Journals / Dini Araştırmalar / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 53 (15-06-2018)

A Quantitative Study on the Relationship Among Religiosity, Cyberbullying, and Problematic Internet Use

Dindarlık, Siber Zorbalık ve Problemli İnternet Kullanımı İlişkisine Dair Nicel Bir Araştırma

Pages
35–54
Publication Date
2018-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, it was seen that there was a statistically significant difference in the cyber bullying variable according to the sex.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, firstly, the related literature of cyberbullying/victimization, problematic internet usage and religiosity and correlations among religiosity, cyberbullying/victimization and problematic internet use were tried to be revealed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with 1130 participants between 16-55 years old.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, it was seen that there was a statistically significant difference in the cyber bullying variable according to the sex.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cyberbullying · Cyber Victimization · Problematic Internet Usage

Abstract

In this research, firstly, the related literature of cyberbullying/victimization, problematic internet usage and religiosity and correlations among religiosity, cyberbullying/victimization and problematic internet use were tried to be revealed. Subsequently, the differences between the gender groups on cyberbullying/victimization, problematic internet use and religiosity were examined. Moreover, the differences among the age groups on cyberbullying/victimization, problematic internet use and religiosity were analyzed. The study was conducted with 1130 participants between 16-55 years old. In the study, Personal Information Form, Revised CyberBullying Inventory, Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 (GPIUS2) and two different Religiosity Scales were utilized. Personal Information Form was arranged by researchers. Two items of the Personal Information Form are derived from the Bapint Scale who developed by Öğel and et al. Revised CyberBullying Inventory was developed by Topçu and Erdur-Baker. Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 (GPIUS2) was developed by Caplan in 2010. The first religiosity scale was developed by Veysel and this version edited by Ayten was used. The second religiosity scale was developed by Ayten. According to the results of the study, it was seen that there was a statistically significant difference in the cyber bullying variable according to the sex. However, according to sex, cyber victimization, problematic internet use and religiosity variables were found not to be significantly differentiated. There is a significant difference in the cyberbullying, problematic internet use and religiosity according to the age variable. It has been found that there is no significant difference in the cyber victimization variable. According to the correlation which have been obtained, the significant negative relationship between religiosity, cyber bullying/victimization and problematic internet use were found. It is possible to say that as the religiousness increases, cyberbullying, cyber victimization and problematic internet usage decrease.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, siber zorbalık/mağduriyet, problemli internet kullanımı ve dindarlıkla ilişkili alanyazın incelenmiş ardından cinsiyet ve yaşa göre grup farklılıkları ve değişkenlerin birbirleri arasındaki korelasyon ilişkileri ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırma, 16-55 yaş arasındaki 1130 kişiden oluşan katılımcılardan elde edilen veriler üzerine yapılmıştır. Çalışmada Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Yenilenmiş Siber Zorbalık Envanteri, Genellenmiş Problemli İnternet Kullanımı-2 Ölçeği ve iki farklı Dindarlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre cinsiyet ve yaşa göre siber zorbalık, problemli internet kullanımı ve dindarlıkta gruplar arasında istatistiki olarak anlamlı düzeyde farklılaşma olduğu görülmüştür. Dindarlık ile siber zorbalık/mağduriyet ve problemli internet kullanımı arasında negatif yönde anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, S., MEHMEDOĞLU, A. U. (2018). A Quantitative Study on the Relationship Among Religiosity, Cyberbullying, and Problematic Internet Use. Dini Araştırmalar, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 53 (15-06-2018), 35–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/97681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Almenayes, J. J. (2014). Religiosity and the Perceived Consequences of Social Media Usage in a Muslim Country. Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), 3 (5), 108-117.
  2. Almenayes, J. J. (2015). Empirical Analysis of Religiosity as Predictor of Social Media Addiction. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 4(10), 44-52.
  3. Ayten, A. (2009). Prososyal Davranışlarda Dindarlık ve Empatinin Rolü. İstanbul:Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. Ayten, A., (2012). Kimlik ve Din: İngiltere’deki Türk Gençleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. ÇÜ İlahiyat Dergisi, 12(2), 101-119.
  4. Balcı, Ş. ve Gülnar, B. (2009). Üniversite Öğrencileri Arasında İnternet Bağımlılığı ve İnternet Bağımlılarının Profili. Selçuk İletişim, 6 (1), 5-22.
  5. Bayram, N. ve Saylı, M. (2013). Üniversite Öğrencileri Arasında Siber Zorbalık Davranışı. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, cilt:71, sayı:1:107-116.
  6. Berne, S. ve diğerleri, (2014). Appearance-related cyberbullying: a qualitative investigation of characteristics, content, reasons, and effect. Body Image, 11 (4), 527-533.
  7. Caplan, S.E. (2002). Problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computer in Human Behavior, 18, 553-575.
  8. Caplan, S.E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic internet use: A two step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (1), 1089-1097.
  9. Davis, R.A. (2001). A Cognitive-behavioral model for pathological internet use (PIU). Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 187-195.
  10. Deniz, L. ve Tutgun-Ünal, A. (2016). Genelleştirilmiş problemli internet kulanımı ölçeği-2 (GPİKÖ2)’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(23), 7-20.
  11. Dilmaç, B. (2009). Sanal Zorbalığı Yordayan Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar: Lisans Öğrencileri İçin Bir Ön Çalışma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9 (3), 1291-1325.
  12. Ekşi, H. & Çiftçi, M. (2017). Lise öğrencilerinin problemli internet kullanım durumlarının dinî inanç ve ahlaki olgunluk düzeylerine göre yordanması. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 4, 181-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2017.4.2.0013
  13. Erdur-Baker, Ö. & Kavşut, F. (2007). A new face of peer bullying: cyberbullying. Journal of Euroasian Educational Research, 27, 31-42.
  14. Eroğlu, Y. (2014). Ergenlerde Siber Zorbalik Ve Mağduriyeti Yordayan Risk Etmenlerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bütüncül Bir Model Önerisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. Ga