SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mersin Photogrammetry Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

3D Modeling of Cultural Heritage Elements Displayed in a Museum Environment Using Close-Range Photogrammetry: The Louvre Museum Example

Fatih Varol(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0258-5220
Yusuf Dündar(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4405-7557
Hasan Suat Aksu(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8196-129X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrate that CRP can generate dense point clouds containing millions of points and produce detailed mesh models with consistent surface representation under controlled museum conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Digital documentation of cultural heritage requires reliable, non-contact, and scalable methods capable of producing geometrically accurate and visually consistent three-dimensional (3D) models.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The resulting 3D models were assessed using point cloud density, mesh structure, and texture quality as primary evaluation criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrate that CRP can generate dense point clouds containing millions of points and produce detailed mesh models with consistent surface representation under controlled museum conditions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cultural heritage · Tourism · Digital documentation

Abstract

Digital documentation of cultural heritage requires reliable, non-contact, and scalable methods capable of producing geometrically accurate and visually consistent three-dimensional (3D) models. In this study, the applicability of close-range photogrammetry (CRP) for the digital documentation of cultural heritage objects was evaluated based on results obtained from museum-based test applications. Three internationally renowned cultural heritage objects exhibited at the Louvre Museum were selected as test cases, representing different materials, scales, and surface characteristics. A CRP based workflow was implemented, including controlled image acquisition, Structure from Motion (SfM) orientation, Multi-View Stereo (MVS) based dense point cloud generation, mesh reconstruction, texture mapping, and metric scaling. The resulting 3D models were assessed using point cloud density, mesh structure, and texture quality as primary evaluation criteria. The results demonstrate that CRP can generate dense point clouds containing millions of points and produce detailed mesh models with consistent surface representation under controlled museum conditions. The findings reveal that object material and surface properties significantly influence model quality. High geometric continuity and texture consistency were achieved for marble artifacts, while reflective bronze surfaces led to localized mesh irregularities and minor texture degradation. Nevertheless, all models successfully preserved overall geometry, proportions, and visual recognizability. Variations in triangle density further indicated that image acquisition geometry and object complexity directly affect reconstruction resolution. Overall, the results confirm that CRP can produce scaled, photorealistic, and geometrically reliable 3D models of museum artifacts when appropriate acquisition and processing strategies are applied. The study highlights the potential of CRP as a practical digital documentation tool for cultural heritage, particularly within museum environments and tourism related applications, while emphasizing the importance of controlled conditions and method aware implementation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Varol, F., Dündar, Y., Aksu, H. S. (2026). 3D Modeling of Cultural Heritage Elements Displayed in a Museum Environment Using Close-Range Photogrammetry: The Louvre Museum Example. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1849558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (41)

  1. Ahmad Shazali, A. S., & Tahar, K. N. (2020). Virtual 3D model of Canseleri building via close-range photogrammetry implementation. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(1), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0016
  2. Alav, O. (2023). Açık kültür: Dijital kültürel miras ve kültürel mirasa açık erişim. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 16(32), 605–625.
  3. Amzil, M., Oukassou, M., Lallensack, J. N., Klein, H., Zafaty, O., Saber, H., Charrière, A., Meyer, C., & Gierliński, G. D. (2024). New dinosaur tracks from the Middle Jurassic red beds of the Middle Atlas (Morocco): Application of photogrammetry to ichnology and conservation of geological heritage. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 135(4), 458–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2024.03.003
  4. Avcı, O., & Aktaş, C. (2025). Arkeolojik alanların İHA ile modellenmesi: Andoz Kalesi (Espiye-Giresun) örneği. Türk Uzaktan Algılama ve CBS Dergisi, 6(2), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.48123/rsgis.1655969
  5. Colson, A. (2017). Digital documentation of ships in cultural heritage: A European review. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W5, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-129-2017
  6. Çolak, Ş. T., & Çolak, A. T. (2023). Cam kapların mobil uygulama ile 3B modellenmesi: Aksaray Müzesinde bulunan amphoriskos ve antropomorfik kap örneği. Kültürel Miras Araştırmaları, 4(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.59127/kulmira.1381618
  7. Dilek, S. E., & Koyun, S. S. (2024). Yerel halkın kültürel miras unsurlarının turizme kazandırılmasına ilişkin bakış açısı: Savur-Dereiçi örneği. Safran Kültür ve Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 223–234.
  8. Döş, M., & Yiğit, A. Y. (2022). Tarihi minberlerin fotogrametri yöntemi ile belgelenmesi. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 4(2), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.53030/tufod.1197086
  9. Döş, M. E., & Yiğit, A. Y. (2023). Küçük ölçekli tarihi eserlerin fotogrametri yöntemi ile 3B modellenmesi ve web tabanlı görselleştirilmesi. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 5(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.53030/tufod.1293789
  10. Ferdani, D., Barandoni, C., Bonifazi, F., Iannaccone, R., & Magrini, D. (2025). Multiband photogrammetry for multispectral 3D reconstruction of statuary. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 76, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2025.09.003
  11. Fokaides, P. A. (2025). Development of a heritage life cycle assessment (H-LCA) framework: Integrating sustainability metrics and cultural preservation in heritage buildings. Energy Reports, 14, 4437–4448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.11.033
  12. Froehner, W. (1874). Notice de la sculpture antique du Musée national du Louvre (Vol. 1). C. de Mourgues Frères.
  13. Helmke, C., Bercu, C., Drug, I., Jakovlev, A., Kjær, L., Saulins, P., & Vepretskii, S. (2022). All that is old is new again: Epigraphic applications of photogrammetry in ancient Mesoamerica. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 25, e00214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2022.e00214
  14. Jiaqi, Y., Lijia, W., Hongxin, L., Qidong, W., & Junan, H. (2025). Research on the use of UAV-inclined photography and 3D laser scanning in the digital conservation of historic structures: A case study of Shaoxing Lvfu. Results in Engineering, 107507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107507
  15. Kabadayı, A. (2023). Kültürel mirasın dijital arşivlenmesi: Emirci Sultan Türbesi ve Camii örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 5(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.53030/tufod.1401899
  16. Kabadayı, A., & Kaya, Y. (2024). Tarihi sütunların yersel fotogrametri yöntemiyle 3 boyutlu modellenmesi ve web tabanlı görselleştirilmesi. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 6(2), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.53030/tufod.1587831
  17. Kum, Ö. (2022). Kültürel mirasın fotogrametrik yöntemle 3D modellenmesi: Tokat yazma kalıbı örneği. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 237–252.
  18. Marangoz, A., & Özen, M. (2020). Tarihi yerleşim alanlarının yersel fotogrametrik yöntem ile 3B modellenmesi: Zeynel Bey Türbesi örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 2(1), 1–6.
  19. Martinenko, A., Pejić, M., Obradović, M., & Ristić, N. D. (2025). Advancing 3D reconstruction: Evaluating surveying techniques for medium-sized heritage objects. Measurement, 256, 118596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.118596
  20. Masciotta, M. G., Sanchez-Aparicio, L. J., Oliveira, D. V., & Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. (2023). Integration of laser scanning technologies and 360º photography for the digital documentation and management of cultural heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 17(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2022.2069062
  21. Murro, R. (2025). Assessing the sustainability of valorization policies for cultural heritage: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 76, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2025.10.006
  22. Özsoy, E. E., & Aksoy, T. (2021). Risk altındaki arkeolojik alanların belgelenmesinde fotogrametri ile uzaktan algılama entegrasyonu: İstanbul Kara Surları örneklemi. GSI Journals Serie C: Advancements in Information Sciences and Technologies, 4(2), 80–100.
  23. Palonka, R., Lewinska, P., & Zych, B. (2023). Inventory and digital documentation for uncovering the hidden secrets of pre-Hispanic heritage sites. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 28, e00256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2023.e00256
  24. Pepe, M., & Domenica, C. (2020). Techniques, tools, platforms and algorithms in close range photogrammetry in building 3D model and 2D representation of objects and complex architectures. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 18(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2021.42-65
  25. Remondino, F., & El-Hakim, S. (2006). Image-based 3D modelling: A review. The Photogrammetric Record, 21(115), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00383.x
  26. Saipi, S. (2025). Digitizing the past: The role of photogrammetry in architectural heritage conservation. Journal of Balkan Architecture, 1(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.69648/GADD7585
  27. Salaki, D. T., Latumakulita, L. A., Sintaro, S., & Islam, N. (2025). Comparing orientation position in close-range photogrammetry for the documentation of Waruga cultural heritage as 3D objects. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 6(2), 965–980. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2025.6.2.4305
  28. Sauer, B. (1904). Archaeology. The Classical Review, 18(5), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00990280
  29. Singh, S. P., Jain, K., & Mandla, V. R. (2013). Virtual 3D campus modeling by using close range photogrammetry. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1(6), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-1-6-9
  30. Solakoğlu, S., & Edirne, J. (2024). Miras yönetiminde sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın uygulanabilirliği. Haliç Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.46373/hafebid.1534330
  31. Soylu, B. Ç., Şahin, B., Demir, B., & Misir, İ. (2024). Kazdağı Türkmen köylerinde geleneksel tören ve ritüeller: Sürdürülebilir kültürel miras turizmi üzerine bir araştırma. Türkbilig, 2024(48), 394–419.
  32. Tanasi, D., Stroud, K., Cardona, D., Calderone, D., Trapani, P., & Pirone, F. (2024). Digital preservation and archaeoastronomical insights: 3D digitization of megalithic heritage in the Maltese Archipelago. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 227, 105434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105434
  33. Tekin, G. (2023). Gelecekten ödünç almak: Somut olmayan kültürel miras ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma. Milli Folklor, 19(146), 146–149.
  34. Ulvi, A., & Yiğit, A. Y. (2019). Kültürel mirasın dijital dokümantasyonu: Taşkent Sultan Çeşmesinin fotogrametrik teknikler kullanarak 3B modelinin yapılması. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 1(1), 1–6.
  35. Uslu, A., & Uysal, M. (2020). Kültürel mirasın etkileşimli keşfi için mobil artırılmış gerçeklik ve web tabanlı görselleştirme teknolojilerinin kullanılması: Sfenks Heykeli örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(6), 1024–1031. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.819267
  36. Varol, F., Yiğit, A. Y., & Ulvi, A. (2021). Kültürel mirasın dijital ortamda 3B arşivlenmesi: Magoki Attar Cami sanal model örneği. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 8(1), 181–191.
  37. Xing, Y., Yang, S., Fahy, C., Harwood, T., & Shell, J. (2025). Capturing the past, shaping the future: A scoping review of photogrammetry in cultural building heritage. Electronics, 14(18), 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14183666
  38. Yakar, İ., & Bilgi, S. (2019). Mobil telefonlar kullanılarak elde edilen 3 boyutlu modellerin kültürel mirasın korunması kapsamında kullanılabilirliği: III. Ahmet Çeşmesi örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 1(1), 25–29.
  39. Yıldırım, F., & Dimez, E. (2024). Turizm, kültür turizmi, sürdürülebilirlik ve çocuk. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 161–171.
  40. Yılmaz Bakır, N. (2025). Kültürel peyzaj koruma yaklaşımında yeni bir boyut: Sosyo-ekolojik sürdürülebilirlik. Tasarım Mimarlık ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.59732/dae.1674895
  41. Yiğit, A. Y., & Uysal, M. (2024). Yerinde yapısal denetime alternatif olarak dijital ikiz kullanarak otomatik çatlak tespiti ve web tabanlı sanal gerçeklik ile görselleştirme. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 40(2), 234–253.