SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 67

LAND SPECULATION AND URBAN RENT IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’DE ARSA SPEKÜLASYONU VE KENTSEL RANT

Seçil Gül MEYDAN YILDIZ
Semih Halil EMÜR
Pages
1222–1233
Publication Date
2018-07-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between the city (urban), land and the rent in Turkey, and the role of land speculation that is influenced in this process is described.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The content and impact of rent is increasingly seen as related with the historical period that shaped urban structure depending on the rent relations, changing of life requirements and the scientific and technological developments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a natural result of urbanization and being urbanized, the specification of urban land and gainings to the owners are changing due to the increase of social, economic, political and spatial requirements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between the city (urban), land and the rent in Turkey, and the role of land speculation that is influenced in this process is described.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rant · Kentsel Toprak · Kentsel Toprağın Özellikleri

Abstract

The content and impact of rent is increasingly seen as related with the historical period that shaped urban structure depending on the rent relations, changing of life requirements and the scientific and technological developments. The land speculation which is a result of private property, is an important factor in the selection of land use decisions and defining the direction of urban development growth. As a natural result of urbanization and being urbanized, the specification of urban land and gainings to the owners are changing due to the increase of social, economic, political and spatial requirements. Attitudes and behaviors contrary to reconstruction (planning) decisions increase the land speculation. In this case, land can become a tool for the storage of wealth depending on the relative position of land in the urban area or being on the direction of urban development. In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between the city (urban), land and the rent in Turkey, and the role of land speculation that is influenced in this process is described.

Özet

The content and impact of rent is increasingly seen as related with the historical period that shaped urban structure depending on the rent relations, changing of life requirements and the scientific and technological developments. The land speculation which is a result of private property is an important factor in the selection of land use decisions and defining the direction of urban development growth. As a natural result of urbanization and being urbanized, the specification of urban land and gainings to the owners are changing due to the increase of social, economic, political and spatial requirements. Attitudes and behaviors contrary to reconstruction (planning) decisions increase the land speculation. In this case, land can become a tool for the storage of wealth depending on the relative position of land in the urban area or being on the direction of urban development. In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between the urban, land and the rent in Turkey, and the role of land speculation that is influenced in this process is described.Anahtar Kelimeler: Rant, Kentsel Toprak, Kentsel Toprağın Özellikleri, Türkiye.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, S. G. M., EMÜR, S. H. (2018). LAND SPECULATION AND URBAN RENT IN TURKEY. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 67, 1222–1233. https://ajindex.com/articles/98447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akın, E. (2008). “Rents and Reconciliation Planning: Local Government, Participation in Local Government”, Mimarlık Dosya Dergisi, 64: 50-53.Aktan, Coşkun C., (1993). “In politics Rent-Seeking”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, (December), 26 (4): 119-136.Alkan, A. (1991). “City, Urbanization and Family”, Türk Aile Ansiklopedisi, Türkiye Yazarlar Birliği Vakfı, Birim Basın-Yayın Organizasyon, Ankara, 3: 960-967.AnaBritannica Genel Kültür Ansiklopedisi, Volume: 16.AnaBritannica Genel Kültür Ansiklopedisi, Volume: 26.Campbell, Heather, Marsall, Robert (2000). “Moral Obligations, Planning And The Public İnterest: A Commentary On Current British Practice”, Environment And Planning, 27: 297-312.
  2. Dinler, Z. (2008). İktisada Giriş, 14. Edition,
  3. Ekin Publishing, Bursa.Eceral, T., Varol, Ç., Alkan, L. (2010). “Urban Land Valuation Process: The Case of Ankara, Mustafa Kemal Mahallesi”, pp. 307-325, Toprak Mülkiyeti Sempozyum Bildirileri, Memleket Publishing, Ankara.Ertürk, H. (1995). Urban Economics, 1.Edition,
  4. Bursa.Genel Ekonomi Ansiklopedisi (1998). Milliyet Publishing, 2: 950. Genel Türkçe Sözlük, Türk Dil Kurumu Publishing (2007).Harvey, D. (1996).
  5. Social Justice and the City, Translated: Mehmet Moralı, Metis Publishing, İstanbul.Kartal, S. Kemal. (1977). “Problems of Arising from the Urban Land of Private Property Rights”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, (June), 10 (2):17-48.Keleş, R. (2014). 100 Questions on Urbanization, Housing and Slum In Turkey, Cem Publishing, 1. Edition, (February), İstanbul.Keleş, R. (2004).
  6. Policy of Urbanization, İmge Kitabevi,
  7. Ankara.Keleş, R., Mengi, A. (2014).
  8. Introduction to Construction Law, İmge Kitabevi, 2. Edition, (May), Ankara.Keleş, R. (1998).
  9. Urban Glossary, İmge Kitabevi,
  10. Ankara.Keleş, R., Geray, C., Emre, C., Mengi, A. (1999).
  11. Gaining Public Urban Land Rent, Öteki Publishing, Ankara.Kılınçaslan, İ. (2010).
  12. Urban Economics, Sectoral Development, Economic Geography, Applied Economics, Structural Analysis, Ninova Publishing, İstanbul.Marx, K. (1978).
  13. Capital, Çev. Alaattin Bilgi, Sol Publishing, Ankara.Meydan Larousse Büyük Lugat ve Ansiklopedi, 16: 487-492.Meydan, S. G., (2011). Kentsel Toprakta Değer Artış Süreci Kentleşme ve Kentsel Rant İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kayseri.Meydan, S. G., Emür, S. H. (2013). “Kentleşme ve Kentsel Rant İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği”, Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 22 (4): 51-73.Müderrisoğlu, B. (2006). The Transformation of Urban Rent