SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar / 2015 / Sayı: 608

Energy Poverty and Energy Choice Profile in Turkey

Türkiye’de Enerji Yoksulluğu ve Enerji Tercihi Profili

Hamdi EMEÇ
Asuman ALTAY
Esin ASLANPAY
M.ozan ÖZDEMİR
Pages
9–21
Publication Date
2015-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We use 2012 TÜİK ‘Household Budget Survey’ to estimate the econometric models

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is a relationship between poverty and access to modern energy sources which are clean, sufficient and economic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Access to modern energy resources is one of the important factors creating an increase in poor people's standard of life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We use 2012 TÜİK ‘Household Budget Survey’ to estimate the econometric models
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Enerji · enerji yoksulluğu · enerji tercihi

Abstract

There is a relationship between poverty and access to modern energy sources which are clean, sufficient and economic. People with low income levels are not able to reach modern energy resources. Inability of the goverment to create effective and fair energy policies is preventing the consumption of high quality energy. Access to modern energy resources is one of the important factors creating an increase in poor people's standard of life. In this context, welfare will increase through the provision of modern energy resources such as improved cooking facilities, healthy heating and lightening to households with energy policies developed by the government. The aim of this study is to determine the factors of energy choices of households. Indeed, urban-rural differences among wood, coal, electricity, natural gas, dung and other energy choices are discussed with demographic characteristics of households. Primary variables causing energy poverty will be determined by constituting energy profile of Turkey with founded econometric models. We use 2012 TÜİK ‘Household Budget Survey’ to estimate the econometric models

Özet

Temiz, yeterli ve ekonomik modern enerji kaynaklarına ulaşım ile yoksulluk arasında bir ilişki söz konusudur. Düşük gelir seviyelerine sahip olan insanların modern enerji kaynaklarına ulaşmaları mümkün değildir. Hükümetlerin etkin ve adil enerji politikaları oluşturma konusundaki yetersizlikleri kaliteli enerji tüketimini engellemektedir. Yoksulların yaşam standartlarının artmasında en önemli unsurlardan biri modern enerji kaynaklarına ulaşımlarıdır. Bu kapsamda hükümetlerin geliştireceği enerji politikaları ile hanelere, iyileştirilmiş yemek pişirme imkânları, sağlıklı ısınma ve aydınlatma gibi modern enerji hizmetlerinin etkin olarak sunulması kişilerin refah seviyesini artıracaktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı hanelerin enerji tercihlerini belirleyen faktörleri incelemektir. Böylece odun, kömür, elektrik, doğal gaz, tezek ve diğer enerji tercihlerindeki kır-kent farklılıkları, hanelerin demografik özellikleri ile birlikte ele alınacaktır. Kurulan ekonometrik modeller ile Türkiye’nin enerji tercih profili çıkartılarak, enerji yoksulluğuna neden olan başat değişkenler belirlenecektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda 2012 TÜİK “Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi” verilerinden faydalanılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

EMEÇ, H., ALTAY, A., ASLANPAY, E., ÖZDEMİR, M. (2015). Energy Poverty and Energy Choice Profile in Turkey. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, Sayı: 608, 9–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/989247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. BARNES, F. Douglas., Shahidur R. KHANDKER and Hussain A. SAMAD; (2011), “Energy Poverty in Rural Bangladesh”, En- ergy Policy, 39(2), pp. 894-904.
  2. BOARDMAN, Brenda; (2010), Fixing Fuel Poverty-Challenges and Solutions, Earthscan Publishing, UK. CHENG, Simon and J. Scott LONG; (2007), “Testing For IIA in the Multinomial Logit Model”, Sociological Methods and Re- search, 35, pp. 583–600.
  3. COULTER, A. E. Fiona, A. Frank COWELL and Stephen P. JENKINS; (1992), “Differences in Needs and Assessment of Income Distributions” Bulletion of Economic Research, 44(2), pp. 77-124.
  4. DEVOS, Klaas and M. Asghar ZAIDI; (1997), “Equivalence Scale Sensivity of Poverty Statistics for the Member States of the European Community”, Review of Income and Wealth, (3), pp. 319-333. EC; (2010),
  5. An Energy Policy For Consumers, Commission Working Paper, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ ener/files/documents/sec(2010)1407_0.pdf, (14.10.2015).
  6. FARSI, Mehdi, Massimo FILIPPINI and Shonali PACHAURI; (2007), “Fuel Choices in Urban Indian Households”, Environ- ment and Development Economics, 12, pp. 757–774.
  7. FOSTER, Vivien, Jean-Philippe TRE, Quentin WODON; (2000), “Energy Prices, Energy Efficiency, And Fuel Pov- erty”, World Bank, http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/vod- docs/240/502/Gua_price.pdf, (12.10.2015).
  8. GROH, Sebastian; (2014), “The role of energy in development processes—The energy poverty penalty: Case study of Areq- uipa (Peru)”, Energy For Sustainable Development, 18, pp. 99. HAUSMAN, Jerry and Daniel MCFADDEN; (1984), “Specifi- cation Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model”, Econometrica, (5), pp. 1219-1240. IEA; (2002), World Energy Outlook 2002, OECD/IEA, Paris IEA, UNDP, UNIDO, (2010), “Energy Poverty How to Make Modern Energy Access Universal?”, Special Early Excerpt of the Wold Energy Outlook 2010 for the UN General Assembly on the Millennium Development Goals, OECD/IEA. IEA; (2012), World Energy Outlook 2012, OECD/IEA, Paris JAIN, Garima; (2010), “Alleviating energy poverty: Indian Expe- rience”, Regulatory Studies and Governance Division. The En- ergy and Resources Institute, http://www.indiaenergycongress. in/montreal/library/pdf/319.pdf, (11.10.2015).
  9. JOHANSSON, Thomas B., Anand PATWARDHAN, Nebojsa NAKICENOVIC, Luis GOMEZ-ECHEVERRI, (Eds); (2012) Global Energy Assesment: Toward a Sustainable Future, GEA, Cambridge University Press,
  10. Cambridge UK. KANAGAWA, Makato and Toshihiko NAKATA; (2007), “Analy- sis of the Energy Access Improvement and Its Socio-Economic Im