. Zhang, M., Fried, D. D. ve Griffeth, R. W. (2012). A review of job embeddedness: Conceptual, measurement issues, and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3), 220-231.