SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Instruction / 2013 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Using Anticipatory Reading Guides to Improve Elementary Students’ Comprehension

Evan Ortlieb
Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicate that the experimental treatment group outperformed the control group by a statistically significant rate on both reading and content area measures, indicating that when struggling readers practice and use strategies to explicitly think what will be asked of them after reading the passage they perform at higher levels

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:students with comprehension strategies that transfer to all content areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With stable levels of reading achievement over the last two decades in the United States, it is necessary that further research be conducted on methods of increasing students’ comprehension proficiencies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings indicate that the experimental treatment group outperformed the control group by a statistically significant rate on both reading and content area measures, indicating that when struggling readers practice and use strategies to explicitly think what will be asked of them after reading the passage they perform at higher levels
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

students with comprehension strategies that transfer to all content areas. With stable levels of reading achievement over the last two decades in the United States, it is necessary that further research be conducted on methods of increasing students’ comprehension proficiencies. This experimental research study explores the use of an anticipatory reading guide with third grade struggling readers across multiple subject areas. Findings indicate that the experimental treatment group outperformed the control group by a statistically significant rate on both reading and content area measures, indicating that when struggling readers practice and use strategies to explicitly think what will be asked of them after reading the passage they perform at higher levels

Özet

-

🔖

Cite This Article

Ortlieb, E. (2012). Using Anticipatory Reading Guides to Improve Elementary Students’ Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/995833

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Afflerbach et al. (2008). Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5): 364-373.
  2. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach. New York: Wiley. Barry, A. L. (2002). Reading Strategies Teachers Say They Use. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(2): 132-141.
  3. Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding Behaviorism: Science, Behavior, and Culture. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
  4. Cantrell et al. (2010). The Impact of a Strategy-Based Intervention on the Comprehension and Strategy Use of Struggling Adolescent Readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2): 257-280.
  5. Carlisle et al. (2010). Reading Achievement in Reading First Schools in Michigan. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(1): 49-70. doi:10.1080/10862960903583236 Cassidy, J. & Ortlieb, E. (in press). What was Hot (and Not) in Literacy: What We Can Learn. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(1). Cassidy, J. & Ortlieb, E. (2012). Looking at Literacy in the 21st Century. The Clearing House, 85(4): 141-145.
  6. Cassidy, J. & Ortlieb, E. (2011). Literacy – The First Decade of the New Millennium. Reading Horizons, 51(2): 93-102.
  7. Cheek, E. H. & Cheek, M.C. (1983). Reading Instruction through Content Teaching. Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company. Dole et al. (1991). Moving from the Old to the New: Research in Reading Comprehension Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2): 239-264.
  8. Duffelmeyer, F. (1994). Effective Anticipation Guide Statements for Learning from Expository Prose. Journal of Reading, 37: 452-455.
  9. Durkin, D. (1978/1979). What Classroom Observations Reveal about Reading Comprehension Instruction Practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4): 481-533.
  10. Durkin, D. (1981). Reading Comprehension Instruction in Five Basal Reader Series. Reading Research Quarterly, 16: 515-544.
  11. Fitts, P. M. & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information Capacity of Discrete Motor Responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2): 103–112.
  12. Frankel et al. (2013). Embracing Complexity: Integrating Reading, Writing, and Learning in Intervention Settings. In E. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek, Jr. (Eds.), School-Based Interventions for Struggling Readers, K-8 (pp. 3-20).
  13. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. Gagne, R. M. & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of Instruction Design. Oxford, England: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Goodin et al. (2009). Comprehension: The Means, Motive, and Opportunity for Meeting the Needs of Diverse Learners. In L. M. Morrow, R.