Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

Kalabalık ve Afet Başlıklı Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi: Scopus Veri Tabanı Üzerine Vosviewer İncelemesi

A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Crowds and Disasters: A Vosviewer-Based Study Using the Scopus Database

Fulya Sağ Kara(Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi)0000-0001-8279-1536
Sayfa
1157–1177
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu çalışmanın amacı, “crowd and disaster” anahtar kelimeleri ile Scopus veritabanında yer alan literatürü inceleyerek bu alandaki araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmek ve bulguları grafikler aracılığıyla niceliksel olarak ortaya koymaktır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Kalabalık, çok sayıda insanın bir arada bulunduğu durumdur.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Alışveriş merkezleri, metro istasyonları gibi gündelik yaşam alanlarında ya da futbol stadyumları ve olimpiyat oyunları gibi planlı etkinliklerde, bireyler arasında fiziksel yakınlığın fazla olduğu, sosyal mesafenin korunamadığı ve hijyen koşullarının yetersiz kalabildiği ortamlar oluşur.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu çalışmanın amacı, “crowd and disaster” anahtar kelimeleri ile Scopus veritabanında yer alan literatürü inceleyerek bu alandaki araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmek ve bulguları grafikler aracılığıyla niceliksel olarak ortaya koymaktır.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Afet · bibliyometrik analiz · kalabalık

Özet

Kalabalık, çok sayıda insanın bir arada bulunduğu durumdur. Alışveriş merkezleri, metro istasyonları gibi gündelik yaşam alanlarında ya da futbol stadyumları ve olimpiyat oyunları gibi planlı etkinliklerde, bireyler arasında fiziksel yakınlığın fazla olduğu, sosyal mesafenin korunamadığı ve hijyen koşullarının yetersiz kalabildiği ortamlar oluşur. Kalabalıklar etkili şekilde yönetilmediğinde, çok sayıda insanın zarar görmesine yol açabilir ve mevcut bir afetin etkilerini artırabilir. Kalabalık ve afet ilişkisi, risk faktörleri ve kriz yönetimi açısından kritik öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, “crowd and disaster” anahtar kelimeleri ile Scopus veritabanında yer alan literatürü inceleyerek bu alandaki araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmek ve bulguları grafikler aracılığıyla niceliksel olarak ortaya koymaktır. Yayınlar VOSviewer yazılımı aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimelerin afet yönetimi, kalabalık afetler, kitle kaynak kullanımı, sosyal medya ve afet müdahalesi olduğu; son yıllarda ise metro istasyonu, kalabalık tahliyesi, acil tahliye, kalabalık afeti ve izdiham gibi anahtar sözcüklerin yaygınlaştığı gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca, bu konudaki çalışmaların başta bilgisayar bilimleri, mühendislik ve sosyal bilimler olmak üzere çeşitli disiplinlerde yoğunlaştığı belirlenmiştir. Bibliyometrik analiz bulgularına dayanarak üç araştırma önerisi sunulmuştur: disiplinlerarası uygulama ve araştırmaların geliştirilmesi, uluslararası iş birliğinin artırılması ve kalabalık ve afet araştırmalarının teşvik edilmesi.

Abstract

Crowds are defined as situations in which large numbers of individuals congregate in close proximity. These environments can be observed in everyday settings such as shopping malls and metro stations, as well as planned events like football matches and the Olympic Games. In such settings, physical closeness, lack of social distancing and insufficient hygiene may pose significant public health and safety risks. When not properly managed, crowds can harm large numbers of people and exacerbate the impacts of existing disasters. The relationship between crowds and disasters is critical to risk assessment and crisis management. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of research within the context of crowds and disasters by examining documents indexed in the Scopus database using the keywords “crowd and disaster”. Bibliometric visualizations were generated using VOSviewer software. The analysis revealed that the most frequently used keywords were disaster management, crowd disasters, crowdsourcing, social media, and disaster response. In more recent years, keywords such as metro station, crowd evacuation, emergency evacuation, crowd disasters and stampede have gained prominence. It was also found that studies in this area spanned multiple disciplines, notably computer science, engineering, and the social sciences. Based on the findings, three research recommendations are proposed: fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, enhancing international cooperation and promoting research on crowds and disasters.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kara, F. S. (2026). Kalabalık ve Afet Başlıklı Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi: Scopus Veri Tabanı Üzerine Vosviewer İncelemesi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1801799

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (46)

  1. Abustan, M.S.S., Ali, MFM., Talib, S., Adnan, MS. (2018). A Microscopic Analysis of Crowd Behavior at Dewan Sultan Ibrahim (DSI), UTHM on Convocation Day during the Emergency Situation by using the Crowd Behavior Simulator for Disaster Evacuation (CBS-DE) Method. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2018.10.02.025
  2. Alshaer, A. (2024). Investigating the efficacy of virtual reality exposure for crowd management real-world application. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 5, 1332794. DOI:10.3389/frvir.2024.1332794
  3. Albi, G., Cristiani, E., Pareschi, L., Peri, D. (2020). Mathematical models and methods for crowd Dynamics control. In Crowd Dynamics, Volume 2: Theory, Models, and Applications (pp. 159-197). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  4. Ammar, A. (2007). Role of leadership in disaster management and crowd control. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 22(6):527-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00005379
  5. Arbon, P. (2005). Planning medical coverage for mass gatherings in Australia: what we currently know. J Emerg Nurs, 31(4):346-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2005.03.002
  6. Arruda, H., Silva, ER., Lessa, M., Proença, D., Jr, Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and bibliometrix. J Med Libr Assoc, 1;110(3):392-395. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1434.
  7. Cao, S., Wang, M., Zeng, G., Li, X. (2024). Simulation of crowd evacuation in subway stations under flood disasters. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(9): 11858-11867. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2024.337299
  8. Coppola, D. (2010). Introduction to international disaster management (2rd ed.). Elsevier.
  9. Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ., Erhan, T. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of studies on the concept of pos truth with vosviewer. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(2):164-188. DOI: 10.54733/smar.1271369
  10. Drury, J., Cocking, C., Reicher, S. (2009). The nature of collective resilience: Survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 27(1), 66–95.
  11. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2005). Special Events Contingency Planning Job Aids Manual.
  12. Fu, M., Xu, P., Li, X., Liu, Q., Ye, M., Zhu, C. (2015). Fast crowd density estimation with convolutional neural networks. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 43, 81–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.04.006
  13. Goel, S., Koundal, D., Nijhawan, R. (2024). Learning models in crowd analysis: a review. Archivesof Computational Methods in Engineering 1-19. DOI:10.1007/s11831-024-10151-1
  14. Gong, X., Herty, M., Piccoli, B., Visconti, G. (2023). Crowd dynamics: Modeling and control of multiagent systems. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 6(1), 261-282.
  15. Hafeezallah, A., Al-Dhamari, A., Abu-Bakar, SAR. (2024). Motion segmentation using Ward's hierarchical agglomerative clustering for crowd disaster risk mitigation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 102(19):104262. DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104262
  16. Haghani, M., Coughlan, M., Crabb, B., Dierickx, A., Feliciani, C., van Gelder, R.,. & Wilson A. (2023). Contemporary challenges in crowd safety research and practice, and roadmap for the future: the Swiss Cheese model of crowd safety and the need for a vision zero target. Safety Science, 168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106292
  17. Helbing, D., Johansson, A., Al-Abideen, HZ. (2007). Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study. Physical Review E-Statistical, 75(4):046109. DOI: doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.046109
  18. Helbing, D., Molnar, P. (1995). Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical review E, 51(5), 4282.
  19. Helbing, D., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2000). Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 407(6803), 487-490.
  20. Huang, N. (2024). Quantitative and visual analysis of tsunami warning research: A bibliometric study using web of science and VOSviewer. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104307
  21. Huang, J., Pang, T., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, H. (2023). Risk Simulation of Urban Rainstorm Flood Disasters Considering Crowd Activities. Systems, 11(8): 407. DOI: 10.3390/systems11080407
  22. Johansson, A., Batty, M., Hayashi, K., Al Bar, O., Marcozzi, D., & Memish, ZA. (2012). Crowd and environmental management during mass gatherings. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 12(2): 150-156. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70287-0
  23. Kawai, Y. (2022). Agent-based tsunami crowd evacuation simulation for analysis of evacuation start time and disaster rate in Zushi City. Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction, 6th IFIP WG 5.15 International Conference, ITDRR 2021, Morioka, Japan, October 25–27:63-75. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-04170-9_5
  24. Krausz, B., Bauckhage, C. (2012). Loveparade 2010: Automatic video analysis of a crowd disaster. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 116(3):307–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2011.08.006
  25. Li, T., Chang, H., Wang, M., Ni, B., Hong, R., & Yan, S. (2014). Crowded scene analysis: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 25(3):367–386. DOI:10.1109/TCSVT.2014.2358029
  26. Morimura, N., Mizobata, Y., Sugita, M., Takeda, S. (2020). Medicine at mass gatherings: current progress of preparedness of emergency medical services and disaster medical response during 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games from the perspective of the Academic Consortium (AC2020). Acute Medicine & Surgery, 8(1). DOI: 10.1002/ams2.626
  27. Moussaïd, M., Garnier, S., Theraulaz, G., Helbing, D. (2016). Collective information processing and crowd behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 141–150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01028.x
  28. National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) (2014). Managing crowds at events and venues of mass gathering. A Guide for state government, local authorities. https://ndma.gov.in/sites/default/files/PDF/Reports/managingcrowdsguide.pdf
  29. Noji, EK. (2005). Public health in the aftermath of disasters. BMJ, 11:330:1379-81. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1379
  30. Rollan, TA., Chua, C., Marquez, L. (2021). Crowd cognitive modelling as a vital process for collaborative disaster management. Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering, 20-30. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-88207-5_3
  31. Sağ Kara, F., Yıldırım, GÖ. (2023). Crowd management: a literature review on crowds occurring in sporting events (football). Journal of Disaster and Risk, 6(3), 1115-1130. DOI: 10.35341/afet.1287475
  32. Sangeetha, M., Keerthana, M., Abirami, B., Ab, M., Savitha, S., Logeswaran, K. (2024). Enhancing public safety during natural disasters using multimodal deep learning based analysis of crowd-sourced tweets. In 2024 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications Theme: Healthcare and Internet of Things 1-7.
  33. Sieben, A., Seyfried, A. (2023). Inside a life-threatening crowd: Analysis of the Love Parade disaster from the perspective of eyewitnesses. Safety Science 166, 106229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106229
  34. Thangam, A. J., Siva, P. T., Yogameena, B. (2015). Crowd count in low resolution surveillance video using head detector and color based segementation for disaster management. In 2015 International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing (ICCSP) (pp. 1905-1909). IEEE.
  35. Takeuchi, I., Kakumoto, S., Goto, Y. (2003). Towards an integrated earthquake disaster simulation system. In First International Workshop on Synthetic Simulation and Robotics to Mitigate Earthquake Disaster.
  36. Tetik, R. A. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis. https://robabahmadian.com/bibliyometrik-analizi/
  37. Turris, S. A., Lund, A., Hutton, A., Rowles, R., Ellerson, E., Steenkamp, M., Ranse, J. Arbon, P. (2014). Mass gathering Health Research Foundational Theory: Part 2 - Event Modeling for Mass Gatherings. Prehosp. Disaster Med., 29(6), 655–663.
  38. ULAKBIM (2024). Frequently Asked Questions. https://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/
  39. Zahari, MZM., Zulkifli, A., Mohamad, MR., Olabayonle, OA. (2020). Route planning for crowd management in disaster prone areas. Planning Malaysia, 18(4). DOI: 10.21837/pm.v18i14.846
  40. Zhang, Y., Qin, L., Ji, R., Zhao, S., Huang, Q., Luo, J. (2016). Exploring coherent motion patterns via structured trajectory learning for crowd mood modeling. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 27(3), 635-648.
  41. Zeitz, KM., Tan, HM., Grief, M., Couns, PC., Zeitz, CJ. (2009). Crowd behaviour at mass gatherings: a literature review. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 24(1):32-38. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X00006518
  42. Zhao, J., Xu, X., Xiao, F. (2024). Aegis: a cloud-edge computing based multi-disaster crowd evacuation model using ımproved deep reinforcement learning. Computer Communications, 231(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2024.108036
  43. WHO. (2017). Health emergency and disaster risk management mass gatherings. Health emergency and disaster risk management fact sheets. https://www.who.int/publication
  44. Wang, S., Pu, Z., Li, Q., Wang, Y. (2022). Estimating crowd density with edge intelligence based on lightweight convolutional neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 206, 117823.
  45. Haghani, M., Coughlan, M., Crabb, B., Dierickx, A., Feliciani, C., van Gelder, R.,. & Wilson A. (2023). Contemporary challenges in crowd safety research and practice, and roadmap for the future: the Swiss Cheese model of crowd safety and the need for a vision zero target. Safety Science, 168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106292
  46. Morimura, N., Mizobata, Y., Sugita, M., Takeda, S. (2020). Medicine at mass gatherings: current progress of preparedness of emergency medical services and disaster medical response during 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games from the perspective of the Academic Consortium (AC2020). Acute Medicine & Surgery, 8(1). DOI: 10.1002/ams2.626