SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4

Empathy and Human Rights

Empati ve İnsan Hakları

Yunus Düger(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3077-6793
Pages
443–454
Publication Date
2023-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the view defended in the study is that the idea of human rights cannot be reduced to emotions such as empathy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to evaluate whether empathy plays a role in developing and securing human rights.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In other words, can the concept of empathy be a guide in seeing points that may be dangerous for human rights, both in theory and in practice, and at the same time in intervening in these violations?
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the view defended in the study is that the idea of human rights cannot be reduced to emotions such as empathy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Empati · İnsan Hakları · Etik

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether empathy plays a role in developing and securing human rights. In other words, can the concept of empathy be a guide in seeing points that may be dangerous for human rights, both in theory and in practice, and at the same time in intervening in these violations? Is empathy a prerequisite for this? For example, does being against inhumane treatments such as torture, discrimination, and genocide that others are subjected to depend on that person's ability to empathize both in thought and in practice? Or can one reach the epistemic basis of basic human rights and freedoms independently of empathic feelings? This study briefly aims to find answers to these questions. In this context, the basis of the study is based on qualitative research methods. Empathic emotion can pave the way for humanitarian aid by providing individual feelings such as immediate intervention, helping, and solidarity in emergencies that may occur after some natural disasters or some human rights violations. However, the view defended in the study is that the idea of human rights cannot be reduced to emotions such as empathy.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı empatinin insan haklarının geliştirilmesinde ve güvence altına alınmasında bir rol oynayıp oynamadığını değerlendirmektir. Başka bir deyişle, empati kavramı hem teoride hem de pratikte insan hakları açısından tehlikeli olabilecek noktaları görmede ve bu ihlallere müdahale etmede yol gösterici olabilir mi? Empati bunun için bir ön koşul mudur? Örneğin başkalarının maruz kaldığı işkence, ayrımcılık, soykırım gibi insanlık dışı muamelelere karşı çıkmak, o kişinin hem düşüncede hem de uygulamada empati yeteneğine sahip olmasına mı bağlıdır? Yoksa temel insan hak ve özgürlüklerinin epistemik temellerine empatik duygulardan bağımsız olarak ulaşılabilir mi? Bu çalışma kısaca bu sorulara cevap bulmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın temeli nitel araştırma yöntemlerine dayanmaktadır. Empatik duygu, bazı doğal afetler ya da bazı insan hakları ihlalleri sonrasında oluşabilecek acil durumlarda anında müdahale, yardım etme, dayanışma gibi bireysel duyguların ortaya çıkmasını sağlayarak insani yardımın önünü açabilir. Ancak çalışmada savunulan görüş, insan hakları düşüncesinin empati gibi duygulara indirgenemeyeceği yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Düger, Y. (2023). Empathy and Human Rights. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 443–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/969859

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.01.001
  2. Barnett, G., & Mann, R. E. (2013). Empathy deficits and sexual offending: A model of obstacles to empathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.010
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.198
  4. Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290
  5. Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x
  6. Batson, C. D., Klein, T. R., Highberger, L., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1042-1054. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1042
  7. Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy. Bodley Head.
  8. Colman, A. M. (2009). A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199534067.001.0001/acref-9780199534067-e-2731?rskey=aWvvek&result=2823
  9. Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2014). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2). 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466
  10. Cumper, P., & Lewis, T. (2018). Empathy and human rights: The case of religious dress. Human Rights Law Review, 18(1), 61-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx046
  11. Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2015). Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. AJOB Neuroscience, 6(3). 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2015.1047055
  12. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146-1163. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.221
  13. Dymond, R. F. (1949). A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13(2). 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061728
  14. Gibson, J. (2015). Empathy. In N. Carroll and J. Gibson (Ed.). The routledge companion to philosophy of literature (p. 234-246). Routledge.
  15. Goldman, A. I. (1993). Ethics and cognitive science. Ethics, 103(2). 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1086/293500
  16. Han, S. (2018). Neurocognitive basis of racial ingroup bias in empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(5), 400-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.013
  17. Hapla, M. (2017). Taking stories seriously: Richard Rorty and human rights. The Argumentation: International Conference on Alternative Methods of Argumentation in Law, 39-51.
  18. Have Ten, H., & Gordij, B. (2016). Empathy and violence. Med Health Care and Philos, 19, 499-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9730-5
  19. Hoffman, M. L. (1990). Empathy and justice motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2). 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00991641
  20. Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027580
  21. Hunt, L. (2007). Inventing human rights: A history. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  22. Johnson, J. D., Simmons, C. H., Jordav, A., Maclean, L., Taddei, J., Thomas, D., Dovidio, J. F., & Reed, W. (2002). Rodney King and O. J. revisited: The impact of race and defendant empathy induction on judicial decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1208-1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01432.x
  23. Kant, I. (2009). Ahlâk metafiziğinin temellendirilmesi. (İoanna Kuçuradi, Çev.), Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu.
  24. Krause, S. R. (2010). Empathy, democratic politics, and the impartial juror. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 7(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872109355567
  25. Krznaric, R. (2015). Empathy: Why it matters and how to get it. Penguin Group.
  26. Marshall, W. L., Hudson, S. M., Jones, R., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1995). Empathy in sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 15(2). 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(95)00002-7
  27. Montag, C., Gallinat, J., & Heinz, A. (2008). Theodor Lipps and the concept of empathy: 1851-1914. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(10). 1261-1261. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081283
  28. Oliveira-Silva, P., & Gonçalves, Ó. F. (2011). Responding empathically: A question of heart, not a question of skin. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 36(3). 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-011-9161-2
  29. Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2012). I help because ı want to, not because you tell me to. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5). 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211435940
  30. Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2017). The moral importance of reflective empathy. Neuroethics, 11(2). 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9350-7
  31. Phongpetra, P. (2011). The duality of empathy and human rights. The Trinity Papers. https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/trinitypapers/113
  32. Prinz, J. (2011). Against empathy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49, 214-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00069.x
  33. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships: As developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science. Formulations of the Person and the Social Context (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). McGraw Hill.
  34. Sajo, A. (2006). Constitutional sentiments. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 47(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1556/ajur.47.2006.1.1
  35. Sajo, A. (2011). Empathy and human rights: The case of slavery. Constitutional Sentiments, Yale University Press, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1769787
  36. Santos, F. G. (2020). Social movements and the politics of care: Empathy, solidarity, and eviction blockades. Social Movement Studies, 19(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1665504
  37. Schultz, N. (2013). Empathy as the key to equality and human rights: An investigation of emphatys role in inter-group relations and discrimination. Global Campus Open Knowledge Repository. https://doi.org/20.500.11825/643
  38. Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2009). Differential roles of fairness- and compassion-based motivations for cooperation, defection, and punishment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1). 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04733.x
  39. Slote, M. A. (2010). Moral sentimentalism. Oxford University Press.
  40. Tarrant, M., Branscombe, N. R., Warner, R. H., & Weston, D. (2012). Social identity and perceptions of torture: It’s moral when we do it. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2). 513-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.017
  41. Wispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: to call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2). 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314
  42. Xu, X., Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S. (2009). Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(26). 8525-8529. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2418-09.2009