SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2009 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

The analysis of the relationship between the socio-economic indicators and the mortality rates with respect to age

Yaşlara göre ölüm oranları ile sosyo-ekonomik göstergeler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi

Bilge Acar Bolat
Fatma Lorcu
Pages
124–133
Publication Date
2008-12-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the analysis, the mortality rates with respect to ages are used as dependent variables, socio-economic indicators are used as independent variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Health criteria, developed in order to determine the health condition of the societies, and to evaluate the quality of the health services, are classified in many different ways such as disease, mortality and fertility rate, etc.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the relationship between socio-economic indicators and the mortality rates with respect to age, which are accepted as the main health criteria of countries‟ population increase, are analysed with canonical correlation analysis for Turkey‟s provinces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the analysis, the mortality rates with respect to ages are used as dependent variables, socio-economic indicators are used as independent variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yaşa göre ölüm oranları · kanonik korelasyon analizi · sosyo-ekonomik değişkenler

Abstract

Health criteria, developed in order to determine the health condition of the societies, and to evaluate the quality of the health services, are classified in many different ways such as disease, mortality and fertility rate, etc. In this study, the relationship between socio-economic indicators and the mortality rates with respect to age, which are accepted as the main health criteria of countries‟ population increase, are analysed with canonical correlation analysis for Turkey‟s provinces. In the analysis, the mortality rates with respect to ages are used as dependent variables, socio-economic indicators are used as independent variables.

Özet

Toplumların sağlık durumlarının saptanması, sağlık hizmetlerinin niteliğinin değerlendirilmesi için geliştirilen sağlık ölçüleri; hastalık, ölüm, doğurganlık oranları olarak değişik şekillerde sınıflandırılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada; ülkelerin nüfus artışının temel belirleyicisi olarak da kabul edilen sağlık ölçülerinden yaşa göre ölüm oranları ile sosyo-ekonomik göstergeler arasındaki ilişki, Türkiye‟deki iller kapsamında, kanonik korelasyon analizi ile incelenmiştir. Analizde, yaşa göre ölüm oranları bağımlı değişken, sosyo-ekonomik göstergeler bağımsız değişken olarak kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bolat, B. A., Lorcu, F. (2008). The analysis of the relationship between the socio-economic indicators and the mortality rates with respect to age. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 124–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/96781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. South African Medical Council, (Çevrimiçi) http://www.mrc.ac.za/bod/chapters3.pdf, (Erişim: 16.10.2007)
  2. J.Benach, Y. Yasui, J. M. Martinez, C. Borrell, M.I. Pasarin ve A. Daponte The geography of the highest mortality areas in Spain: a striking cluster in the soutwestern region of the country, Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 61, 280-281, (2004).
  3. V.Carstairs, Socioeconomic Factors at Area Level and Their Relationship with Health. In Spatial Epidemiology Methods and Applications, Ed.Elliott P, Wakefield JC, Best NG, Brigss DJ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2000).
  4. H.Frederiksen, Determinants and Consequences of Mortality Trends in Ceylon, Public Health Reports, 76 (8), 659-664, (1961).
  5. P. Papastergiou, G. Rachiotis, K. Polyzou, C. Zilidis ve C. Hadjichristodoulou, Regional differences in mortality in Greece (1984–2004):
  6. The case of Thrace, BMJ Public Health, 8, (297), 1-15, (2008).
  7. G. F. Anderson, J. Hurst, P. S. Hussey ve M. J. Hughes, Health Spending and Outcomes: Trends in OECD Countries. 1960-1998, Health Affairs, 19 (3), 150-157, (2000).
  8. I. R. Pacifico, Welfare in the Mediterranean Countries Republic of Turkey, C.A. I. MED. Italy, (2004).
  9. United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, New York,1-88, (2005). World Health Organization, (Çevrimiçi) http://www.who.int, (Erişim: 16.01.2008). [10] Denizli Valiliği Öncelikli Yaşam Kalitesi Göstergeleri, (Çevrimiçi) http://www.denizli.gov.tr/valilik/öncelikliyasam/gosterge.doc. 23.10.2007). (Erişim: Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sektörlerdeki Gelişmeler, VIII. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı (2001-2005) 2005 Yılı Programı Destek Çalışmaları, (2006).
  10. A. Kumar, L. Ozdamar, International Comparison of Health Care Systems, International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management, 12 (3), 81- 95, (2004).
  11. U. G. Gerdtam, F. A. Sogaard, B. Jonsson, An Econometric Analysis of Health Care Expenditure: A Cross- Section Study of the OECD Countries, Journal of Health Economics, 11 (1), 63-84, (1992).
  12. N. Zhang, A. Hu ve J. Zheng, Using Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Estimate the Health Production Efficiencies in China, Frontiers of Economics in China, 2, (1), 1-23, (2007).
  13. R.Tresserras, J. Canela, J. Alvarez, J. Sentis ve L. Salleras, Infant Mortality, Per Capita Income and Adult Illiteracy: An Ecological Approach, American Journal of Public Health, 82 (3), 435-437, (1992).
  14. European Communities, The Health Status of the European Union Norrowing the Health Gap, Italy, (Çev