SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Van Diş Hekimliği Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Orthodontic Treatment of an Individual with Class I Malocclusion with Clear Aligner: A Case Report

Sınıf I Maloklüzyona Sahip Bireyin Şeffaf Plak ile Ortodontik Tedavisi: Vaka Raporu

Ahmet Can Yılmaz(bingöl üniversitesi diş hekimliği fakültesi)
Yasemin Tunca(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ, ORTODONTİ ANABİLİM DALI)
Seda Kotan(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ, ORTODONTİ ANABİLİM DALI)
Nihal Fahrzadeh(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, KLİNİK BİLİMLER BÖLÜMÜ, ORTODONTİ ANABİLİM DALI)
Pages
23–30
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A prescription for the ClinCheck treatment plan of our patient with Angle class I, in whom the maxillary dental midline deviated 3 mm to the left, with 2 mm overjet and 4 mm overbite in clinical examination, was created and sent to Invisalign Technology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Clear aligner treatment is an alternative to traditional orthodontic procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of research in the literature evaluating the general working principles of clear aligner therapy, understanding the treatment limits, and evaluating the advantages and disadvantages compared to conventional orthodontic treatments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A prescription for the ClinCheck treatment plan of our patient with Angle class I, in whom the maxillary dental midline deviated 3 mm to the left, with 2 mm overjet and 4 mm overbite in clinical examination, was created and sent to Invisalign Technology.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diş hareketi · ortodontik tedavi · şeffaf plak

Abstract

Clear aligner treatment is an alternative to traditional orthodontic procedures. Clinical applications are developing as a result of the spread of clear aligner manufacturing companies and the rapid improvement of material and planning technologies. In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of research in the literature evaluating the general working principles of clear aligner therapy, understanding the treatment limits, and evaluating the advantages and disadvantages compared to conventional orthodontic treatments. The aim of this case report is to present the results of the treatment of our patient with dental class I malocclusion with clear aligner. A prescription for the ClinCheck treatment plan of our patient with Angle class I, in whom the maxillary dental midline deviated 3 mm to the left, with 2 mm overjet and 4 mm overbite in clinical examination, was created and sent to Invisalign Technology.

Özet

Şeffaf plak tedavisi, konvansiyonel ortodontik tedavilere alternatif bir tedavi seçeneği olarak günümüzde karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Şeffaf plak üreten firmaların yaygınlaşması, materyal ve planlama teknolojilerinin gelişmesiyle birlikte klinik uygulamalarda hızla artmaktadır. Son yıllarda şeffaf plak tedavisinin genel çalışma prensiplerinin değerlendirilmesi, tedavi sınırlarını anlaşılabilmesi ve konvansiyonel ortodontik tedavilere göre avantaj ve dezavantajlarının değerlendirilmesi ile ilgili literatürde araştırma sayısı artmaktadır. Bu vaka raporunda amaç, dişsel sınıf I maloklüzyonu olan hastamızın şeffaf plak ile tedavisinin sonuçlarını sunmaktır. Klinik muayenede 2 mm overjet ve 4 mm overbite saptanan, maksiller dental orta hattın 3 mm sola deviasyon gösterdiği Angle sınıf I olan hastamızın ClinCheck tedavi planı için reçete oluşturularak Invisalign Technology firmasına gönderilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, A. C., Tunca, Y., Kotan, S., Fahrzadeh, N. (2022). Orthodontic Treatment of an Individual with Class I Malocclusion with Clear Aligner: A Case Report. Van Diş Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 23–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/978533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Rosenstiel SF, Johnston WM. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(3): 276-277.
  2. Johnson G, Walker MP, Kula K. Fracture strength of ceramic bracket tie wings subjected to tension. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(1):95-100.
  3. Papageorgiou SN, Gölz L, Jäger A, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(2):105-18.
  4. Sinclair PM, Cannito MF, Goates LJ, Solomos LF, Alexander CM. Patient responses to lingual appliances. J Clin Orthod. 1986;20(6):396-404.
  5. Hennessy J, Garvey T, Al-Awadhi EA. A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):706-12.
  6. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, Huang GJ. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 6th ed. St.Louis: Elsevier; 2016.
  7. Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II. J Orthod. 2004;31(2):154-62.
  8. Vlaskalic V, Boyd R. Orthodontic treatment of a mildly crowded malocclusion using the Invisalign System. Aust Orthod J. 2001;17(1):41-6.
  9. Tai S. Clear aligner technique. China: Quintessence Publishing; 2018.
  10. Miethke R-R, Brauner K. A Comparison of the periodontal health of patients during treatment with the Invisalign system and with fixed lingual appliances. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68(3):223-31.
  11. Miller KB, McGorray SP, Womack R, Quintero JC, Perelmuter M, Gibson J, vd. A comparison of treatment impacts between Invisalign aligner and fixed appliance therapy during the first week of treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(3):302.e1-9.
  12. Barbagallo LJ, Jones AS, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(2):218-27.
  13. Jeremiah HG, Bister D, Newton JT. Social perceptions of adults wearing orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(5):476-82.
  14. Azaripour A, Weusmann J, Mahmoodi B, Peppas D, Gerhold-Ay A, Van Noorden CJF, vd. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients’ satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:69.
  15. White DW, Julien KC, Jacob H, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. Discomfort associated with Invisalign and traditional brackets: A randomized, prospective trial. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(6):801-8.
  16. Christou T, Abarca R, Christou V, Kau CH. Smile outcome comparison of Invisalign and traditional fixed-appliance treatment: A case-control study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(3):357-64.
  17. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):881-9.
  18. Zheng M, Liu R, Ni Z, Yu Z. Efficiency, effectiveness and treatment stability of clear aligners: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017;20(3):127-33.
  19. Robertson L, Kaur H, Fagundes NCF, Romanyk D, Major P, Flores Mir C. Effectiveness of clear aligner therapy for orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23(2):133-42.
  20. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Periodontal health during clear aligners treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(5):539-43.
  21. Bollen A-M, Huang G, King G, Hujoel P, Ma T. Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 1: Ability to complete treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(5):496-501.
  22. Dai F-F, Xu T-M, Shu G. Comparison of achieved and predicted tooth movement of maxillary first molars and central incisors: First premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(5):679-87.
  23. Haouili N, Kravitz ND, Vaid NR, Ferguson DJ, Makki L. Has Invisalign improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158(3):420-5.
  24. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(1):27-35.
  25. Tuncay OC. The invisalign system. United Kingdom: Quintessence Publishing; 2006.
  26. Larson BE, Vaubel CJ, Grünheid T. Effectiveness of computer-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted outcomes. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(4):557-62.
  27. Tai S. Clear aligner technique. China: Quintessence Publishing; 2018.
  28. Tuncay OC. The invisalign system. United Kingdom: Quintessence Publishing; 2006.