SavedAdd your journal

Journals / HAYEF Journal of Education / 2014 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

-

DENGELİ BÜTÜNLEŞME VE AYRIŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ: ERGENLERDE GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Özlem KARAIRMAK
Özge HACIFAZLIOĞLU
Selçuk ŞİRİN
Pages
237–257
Publication Date
2015-01-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the second data set, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted, and it was found that the model is acceptable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine reliability and validity analysis of the Balanced Differentiation and Integration Scale (İmamoğlu, 1998) on an adolescence sample and test the psychometric properties of the scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data was obtained from 1658 high school students from 16 high schools in four provinces in Istanbul that have the highest rates of immigration (Zeytinburnu, Gaziosmanpaşa, Büyükçekmece and Esenyurt Regions).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the second data set, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted, and it was found that the model is acceptable.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dengeli bütünleşme · Ergenler · Bütünleşme ve Ayrışma

Abstract

This study aims to examine reliability and validity analysis of the Balanced Differentiation and Integration Scale (İmamoğlu, 1998) on an adolescence sample and test the psychometric properties of the scale. The data was obtained from 1658 high school students from 16 high schools in four provinces in Istanbul that have the highest rates of immigration (Zeytinburnu, Gaziosmanpaşa, Büyükçekmece and Esenyurt Regions). The data was divided into two sets. In the first set, Explanatory Factor Analysis was conducted, and 6 factors were found, which is similar to Imamoğlu’s study. In the second data set, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted, and it was found that the model is acceptable. This study is based on the data collected as a part of TÜBİTAK 1010 Project

Özet

Bu çalışmada, benlik tiplerini belirlemede oldukça güçlü bir ölçme aracı olan Dengeli Bütünleşme –Ayrışma Ölçeği’nin (İmamoğlu, 1998) en önemli gelişimsel krizi kimlik arayışı olan ergen grupta daha çok kullanılabilirliğini sağlamak ve ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini yeniden gözden geçirmek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında, İstanbul’un en yoğun göç alan bölgeleri olan Büyükçekmece, Esenyurt, Gaziosmanpaşa ve Zeytinburnu ilçelerindeki 16 lisede öğrenim gören 1658 ergenden veri toplanmıştır. Veriler iki sete ayrılmıştır. Birinci veri setine dayalı yapılan Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi sonuçlarına göre İmamoğlu tarafından belirlenmiş olan alt boyutlarla paralel 6 alt boyut ortaya çıkmıştır. İkinci veri seti kullanılarak yapılan Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizinde, modelin uyumunun iyi olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu araştırma, TÜBİTAK 1010 projesi kapsamında yürütülmüş olan proje verilerine dayalı olarak geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAIRMAK, Ö., HACIFAZLIOĞLU, Ö., ŞİRİN, S. (2015). -. HAYEF Journal of Education, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 237–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/992355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Tavistock Professional Book. London: Routledge. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  2. Pegem Yayıncılık. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation (ss. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  3. Faschingbauer T., Zisook S. DeVaul R. (1987).The Texas revised inventory of grief. S Zisook (Ed.). Biopsychosocial Aspect of Bereavement. Washington: American Psychiatric Press. (pp.111-124)
  4. Gezici, M. & Güvenç, G. (2003). Çalışan kadınların ve ev kadınlarının benlik algısı ve benlik kurgusu açısından karşılaştırılması. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 18, 1-17.
  5. Gabriel, S. & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655.
  6. Gilligan, C. (1982)
  7. In a Different Voice, United States of America: Harvard University Press.
  8. Guisinger, S. & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: evolution of a fundamental dialectic. American Psychologist, 49, 104-111.
  9. Güler, A. (2004). Relationship between self-construals and future time orientations. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara, Türkiye: Middle East Technical University. İmamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed)., Growth and Progress in Cross Cultural Psychology (ss. 138-145). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger. İmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. Journal of Psychology, 132, 95-105.
  10. İmamoğlu, E. O. (1995). Değişim sürecinde aile: evlilik ilişkileri, bireysel gelişim ve demogratik değerler. 1994 Aile Kurultayı (s.33-51).
  11. Ankara, Turkey: Aile Araştırma Kurumu. İmamoğlu. E. O. (2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing but distinct and complementary. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367-402.
  12. Imamoğlu, E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Self-construals and values across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 277–306. İmamoğlu. E. O. & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün. Z. (2006). Actual, ideal and expected relatedness with pa