Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2013 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Prospective Teachers\' Perceptions of Web Specific Self-Efficacy

Öğretmen Adaylarının Webe Özgü Özyeterlik Algıları

Pages
1–19
Publication Date
2013-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings revealed that male prospective teachers had higher web specific selfefficacy level than female students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this study is to explore prospective teachers’ perceptions of web specific selfefficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data for the study were collected through a 21-item, five-point Likert-style scale from a total of 807 prospective teachers at the Science Faculty, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and College of Physical Education and Sports at Fırat University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings revealed that male prospective teachers had higher web specific selfefficacy level than female students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Webe özgü özyeterlik · özyeterlik · web

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to explore prospective teachers’ perceptions of web specific selfefficacy. Data for the study were collected through a 21-item, five-point Likert-style scale from a total of 807 prospective teachers at the Science Faculty, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and College of Physical Education and Sports at Fırat University. Web specific self-efficacy scale was administered to all participants. Independent samples t-test, one way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis H were utilized to analyze the data. Findings revealed that male prospective teachers had higher web specific selfefficacy level than female students. Prospective teachers enrolled at the department of Computer and Instructional Technologies had higher self-efficacy level than those enrolled at other departments. Web specific self-efficacy level of the graduates of numerical field was higher than other field graduates. Those who accessed the internet at home had higher levels of self-efficacy than those who had access at other places. Moreover, the prospective teachers having more on-line hours per week, in general, displayed more positive web specific selfefficacy than those who had less access. Some useful implications are discussed based on the research findings.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı öğretmen adaylarının webe özgü özyeterllik düzeylerini incelemektir. Araştırmanın verileri Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi, İnsani ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, Eğitim Fakültesi ile Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksek Okulu’nda öğrenim gören 807 öğretmen adayından 21 maddelik beşli Likert tipi bir ölçek aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Webe Özgü Özyeterlik Ölçeği tüm katılımcılara uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde bağımsız gruplar t testi, Varyans analizi ve Kruskal Wallis H testleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma ile erkek öğretmen adaylarının webe özgü özyeterlik düzeylerinin kız öğretmen adaylarınkinden daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Bölümü öğretmen adaylarının özyeterlik düzeyleri diğer bölümlerdeki öğretmen adaylarınkinden daha yüksek çıkmıştır. Sayısal alan mezunlarının webe özgü özyeterlik düzeylerinin diğer alan mezunlarından, internete evden bağlananların başka yerden bağlananlara gore daha yüksek çıkmıştır. İnternete hafta boyunca daha sık bağlananların özyeterlik düzeylerinin de daha az bağlananlara göre daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına dayalı olarak çeşitli görüşler tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖMLEKSİZ, M. N., ERTEN, P. (2013). Prospective Teachers\' Perceptions of Web Specific Self-Efficacy. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 1–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/999077

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research Report: The Evolving Relationship between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy: An Empirical Assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430.
  2. Akkoyunlu, B. Orhan, F. ve Umay, A. (2005). Bilgisayar Öğretmenleri İçin “Bilgisayar Öğretmenliği Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği” Geliştirme Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 1Aşkar, P. ve Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayarla İlgili Öz-Yeterlik Algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  4. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 1221 Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A. (1993). Percieved Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
  5. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4, 71- New York: Academic Press.
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
  7. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307-338). USA: Information Age Publishing, Inc. Barnes, A. (2006). Web Self Efficacy and Web Site Recognition: Virtual Capacities for Our Time. Australian Computers in Education Conference 2006 (ACEC 2006), 2-4 October 2006.
  8. Cairns, Queensland, Australia. http://acce.edu.au/sites/acce.edu.au/files/archived_papers/conf_P_697_Web%20Efficacypaper doc adresinden 13.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir. Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi Yönetimi. İstanbul:
  9. Kariyer Yayıncılık. Bates, R, & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-Efficacy and College Students' Perceptions and Use of Online Learning Systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175-191.
  10. Briggs, P., Burford, B. & Dracup, C. (1998). Modelling Self-Confidence in Users of a ComputerBased System Showing Unrepresentative Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49(5), 717-742.
  11. Brown, J. H. (2008). Developing and Using a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale for Adults. 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning 5-8 August 2008 (pp. 1-5).