Journals / Uluslararası Disiplinlerarası ve Kültürlerarası Sanat / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16

VANDALISM IN THE PUBLIC SPACE IN THE CASE OF RICHARD SERRA, PRIVATIZATION OF CULTURE AND CENSORSHIP OF CRITICAL ART

RICHARD SERRA ÖRNEKLEMİNDE KAMUSAL ALANDA VANDALİZM, KÜLTÜRÜN ÖZELLEŞTİRİLMESİ VE ELEŞTİREL SANATIN SANSÜRLENMESİ

Pages
129–149
Publication Date
2023-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study, in which the descriptive content analysis method was used, is qualitative research in the relational screening model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, the underlying elements of violence against artworks, types of vandalism, the focus of criticism of public art from above and below, and the position of government policies in the critical dimension of public art are examined in the sample of Richard Serra's Tilted Arc and Berlin Junction works.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition to the importance of public art and the positive policies towards public art since the 1960s, the effect of negative approaches such as site specificity (site specificity) law, privatization of culture and censorship of critical art on violence against works exhibited in the public space are other important factors analyzed within the scope of the research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study, in which the descriptive content analysis method was used, is qualitative research in the relational screening model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vandalizm · İkonoklazm · Kamusal alan

Abstract

In the study, the underlying elements of violence against artworks, types of vandalism, the focus of criticism of public art from above and below, and the position of government policies in the critical dimension of public art are examined in the sample of Richard Serra's Tilted Arc and Berlin Junction works. In addition to the importance of public art and the positive policies towards public art since the 1960s, the effect of negative approaches such as site specificity (site specificity) law, privatization of culture and censorship of critical art on violence against works exhibited in the public space are other important factors analyzed within the scope of the research. However, although the reasons for the rejection of public art in the audience are classified as lack of experience and rejection of the unnatural in the mechanical flow, there are many underlying psychological factors that cause vandalism and turn into aggression towards the work. Among these, personality traits and psychological state of the individual come first; but it is also other factors among the reasons for the attacks on sculptures/installations exhibited in the public space such as aggression as an impulsive act as a result of the unconscious's rejection of the unknown, criticism as a social message, turning to vandalism as a way of getting rid of the uncomfortable situation, individual's desire to provide justice due to the imbalance between the perceived level of justice and the level of control. In the research, which aims to examine the psychological causes of vandalist acts against art exhibited in the public sphere, through the works taken as a sample; Andy Warhol's 13 Most Wanted Man works, Robert Motherwell's New England Elegy painting, Pablo Picasso's Chicago Picasso sculpture and George Sugarman's Baltimore Federal installation are other works selected for sampling from the universe by element sampling. The study, in which the descriptive content analysis method was used, is qualitative research in the relational screening model.

Özet

Araştırmada Richard Serra’nın Tilted Arc ve Berlin Junction eserleri örnekleminde sanat eserine yönelik şiddetin altında yatan unsurlar, vandalizm türleri ve kamusal sanata yönelik yukarıdan ve aşağıdan gerçekleştirilen eleştirilerin odak noktası ile hükümet politikalarının kamusal sanatın eleştirel boyutundaki konumu incelenmektedir. Kamusal sanatın önemi ve 1960’lardan itibaren kamusal sanata yönelik gerçekleştirilen olumlu politikaların yanında site özgüllüğü (mekana özgülük) yasası, kültürün özelleştirilmesi ve eleştirel sanatın sansürlenmesi gibi olumsuz yaklaşımların kamusal alanda sergilenen eserlere yönelik şiddet üzerindeki etkisi araştırma kapsamında analiz edilen diğer önemli unsurlardır. Bununla birlikte kamusal sanatın reddinin izleyici boyutunda nedenleri genel tanımıyla deneyim eksikliği ve mekanik akış içinde doğal olmayanın reddi şeklinde sınıflandırılsa da vandalizme neden olan ve esere yönelik saldırganlığa dönüşen altta yatan pek çok psikolojik etken söz konusudur. Bunlar arasında kişilik özellikleri ve bireyin psikolojik durumu başta gelirken, bilinçaltının bilinmeyeni reddinin sonucunda dürtüsel bir eylem olarak saldırganlaşma, toplumsal bir ileti olarak eleştiri, rahatsızlık duyulan durumdan kurtulma yolu olarak vandalizme yönelme, algılanan adalet düzeyi ile denetim düzeyi arasındaki dengesizlik nedeniyle adaleti bireyin kendisinin sağlama isteği gibi diğer etkenler de kamusal alanda sergilenen heykel/yerleştirmelere yönelik gerçekleşen saldırıların nedenleri arasındadır. Kamusal alanda sergilenen sanata yönelik vandalist eylemlerin psikolojik nedenlerini örnekleme alınan eserler üzerinden incelemeyi amaçlayan araştırmada, Andy Warhol’un 13 Most Wanted Man eseri, Robert Motherwell’in New England Elegy resmi, Pablo Picasso’nun Chicago Picasso heykeli ve George Sugarman’ın Baltimore Federal yerleştirmesi amaçlı eleman örnekleme ile evrenden örnekleme seçilen diğer eserlerdir. Betimsel içerik analizi yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışma, ilişkisel tarama modelinde nitel bir araştırmadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKDİL, E. (2023). VANDALISM IN THE PUBLIC SPACE IN THE CASE OF RICHARD SERRA, PRIVATIZATION OF CULTURE AND CENSORSHIP OF CRITICAL ART. Uluslararası Disiplinlerarası ve Kültürlerarası Sanat, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16, 129–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/970081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agamben, G. (1993).
  2. Infancy and History, Essays on the Destruction of Experience. London: Verso Publishing. Alfred&Marie (2016). “Tilted Arc- Vandalism from Above and Below”. https://www.alfredmarie.com/posts/en/vandalism.html (Erişim Tarihi: 18.12.2022).
  3. Altıntaş, O. ve Eliri, İ. (2012). Birey Toplum İlişkisinde Kent Kültürü, Kamusal Alan ve Onda Şekillenen Sanat Olgusu. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi. 1 (5): 61-74.
  4. Anonim (2017). “Andy Warhol’s Scandalous 13 Most Wated Men: Destroyed Within Days”. https://publicdelivery.org/andy-warhol-thirteen-most-wanted-men/ (Erişim Erişim Tarihi: 08.04.2023).
  5. ArtDamaged (2022). “Richard Serra, Berlin Junction”. https://www.tumblr.com/artdamaged/173230373350/chris-ofili-the-holy-virgin-mary-1996-paint (Erişim Tarihi: 12.12.2022).
  6. Buchloh, B. (1983). Michael Asher and the Conclusion of Modernist Sculpture. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. Vol. 10, p. 276-295.
  7. Crimp, D. (1981). Richard Serra: Sculpture Exceeded. October. Vol. 18, p. 67-78.
  8. Crimp, D. (1986). Serra’s Public Sculpture: Redefining Site Specificity in Richard Serra Sculpture (Ed. Laura Rosenstock). New York: The Museum of Modern Art. De More, S.W., Fisher, J.D. & Baron, R.M. (1988). The Epuity-Control Model as Aprediction of Vandalism Among College Students. Journal of Appied Social Psychology. 18 (1): 80-91.
  9. Duning, E.G. (1987). Working Class Violence in Great Britain Recherche. The Archrec Press. 18 (189): 708-803.
  10. Foucault, M. (1978).
  11. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books. Gamboni, D. (1997). Destruction of Art: Iconoclasm and Vandalism Since the French Revolution. London: Reaktion Books. Gamboni, D. (1998). Destroyed Art: Iconoclasm and Vandalism in the 20th century (Zerstörte Kunst; Bildersturm und Vandalismus im 20. Jahrhundert). Köln: DuMont Buchverlag. Gamboni, D. (2018). Destruction of Art: Iconoclasm and Vandalism Since the French Revolution. London: Reaktion Books. Gandhi, S. K. (2002). The Pendumum of Art Procurement Policy: The Art-in-Architecture Program’s Struggle to Balance Artistic Freedom and Public Acceptance. Public Contract Law Journal. 31 (3): 536-545.
  12. Greasskamp, W. (1992). Unwanted Monuments: Modern Art in Urban Space (Unerwünschte Monumente; Moderne Kunst im Stadtraum). Munich: Schreiber. Greenberger, A. (2022). “25 Famed Artworks that have been Vandalized”. https://www.artnews.com/list/art-news/news/art-vandalism-mona-lisa-van-gogh-famousartworks-1234647552/religious-imagery-is-defaced-during-