Journals / OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 34

The Change of Indian Politics from a New Institutionalist Perspective

Yeni Kurumsalcı Perspektiften Hindistan Siyasetinin Değişimi

Pages
1455–1486
Publication Date
2021-02-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The rise of all these unofficial institutions and their impact on Indian politics will be discussed in the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this article is to examine the change in Indian politics through institutional analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While formal institutions increased the power of the Congress Party in those years; informal institutions also positively affected the capacity to manage in the same years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The rise of all these unofficial institutions and their impact on Indian politics will be discussed in the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:change · india · institutions

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the change in Indian politics through institutional analysis. In the recent period, institutions have been studied extensively in political change studies. The change in country policies has been able to analyze not only through official institutions but also through informal institutions. This article will also examine Indian politics through emerging informal institutions. The change in Indian politics will be discussed through the change of informal institutions. The Congress Party, which was in power in the country after the independence of India, became the actor that managed both nation and state building processes in the country. While formal institutions increased the power of the Congress Party in those years; informal institutions also positively affected the capacity to manage in the same years. At this point, the unofficial institution that the Congress Party applied to was secularism. During the Congress rule, secularism strengthened the coexistence culture of the country, which was known for its diversity. After the collapse of the Congress System, the rising Hindu nationalism replaced secularism. The ideology of Hindu nationalism known as Hindutva, as an unofficial institution, has both mobilized the masses and brought the BJP to power. The anti-democratic and exclusionary character of Hindu nationalism has created an anti-Hindutva wave both nationally and regionally. In this context, many alternative national and regional informal institutions to Hindutva have been on the rise. The rise of all these unofficial institutions and their impact on Indian politics will be discussed in the study.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, Hindistan siyasetinin değişimini kurumsal analiz üzerinden incelemektir. Kurumlar son dönemlerde siyasal değişim çalışmalarında fazlasıyla incelenmektedir. Sadece resmi kurumlar değil, gayri resmi kurumlar üzerinden de ülke siyasetlerinin değişimi analiz edilebilmektedir. Bu makalede de Hindistan siyaseti, yükselen gayri resmi kurumlar üzerinden incelenecektir. Hindistan siyasetindeki değişim, gayri resmi kurumların değişimi üzerinden tartışılacaktır. Hindistan’ın bağımsızlığı sonrası ülkede iktidar olan Kongre Partisi ülkedeki hem ulus hem de devlet inşası süreçlerini yöneten aktör olmuştur. Resmi kurumlar, Kongre Partisi’nin yönetme gücünü arttırmışken; gayri resmi kurumlar da yönetme kapasitesini pozitif yönde etkilemiştir. Bu noktada Kongre Partisi’nin başvurduğu gayri resmi kurum sekülerizm olmuştur. Sekülerizm, çeşitlilikleriyle tanınan ülkenin bir arada yaşama kültürünü güçlendirmiştir. Kongre Sistemi’nin çöküşü sonrası ise yükselen Hindu milliyetçiliği sekülerizmin yerini almıştır. Hindutva olarak bilinen Hindu milliyetçiliği ideolojisi, bir gayri resmi kurum olarak hem kitleleri mobilize etmiş hem de BJP’yi iktidara taşımıştır. Hindu milliyetçiliğinin anti-demokratik ve dışlayıcı karakteri ise hem ulusal hem de bölgesel anlamda Hindutva karşıtı bir dalga ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu bağlamda Hindutva’ya alternatif birçok ulusal ve bölgesel gayri resmi kurum yükselişe geçmiştir. Çalışmada tüm bu gayri resmi kurumların yükselişi ve Hindistan siyasetine etkisi ele alınacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNLÜ, H. (2021). The Change of Indian Politics from a New Institutionalist Perspective. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 34, 1455–1486. https://ajindex.com/articles/98507

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anderson, S. (2012). Caste dominance in Rural India: Cause and effect. https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/governance/castedominance-in-ruralindia-cause-and-effect.html adresinden erişilmiştir. Balasubramanian, M. (1980). Nehru: A study in secularism.Uppal. Berman, S. (1998).The social democratic moment: Ideas and politics in the making of Interwar Europe. Harvard University Press.
  2. Berman, S. (2013). Ideational theorizing in the social sciences since ‘policy paradigms, social learning and the state’. Governance, 26(2), 217-237.
  3. Brinks, D. (2003). Informal institutions and the rule of law: The judicial response to state killings in Buenos Aires and Sao Paulo in the 1990s. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 1-19.
  4. Chitkara, M. G. (1997). Hindutva. New Delhi: APH Publishing. Colignon, R. A. ve Chikako U. (2003). Amakudari: The hidden fabric of Japans economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  5. Collins, K. (2002). Clans, pacts and politics in Central Asia. Journal of Democracy 13 (3), 137-52.
  6. Curran, J.A. (1950). The RSS: Militant Hinduism. Far Eastern Survey, 19(10), 93-98
  7. Della Porta, D.ve Alberto V. (1999). Corrupt exchanges: Actors, resources, and mechanisms ofpolitical corruption. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Devare, A. (2011). History and the making of a Modern Hindu Self, Routledge. DFID (2010). Building peaceful states and societies. A DFID Practice Paper. London: Department for International Development. Do Not Need Lesson On Food Habits From Delhi, Nagpur: Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan. (28.05.2017.). Indian Express. Dravidanadu Demand Revives On Twitter, After Centre’s Ban On Cattle Slaughter. (30.05.2017). Newsd. https://newsd.in/dravidanadu-demand-revivestwitterafter-centres-ban-cattle-slaughter/ adresinden erişilmiştir. Gafoor, A. ve Noorani, A. M. (2002). Savarkar and Hindutva: The GodseConnection. LeftWord Books. Giddens,A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  8. Gokhale, J. (1993). From concessions to confrontation: The politics of an India Untouchable Community. Bombay: Popular Prakashan. Hankla, C.R. (2008). Parties and patronage: An analysis of trade and industrial policy in India. Comparative Politics, 41(1), 41-60.
  9. Hoveyda, A. (2011). Indian Government and politics. New Delhi: Pearson. How Slaughter Ban Revived the Demand for #DravidaNadu. (30.05.2017). Quint. https://www.thequint.com/news/india/how-slaughter-ban-revived-thedemandfor-dravida-nadu. adresinden erişilmiştir.