Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND OBSERVABLE DIMENSIONS OF POWER: AN ASSESSMENT FROM A REALIST PERSPECTIVE

ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER VE GÜCÜN GÖZLEMLENEBİLİR BOYUTLARI:REALİST PERSPEKTİFTEN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Pages
98–115
Publication Date
2010-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Channels through which economic, technological and military factors affect international relations were investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Economic, technological and military factors affect international relations dynamics in many respects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Developments such as the end of the Cold War, globalization, Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) and technological advances increased the interaction of these factors and the complexity of international relations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Channels through which economic, technological and military factors affect international relations were investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uluslararası ilişkiler · güç · ekonomi

Abstract

Economic, technological and military factors affect international relations dynamics in many respects. Developments such as the end of the Cold War, globalization, Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) and technological advances increased the interaction of these factors and the complexity of international relations. Defining one of the most controversial concepts in international relations, power, was also affected from this process. The power concept, which has been defined from different perspectives by schools of thought such as realism, liberalism and constructivism, became more complicated. In this study, observable dimensions of power (economic, technological and military dimensions) were focused on. Channels through which economic, technological and military factors affect international relations were investigated.

Özet

Ekonomik, teknolojik ve askeri faktörler, uluslararası ilişkiler dinamiklerini birçok yönden etkilemektedirler. Soğuk Savaş'ın sona ermesi, küreselleşme, Askeri Alanda Devrim ve teknolojik ilerlemeler gibi gelişmeler, bu faktörlerin birbirleriyle olan etkileşimini ve uluslararası ilişkilerin karmaşıklığını arttırmışlardır. Uluslararası ilişkilerin en tartışmalı kavramlarından birisi olan gücün tanımlanması da bu süreçten etkilenmiştir. Realizm, liberalizm ve konstrüktivizm gibi düşünce okullarının farklı perspektiflerden tanımladığı güç kavramı, anlaşılması daha da güç hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, gücün gözlemlenebilir boyutlarına (ekonomik, teknolojik ve askeri boyutlarına) odaklanılmıştır. Ekonomik, teknolojik ve askeri faktörlerin, uluslararası ilişkileri hangi kanallardan etkilediği araştırılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Uluslararası ilişkiler, güç, ekonomi, teknoloji, askeri yetenekler

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, G. (2010). INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND OBSERVABLE DIMENSIONS OF POWER: AN ASSESSMENT FROM A REALIST PERSPECTIVE. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34, 98–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/98365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Altıntaş, H. (2004). “Bankacılık Krizleri, Nedenleri ve Ekonomik Maliyetleri”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22 (1), 39-61.
  2. Altman, R.C. (2009). “The Great Crash, 2008: A Geopolitical Setback for the West”, Foreign Affairs, 88 (1), 2-15.
  3. Atta, R. H.V., Lippitz, M. J. (2003). Transformation and Transition: Darpa’s Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs, Alexandria: Institute for Defense Analyses. Bachrach, P., Baratz, M. (1962). “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review, 56 (4), 947-952.
  4. Battilega J. (2005). Transformations in Global Defense Markets and Industries: Implications for the Future of Warfare, Washington, DC: National Intelligence Council. Bayne, N. (2008). “Financial Diplomacy and the Credit Crunch: The Rise of Central Banks”, Journal of International Affairs, 62 (1), 1- 16. Bitzinger, R. A. (2004). Civil-Military Integration and Chinese Military Modernization, Asia- Pacific Center for Security Studies Series. Honolulu, Hawaii: APCSS. CIA. (2008). The World Factbook 2008,
  5. Washington, DC: CIA. Cliff, R. (2001) The Military Potential of China's Commercial Technology, Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Escude, C. (1998). “An Introduction to Peripheral Realism and its Implications fort he Interstate System: Argentina and the Condor II Missile Project”, in S. G. Neuman (ed.) International Relations Theory and the Third World, New York: St. Martin’s Pres, 55-75. Federation of American Scientists (FAS). (2004). Ensuring America’s Space Security: Report of the FAS Panel on Weapons in Space, Washington: FAS. Ferster, W., Clark, C. (2006, October 2). “NRO Confirms Chinese Laser Test Illuminates U.S. Spacecraft”, Defense News. Garrett, G. (2002). “Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtous Circle” in Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., Krasner, Stephen D., Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press.
  6. Gilpin, R. (1981).
  7. War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. Hartley, K, Sandler, T. (2003). “The Future of the Defense Firm”, Kyklos, 56 (3), 361-380.
  8. Hosenball, M., Hirsh, M. (2009, March 9). “There’s a world of trouble out there; the CIA faces a threat it’s never been great at analyzing: the fallout from global recession”, Newsweek, 153 (10). Hudson Institute. (2005). China’s New Great Leap Forward: High Technology and Military Power in the Next Half-Century, Indiana: Hu