SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The Effects Of Ongoing Cooperation In Technoparks On The Technology Transfer Performance Of Resident Firms

Teknoparklarda Sürdürülen İşbirliklerinin Yerleşimci Firmaların Teknoloji Transfer Performansına Etkisi

Tayfun ERÜN
Ali KILIÇ
Hakan EREN
Pages
109–134
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of multiple linear regression analysis, it has been identified collaboration with technopark management and TTO, firm-firm collaborations, collaboration about R&D and human resources with university and informal collaborations have a positive and significant performance, collaboration on the use of infrastructure has a negative effect and collaboration about education with university has no significant effect

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines that which collaboration type or types are superior to others and what are the contributions of these effects on firm technology transfer performance by determining the probable implemented technoparks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Field research was carried out with the participation of 151 firms operating within five technoparks located Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of multiple linear regression analysis, it has been identified collaboration with technopark management and TTO, firm-firm collaborations, collaboration about R&D and human resources with university and informal collaborations have a positive and significant performance, collaboration on the use of infrastructure has a negative effect and collaboration about education with university has no significant effect
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teknoparklar · Teknopark İçi İşbirliği · Teknoloji Transferi

Abstract

This study examines that which collaboration type or types are superior to others and what are the contributions of these effects on firm technology transfer performance by determining the probable implemented technoparks. Field research was carried out with the participation of 151 firms operating within five technoparks located Ankara. As a result of multiple linear regression analysis, it has been identified collaboration with technopark management and TTO, firm-firm collaborations, collaboration about R&D and human resources with university and informal collaborations have a positive and significant performance, collaboration on the use of infrastructure has a negative effect and collaboration about education with university has no significant effect

Özet

Bu araştırma ile teknopark bünyesinde faaliyet gösteren uyguladıkları işbirliklerinin onların teknoloji transfer performansları üzerindeki etkilerini tespit ederek, söz konusu işbirliği türlerinden hangisi veya hangilerinin diğerlerine göre etkili olduğu ve bu performansına sağlayacağı katkıların neler olduğu incelenmiştir. Saha araştırması, Ankara ilindeki beş teknopark bünyesinde faaliyet gösteren 151 firmanın katılımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi neticesinde, teknopark yönetimi ve Teknoloji Transfer Ofisi TTO ile aracılık üniversite ile AR-GE ve insan kaynaklarına ilişkin işbirlikleri ve gayri resmi işbirliklerinin teknoloji transfer performansını pozitif yönde etkilediği tespit edilirken, altyapı kullanımına ilişkin işbirliklerinin ise beklenmedik bir şekilde negatif yönde etkilediği, üniversite ile eğitime ilişkin işbirliklerinin anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olmadığı tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERÜN, T., KILIÇ, A., EREN, H. (2016). The Effects Of Ongoing Cooperation In Technoparks On The Technology Transfer Performance Of Resident Firms. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 109–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/99201

References (10)

  1. Akgün, A.E., H. Keskin ve A. Günsel (2005), “Bilgi Ekonomisi Kapsamında Teknoloji Transferinin Bilgi Transferine Dönüşümüne Dair Bir Yazın Alanı Taraması”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 227-242.
  2. Almeida, A., C. Santos ve M. Rui-Silva (2008), Bridging Science to Economy: The Role of Science and Technologic Parks in Innovation Strategies in “Follower” Regions, FEP Working Papers N.302, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Do Porto. Amesse, F. ve P. Cohendet. “Technology Transfer Revisited from the Perspective of the Knowledge-Based Economy”, Research Policy, 30, 2001, 1459-1478.
  3. Anderson, T.R., T.U. Daim ve F.F. Lavoie (2007), “Measuring the Efficiency of University Technology Transfer”, Technovation, 27, 306-318.
  4. Arvanitis, S., N. Sydov ve M. Woerter (2008), “Do Specific Forms of UniversityIndustry Knowledge Transfer Have Different Impacts on the Performance of Private Enterprises? An Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 504-533.
  5. Bartelle (2007),“Characteristics and Trends in North American Research Parks: 21st Century Directions, Bartelle Technology Partnership Practice, Columbus, Ohio. (Erişim: 15.12.2014).
  6. Basile, A. (2011), “Networking System and Innovation Outputs: The Role of Science and Technology Parks”, Int. Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 3- 15. Bennet, J.P.H., M. Polkınghorne ve J.F. Pearce. “Quantifying the Effectiveness of an Academia-Industry Technology Transfer Initiative in a Low Prosperity Region of The UK”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management of Technology, Orlando, Florida, 1998, 16-20.
  7. Betts, S.C. ve M.D. Santoro (2009), “Controlling Industry-University Relationships for Initial and Continuing Success”, Proceedings of the Academy of Strategic Management, Allied Academies International Conference, New Orleans, 8(1), 12- 17. Bozeman, B. (2000), “Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory”, Research Policy, 29, 627-655.
  8. Buratti, N. ve L. Penco (2001), “Assisted Technology Transfer to SMEs: Lessons from an Exemplary Case”, Technovation, 21, 35-43.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006), “Anket Geliştirme”, Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133- 151. Carlsson, B. ve A.C. Fridth (2002), “Technology Transfer in United States Universities a Survey and Statistical Analysis”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 199-232.
  10. Chan, K.Y.A., L.A.G. Oerlemans ve M.W. Pretorius (2010), “Knowledge Flows and Innovative Performanc