KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2023 / Cilt: 36 Sayı: 4

Review of the Definition of Weld Penetration, Depth of Fusion and Throat Thickness on Fillet Welds

Umut Yaşar UZUNALİ
Hamdullah ÇUVALCI
Sayfa
1746–1757
Yayın Tarihi
2023-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this review, in addition to evaluation of the definitions of standards, it is also suggested that the evaluation of FOP rate on fillet welds should be determined in terms of unit of area rather than length.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, definitions of Weld Penetration (WP), Depth of Fusion (DOF) and Throat Thickness (TT) in fillet welds according to related standards are evaluated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In many studies, assessment of fusion or penetration (FOP) rate on fillet welds is performed as the ratio of the maximum FOP depth to the material thickness.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this review, in addition to evaluation of the definitions of standards, it is also suggested that the evaluation of FOP rate on fillet welds should be determined in terms of unit of area rather than length.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Weld penetration · Depth of fusion · Throat thickness

Abstract

In this study, definitions of Weld Penetration (WP), Depth of Fusion (DOF) and Throat Thickness (TT) in fillet welds according to related standards are evaluated. Each standard makes its own definition related to WP, DOF and TT. Moreover, when looking at these standards, it is seen that definitions are always made in terms of unit of length. In many studies, assessment of fusion or penetration (FOP) rate on fillet welds is performed as the ratio of the maximum FOP depth to the material thickness. Depth assessment taking into consideration unit of length is not ideal for accurate evaluation of FOP rates especially on fillet welds. In the evaluation made in terms of unit of length, FOP rate can be approximately 50 percent more than the evaluation made in terms of unit of area. Method taking into consideration unit of area will be more suitable as it allows accurate assessment of FOP rates in welded joints. In this review, in addition to evaluation of the definitions of standards, it is also suggested that the evaluation of FOP rate on fillet welds should be determined in terms of unit of area rather than length.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UZUNALİ, U. Y., ÇUVALCI, H. (2023). Review of the Definition of Weld Penetration, Depth of Fusion and Throat Thickness on Fillet Welds. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 4, 1746–1757. https://ajindex.com/articles/1020142

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Ishigami, A., Roy, M.J., Walsh, J.N., and Withers P.J., "The effect of the weld fusion zone shape on residual stress in submerged arc welding", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(9): 3451-3464, (2017)
  2. ISO 5817:2014, Welding - Fusion-welded joints in steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys (beam welding excluded) - Quality levels for imperfection
  3. AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2020, An American National Standard, Approved by the American National Standards Institute, December 9, 2019, Structural Welding Code-Steel, 24th Edition
  4. AASHTO/AWS D1.5M/D1.5:2010, An American National Standard, Approved by the American National Standards Institute, August 18, 2010, Bridge Welding Code, 6th Edition
  5. ASM Handbook, ASM International, 1993, Welding, Brazing and Soldering, Volume 6
  6. EN 1090-2:2019 Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures - Part 2: Technical requirements for steel structures
  7. EN 1993-1-8:2005, Design of steel structures - Part 1-8: Design of joints
  8. AWS A3.0M/A3.0:2010, An American National Standard, Approved by the American National Standards Institute, July 1, 2009, Standard Welding Terms and Definitions Including Terms for Adhesive Bonding, Brazing, Soldering, Thermal Cutting, and Thermal Spraying 12th Edition
  9. ISO 2553:2019, Welding and allied processes - Symbolic representation on drawings - Welded joints
  10. DIN EN ISO 17659:2002, Welding - Multilingual terms for welded joints with illustrations
  11. Wojsyk, K., and Kudła K., "The rational use of fillet welds and butt-fillet welds in welded structures", Welding Technology Review, 91(6): 7-13, (2019)
  12. Lee, Y.B., Chung, J.K., and Park S.H., "Patterns and Characteristics of Fatigue Failure in Cruciform Fillet Weld Joint", Journal of Welding and Joining, 29(4): 67-72, (2011)
  13. Mansour, R., Zhu, J., Edgren, M., and Barsoum Z., "A probabilistic model of weld penetration depth based on process parameters", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105(1): 499-514, (2019)
  14. Chen, Y., Shen, Z.Y., Zheng, Q., and Chen C., "Experimental study on the performance of single weld joints in H-shaped steel members", International Journal of Steel Structures, 1(3): 201-211, (2001)
  15. Hanji, T., Tateishi, K., Ohashi, Y., and Shimizu M., "Effect of weld penetration on low-cycle fatigue strength of load-carrying cruciform joints", Welding in the World, 64(2): 327-334, (2020)
  16. Sim, H.B., Uang, C.M., and Siko