SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Leadership Concern: Its Causes, Consequences and The Coping Strategies

Metin Işık(KIRŞEHİR AHİ EVRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ KAMAN UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER YÜKSEKOKULU YÖNETİM BİLİŞİM SİSTEMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7431-4091
Pages
605–631
Publication Date
2023-10-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They also expressed the assumption that the reluctance they experienced about being a leader in their choices in schools negatively reflected in their applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to explore the leadership perceptions and leadership-related worries of educational administrators within the context of their own perspectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants of this study include 30 school administrators and deputy principals working in schools of various types and levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They also expressed the assumption that the reluctance they experienced about being a leader in their choices in schools negatively reflected in their applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Education management · leadership · leadership concern

Abstract

This study aims to explore the leadership perceptions and leadership-related worries of educational administrators within the context of their own perspectives. This research was conducted as a phenomenology pattern, one of the qualitative research methods. Participants of this study include 30 school administrators and deputy principals working in schools of various types and levels. A semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher was used as the data collection tool in the study. The final form of the interview form, used as the data collection tool in the research, was given in line with the opinions of two educational science experts and two school administrators. The data obtained from the participants, chosen using criterion sampling, were collected using a semi-structured interview form and analyzed with content analysis. Participants stated that the fear of failure, according to their leadership perceptions in the context of leadership, hindered their actions. As a result of the analysis of the data regarding the concerns experienced by school administrators in the research, the theme of "Leadership Concern" and the categories of "Perception", "Leadership", "Competence" and "Bureaucratic Obstacles" and their codes were obtained. It is stated that the desire to be a leader of school administrators with the characteristics of openness to innovation, responsibility, compatibility, willingness, and balance in work-private life will increase, and their concerns related to leadership will also decrease. They also expressed the assumption that the reluctance they experienced about being a leader in their choices in schools negatively reflected in their applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Işık, M. (2023). Leadership Concern: Its Causes, Consequences and The Coping Strategies. İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 605–631. https://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1366870

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Allen, T. (2022, 11 Kasım). 3 fears you need to overcome if you want to be successful. https://www.forbes.com/sites/terinaallen/2019/10/23/3-fears-you-need-to-overcome-if-you-want-to-be-successful
  2. Anderson, K., Brien, K., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J. & McIsaac, D. (2011). Reluctant leaders: Why are some capable leaders not interested in the principalship?. International Journal of Management in Education, 5(4), 384-400.
  3. Araç Ilgar, E. (2019). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin yönetici olmaya isteklilik düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.482911
  4. Aycan, Z. & Shelia, S. (2019). “Leadership? No, thanks!” A new construct: worries about leadership. European Management Review, 16(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12322
  5. Birekul, M. (2018). Özel öğretim kurumlarında okul müdürlerinin liderlik rolleri. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 5(24), 1652-1671. http://www.jshsr.org/Makaleler/1018740016_28_2018_524.ID522.%20B%C4%B0REKUL_1652-1671.pdf
  6. Brue, K. L. (2018). Harmony and help: Recognizing the ımpact of work-life balance for women leaders. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(4), 214-243. https://journalofleadershiped.org/jole_articles/harmony-and-help-recognizing-the-impact-of-work-life-balance-for-women-leaders/
  7. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. Pearson Education. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and Research design. Choosing among five approches. Sage Publications.
  8. Demir, C., Yılmaz, M. K. & Çevirgen, A. (2010). A research on leadershıp approaches and leadershıp styles. International Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business, 2(1), 129-152. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uaifd/issue/21589/231821
  9. Dilaver, H. (1996). Past, present and future of teacher employment in Turkey, Overviews of Our Education, Istanbul: Kultur College Foundation Publications.
  10. Elmuti, D., Minnis, W. & Abebe, M. (2005). Does education have a role in developing leadership skills?. Management Decision. 1018-1031.
  11. Epitropaki, O. (2018). Self-selection bias in leadership. R. E. Riggio (Ed.), What’s wrong with leadership?: Improving leadership research and practice In. (89-104). Routledge.
  12. Eraslan, L. (2004A post-modern paradigm in leadership: Transformational leadership. Journal of Human Sciences, 1(1). https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/168
  13. Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2000). Vision in The Leader Spiral. Nobel Broadcast Distribution.
  14. Erkuş, A. & Tabak, A. (2009). The effect of five factor personality traits on employees' conflict management styles: A study in the defense ındustry. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 23(2), 213-242. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atauniiibd/issue/2696/35515
  15. Genç, N. & Demiröğen, O. (2000). Management handbook. Birey Publishing.
  16. Giessner, S. R., Van Knippenberg, D. & Sleebos, E. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 105(1), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2017.1316771
  17. Güleryüz, İ. (2016). Work-life balance and work engagement as predictors of turnover intention in teachers [Unpublished master thesis]. Bahçeşehir University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  18. Günay, G. & Özbilen, F. M. (2018). Determining the factors affecting the willingness of teachers to be school administrators. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(19). 1331-1344. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14069
  19. Gündoğar, D. (2010). Evaluation of school principals' educational leadership in private primary schools according to parent perceptions [Unpublished master thesis]. Maltepe University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  20. Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49(6), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.6.493
  21. https://waytosay.com.tr, (1 November 2021). Can Business Leaders Talk About Their Fears and Worries? https://waytosay.com.tr/is-hayatinda-liderler-korkularindan-ve-endiselerinden-bahsedebiliyor-mu/5
  22. İzki, Ö. (2019). The effect of teachers' work-family life balance on performance. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Sabahattin Zaim University Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  23. Karabudak, A. (2015). Comparison of professional anxiety of psychology first and last year students and the relationship between problem solving ability. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Beykent University. Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  24. Karataş, İ. H., Radmard, S., Öksüz Gül, F., Varol, N., & Dağ, Ş. (2019). Turkey school administrators report 2019. İstanbul: Öncü School Administrators Association Publications. https://www.oncuyoneticiler.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Rapor_1_TurkiyeOkulYoneticileriRaporu_2019_Kucuk.pdf
  25. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.
  26. Ödemiş, G. (2018). A research on the work-life balance of women entrepreneurs, the case of Izmir. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Izmir Katip Çelebi Universtiy, Social Sciences Institute, Izmir. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  27. Özbezek, B. D. & Paksoy, H. M. (2018). A theoretical study on motivation to lead, Social Mentality and Research Thinkers Journal (Smart Journal)14, 1276-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.31576/smryj.185
  28. Öztürk, H. (2021). Investigation of Burdur provincial directorate of youth and sports employees' concerns about being a leader, Suleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 12(31), 752-765. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.873381
  29. Peddleton, D. & Adrian, F. (2012). Leadership All You Need to Know. 1st edt, Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.10.1057/9780230354425
  30. Polat, Ş. (2018). Examining the relationship between work-life balance and work performance in female teachers, KADEM Journal of Women’s Studies, 4 (2), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.21798/kadem.2019249085
  31. Rigby, J. G. (2014). Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 610-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13509379
  32. Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2012). Organizational Behavior. Çev, İnci Erdem, 14. Basım, Nobel, İstanbul. https://www.nobelyayin.com/orgutsel-davranis-organizational-behavior-3309.html
  33. Saldana, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
  34. Sertoğlu, R. (2010). Strategic Leadership. İstanbul: Etap Publisher.
  35. Sharma, N., &Nayak, P. (2016). Study on Work Life Balance and Organisation Policy in IT Sector in NCR. Amity Global Business Review, 11.
  36. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies For Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for İInformation, 22(2), 63-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  37. Şahin, K. & Gül, H. (2011). Transformational leadership as a new leadership approach in the information society and the perception of transformational leadership by public employees. Selcuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (25) 237-249. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/susbed/issue/61802/924566
  38. Tahaoğlu, F. & Gedikoğlu, T. (2009). Leadership roles of primary school principals. Journal of Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 15(2), 274-298. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/108265
  39. Tuğsal, T. (2017). The effect of work-life balance, social support and socio-demographic factors on burnout. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), İstanbul Commerce University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
  40. Turna, İ. (2017). Examination of work-life balance in employees in terms of Y generation. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Bahçeşehir University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=aTCvAMyzenuWwXnyB58W8Q&no=Vy1y9HRY8DXU5d_1XGhwKQ
  41. Uğur, S. S. & Uğur, U. (2014). The role of personal differences in the distinction between management and leadership. Journal of Organization and Management Sciences, 6(1), ISSN: 1309-8039 (Online). http://www.sobiad.org/ejournals/dergi_ybd/arsiv/OYBED2014_1/sevtap_sariog.pdf
  42. Ural, E. (2012). The relationship between school administrators' administrator anxiety levels and problem solving skills. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ahi Evran University, Institute of Social Sciences, Kırşehir. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=P1_jTjxpPl97s4U7zOhx3Q&no=jeIj4MOkAMNXlpP1UViUIg
  43. Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of Practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11 – 30. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19803
  44. Yeşil, A. (2016). A conceptual review of leadership and motivation theories. International Journal of Academic Management Sciences, 2(3), 158-180. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/627098
  45. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social science (8. Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  46. Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-Based Perspectives of Leadership, American Psychologist, 62(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.6