Journals / Mersin Photogrammetry Journal / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Investigation of geometric object and indoor mapping capacity of Apple iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR

Pages
82–89
Publication Date
2023-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it was found that the root mean square error and mean error in indoor mapping were ±1.41 cm and -0.56 cm in 3D Scanner and ±3.94 cm and -0.60 cm in the Clirio Scan application, respectively, despite the findings obtained showing low accuracy in scanning small geometric objects due to the scanning difficulty.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:LiDAR (light detection and ranging) sensors use laser beams to calculate distances in the surroundings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These sensors can be applied to a wide range of tasks, and they are frequently helpful in tasks like building 3D maps, navigating airplanes, robots, conducting mining operations, and automated driving.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it was found that the root mean square error and mean error in indoor mapping were ±1.41 cm and -0.56 cm in 3D Scanner and ±3.94 cm and -0.60 cm in the Clirio Scan application, respectively, despite the findings obtained showing low accuracy in scanning small geometric objects due to the scanning difficulty.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Iphone 12 Pro · Point Cloud · LiDAR

Abstract

LiDAR (light detection and ranging) sensors use laser beams to calculate distances in the surroundings. These sensors can be applied to a wide range of tasks, and they are frequently helpful in tasks like building 3D maps, navigating airplanes, robots, conducting mining operations, and automated driving. High-resolution distance measurements are taken by LiDAR sensors, but they also gather environmental data. This information aids in locating, identifying, and quantifying things and their surroundings. The iPhone 12 Pro, which Apple released in 2020, was evaluated for accuracy with various geometric shapes and its capacity to recognize indoor environments. Free of charge 3D Scanner and the Clirio Scan application were employed in this situation. However, it was found that the root mean square error and mean error in indoor mapping were ±1.41 cm and -0.56 cm in 3D Scanner and ±3.94 cm and -0.60 cm in the Clirio Scan application, respectively, despite the findings obtained showing low accuracy in scanning small geometric objects due to the scanning difficulty. Clirio does not reject the null hypothesis in the t-test that was conducted. The accuracy of the LiDAR sensor in indoor mapping has been shown to be more promising than that of small items. In order to evaluate the reliability and reusability of the indoor mapping application according to reference measurements, intraclass correlation test was performed and the results were determined to be reliable.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEN, M. A., ERKAN, İ., ALİYAZICIOĞLU, Ş., KUMAŞ, C. (2023). Investigation of geometric object and indoor mapping capacity of Apple iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 82–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/969562

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Günen, M. A., & Beşdok, E. (2021). Comparison of point cloud filtering methods with data acquired by photogrammetric method and RGB-D sensors. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(3), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.731129
  2. Guo, B., Zhang, Y., Gao, J., Li, C., & Hu, Y. (2022, September). SGLBP: Subgraph‐based local binary patterns for feature extraction on point clouds. Computer Graphics Forum, 41(6), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14500
  3. Seyfeli, S., & OK, A. (2022). Classification of mobile laser scanning data with geometric features and cylindrical neighborhood. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 10(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2022.10.2.08
  4. Silva, M. F., Green, A., Morales, J., Meyerhofer, P., Yang, Y., Figueiredo, E.,. & Mascareñas, D. (2022). 3D structural vibration identification from dynamic point clouds. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 166, 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108352
  5. Nex, F., & Rinaudo, F. (2009). New integration approach of photogrammetric and LIDAR techniques for architectural surveys. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(3), 12-17
  6. Bahirat, K., & Prabhakaran, B. (2017). A study on lidar data forensics. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 679-684. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2017.8019395
  7. Almeida, D. R. A. D., Stark, S. C., Chazdon, R., Nelson, B. W., César, R. G., Meli, P.,. & Brancalion, P. H. S. (2019). The effectiveness of lidar remote sensing for monitoring forest cover attributes and landscape restoration. Forest Ecology and Management, 438, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.002 Lozić, E., & Štular, B. (2021). Documentation of archaeology-specific workflow for airborne LiDAR data processing. Geosciences, 11(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010026
  8. Leottau, D. L., Vallejos, P., & del Solar, J. R. (2018). LIDAR-based displacement estimation in mining applications. 6th International Congress on Automation in Mining. 1-9
  9. Froese, C. R., & Mei, S. (2008). Mapping and monitoring coal mine subsidence using LiDAR and InSAR. GeoEdmonton, 8, 1127-1133.
  10. Kekeç, B., Bilim, N., Karakaya, E., & Ghiloufi, D. (2021). Applications of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) in mining: A review. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 3(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.51946/melid.927270
  11. Murray, X., Apan, A., Deo, R., & Maraseni, T. (2022). Rapid assessment of mine rehabilitation areas with ai