SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sağlık Bilimlerinde İleri Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

IN VITRO STUDY OF FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF OSTEOTOMIES PERFORMED WITH DIFFERENT DESIGN IMPLANT DRILLS IN LOW DENSITY BONE BLOCKS

DÜŞÜK YOĞUNLUKLU KEMİK BLOKLARINDA FARKLI TASARIMA SAHİP İMPLANT FREZLERİ İLE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN OSTEOTOMİLERİN FRAKTAL ANALİZLERİNİN VİTRO İNCELENMESİ

Ayşegül ÖZTÜRK
Volkan ARISAN
Pages
160–165
Publication Date
2023-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: According to the results, the FA value of apical and lateral areas from the PV group (1.292, 1.251 respectively) were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Alternative osteotomy techniques were introduced instead of the traditional drilling procedures of dental implant placement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In each group, 10 dental implants (4.2x10mm) were placed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: According to the results, the FA value of apical and lateral areas from the PV group (1.292, 1.251 respectively) were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.01).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Osseodensifikasyon · fraktal analiz · mikro-BT

Abstract

Objective: Alternative osteotomy techniques were introduced instead of the traditional drilling procedures of dental implant placement. One of these techniques is bone densification through a special design of drills. To study the effect of densification burs on low bone quality in comparison with conventional drilling procedures, the trabecular bone changes will be determined quantitively using fractal analysis (FA). Material and Methods: A control group (PKD) with the standard osteotomy burs and a test group (PV) with the osseodensification burs were used. In each group, 10 dental implants (4.2x10mm) were placed. A three dimensional (3D) image was obtained from the blocks on a Micro Computed Tomography (micro-CT) device. Fractal analysis was performed, and the results were analyzed by nonparametric tests (p<0.05). Results: According to the results, the FA value of apical and lateral areas from the PV group (1.292, 1.251 respectively) were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.01). When apical and lateral FA values of the PV group were compared, the apical values were found to be significantly higher than the lateral ones (p<0.01). Conclusion: In terms of fractal analysis, the bone densification effect of the burs in the PV group around the implants, compared to the PKD group, apical and lateral values, were found to be higher and have been found to provide better trabecular compression. FA may be useful for preoperative and non-invasive assessment of bone quality at implant sites.

Özet

Amaç: Dental implant cerrahisinde; osteotomi bölgelerindeki kemik partiküllerini dışarı çıkarma prensibi ile çalışan geleneksel yaklaşımlara ek olarak; partikülleri osteotomi alanında tutarak yoğunlaştırılmasını sağlayan frezleme teknikleri geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışma ile, düşük kemik yoğunluğuna sahip yapay bloklar kullanılarak; iki farklı frez tasarımı ile oluşturulan osteotomilerde; trabeküler kemik değişikliklerinin kantitatif olarak belirlenmesinde fraktal analizin (FA) etkinliği araştırılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Standart osteotomi frezleri ile bir kontrol grubu (PKD) osseodensifikasyon frezleri ile bir test grubu (PV) oluşturulmuştur. Osteotomiler 2x2x2cm ebatlarındaki yapay kemik bloklarında gerçekleştirilmiştir ve her gruba 10 adet dental implant (4,2x10mm) yerleştirilmiştir. Blokların, Mikro Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (mikro-BT) cihazında elde edilen kesitlerinin mezial ve lateral bölgelerinden ölçümler gerçekleştirilmiş, kutu sayma algoritması ile ImageJ programı kullanılarak FA yapılmıştır. Veriler varyans analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir (p<0,05). Bulgular: Elde edilen bulgulara göre PV grubunda apikal ve lateral alanlarda FA değerleri (sırasıyla 1,292, 1,251), PKD grubuna göre (1,258, 1,233)istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0,01). PV grubunun apikal ve lateral FA değerleri karşılaştırıldığında ise apikal değerler laterale göre anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0,01). Sonuçlar: Fraktal analiz değerleri açısından; osseodensifikasyon frezlerininimplant etrafındaki kemik yoğunlaştırma etkisi, geleneksel grubuna göre, hem apikalde hem de lateralde yüksek bulunmuş ve daha etkin trabeküler sıkıştırma sağladığı tespit edilmiştir. FA; implant bölgelerindeki kemik kalitesinin, preoprative ve noninvaziv değerlendirilmesinde, faydalı bir yöntem olarak düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, A., ARISAN, V. (2023). IN VITRO STUDY OF FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF OSTEOTOMIES PERFORMED WITH DIFFERENT DESIGN IMPLANT DRILLS IN LOW DENSITY BONE BLOCKS. Sağlık Bilimlerinde İleri Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 160–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/967902

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Boustany CM, Reed H, Cunningham G, Richards M, Kanawati A. Effect of a modified stepped osteotomy on the primary stability of dental implants in low-density bone: a cadaver study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015
  2. 30(1):48-55. google scholar El-Kholey KE, Elkomy A. does the drilling technique for implant site preparation enhance implant success in low-density bone? a systematic review. Implant Dent 2019
  3. 28(5):500-9. google scholar Huwais S, Meyer EG. A novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017
  4. 32(1):27-36. google scholar Lahens B, Neiva R, Tovar N, Alifarag AM, Jimbo R, Bonfante EA, et al. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016
  5. google scholar Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to increase bone density in low-density bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dent 2016
  6. 25(1):24-31. google scholar Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009
  7. 20(5):467-71. google scholar Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006
  8. 19(1):77-84. google scholar Skalak R, Zhao Y. Interaction of force-fitting and surface roughness of implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000
  9. 2(4):219-24. google scholar Shalabi MM, Wolke JG, de Ruijter AJ, Jansen JA. A mechanical evaluation of implants placed with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats. J Oral Implantol 2007
  10. 33(2):51-8. google scholar Groen WM, Diloksumpan P, van Weeren PR, Levato R, Malda J. From intricate to integrated: Biofabrication of articulating joints. J Orthop Res 2017
  11. 35(10):2089-97. google scholar Taşsöker M, Özcan S, Güleç M. Tıpta ve diş hekimliğinde fraktal analiz. EÜ DişHek Fak Derg 2019
  12. 40(1):17-31. google scholar Updike SX, Nowzari H. Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes. J Periodontal Res 2008
  13. 43(6):658-64. google scholar Southard TE, Southard KA, Jakobsen JR, Hillis SL, Najim CA. Fractal dimension in radiographic analysis of alveola