SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2008 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Science Teachers' Opinions about Science Activities and Problem Solving

Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Fen Etkinliklerine ve Problem Çözmeye İlişkin Görüşleri

Murat BOZAN
Hüseyin KÜÇÜKÖZER
Pages
218–231
Publication Date
2008-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

BOZAN, M., KÜÇÜKÖZER, H. (2008). Science Teachers' Opinions about Science Activities and Problem Solving. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 218–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/999328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arena, P. (1996). The role of relevance in the acquisition of science process skills. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(4), 34-39.
  2. Bodner, M. G. (1987). The role of algorithms in teaching problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 513-514.
  3. Cai. J. (2003). Singaporean students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737.
  4. Chang, C. -Y. & Weng, Y.-H. (2002). An exploratory study on students'problem-solving ability in earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 441-452.
  5. Charles, H., Kennth, H., Patricia, H., Vince H., K. & Edit, Y. (2002). Students learning problem solving in introductory physics. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Boise, ID. Chin, C., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., Lee, K. W. L. & Soh, K.C. (1994). Pre-service teachers’ use of problemsolving in primary science teaching. Research in Science Education, 24, 41–50.
  6. Edwards, J. (1987). Teaching thinking - a focus for science teaching?. Research in Science Education, 17, 38-46.
  7. Gabel, D. L., & Bunce, D. M. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301–325).
  8. New York. Harlen, W. (2001). Research in primary science education. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 61–65.
  9. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., Dewater, L. S. & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 451-493.
  10. Heyworth, R. M. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of export and novice students for the solving of basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195-212.
  11. Hobden, P. (1998). The role of routine problem tasks in science teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 219–231).
  12. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. http: 1 http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&an=ED309049.
  13. Blosser, P. E. (1988). Teaching problem solving-secondary school science. ERIC/SMEAC Science Education, Digest No. 2. (Eriim: 14 Austos 2006). http: 2 www.utm.edu/departments/ed/cece/k12sci.pdf Science Framework Grades Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. (1995). Prepared by