Journals / European Journal of Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

An Investigation of Teacher Candidates' Perceptions About Physical Dimension of Classroom Management

Pages
199–212
Publication Date
2017-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, this study aims to discover students’ perception on actual classroom and their construction of dream classroom in terms of physical characteristics.The research findings revealed that most of the teacher candidates mentioned their dream classroom according to the actual classroom and only one third of them designed the classroom according to their own dream classroom characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to investigate teacher candidates’ perceptions about the physical dimension of classroom management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A hundred two 3rd year students at the Primary School Education Department of a state university were instructed to visit a primary school and to observe a classroom in terms of its physical dimensions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, this study aims to discover students’ perception on actual classroom and their construction of dream classroom in terms of physical characteristics.The research findings revealed that most of the teacher candidates mentioned their dream classroom according to the actual classroom and only one third of them designed the classroom according to their own dream classroom characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Physical dimension · teacher candidate · classroom management.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate teacher candidates’ perceptions about the physical dimension of classroom management. A hundred two 3rd year students at the Primary School Education Department of a state university were instructed to visit a primary school and to observe a classroom in terms of its physical dimensions. The students were guided both to tell about the actual classroom they observed and to tell about their dream classroom. Thus, this study aims to discover students’ perception on actual classroom and their construction of dream classroom in terms of physical characteristics.The research findings revealed that most of the teacher candidates mentioned their dream classroom according to the actual classroom and only one third of them designed the classroom according to their own dream classroom characteristics. Also teacher candidates did not mention the affective influences of physical layouts and environments on individuals

🔖

Cite This Article

OZSEZER, M. S. B., SABAN, A. İ. (2017). An Investigation of Teacher Candidates' Perceptions About Physical Dimension of Classroom Management. European Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 199–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/987316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahrentzen, S., & Evans, G. (1984). Distraction, privacy, and classroom design. Environment and Behavior, 16(4), 437-454.
  2. Aktas Arnas, Y. (2016). Fiziksel ortamlarin planlanmasi. (Edt. Aktas Arnas Y. ve Sadik, F. ) Okul Oncesinde Sinif Yonetimi. (pp.47-62). Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Aydin, A. (2008). Sinif yonetimi. (9. Baski). Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi. Baker, L., & Bernstein, H. (2012). The impact of school buildings on student’s health and performance: A call for research. Retrieved 27.05.2015 from http://mcgraw-hillresearchfoundation.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/02/GreenSchoolsWP-2012.pdf
  5. Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12-25.
  6. Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Davies, F. & Barrett, L. (2015). Clever classroom: Summary report of the HEAD Project (holistic evidence and design). Received 14.05.2015 from www.salford.ac.uk/cleverclassrooms/1503-Salford-uni-Report-DIGITAL.pdf Basar, H. (1999). Sinif yonetimi. Ankara:
  7. Milli Egitim Basimevi. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P. & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction 21, 715-730
  8. Bull, S. L. & Solity, J.E. (1996). Classroom management: Principles to practice. London: Routledge. Cardellino, P., Leiringer, R., & Clements-Croome, D. (2009). Exploring the role of design quality in the building schools for the future programme. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5, 249-262.
  9. Celep, C. (2008). Sinif yonetimi. (3. Basim), Ankara:
  10. Pegem Akademi Celik, V. (2002). Sinif yonetimi. Ankara:
  11. Nobel Yayinevi. Clark, H. (2002). Building education: The role of the physical environment in enhancing teaching and research. Issues in practice. Institute of Education, University of London. Dittoe, W. (2002). Innovative models of learning environments. The Importance of Physical Space in Creating Supportive Environments, 92, 81-90.
  12. Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A. and Willms, D. J. (2001), Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1-30.
  13. Erdogan, I. (2001). Sinif yonetimi ders, konferans, panel ve seminer etkinliklerinde basarinin yollari. (Birinci Basim), Istanbul: Sistem Yayincilik Ersoy, A. (2005). Ilkogretim bilgisayar dersindeki sinif yerlesim duzeni ve ogretmen rolunun yapilandirmaci ogrenmeye gore degerlendirilmesi. The Turkish J