SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 63

THE MACROECONOMIC REACTION OF TURKEY TO GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: AN EMPIRICAL APPLICATION

TÜRKİYE’NİN KÜRESEL FİNANSAL KRİZE MAKRO EKONOMİK TEPKİSİ: AMPİRİK BİR UYGULAMA

Mustafa ŞİT
Pages
1127–1141
Publication Date
2017-10-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to these findings, economic growth cause export in the short term.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Global financial crisis has been affected the whole world in the last quarter of 2008, has led to a severe recession in the international markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the effects of 2008 global financial crisis on Turkey were examined with macro- economic respects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to these findings, economic growth cause export in the short term.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Küresel Finans Krizi · Türkiye Ekonomisi · Lee-Strazicich

Abstract

Global financial crisis has been affected the whole world in the last quarter of 2008, has led to a severe recession in the international markets. Crisis effects started in the USA and has affected many developed and developing countries, including Turkey. In this study, the effects of 2008 global financial crisis on Turkey were examined with macro- economic respects. In this context, primarily the public and private sector external debt stock, stock indexes, foreign exchange, Brent oil prices, imports, exports, current account balance, short-and long -term foreign capital investment and GDP growth are analyzed. Then, examined the interaction between Istanbul Stock Exchange National 100 Index (bist), interest rates (faiz), export (ihr) and U.S. Dollars (usd) indicators with economic growth (gdp) via empirical methods. According to the findings of the study, Istanbul Stock Exchange National 100 index in the medium and long-term, interest rates in the short and medium term, exports in the medium and long-term causes on the economic growth. In addition to these findings, economic growth cause export in the short term.

Özet

2008 yılı son çeyreğinde hemen tüm dünyayı etkisi altına alan küresel finans krizi, uluslararası piyasalarda ciddi bir durgunluğa neden olmuştur. Krizin etkileri krizin baş gösterdiği Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) başta olmak üzere birçok gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkede olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de hissedilmiştir. Bu çalışmada 2008 küresel finans krizinin Türkiye’ye yansımaları makro iktisadi bir bakış açısı ile ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda, öncelikle kamu ve özel sektörün dış borç stoku, borsa endeksi, döviz kuru, Brent petrol fiyatı, ithalat, ihracat, cari işlemler dengesi, kısa ve uzun vadeli yabancı sermaye yatırımları ve GSYH büyümesinin gelişimi incelenmiştir. Ardından da, Borsa İstanbul Ulusal 100 endeksi (bist), faiz oranı (faiz), ihracat (ihr) ve Amerikan Doları (usd) göstergelerinin ekonomik büyüme (gdp) ile etkileşimi ampirik analizler ile sorgulanmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre, Borsa İstanbul Ulusal 100 endeksi orta ve uzun dönemde, faiz oranı kısa ve orta dönemde, ihracat ise orta ve uzun dönemde ekonomik büyümeye neden olmaktadır. Ekonomik büyüme ise, kısa dönemde ihracatın nedenidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİT, M. (2017). THE MACROECONOMIC REACTION OF TURKEY TO GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: AN EMPIRICAL APPLICATION. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 63, 1127–1141. https://ajindex.com/articles/97363

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Berkmen, P., Gelos, G., Rennhack, R., Walsh, J.P., (2012), The global financial crisis: explaining cross-country differences in the output impact, J. Int. Money Finance 31 (1), 42–59.
  2. Breitung, J. Candelon B. (2001), Testing for Short and Long Run Causality: The Case of the Yield Spread and Economic Growth, Discussion Papers 96, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes. Breitung, J. Candelon B. (2006), Testing for Short and Long-Run Causality: A Frequency Domain Approach, Journal of Econometrics, 132, 363−378. Cecchetti, S., King, M., Yetman, J., (2011), Weathering the Financial Crisis: Good Policy or Good Luck?. BISWorking Papers, No. 351. Cheung, Yin-Wong, Kon S. Lai (1995), Lag Order and Critical Values of the Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test, American Statistical Association, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(3), 277-280.
  3. Dickey, David.A., Wayne A. Fuller, (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
  4. Dufour, J. M., Renault E. (1998), Short Run and Long Run Causality in Time Series: Theory, Econometrica, Econometric Society, 66(5), 1099-1126. Energy Information Administration, www.eia.gov, Erişim: 01.09.2016.
  5. Frankel, J.A., Saravelos, G., (2012), Can leading indicators assess country vulnerability? Evidence from the 2008–09 global financial crisis. J. Int. Econ. 87 (2), 216–231.
  6. Geweke J. (1982), Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series, Journal of American Statistical Association, 77, 304–313.
  7. Giannone, D., Lenza, M., Reichlin, L., (2011), Market freedom and the global recession. IMF Econ. Rev. 59, 111–135.
  8. Glynn J, Perera N, Verma R, (2007), Unit Root Tests and Structural Breaks: A Survey with Applications, Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 63-79.
  9. Hosaya Y. (1991), The Decomposition and Measurement of the Interdependence between Second-Order Stationary Process, Probability Theoryand Related Fields, 88, 429-444. Jordà, O., Schularick, M., Taylor, A.M., (2011), Financial crises, credit booms, and external imbalances: 140 years of lessons. IMF Econ. Rev. 59 (2), 340–378.
  10. Lane, P.R., Milesi-Ferretti, G.M., (2011), The cross-country incidence of the global crisis, IMF Econ. Rev. 59, 11–110.
  11. Lee, J, Strazicich M.C., (2003), Minimum LM Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks, R