Journals / Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

A New Material For Detecting Submerged Implants: An Animal Experiment

Pages
679–695
Publication Date
2023-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that the titanium implant cover screws coated with europium and dysprosium doped strontium aluminate were biocompatible for rabbits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: There are difficulties in determining the location of submerged implants when cover screws and healing screws are to be replaced.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: 10 New Zealand White rabbits were randomly divided into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that the titanium implant cover screws coated with europium and dysprosium doped strontium aluminate were biocompatible for rabbits.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biocompatibility · Cover screw · Dental implant

Abstract

Objective: There are difficulties in determining the location of submerged implants when cover screws and healing screws are to be replaced. Because of this, a new implant cover screw has been designed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the properties of a novel implant cover screws in rabbits. Methods: 10 New Zealand White rabbits were randomly divided into two groups. Diastema regions behind the incisor teeth were used for the placement of cover screws. In the control group, the screws (n=20) that received no processing were placed whereas, in the experimental group, the screws (n=20) that top surfaces were coated with europium and dysprosium doped strontium aluminate were placed to the diastema regions. Animals were sacrificed after 6 weeks. Dental LED curing light was applied to the oral mucosa regions in which screws were placed in the experimental group just after sacrification and the visibility of the screws was evaluated. To determine the biocompatibility of the coated screws, oral mucosas which contacted with the screws, livers and kidneys were removed and examined histopathologically. Results: After light application, only the screws in the upper jaws of the experimental group became visible (n=10). Histopathological examinations performed on the kidneys, livers and oral mucosa tissues which contacted with the screws. There were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups regarding these tissues. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that the titanium implant cover screws coated with europium and dysprosium doped strontium aluminate were biocompatible for rabbits.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, E., BULUT, E., KURUCA, N., GÜVENÇ, T. (2023). A New Material For Detecting Submerged Implants: An Animal Experiment. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 679–695. https://ajindex.com/articles/969591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Li Y, Gecevicius M, Qiu J. Long persistent phosphors--from fundamentals to applications. Chem Soc Rev 2016;45:2090-136.
  2. Montes-Frausto JB, Juarez-Moreno K, Can-Uc B, Hirata-Flores GA. Synthesis and cytotoxic effects of SrAl2O4 persistent luminescence nanoparticles co-doped with Eu2+/Dy3+ ions. Optical Materials Express 2016;6:1488-99. Alumilite Corporation. 2015. Strontium-Dysprosium-Europium-Aluminate safety data sheet https://www.alumilite.com/PDFs/SDS/powders/Phosphorescent-Powder.pdf.
  3. Yen WM, Shionoya S, Yamamoto H. Phosphor Handbook 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.
  4. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207-18.
  5. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:442-7.
  6. Sanchez-Siles M, Munoz-Camara D, Salazar-Sanchez N, Camacho-Alonso F, Calvo-Guirado JL. Crestal bone loss around submerged and non-submerged implants during the osseointegration phase with different healing abutment designs: a randomized prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:808-12.
  7. Barber HD, Seckinger RJ, Silverstein K, Abughazaleh K. Comparison of soft tissue healing and osseointegration of IMZ implants placed in one-stage and two-stage techniques: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1996;5:11-4.
  8. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Petersson A. Some clinical and radiographical features of submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:422-6.
  9. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Moon IS, Lindhe J. Peri-implant tissues at submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:600-7.
  10. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:153-61.
  11. Becker W, Becker BE, Ricci A, Bahat O, Rosenberg E, Rose LF, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing one- and two-stage titanium screw-shaped fixtures with one-stage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:159-65.
  12. Cecchinato D, Olsson C, Lindhe J. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used