KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 55 Sayı: 1

Dışadönüklük ve Çevrim içi Olumlu Sosyal Davranış Arasındaki İlişkide Empatinin Düzenleyici Rolü

The Moderating role of Empathy in the Relationship Between Extraversion and Online Prosocial Behaviour

Derya Atalan Ergin(KAPADOKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6602-1985
Sayfa
196–217
Yayın Tarihi
2026-04-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuçlar, yüksek empati seviyesine sahip bireylerde dışadönüklüğün ÇOSD’yi yordamadığını, bunun aksine düşük ve orta empati düzeyine sahip bireylerde dışadönüklüğün ÇOSD ile ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.azaltılabilmesi, kullanılan ders kitaplarının güncellenmesi, programın kazanım ve içerik açısından sadeleşmesi, çoğunlukla konuşma becerisine yönelik bir programın geliştirilmesi ve öğretmenlere programın uygulanması ile ilgili detaylı hizmetiçi eğitim verilmesidir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çevrim içi olumlu sosyal davranış (ÇOSD), sosyal medya platformları gibi çevrim içi ortamlarda başkalarına fayda sağlayan eylemleri kapsar.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Empatinin farklı düzeylerinin ise sosyo-duygusal sonuçlar üzerindeki etkisi tartışmalıdır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuçlar, yüksek empati seviyesine sahip bireylerde dışadönüklüğün ÇOSD’yi yordamadığını, bunun aksine düşük ve orta empati düzeyine sahip bireylerde dışadönüklüğün ÇOSD ile ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.azaltılabilmesi, kullanılan ders kitaplarının güncellenmesi, programın kazanım ve içerik açısından sadeleşmesi, çoğunlukla konuşma becerisine yönelik bir programın geliştirilmesi ve öğretmenlere programın uygulanması ile ilgili detaylı hizmetiçi eğitim verilmesidir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Empati · dışadönüklük · düzenleyici rol

Özet

Çevrim içi olumlu sosyal davranış (ÇOSD), sosyal medya platformları gibi çevrim içi ortamlarda başkalarına fayda sağlayan eylemleri kapsar. ÇOSD, sosyal ortamlara katılımı ve özellikle yardıma ihtiyaç duyduklarında başkalarının duygularını ve düşüncelerini anlamayı içerebileceğinden, dışadönüklükle ilişkili olabilir. Empatinin farklı düzeylerinin ise sosyo-duygusal sonuçlar üzerindeki etkisi tartışmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ÇOSD ile dışadönüklük arasındaki ilişkide empatinin düzenleyici rolünü araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya toplam 248 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır (Myaş=20.75, SS=1.56; yaş aralığı =18-25, Nkadın=170, %68.5). Araştırma sonuçları, düşük ve orta düzeyde empatiye sahip bireyler arasında ÇOSD ile dışadönüklük arasında pozitif bir korelasyon olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak, yüksek empati seviyesine sahip gençler için bu korelasyon gözlemlenmemiştir. Sonuçlar, yüksek empati seviyesine sahip bireylerde dışadönüklüğün ÇOSD’yi yordamadığını, bunun aksine düşük ve orta empati düzeyine sahip bireylerde dışadönüklüğün ÇOSD ile ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.azaltılabilmesi, kullanılan ders kitaplarının güncellenmesi, programın kazanım ve içerik açısından sadeleşmesi, çoğunlukla konuşma becerisine yönelik bir programın geliştirilmesi ve öğretmenlere programın uygulanması ile ilgili detaylı hizmetiçi eğitim verilmesidir.

Abstract

Online prosocial behaviour (OPB) encompasses actions performed in online environments such as social media platforms, that are intended to benefit others. OPB may be associated with extraversion, as it may involve engagement in social environments and understanding others' emotions and thoughts, particularly when they require assistance. The impact of varying levels of empathy on socioemotional outcomes remain debated. The aim of the current study was to investigate the moderating role of empathy in the relationship between OPB and extraversion. A total of 248 university students (Mage=20.75, SD=1.56; range =18-25, Nfemale=170, 68.5%) participated in the study. The moderating role of empathy was examined. The research results demonstrated a positive correlation between OPB and extraversion among individuals with low and moderate levels of empathy. However, this correlation was not observed among young adults with high levels of empathy. The results have shown that extraversion does not predict OPB in individuals with high empathy, whereas extraversion is significantly associated with OPB among those with low and moderate levels of empathy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ergin, D. A. (2026). Dışadönüklük ve Çevrim içi Olumlu Sosyal Davranış Arasındaki İlişkide Empatinin Düzenleyici Rolü. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 55 Sayı: 1, 196–217. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1636680

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (70)

  1. Afolabi, O. A. (2013). Roles of personality types, emotional intelligence and gender differences on prosocial behavior. Psychological Thought, 6(1)124-139. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v6i1.53.
  2. Andreoni, J., & Rao, J. M. (2011). The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 513-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.008
  3. Arrivillaga, C., Rey, L., & Extremera, N. (2020). Adolescents’ problematic internet and smartphone use is related to suicide ideation: Does emotional intelligence make a difference?. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106375
  4. Armstrong-Carter, E., & Telzer, E. H. (2021). Advancing measurement and research on youths’ prosocial behavior in the digital age. Child Development Perspectives. 15, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12396
  5. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1088868306294907
  6. Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729
  7. Berchtold, A., Akre, C., Barrense-Dias, Y., Zimmermann, G., & Surís, J. C. (2018). Daily internet time: towards an evidence-based recommendation?. The European Journal of Public Health, 28(4), 647-651. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky054
  8. Bętkowska-Korpała, B., Pastuszak-Draxler, A., Olszewska-Turek, K., Sikora-Zych, K., Epa, R., & Starowicz-Filip, A. (2022). Personality characteristics of empathy profiles–practical implications for education of medicine students. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03432-5
  9. Bourgault, P., Lavoie, S., Paul-Savoie, E., Gregoire, M., Michaud, C., Gosselin, E., & Johnston, C. C. (2015). Relationship between empathy and well-being among emergency nurses. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 41(4), 323-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2014.10.001
  10. Brewer, G., & Kerslake, J. (2015). Cyberbullying, self‐esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073
  11. Brocklebank, S., Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). Personality accounts for stable preferences and expectations across a range of simple games. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 881-886., doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.007
  12. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  13. Dodaj, A., Sesar, K., & Šimić, N. (2020). Impulsivity and empathy in dating violence among a sample of college females. Behavioral Sciences, 10(7), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10070117
  14. Ehrenreich, S. E., George, M. J., Burnell, K., & Underwood, M. K. (2021). Importance of digital communication in adolescents’ development: theoretical and empirical advancements in the last decade. Journal of Resesearh on Adolescence. 31, 928–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12643
  15. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
  16. Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press
  17. Ergin, D. A., & Kapçı, E. G. (2022). Problematic Internet Usage on Adolescents. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 38(89), 101-104. doi: 10.31828/tpd1300443320200911m000041
  18. Ergün, N., Özkan, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2023). Social media addiction and poor mental health: examining the mediating roles of internet addiction and phubbing. Psychological Reports, 00332941231166609. doi: 10.1177/00332941231166609
  19. Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018). Development of a measure of adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Children and Media, 12(4), 448-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1431558
  20. Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I. Baillien, E. & Witte, H De (2019). Feel Good, Do Good Online? Spillover and Crossover Effects of Happiness on Adolescents’ Online Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Happiness Study 20, 1241–1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0003-2
  21. Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2017). Nice or naughty? The role of emotions and digital media use in explaining adolescents’ online prosocial and antisocial behavior. Media Psychology, 20(3), 374-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1200990
  22. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist. 359, 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
  23. Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). The impact of daily stress on adolescents’ depressed mood: The role of social support seeking through Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.070
  24. Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(5), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.016
  25. Guasp Coll, M., Navarro-Mateu, D., Giménez-Espert, M. D. C., & Prado-Gascó, V. J. (2020). Emotional intelligence, empathy, self-esteem, and life satisfaction in Spanish adolescents: regression vs. QCA models. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1629. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01629
  26. Goldberg, L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 141-165.
  27. Guo, Q., Sun, P., & Li, L. (2018). Shyness and online prosocial behavior: A study on multiple mediation mechanisms. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.032
  28. Guilera, T., Batalla, I., Forné, C. & Soler-González, J. (2019). Empathy and big five personality model in medical students and its relationship to gender and specialty preference: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 19, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1485-2
  29. Gülseven, Z., Carlo, G., Kumru, A., Sayıl, M., & Selcuk, B. (2022). The protective role of early prosocial behaviours against young Turkish children’s later internalizing and externalizing problems. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 400-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1920917
  30. Habashi, M. M., Graziano, W. G., & Hoover, A. E. (2016). Searching for the prosocial personality: A big five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1177–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216652859
  31. Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074
  32. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
  33. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
  34. Koole, Sander L., Wander Jager, Agnes E. van den Berg, Charles A. J. Vlek, & Willem K. B. Hofstee. (2001). On the social nature of personality: effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(3), 289–301.
  35. Iwasa, Y., Hihara, S., Ishizaki, K., Yasui, G., Hiro, M., & Sugimura, K. (2023). Identity development and online and offline prosocial behaviors among early and middle adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1148347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148347
  36. Leng, J., Guo, Q., Ma, B., Zhang, S., & Sun, P. (2020). Bridging personality and online prosocial behavior: The roles of empathy, moral identity, and social self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575053
  37. Lv, Y., Qiao, X., Leng, J., Zheng, Y., & Guo, Q. (2021). Mindfulness promotes online prosocial behavior via cognitive empathy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18137017
  38. Macur, M., & Pontes, H. M. (2021). Internet Gaming Disorder in adolescence: investigating profiles and associated risk factors. BMC Public Health, 21, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11394-4
  39. Marshall, T. C., Chavanovanich, J., Huang, L., & Deng, J. (2023). Online prosocial behaviour predicts well-being in different cultures: A daily diary study of Facebook users. Cross-Cultural Research, 57(5), 472-498. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971231187470
  40. Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007
  41. Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). The emerging study of positive empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(2), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702155114
  42. Mooradian, T. A., Davis, M., & Matzler, K. (2011). Dispositional empathy and the hierarchical structure of personality. The American Journal Psychology, 124(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0099.
  43. Neumann, D. L., Chan, R. C., Wang, Y., & Boyle, G. J. (2016). Cognitive and affective components of empathy and their relationship with personality dimensions in a Chinese sample. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 244-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12138
  44. Oda, R., Machii, W., Takagi, S., Kato, Y., Takeda, M., Kiyonari, T., Fukukawa, Y. & Hiraishi, K. (2014). Personality and altruism in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences. 56, 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.017
  45. Shabahang, R., Shim, H., Aruguete, M. S., & Zsila, A. (2022). Oversharing on social media: Anxiety, attention-seeking, and social media addiction predict the breadth and depth of sharing. Psychological Reports, 00332941221122861. doi: 10.1177/00332941221122861
  46. Shek, D. T., Dou, D., Zhu, X., & Chai, W. (2019). Positive youth development: Current perspectives. Adolescent health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S179946
  47. Sümer N. & Sümer H. C. (2005). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri Ölçeği. [Five Factor Personality Features Scale] (Unpublished research project)
  48. Spataro, P., Calabrò, M., & Longobardi, E. (2020). Prosocial behaviour mediates the relation between empathy and aggression in primary school children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 727-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1731467
  49. Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: the impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101, 862–882. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024950
  50. Statista (2023) Internet usage worldwide - statistics & facts https://www.statista.com/topics/1145/internet-usage-worldwide/#topicOverview
  51. Stevens, F., & Taber, K. (2021). The neuroscience of empathy and compassion in pro-social behavior. Neuropsychologia, 159, 107925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107925
  52. Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217
  53. Tone, E. B., & Tully, E. C. (2014). Empathy as a “risky strength”: A multilevel examination of empathy and risk for internalizing disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 1547–1565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414001199
  54. Topcu, Ç., Erdur-Baker, Ö., & Çapa-Aydın, Y. (2010). Turkish adaptation of basic empathy scale: validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling & Guidance Journal, 4(34),174-180.
  55. Tov, W., Nai, Z. L., & Lee, H. W. (2016). Extraversion and agreeableness: Divergent routes to daily satisfaction with social relationships. Journal of Personality, 84(1), 121–134. https://doi. org/10.1111/jopy.12146
  56. Van Berkhout, E., & Malouff, J. M. (2016). The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 32–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000093
  57. Van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., De Wied, M., Hawk, S., Van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 881. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034325
  58. Van Lissa, C. J., Hawk, S. T., Koot, H. M., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2017). The cost of empathy: Parent–adolescent conflict predicts emotion dysregulation for highly empathic youth. Developmental Psychology, 53(9), 1722–1737. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000361
  59. Wan, Q., Jiang, L., Zeng, Y., & Wu, X. (2019). A big-five personality model-based study of empathy behaviors in clinical nurses. Nurse Education in Practice, 38, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.06.005
  60. Wartberg, L., Zieglmeier, M., & Kammerl, R. (2021). An empirical exploration of longitudinal predictors for problematic internet use and problematic gaming behavior. Psychological Reports, 124(2), 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120913488
  61. Wei, M., Liao, K. Y., Ku, T., & Shaffer, P. A. (2011). Attachment, self-compassion, empathy, and subjective well-being among college students and community adults. Journal of Personality, 79(1), 191-221. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 6494.2010.00677.x
  62. Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1959-1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.019
  63. Xie, X., Chen, W., Lei, L., Xing, C., & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences. 95, 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.002
  64. Yan, Z., Zeng, X., Su, J., & Zhang, X. (2021). The dark side of empathy: Meta‐analysis evidence of the relationship between empathy and depression. PsyCh Journal, 10(5), 794-804. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.48
  65. Yang, J., Li, W., Gao, L., & Wang, X. (2022). How is Trait Anger Related to Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Perpetration? A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP6633–NP6654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520967129
  66. Yu, G., Li, S., & Zhao, F. (2020). Childhood maltreatment and prosocial behavior among Chinese adolescents: Roles of empathy and gratitude. Child Abuse & Neglect, 101, 104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104319
  67. Zhang, W., Yu, G., & Fu, W. (2022). The cross-spillover effects of online prosocial behavior on subjective well-being: Daily diary evidence from Chinese adolescents. Sustainability, 14(15), 9734. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14159734
  68. Zheng, X. L., Xie, F. W., and Ding, L. (2018). Mediating role of self-concordance on the relationship between internet altruistic behavior and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2017.14
  69. Zeng, P., Zhao, X., Xie, X., Long, J., Jiang, Q., Wang, Y., Qi, L., Lei, L. & Wang, P. (2020). Moral perfectionism and online prosocial behavior: The mediating role of moral identity and the moderating role of online interpersonal trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 162, 110017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110017
  70. Brocklebank, S., Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). Personality accounts for stable preferences and expectations across a range of simple games. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 881-886., doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.007