Journals / Research on Education and Psychology / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: Special Issue 2 - Education and Psychology Research in the 100th Anniversary of the Republic

Investigation of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Processes of Preparing Mathematical Modelling Activities

Pages
704–723
Publication Date
2023-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that teachers’ theoretical knowledge deficiencies should be eliminated in modelling teaching and learning environments should be prepared for their active participation in mathematical modelling activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to investigate the mathematical modelling activity preparation processes of secondary school mathematics teachers who participated in mathematical modelling training.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with six mathematics teachers working in secondary schools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that teachers’ theoretical knowledge deficiencies should be eliminated in modelling teaching and learning environments should be prepared for their active participation in mathematical modelling activities.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mathematical modelling activity · Mathematics teacher · Principles of modelling task

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to investigate the mathematical modelling activity preparation processes of secondary school mathematics teachers who participated in mathematical modelling training. The study was conducted with six mathematics teachers working in secondary schools. In the study designed as action research, two action plans were applied to the teachers. The first activity forms collected from the teachers before the application, the second activity forms collected as a result of the theoretical training about modelling and the activity forms collected at the end of the active participation of the teachers in the modelling activities constitute the data source of this study. An activity evaluation form was used in data analysis. The results of the study showed that teachers initially had deficiencies in preparing modelling activities in accordance with all criteria. After the theoretical training given, it was determined that teachers’ competencies in preparing modelling activities improved very little. In addition to theoretical training, it was seen that the learning environment prepared to ensure teachers’ active participation in modelling activities affected their activity preparation competencies more positively. The results show that teachers’ theoretical knowledge deficiencies should be eliminated in modelling teaching and learning environments should be prepared for their active participation in mathematical modelling activities.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKEZ, C. Ç., GÜREL, Z. Ç. (2023). Investigation of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Processes of Preparing Mathematical Modelling Activities. Research on Education and Psychology, Cilt: 7 Sayı: Special Issue 2 - Education and Psychology Research in the 100th Anniversary of the Republic, 704–723. https://ajindex.com/articles/969757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akgün, L., Çiltaş, A., Deniz, D., Çiftçi, Z. & Işık, A. (2013). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel modelleme ile ilgili farkındalıkları [Primary school mathematics teachers’ awareness on mathematical modeling]. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 1-33.
  2. Arastaman, G., Fidan, İ. Ö. & Fidan, T. (2018). Nitel araştırmada geçerlik ve güvenirlik: Kuramsal bir inceleme [Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A theoretical analysis]. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 15(1), 37-75.
  3. Bilgili, S., Öndeş, R. N. & Çiltaş, A. (2020). Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel modelleme etkinliklerini oluşturma ve çözme süreçlerinin incelenmesi [The investigation of creation and solving processes of mathematical modeling activities of mathematics teachers]. The Journal of Limitless Education and Research, 5(1), 90-108.
  4. Bilgili, S. & Çiltaş, A. (2022). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel modelleme etkinliği oluşturma süreçleri ve sürecin öğretim deneyimlerine yansımaları [Prospective mathematics teachers’ creating processes of model eliciting activities and the reflections on their teaching experiences]. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 17(34), 559-585.
  5. Blum, W. & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1) 45-58.
  6. Borromeo Ferri, R. (2018). Learning how to teach mathematical modeling in school and teacher education. Springer International Publishing. Borromeo Ferri, R. & Lesh, R. (2013). Should interpretation systems be considered to be models if they only function implicitly?. In G. Stillman et al. (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 57-66).
  7. Springer, Dordrecht. Bukova Güzel, E. (2016). Matematik eğitiminde matematiksel modelleme [Mathematical modeling in mathematics education]. Pegem Akademi Publishing, Ankara.
  8. Chamberlin, S. A. & Moon, S. M. (2006). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. Prufrock Journal, 17(1), 37-47.
  9. Çiltaş, A. (2015). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel modelleme etkinliği oluşturma süreçlerinin incelenmesi [Examining creating of mathematical modelling activity of teachers of secondary mathematics]. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 2(4), 332-344.
  10. Dede, A. T., Hidiroglu, Ç. N., & Güzel, E. B. (2017). Examining of model eliciting activities developed by mathematics st