Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2010 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Peer Bullying in Primary Schools in Low Socio-Economic Level

Düşük Sosyo-Ekonomik Düzeydeki İlköğretim Okullarında Akran Zorbalığı

Pages
576–586
Publication Date
2010-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, there is a significant difference in some types of bullying in terms of gender.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acts of violence have been increasing in recent years in the world and in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the study 295 pupils had been reached.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, there is a significant difference in some types of bullying in terms of gender.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Okul zorbalığı · akran şiddeti · kurban

Abstract

Acts of violence have been increasing in recent years in the world and in Turkey. Reflections of these events are seen in schools. One of the most pervasive forms of school violence is bullying. The evidence indicates that school bullying has a variety of negative consequences for both bullies and victims. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequencies and the types of bullying; the gender of the bullies; the places of the bullying and the individuals whom the victims talk about the bullying in peer groups with low socio economic status. During the study 295 pupils had been reached. According to the results of the study, there is a significant difference in some types of bullying in terms of gender. In addition that bullying exists in schools at low socio-economic status and it is important that the Ministry of National Education should consider school bullying as a serious problem, and that it has negative consequences on pupils’ physical, social and emotional damage in terms of the victim. It means continuous and repetitive exposure to bullying behavior harms these children's psycho-social development, and therefore their well-being or life quality. Hence, effective bullying prevention and intervention training programs are needed.

Özet

Düşük-sosyo ekonomik düzeye sahip okullarda okuyan ilköğretim öğrencilerinin uğradıkları zorbalık türleri ve sıklıkları, zorbalığı yapanların kim(ler) olduğu, zorbalığın yapıldığı yerler ve kurbanın zorbalığı anlattığı kişilerin belirlenmesi amacı ile yapılan bu araştırmada 295 öğrenci araştırma kapsamına alınmıştır. Araştırmada “Sosyo Demografik Bilgi Formu”, “Şiddet-Kaba Güç Anketi” ve “Maruz Kalınan ve Gözlenen Zorbalığa Karşı Geliştirilen Tutum ve Davranış Soruları (Colorado Okul İklimi Anketi)” kullanılarak veriler toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar 295 öğrencinin %33.9’unun sözel zorbalığa, %32.9’unun fiziksel zorbalığa, %29.2’sinin duygusal zorbalığa ve %16.9’unun ise cinsel zorbalığa maruz kaldığını ve cinsiyet değişkenine göre zorbalık türleri arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte zorbalık yapan kişilerin daha çok erkekler olduğu, zorba davranışlara en çok sınıfta maruz kalındığı, zorbalıkla karşılaşıldığında daha çok zorba davranış yapan çocuktan uzaklaşıldığı ve bu durumda en çok öğretmenden yardım alındığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca düşük sosyo-ekonomik düzeye sahip okullarda akran zorbalığının yaygın bir davranış olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, Y., ÇİFCİ, E. G. (2010). Peer Bullying in Primary Schools in Low Socio-Economic Level. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 576–586. https://ajindex.com/articles/999193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Buchanan, P. and Winzer, M., (2001). Bullying in schools: Children’s voices. International Journal of Special Education, 16(1), 67–79.
  2. Boulton, M. & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62: 73–87.
  3. Crick, N. and Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). “Relation Aggression, Gender, and Social Psychological Adjustment”, Child Development, 66: 710–722.
  4. Çuhadaroğlu Çetin F., Canat S., Kılıç E., Şenol S., Rugana N., Öncü B., Gündüz Hoşgör A., Işıklı S., Avcı A., 2004.
  5. TUBA, Adolescent and psychic Problems: Study of state determine, Turkey, Science Academy Reports. Sayı: 4. Ankara: TÜBĐTAK Pres. Dake, J.A., Price, J.H., Telljohann, S.K., and Funk, J.B., (2003). Teacher perceptions and practices regarding school bullying prevention. Journal of School Health, 73(9), 347–355.
  6. Egbochuku, E.O., (2007). Bullying in Nigerian schools: Prevalence study and implications for counseling. Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1): 65–71. [Online]: Retrieved on 26December–2007, at URL:http://www.krepublishers.com/02Journals/JSS/JSS–14–0-000-Web/JSS-14-0-000-000-2007-
  7. Elliot, M. (1997). 101 Ways of dealing with bullying. London: Hodde Children’s Book. Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F.I.M., and Verloove-Vanhorick, S.P., (2005). Bullying: who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 20(1), 81–91.
  8. Garrity, C., Jens, K., Porter, W., Sager, N., & Short-Camilli, C. (2000). Bully-proofing your school: A Comprehensive Approach for Elementary School. Chapter Three: Colorado School Climate Survey, Elementary School Student Report, 55–61.
  9. Second Edition.
  10. Longmont, CO: Sopris West. Galloway, D., (1994). Bullying: The importance of a whole school approach. Therapeutic Care and Education, 3, 315–329. Gini G., (2004). Bullying in Italian schools: An overview of intervention programmes. School Psychology Int 25: 106–116.
  11. Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G., (2007). Does empathy predict adolescent’s bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 467–476.
  12. Glover, D., Gough, G., Johnson, M. & Cartwright, N. (2000). Bullying in 25 secondary schools: Incidence, impact and intervention. Educational Research, 42(2):141–156
  13. Hazler, R.J., Hoover, J.H. & Oliver, R. (1991). Student perceptions of victimization by bullies in school. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 29: 143–150.
  14. Kapcı, E.G. (2004). Đlköğretim Öğrencilerin